===== PHASE 01 CARD INSERT ANCHOR AUDIT ===== BASE: /home/yeff/public_html/devon DOCS: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php DATA: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data OUT: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/_audit/phase01_card_insert_anchor_audit_20260428_192350.txt ===== SOURCE OF TRUTH CHECK ===== PASS: docs/index.php present PASS: panel/data present PASS: hub_index.json present ===== CONTEXT DUMP ===== ===== CANON ===== ----- 03_RULES_OF_OPERATION.md ----- # RULES OF OPERATION ## PRINCÍPIO CENTRAL O sistema NÃO depende de memória do ChatGPT. Toda execução deve ser baseada em evidência real do servidor. --- ## REGRA 1 — EVIDÊNCIA OBRIGATÓRIA Todo novo chat deve iniciar com reconstrução de contexto via dump canônico. Comando obrigatório: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/context_dump.sh Sem dump inicial = MISSING. --- ## REGRA 2 — FLUXO FIXO 1. Evidência 2. Análise 3. Patch Proibido misturar etapas. --- ## REGRA 3 — SOURCE OF TRUTH A fonte de verdade é distribuída em duas raízes obrigatórias: - /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data - /home/yeff/public_html/devon/canon Regra: - panel/data = estado do sistema - canon = governança do sistema --- ## REGRA 4 — PROIBIÇÕES - confiar em memória do ChatGPT - analisar sem dump - criar patch sem dump - inventar caminhos - alterar fora do escopo --- ## REGRA 5 — PATCH - sempre backup - sempre REPLACE no ponto canônico - APPEND só com autorização explícita --- ## REGRA 6 — STATUS PASS / FAIL / MISSING --- ## REGRA 7 — CONTEXTO Contexto é reconstruído via dump canônico. Somente evidência do servidor define o estado do sistema. --- ## REGRA 8 — OBRIGATORIEDADE Esta regra é não opcional e se aplica a todos os fluxos de execução. ----- 06_DECISIONS.md ----- # DECISIONS ## D-001 Decisão: usar diretório /canon Motivo: separar runtime de governança Impacto: organização estrutural Reversível: não ## D-002 Decisão: evidence-first obrigatório Motivo: eliminar erro de contexto Impacto: consistência operacional Reversível: não ## D-003 Decisão: context_dump.sh obrigatório no início de todo novo chat Motivo: reconstruir contexto canônico a partir de evidência real do servidor Impacto: elimina dependência de memória do ChatGPT e reduz drift operacional Reversível: não ## D-004 Decisão: manter separação formal entre panel/data e canon Motivo: distinguir estado do sistema de governança do sistema Impacto: arquitetura canônica com raízes complementares e sem mistura de responsabilidades Reversível: não ----- 07_SCOPE.md ----- # SCOPE ## IN - governança operacional - canon do projeto - regras e fluxo ## OUT - runtime - UI data - logs ----- 08_NEXT_ACTION.md ----- # NEXT ACTION ## Objetivo Operar todo novo chat do projeto com reconstrução obrigatória de contexto via dump canônico. ## Próximo passo Antes de qualquer análise ou patch em novo chat, executar: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/context_dump.sh ## Critério de pronto - dump executado no início do chat - contexto colado no chat - análise feita somente após evidência - patch gerado somente após análise ===== CORE ARCHITECTURE ===== # DEVON - MASTER ARCHITECTURE INDEX ## Checkpoint 2026-04-03 — Semantic Runtime Reading Canon ### Validated closure - `build_runtime_contracts.py` already emits canonical runtime contracts with explicit semantics. - `collect_runtime.py` was refactored so `runtime_status.json` now preserves semantic fields from the registry snapshot into final published runtime rows. - The Devon collector now emits semantically typed rows including: - `row_kind` - `semantic_scope` - `counts_toward_completion` - `display_in_cards` - `display_in_donuts` - `ui_group` - `source_contract` - `status_resolution` - `rollup_source` - `stage_rollup` is now a sovereign runtime row type and its `progress_pct` is the canonical source for stage completion in the UI. - `project_progress.json` remains the sovereign source for global project completion. - `export_panel_runtime.sh` was validated as the Devon → Waresite publication bridge for: - `runtime_snapshot.json` - `runtime_status.json` - `host_runtime.json` - `docker_runtime.json` - `project_progress.json` ### Mandatory semantic runtime rule Any runtime row that feeds UI completion or operational grouping must be published by Devon with explicit semantic boundaries. Minimum required fields: - `deployment_stage` - `subcategory` - `row_kind` - `semantic_scope` - `counts_toward_completion` - `display_in_cards` - `display_in_donuts` - `ui_group` - `source_contract` ### Mandatory UI reading rule - Waresite UI must read completion only from declared semantics emitted by Devon. - Global project completion must read from `project_progress.json`. - Stage completion must read from `stage_rollup.progress_pct`. - Subcategory cards must not render percentage donuts when `completionRows == 0`. - If a runtime row is visible but not eligible for completion, the UI must render `MISSING / not eligible`, never `0%`. - No semantic mixing between rollup rows and item rows in the same completion calculation. ### Canonical closure reached on 2026-04-03 The semantic runtime bottleneck is considered closed under the following validated path: 1. Devon server changes observable state 2. `collect_runtime.py` regenerates sovereign runtime artifacts 3. `export_panel_runtime.sh` synchronizes runtime artifacts to Waresite 4. Operator Panel reads published semantics without manual donut patching for new server-side evidence ### Operational implication - The UI is now render-only relative to runtime semantics. - Newly installed or configured Devon components must appear through collector + export, not through Waresite-side workaround patches. - Future work returns to Devon server configuration and host/runtime expansion. ### Material Devon runtime-contract artifacts now validated The following files already exist materially on the Devon server and must be treated as the current runtime-contract artifacts in force: - Canonical expected-runtime manifest: `/opt/devon/canon/runtime_expected_manifest.json` - Canonical probe registry: `/opt/devon/canon/runtime_probe_registry.json` - Contract builder/compiler: `/opt/devon/bin/build_runtime_contracts.py` These artifacts are the current material base for runtime expectation + probe execution mapping. They already exist and therefore must be referenced explicitly in continuity and master before any attempt to invent parallel contract files. version: v3.0 status: ACTIVE mode: CANONICAL_ROOT role: supreme_reference ## 1. SYSTEM IDENTITY Devon is a first-party cognitive development control plane. It is designed to: - architect - validate - generate - canonize - execute - benchmark - observe - promote All operations follow: - sandbox-first execution - evidence-based validation - PASS / FAIL / MISSING rules ## 1.1 OPERATIONAL CONTEXT RULE All Devon operations MUST start with canonical context reconstruction. Mandatory command: `/home/yeff/public_html/devon/context_dump.sh` Rules: - no analysis without dump - no patch without dump - no context = MISSING - ChatGPT memory is NOT a valid source of truth - only server evidence defines system state This rule is non-optional and applies to all execution flows. ## 2. GLOBAL STATUS MODEL PASS = observable evidence exists and validation passes FAIL = observable evidence exists and validation fails MISSING = no observable evidence PLANNED = formally defined but not yet materially present No inference allowed. ## 3. SUPREME REFERENCE LAW If a file is not registered in this master index, it does not exist for Devon canonical governance. This file is the highest human-readable reference for: - canonical file existence - file role - phase ownership - authority ownership - precedence and conflict resolution - structured canon registration ## 4. CANONICAL ROOT Devon canonical structure is composed of two distinct but complementary roots: ### 4.1 DATA ROOT (UI / Runtime / Contracts) `/home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/` Purpose: - UI data source - runtime artifacts - contracts and schemas - documentation hub bridge ### 4.2 GOVERNANCE ROOT (Operational Canon) `/home/yeff/public_html/devon/canon/` Purpose: - operational rules - decision registry - execution flow - project scope and boundaries - continuity and next actions Rule: - panel/data = system state - canon = system governance Both roots are mandatory and must remain strictly separated. ## 5. DOCUMENTATION MODEL Devon canonical documentation is composed of: - authority documents - satellite documents - structured canonical JSON artifacts - runtime/support JSON artifacts - panel/documentation bridge artifacts Rule: one concept = one primary authority A concept may be referenced by multiple files, but only one file may define its sovereign canonical meaning. ## 6. DOCUMENT PRECEDENCE RULE If two files mention the same concept, precedence is: 1. this master index decides registration and ownership 2. the designated authority file defines the sovereign meaning 3. structured canonical JSON defines machine-readable enforcement 4. satellite files may contextualize but may not redefine 5. runtime/support files may operationalize but may not redefine canon ## 7. CANONICAL ORGANIZATION MODEL This master index is organized by four mandatory structural axes: 1. phase 2. category 3. subcategory 4. installation / configuration order Structural rule: - `Phase` is the primary operational axis and preserves real installation / configuration sequence - `Category` is the primary documentary authority grouping inside a phase - `Subcategory` is the internal workflow / context grouping inside a category - `Bucket` and `Item` remain the implementation-detail layers inside each category workflow - `Layer` remains a macro canonical classification axis, but may not replace `Category` as the primary documentary grouping in the Documentation Hub or downstream panel structures Reading rule: - left navigation must prioritize `Phase -> Category` - center workflow must render `Subcategory -> Bucket -> Item` - canonical layers such as `Strategy Layer`, `Architecture Layer`, `Runtime Layer`, `Trust Layer`, `Memory Layer` and `Monitoring Layer` are cross-cutting classification contexts - layers may organize registration semantics, but may not flatten or replace phase/category ownership Authority grouping rule: - within a phase, categories should be bound to sovereign authority documents or explicitly bounded documentary groups - examples: - Phase 02 categories are documentary authorities such as `CAS`, `CGS`, `ACS`, `CSS`, `NCS`, `STS`, `CDMS` - Phase 03 categories are sovereign or bounded contextual documents such as `CFC`, `CCC`, `LPC`, `NRC`, `OAC` - no layer name may be used as a substitute for a documentary category when a more specific authority grouping exists materially in the master Operational dependency rule: - no layer may break deployment order - no categorization may override operational dependency - no documentary grouping may collapse a phase into a generic layer heading System flow: Strategy → Architecture → Delivery → Runtime → Trust → Memory → Monitoring Cross-layer mandatory controls: - release artifact hygiene must be defined before unrestricted promotion - distribution and packaging observability must exist before runtime evidence is treated as operationally complete - environment-specific exposure policy must exist before memory-bearing runtime is treated as trusted ## 8. LAYERED CANONICAL INDEX Interpretation rule for this section: - the `8.x` layers below are macro canonical classification layers - they are not the primary documentary category tree for DH navigation - documentary navigation and ownership must be read through the structural rule: `Phase -> Category -> Subcategory -> Bucket -> Item` - whenever a layer contains multiple registered authority documents, those authorities remain the correct category-level units for DH and downstream structural projection ### 8.1 STRATEGY LAYER Purpose: defines what is being built, why it exists, under which scope, rules and environment constraints. Installation/configuration order: this layer comes first. Phase origin: - Phase 01 - Overview & Scope Authority and registered files: #### 8.1.1 System Root and Registration Authority: - master_architecture_index.md Purpose: define the sovereign root conditions that must exist before any downstream phase, category, runtime contract, Documentation Hub rendering or Operator Panel projection can be treated as structurally valid. Why this prerequisite exists: - the project requires one supreme human-readable reference for canonical existence, role, ownership, precedence and dependency mapping - no downstream artifact may define authority without being bounded by the root registration model - no DH or Panel projection may be treated as truth if the root registration logic is ambiguous Prerequisite rule: before Devon can be expanded safely, the following prerequisite classes must be materially bounded and readable from the canonical roots. #### Prerequisite Class 01 — Canon Prerequisites Definition: these prerequisites determine whether the project is canonically governable. Required conditions: - a sovereign architectural root exists - canonical root separation is explicit - documentary precedence is explicit - one concept maps to one primary authority - structural organization is governed by `Phase -> Category -> Subcategory -> Bucket -> Item` - deployment and reading order are materially defined What exists: - `master_architecture_index.md` is the sovereign root reference - `panel/data` is the canonical state root for UI data, runtime artifacts, contracts and DH bridge artifacts - `canon` is the governance root for operational rules, decisions, scope and continuity - documentary precedence is explicitly bounded in the master - phase/category/subcategory order is explicitly bounded in the master Why it exists: - to prevent authority drift - to prevent layer-only grouping from replacing documentary ownership - to keep DH and Panel downstream projections aligned with the real canonical tree Authority artifacts: - `master_architecture_index.md` Support artifacts: - `project_scope_canonical.json` - `deployment_order_canonical.json` - `devon_continuity.md` - `03_RULES_OF_OPERATION.md` - `06_DECISIONS.md` Unlocks: - phase registration - category ownership - DH structural navigation - downstream artifact legitimacy #### Prerequisite Class 02 — Operational Prerequisites Definition: these prerequisites determine whether work on Devon is allowed to proceed under the operating law of the project. Required conditions: - every new chat starts from canonical context reconstruction - no analysis is allowed without dump - no patch is allowed without dump - no status may be inferred from memory - all validation must resolve through `PASS`, `FAIL`, `MISSING` or `PLANNED` What exists: - `/home/yeff/public_html/devon/context_dump.sh` is the mandatory operational entrypoint - the evidence-first workflow is materially defined - the allowed status model is materially defined - chat memory is explicitly rejected as a source of truth Why it exists: - to eliminate architectural drift - to block speculative patches - to force evidence-backed continuity between chats Authority artifacts: - `03_RULES_OF_OPERATION.md` - `master_architecture_index.md` Support artifacts: - `08_NEXT_ACTION.md` - `06_DECISIONS.md` - `devon_continuity.md` Unlocks: - valid diagnostics - valid patch generation - continuity-safe project evolution #### Prerequisite Class 03 — Infrastructure Prerequisites Definition: these prerequisites determine whether the Devon host baseline exists materially enough to support downstream runtime, service and publication work. Required conditions: - the host baseline must be observable - security and network boundaries must be explicitly bounded - missing infrastructure components must remain visible as `MISSING` - tooling presence must be stated materially, never assumed What exists: - Devon host baseline is observable - host operating system, kernel, architecture, CPU, memory and disk baseline are observed - security baseline is partially bounded through active firewall policy and restricted inbound exposure - Python3, Git and Curl are present What remains missing: - reverse proxy - TLS baseline - Docker - Docker Compose - Nginx Why it exists: - infrastructure maturity cannot be faked by UI or documentation progress - runtime publication and service exposure depend on real host conditions - downstream phases must inherit observable substrate, not assumed substrate Authority artifacts: - `master_architecture_index.md` Support artifacts: - `host_runtime.json` - `host_security_canonical.json` - `server_registry_canonical.json` Unlocks: - runtime deployment feasibility - service exposure hardening - trust-layer expansion - future container runtime adoption #### Prerequisite Class 04 — Publication Prerequisites Definition: these prerequisites determine whether Devon can publish machine-readable truth to Waresite safely and repeatably. Required conditions: - runtime contract artifacts must exist materially on Devon - publication must flow through a declared bridge - exported artifacts must remain contract-bounded - UI must consume published truth rather than invent runtime meaning locally What exists: - canonical expected-runtime manifest exists on Devon - canonical runtime probe registry exists on Devon - runtime contract builder/compiler exists on Devon - runtime row semantic publication is materially recognized - `export_panel_runtime.sh` is the validated Devon -> Waresite publication bridge Published artifact set: - `runtime_snapshot.json` - `runtime_status.json` - `host_runtime.json` - `docker_runtime.json` - `project_progress.json` Why it exists: - DH and Panel can only be trusted if publication is contract-backed - runtime truth must originate on Devon and be projected downstream - Waresite must remain consumer-side, not source-side, for runtime state Authority artifacts: - `master_architecture_index.md` - runtime contract base on Devon Support artifacts: - `runtime_row_semantics_canonical.json` - `project_progress_canonical.json` - `project_progress_model.json` - `panel_runtime_bridge.json` - `panel_sync_contract.json` Unlocks: - trustworthy runtime visibility - project and stage progress projection - downstream synchronization integrity #### Prerequisite Class 05 — Projection Prerequisites Definition: these prerequisites determine whether Documentation Hub and Operator Panel are allowed to project the canon without corrupting ownership or semantics. Required conditions: - DH must preserve documentary authority - left navigation must prioritize `Phase -> Category` - center workflow must render `Subcategory -> Bucket -> Item` - Panel must remain render-only relative to published runtime truth - no layer abstraction may replace category ownership - no completion metric may be shown without semantic boundary control What exists: - Documentation Hub baseline is established - Operational UI baseline is established - DH and Panel projection already depend on canonical JSON and runtime artifacts - semantic runtime reading rules are materially defined Why it exists: - projection layers must expose canon, not redefine it - visual completion without semantic control produces false maturity - downstream consumers must remain structurally subordinate to the canonical roots Authority artifacts: - `master_architecture_index.md` Support artifacts: - `hub_index.json` - `panel_manifest.json` - `panel_canonical_tree.json` - `panel_content_index.json` - `panel_navigation_spec.json` - `panel_component_contract.json` - `panel_data_contract.json` - `panel_ui_blueprint.json` - `panel_runtime_bridge.json` Unlocks: - structurally correct DH rendering - semantically safe Panel completion logic - stable downstream documentation and operational projection #### Program-wide prerequisite reading rule These prerequisite classes are cumulative. Interpretation: - no later phase may be treated as mature if upstream prerequisite classes remain unresolved - no UI completion may conceal unresolved prerequisites - open prerequisites must remain explicitly visible where material evidence is still absent - prerequisite maturity must be read as a program-wide dependency system, not as isolated checklists Program-wide open prerequisites currently visible in evidence: - reverse proxy - TLS baseline - Docker - Docker Compose - Nginx - full SSE bridge maturity - full runtime publication maturity across all downstream views Exit condition for this prerequisite block: this block is considered structurally complete only when it can answer, for each major project dependency group: - what exists - why it exists - where it enters the phase model - who governs it - what supports it - what it depends on - what it unlocks next - how DH and Panel must project it downstream #### 8.1.2 Project Scope Authority: - project_scope_canonical.json Supporting context: - devon_panel_chat_checkpoint.md #### 8.1.3 Deployment Order Authority: - deployment_order_canonical.json #### 8.1.4 Sandbox Environment Authority: - sandbox_environment_canonical.json #### 8.1.5 Server Registry Authority: - server_registry_canonical.json --- ### 8.2 ARCHITECTURE LAYER Purpose: defines the software structure, domains, contracts, state legitimacy, naming, governance and system topology. Installation/configuration order: this layer is defined after strategy and before execution. Phase origin: - Phase 02 - Architecture & Engineering Canon - Phase 03 - Cognitive Flow Canon Authority and registered files: #### 8.2.1 Cognitive Architecture Authority: - cas.md Satellite references allowed in: - cfc.md - ris.md - ccc.md #### 8.2.2 Governance Model Authority: - cgs.md #### 8.2.3 Artifact Canon and Structure Authority: - acs.md #### 8.2.4 Contracts and Schemas Authority: - css.md Structured support: - card_contract_minimums.json - panel_data_contract.json - panel_component_contract.json - panel_sync_contract.json #### 8.2.5 Naming Authority: - ncs.md #### 8.2.6 State Legitimacy and Transitions Authority: - sts.md Satellite references allowed in: - cfc.md - ofc.md #### 8.2.7 Deployment Structure Authority: - cdms.md #### 8.2.8 Deterministic Orchestration and Cognitive Flow Authority: - cfc.md Satellite references allowed in: - cas.md - ris.md - ofc.md - lpc.md #### 8.2.9 Role Interaction Context Authority: - ris.md Rule: RIS is contextual and may not redefine sovereign authority. #### 8.2.10 Operational Flow Mapping Authority: - ofms.md Rule: OFMS is contextual and may not redefine canonical flow. #### 8.2.11 Panel Canonical Tree Authority: - panel_canonical_tree.json #### 8.2.12 Panel Navigation Authority: - panel_navigation_spec.json #### 8.2.13 Panel UI Blueprint Authority: - panel_ui_blueprint.json #### 8.2.14 Canonical Matrix Authority: - canonical_matrix_v1.json --- ### 8.3 DELIVERY LAYER Purpose: defines build progression, release logic, operational flows, canonization and project execution mapping. Installation/configuration order: this layer starts after architecture is materially defined. Phase origin: - Phase 09 - Operational Flows Canon - build/release references from Phase 02 Authority and registered files: #### 8.3.1 Build, Release and Promotion Authority: - brps.md #### 8.3.2 Release Artifact Hygiene and Supply-Chain Evidence Authority: - brps.md Structured enforcement: - delivery_security_canonical.json - subcategory_pipelines.json Canonical scope: - sourcemap blocking in production artifacts - debug artifact exclusion from production delivery - packaging audit before promotion - SBOM generation and traceability for releaseable artifacts Rule: delivery promotion is not canonically safe if release artifacts expose debug-sensitive material or lack auditable packaging evidence. #### 8.3.3 Operational Flows Canon Authority: - ofc.md #### 8.3.4 Subcategory Pipelines Authority: - subcategory_pipelines.json #### 8.3.5 Panel Content Index Authority: - panel_content_index.json #### 8.3.6 Panel Manifest Authority: - panel_manifest.json --- ### 8.4 RUNTIME LAYER Purpose: defines live system state, runtime bridge, containers, observability and operational support artifacts. Installation/configuration order: this layer becomes valid only after delivery/configuration begins materializing runtime. Phase origin: - Phase 04 - Containerization Canon - Phase 05 - Latency & Performance Canon - Phase 06 - Noise Reduction Canon - Phase 07 - Observability & Audit Canon Authority and registered files: #### 8.4.1 Container Topology and Isolation Authority: - cdms.md Rule: cdms.md is the sovereign authority for Phase 04 containerization, deployment topology and isolation boundaries. ccc.md remains a Phase 03 contextual component reference and may not redefine containerization authority. #### 8.4.2 Latency and Performance Authority: - lpc.md #### 8.4.3 Noise Reduction Authority: - nrc.md #### 8.4.4 Observability and Audit Authority: - oac.md #### 8.4.5 Distribution and Packaging Observability Authority: - oac.md Support artifacts: - panel_runtime_bridge.json - runtime_status.json - host_runtime.json - docker_runtime.json Canonical scope: - distribution failure visibility - packaging anomaly visibility - promotion-to-runtime traceability - runtime-visible evidence of what artifact was actually delivered Rule: runtime observability is incomplete if Devon can observe execution failure but cannot expose distribution or packaging failure. #### 8.4.6 Panel Runtime Bridge Authority: - panel_runtime_bridge.json #### 8.4.7 Runtime Status and Host/Docker Runtime Records Registered support artifacts: - runtime_status.json - host_runtime.json - docker_runtime.json Rule: These are runtime/support records and do not override canonical authority. --- ### 8.5 TRUST LAYER Purpose: defines security governance, approval control, protection boundaries and enforcement priority. Installation/configuration order: trust rules govern all layers, but are materially formalized before unrestricted runtime operation. Phase origin: - Phase 08 - Security Canon Authority and registered files: #### 8.5.1 Security Governance Authority: - sec.md Structured implementation authorities: - host_security_canonical.json - app_security_canonical.json - module_security_canonical.json - runtime_security_canonical.json - delivery_security_canonical.json - approval_canonization_policy.json - memory_isolation_canonical.json - security_monitoring_canonical.json Canonical scope: - policy for memory exposure by environment - policy for data exposure by environment - separation between operator-facing, runtime-facing and debug-facing visibility - prohibition of unrestricted cross-environment exposure - protection against runtime-sensitive artifact exposure outside declared trust boundaries Rule: no environment may expose memory, payload, secrets, debug output or runtime-sensitive artifacts outside its declared boundary. --- ### 8.6 MEMORY LAYER Purpose: defines historical cognition, memory boundaries, learning governance, planning and knowledge continuity. Installation/configuration order: memory becomes operational after trust boundaries and architecture rules are defined. Phase origin: - Phase 08 - Security Canon (trust-bound activation point) - post-core canonical expansion registered in this master index Rule: memory-layer authorities become canonically activatable only after trust boundaries are defined. Operationally, their trust-bound phase origin is Phase 08. Authority and registered files: #### 8.6.1 Memory Architecture Authority: - memory_canonical_architecture.json #### 8.6.2 Memory Isolation and Partitioning Authority: - memory_isolation_canonical.json Narrative governance: - sec.md Flow enforcement reference: - cfc.md #### 8.6.3 Memory Lifecycle and Consolidation Authority: - memory_lifecycle_canonical.json #### 8.6.4 Learning Governance Authority: - learning_governance_canonical.json #### 8.6.5 Planning and Reasoning Authority: - planning_reasoning_canonical.json #### 8.6.6 Tool Execution and Permission Model Authority: - tool_execution_canonical.json #### 8.6.7 Knowledge Ingestion and Indexing Authority: - knowledge_ingestion_canonical.json --- ### 8.7 MONITORING LAYER Purpose: defines real-time operational monitoring of the Devon host, containers and services. Monitoring is a first-class operational layer and feeds the Operator Panel monitoring section. Installation/configuration order: this layer becomes active after core_runtime is operational. It must be installed before SSE bridge is activated. Phase origin: - Phase 10 - Monitoring & Real-time Observability Authority and registered files: #### 8.7.1 Monitoring Authority Authority: - monitoring_canonical.json Canonical scope: - CPU, memory, disk, network and uptime monitoring - Docker container health per container with CPU, memory and restart count - Nginx, UFW, Fail2ban service status - Process count and file descriptor monitoring - Latency monitoring for API and network paths - Alert thresholds per metric - Refresh intervals per target Rule: Devon has no GPU. CPU is the primary compute resource. CPU monitoring is mandatory and must be continuous. #### 8.7.2 SSE Bridge Authority: - sse_bridge_canonical.json Canonical scope: - Defines the SSE permanent channel that replaces export_panel_runtime.sh - Devon emits SSE events on /monitoring/stream - Waresite Operator Panel consumes via EventSource - Fallback to 5-second polling if SSE disconnects - Migration gate: SSE only replaces push_snapshot after monitoring is fully operational ## 9. PHASE REGISTRY This registry is preserved as the operational installation and configuration sequence reference. ### Phase 01 - Overview & Scope #### Phase 01 Process-Spec Purpose: canonize the sovereign overview and scope baseline that defines Devon identity, project framing, canonical source of truth and continuity reference before downstream architecture, runtime and monitoring layers. ##### P01-01 Master Architecture Index - authority_owner: master_architecture_index.md - canonical_role: sovereign root architecture index - why_this_item_exists: define the full canonical architecture map, document hierarchy, phase structure, category structure, subcategory workflow model and completeness rules before any downstream canon is interpreted - required_before: - all downstream phase materialization - Documentation Hub structural rendering - Operator Panel canonical alignment - hard_dependencies: - project_scope_canonical.json - feeds_operational_ui: - left navigation - center workflow - dependency mapping - evidence contracts - phase registry view ###### Subcategory: Prerequisites **Bucket: Canonical root registration** - Item: register `master_architecture_index.md` as sovereign source in the canonical root - Item: confirm the file is located under `/panel/data` - Item: confirm downstream documents reference the master without redefining its authority ###### Subcategory: Installation **Bucket: Source-of-truth exposure** - Item: expose `master_architecture_index.md` to Documentation Hub - Item: expose master references to DH relation mapping - Item: make the master selectable as a category-level authority artifact ###### Subcategory: Configuration **Bucket: Structural definition** - Item: define macro phase hierarchy - Item: define category ownership inside each phase - Item: define canonical navigation hierarchy as `Phase -> Category -> Subcategory -> Bucket -> Item` - Item: define rendering contract as `left navigation = Phase -> Category` and `center workflow = Subcategory -> Bucket -> Item` ###### Subcategory: Validation **Bucket: Hierarchy integrity** - Item: verify the master explicitly defines `Phase` - Item: verify the master explicitly defines `Category` - Item: verify the master explicitly defines `Subcategory` - Item: verify the master explicitly defines `Bucket` - Item: verify the master explicitly defines `Item` **Bucket: Alignment integrity** - Item: verify `Master Architecture Index` is treated as a category, not as the phase itself - Item: verify subcategories are declared as internal category workflow layers - Item: verify left navigation rules do not promote subcategories to primary navigation ###### Subcategory: Observable Evidence **Bucket: Observable files and rendering** - Item: `/panel/data/master_architecture_index.md` exists - Item: Documentation Hub renders `Master Architecture Index` under `Overview & Scope` - Item: hierarchy and rendering contract are readable from the master - Item: downstream categories reference the master as the sovereign structural authority ###### Subcategory: Failure Modes & Recovery **Bucket: Canonical failure modes** - Item: missing master file - Item: phase/category hierarchy undefined - Item: subcategories omitted from category workflow - Item: DH rendering hierarchy diverges from master contract - Item: a category is treated as equivalent to a phase **Bucket: Recovery actions** - Item: restore the sovereign hierarchy in the master - Item: rebind categories to the correct phase - Item: rematerialize category internals as `Subcategory -> Bucket -> Item` - Item: revalidate DH against the master before touching the Panel ###### Subcategory: Completion & Promotion **Bucket: Done-when gates** - Item: `Master Architecture Index` is materially registered as the sovereign category authority under `Overview & Scope` - Item: hierarchy `Phase -> Category -> Subcategory -> Bucket -> Item` is explicit and readable - Item: DH can mirror the category center workflow without inventing structure - Item: downstream phase/category materialization can proceed using the master as structural source of truth ##### P01-02 Project Scope Canonical - authority_owner: project_scope_canonical.json - canonical_role: project scope authority - why_this_item_exists: define mission, scope boundaries, principles and explicit project framing that constrain every downstream architectural and operational decision - required_before: - architecture canon expansion - runtime implementation - UI projection - hard_dependencies: - master_architecture_index.md - feeds_operational_ui: - scope cards - project framing - dependency context - evidence mapping ###### Subcategory: Prerequisites **Bucket: Canonical registration** - Item: register `project_scope_canonical.json` in the canonical root - Item: bind the file to `Phase 01` - Item: confirm scope authority is referenced by the master ###### Subcategory: Installation **Bucket: Scope exposure** - Item: expose `project_scope_canonical.json` to Documentation Hub - Item: expose project scope references to relation mapping - Item: make scope authority available for downstream cross-document validation ###### Subcategory: Configuration **Bucket: Scope definition** - Item: define mission - Item: define non-negotiable principles - Item: define scope boundaries - Item: define file index expectations - Item: define what downstream systems may not override ###### Subcategory: Validation **Bucket: Scope integrity** - Item: verify file exists in `/panel/data` - Item: verify file is registered in the master - Item: verify scope constraints are readable and unambiguous - Item: verify downstream artifacts do not violate declared project scope ###### Subcategory: Observable Evidence **Bucket: Observable files and rendering** - Item: `/panel/data/project_scope_canonical.json` exists - Item: Documentation Hub renders `Project Scope Canonical` under `Overview & Scope` - Item: DH relation mapping shows scope authority linked to the master ###### Subcategory: Failure Modes & Recovery **Bucket: Scope failure modes** - Item: missing scope file - Item: undefined mission - Item: scope boundaries omitted - Item: downstream artifact contradicts declared scope **Bucket: Recovery actions** - Item: restore the project scope file - Item: rematerialize mission, principles and scope boundaries - Item: rebind scope authority to `Phase 01` - Item: revalidate DH against declared scope constraints ###### Subcategory: Completion & Promotion **Bucket: Done-when gates** - Item: `Project Scope Canonical` is materially registered, readable and bound to `Phase 01` - Item: scope constraints are explicit enough to govern downstream architecture - Item: DH can render scope context without inference ##### P01-03 Devon Panel Chat Checkpoint - authority_owner: devon_panel_chat_checkpoint.md - canonical_role: supporting continuity context - why_this_item_exists: preserve operational continuity, checkpoint memory and handoff context without redefining sovereign architecture or scope meaning - required_before: - continuity recovery - context restoration after interrupted work - hard_dependencies: - master_architecture_index.md - project_scope_canonical.json - feeds_operational_ui: - continuity links - checkpoint context - restoration support ###### Subcategory: Prerequisites **Bucket: Context binding** - Item: register `devon_panel_chat_checkpoint.md` as supporting context, not sovereign authority - Item: bind the file to `Phase 01` - Item: confirm it does not override the master or project scope ###### Subcategory: Installation **Bucket: Continuity exposure** - Item: expose checkpoint context to Documentation Hub as supporting material - Item: maintain traceability from DH to checkpoint context - Item: preserve checkpoint discoverability for interrupted execution recovery ###### Subcategory: Configuration **Bucket: Context boundaries** - Item: define checkpoint as continuity aid - Item: define checkpoint as non-sovereign - Item: define allowed use as restoration and handoff support only ###### Subcategory: Validation **Bucket: Continuity integrity** - Item: verify file exists in `/panel/data` - Item: verify file is referenced as supporting context - Item: verify no checkpoint content overrides sovereign canon ###### Subcategory: Observable Evidence **Bucket: Observable files and rendering** - Item: `/panel/data/devon_panel_chat_checkpoint.md` exists - Item: DH exposes continuity/checkpoint context under `Overview & Scope` - Item: checkpoint remains linked as support, not authority ###### Subcategory: Failure Modes & Recovery **Bucket: Continuity failure modes** - Item: missing checkpoint file - Item: checkpoint treated as sovereign authority - Item: continuity unavailable after interruption **Bucket: Recovery actions** - Item: restore checkpoint file - Item: rebind checkpoint as supporting context only - Item: revalidate authority boundaries against the master ###### Subcategory: Completion & Promotion **Bucket: Done-when gates** - Item: checkpoint context is available as supporting continuity layer - Item: authority boundaries remain intact - Item: Phase 01 overview package is complete enough to support downstream canon handoff ### Phase 02 - Architecture & Engineering Canon Authority files: - cas.md - cgs.md - acs.md - css.md - ncs.md - sts.md - brps.md - cdms.md Satellite files: - ris.md - ofms.md #### Phase 02 Process-Spec Purpose: canonize the architecture and engineering foundation that governs structure, contracts, naming, state legitimacy, deployment structure and contextual boundaries. ##### Category: CAS · Cognitive Architecture Spec - authority_owner: cas.md - canonical_role: sovereign architecture definition - why_this_item_exists: define the cognitive architecture baseline before downstream orchestration, runtime and monitoring exist - required_before: - cfc.md - ofms.md - operator/runtime implementation - hard_dependencies: - master_architecture_index.md - project_scope_canonical.json - feeds_operational_ui: - category cards - evidence drawer - dependency drawer - phase registry view ###### Subcategory: Prerequisites **Bucket: Canonical registration** - Item: register `cas.md` in the canonical root - Item: bind the file to `Phase 02` - Item: confirm the category is treated as documentary authority, not as a generic layer heading ###### Subcategory: Installation **Bucket: DH exposure** - Item: expose `cas.md` to the Documentation Hub - Item: make `CAS` discoverable under `Architecture & Engineering Canon` - Item: preserve category binding at the documentary-authority level ###### Subcategory: Configuration **Bucket: Architecture definition** - Item: define architecture scope - Item: define core domains and structural boundaries - Item: define sovereignty versus allowed satellite references ###### Subcategory: Validation **Bucket: Category integrity** - Item: verify file exists in `/panel/data` - Item: verify file is registered in the master - Item: verify category binding is correct - Item: verify DH loads the file without error ###### Subcategory: Observable Evidence **Bucket: Observable files and rendering** - Item: `/panel/data/cas.md` exists - Item: DH renders `CAS` under `Architecture & Engineering Canon` ###### Subcategory: Failure Modes & Recovery **Bucket: Architecture failure modes** - Item: missing file - Item: wrong phase binding - Item: satellite redefining sovereign meaning **Bucket: Recovery actions** - Item: restore `cas.md` - Item: rebind `CAS` to `Phase 02` - Item: revalidate sovereign versus satellite boundaries ###### Subcategory: Completion & Promotion **Bucket: Done-when gates** - Item: `CAS` is registered, readable, categorized and treated as sovereign authority ##### Category: CGS · Governance Model - authority_owner: cgs.md - canonical_role: governance authority - why_this_item_exists: define governance rules for architecture, engineering and canonical control - required_before: - structured contracts - runtime enforcement - hard_dependencies: - cas.md - master_architecture_index.md - feeds_operational_ui: - contract drawer - dependency drawer - evidence drawer ###### Subcategory: Prerequisites **Bucket: Canonical registration** - Item: register `cgs.md` in the canonical root - Item: bind the file to `Phase 02` - Item: confirm governance authority is bounded to documentary category ownership ###### Subcategory: Installation **Bucket: Governance exposure** - Item: expose governance authority in DH - Item: preserve discoverability of governance role in relation mapping - Item: keep governance as category-level authority ###### Subcategory: Configuration **Bucket: Governance scope** - Item: define governance scope - Item: define rule ownership - Item: define what satellites may not override ###### Subcategory: Validation **Bucket: Governance integrity** - Item: verify file exists - Item: verify file is registered - Item: verify file is mapped to `Phase 02` ###### Subcategory: Observable Evidence **Bucket: Observable files and rendering** - Item: `/panel/data/cgs.md` exists - Item: DH relation map shows governance role ###### Subcategory: Failure Modes & Recovery **Bucket: Governance failure modes** - Item: governance file missing - Item: duplicated authority - Item: governance scope undefined **Bucket: Recovery actions** - Item: restore `cgs.md` - Item: rebind governance authority to `Phase 02` - Item: revalidate governance scope boundaries ###### Subcategory: Completion & Promotion **Bucket: Done-when gates** - Item: governance authority is materialized and bound to `Phase 02` ##### Category: ACS · Artifact Canon and Structure - authority_owner: acs.md - canonical_role: artifact structure authority - why_this_item_exists: define how canonical artifacts are shaped, separated and registered - required_before: - structured json artifacts - DH/UI artifact mapping - hard_dependencies: - cgs.md - master_architecture_index.md - feeds_operational_ui: - artifact view - contract view - validation timeline ###### Subcategory: Prerequisites **Bucket: Canonical registration** - Item: register `acs.md` - Item: bind artifact structure to `Phase 02` - Item: preserve `ACS` as category-level authority ###### Subcategory: Configuration **Bucket: Artifact structure** - Item: define artifact classes - Item: define authority versus satellite separation - Item: define structural expectations ###### Subcategory: Validation **Bucket: Structural integrity** - Item: verify file exists - Item: verify file is registered - Item: verify structure rules are referenced by dependent artifacts ###### Subcategory: Observable Evidence **Bucket: Observable files and coherence** - Item: `/panel/data/acs.md` exists - Item: dependent docs and jsons remain structurally coherent ###### Subcategory: Failure Modes & Recovery **Bucket: Structure failure modes** - Item: structure undefined - Item: mixed authority boundaries - Item: artifact overlap **Bucket: Recovery actions** - Item: restore `acs.md` - Item: rebind structure authority to `Phase 02` - Item: revalidate dependent artifact coherence ###### Subcategory: Completion & Promotion **Bucket: Done-when gates** - Item: artifact structure is explicit and enforceable ##### Category: CSS · Contracts and Schemas - authority_owner: css.md - canonical_role: contracts and schemas authority - why_this_item_exists: define machine-readable interfaces and operational schema boundaries - required_before: - panel_data_contract.json - panel_component_contract.json - panel_sync_contract.json - card_contract_minimums.json - hard_dependencies: - acs.md - cgs.md - feeds_operational_ui: - contract drawer - card shell rendering - evidence rules - status resolution ###### Subcategory: Prerequisites **Bucket: Canonical registration** - Item: register `css.md` - Item: register declared contract JSON artifacts - Item: bind the contract authority package to `Phase 02` ###### Subcategory: Configuration **Bucket: Schema definition** - Item: define required fields - Item: define join rules - Item: define status/data resolution rules ###### Subcategory: Validation **Bucket: Contract integrity** - Item: verify all declared contract artifacts exist - Item: verify each contract artifact loads correctly - Item: verify no fake status derivation rule is preserved ###### Subcategory: Observable Evidence **Bucket: Observable files and rendering** - Item: `css.md` exists - Item: contract JSON files exist and load - Item: DH exposes them under the correct category ###### Subcategory: Failure Modes & Recovery **Bucket: Contract failure modes** - Item: missing contract artifact - Item: incomplete schema - Item: conflicting field authority **Bucket: Recovery actions** - Item: restore missing contract artifact - Item: rematerialize incomplete schema fields - Item: revalidate contract authority boundaries ###### Subcategory: Completion & Promotion **Bucket: Done-when gates** - Item: contract layer is materialized and readable end to end ##### Category: NCS + STS · Naming and State Legitimacy - authority_owner: - ncs.md - sts.md - canonical_role: naming authority plus state legitimacy authority - why_this_item_exists: prevent naming drift and invalid state transitions during implementation - required_before: - runtime status handling - operator counters - dependency logic - hard_dependencies: - css.md - cgs.md - feeds_operational_ui: - status badges - state rendering - evidence/status reconciliation ###### Subcategory: Prerequisites **Bucket: Canonical registration** - Item: register `ncs.md` and `sts.md` - Item: bind both files to `Phase 02` - Item: preserve the paired authority boundary between naming and state legitimacy ###### Subcategory: Configuration **Bucket: Naming and state rules** - Item: define naming patterns - Item: define legal states - Item: define forbidden transitions ###### Subcategory: Validation **Bucket: Legitimacy integrity** - Item: verify both files exist - Item: verify naming is referenced consistently - Item: verify state legitimacy is not contradicted downstream ###### Subcategory: Observable Evidence **Bucket: Observable files** - Item: `/panel/data/ncs.md` exists - Item: `/panel/data/sts.md` exists ###### Subcategory: Failure Modes & Recovery **Bucket: Naming/state failure modes** - Item: naming drift - Item: invalid state labels - Item: impossible transitions in runtime/UI **Bucket: Recovery actions** - Item: restore `ncs.md` and `sts.md` - Item: rebind both authorities to `Phase 02` - Item: revalidate downstream state usage ###### Subcategory: Completion & Promotion **Bucket: Done-when gates** - Item: naming and state legitimacy are explicit and reusable ##### Category: CDMS + RIS + OFMS + BRPS · Deployment Structure and Contextual Boundaries - authority_owner: - cdms.md - ris.md - ofms.md - brps.md - canonical_role: deployment structure plus contextual boundary support - why_this_item_exists: bind architecture to deployment structure, delivery promotion and role/context references without allowing contextual files to redefine sovereign canon - required_before: - delivery layer - runtime materialization - hard_dependencies: - cas.md - cgs.md - acs.md - css.md - feeds_operational_ui: - dependency drawer - timeline drawer - promotion/timeline views ###### Subcategory: Prerequisites **Bucket: Canonical registration** - Item: register `cdms.md`, `ris.md`, `ofms.md` and `brps.md` - Item: bind all files to `Phase 02` - Item: preserve sovereign versus contextual boundaries ###### Subcategory: Installation **Bucket: DH dependency exposure** - Item: expose dependencies in DH - Item: preserve relation mapping for deployment and contextual references - Item: keep documentary grouping bounded within `Phase 02` ###### Subcategory: Configuration **Bucket: Deployment and context definition** - Item: define deployment model - Item: define contextual interaction boundaries - Item: define operational flow mapping references - Item: define build/release/promotion references ###### Subcategory: Validation **Bucket: Boundary integrity** - Item: verify all support files exist - Item: verify no contextual file overrides sovereign authority - Item: verify dependencies are declared ###### Subcategory: Observable Evidence **Bucket: Observable files and relations** - Item: files exist in `/panel/data` - Item: DH relation map shows their role and dependencies ###### Subcategory: Failure Modes & Recovery **Bucket: Boundary failure modes** - Item: contextual override - Item: undeclared dependency - Item: deployment structure ambiguity **Bucket: Recovery actions** - Item: restore missing support file - Item: rebind contextual references without granting sovereign override - Item: revalidate deployment structure boundaries ###### Subcategory: Completion & Promotion **Bucket: Done-when gates** - Item: deployment structure and contextual support are explicitly registered and bounded ##### Phase 02 Category Completion ###### Subcategory: Failure Modes & Recovery **Bucket: Not-done conditions** - Item: any authority file is missing - Item: any required contract artifact is missing - Item: phase binding is absent - Item: sovereign versus satellite separation is ambiguous - Item: DH cannot load the registered source ###### Subcategory: Completion & Promotion **Bucket: Canonization gate** - Item: `Phase 02` is canonized only when all Phase 02 categories satisfy done-when gates and expose observable evidence **Bucket: Promotion gate** - Item: downstream runtime, trust and memory layers may not be treated as canonically safe until `Phase 02` is materially valid ### Phase 03 - Cognitive Flow Canon Authority file: - cfc.md #### Phase 03 Process-Spec Purpose: canonize deterministic orchestration, cognitive flow routing, execution sequence, context handling and operational flow references before runtime implementation is treated as valid. Mandatory implementation items: ##### P03-01 Deterministic Orchestration and Cognitive Flow - authority_owner: cfc.md - canonical_role: sovereign cognitive flow authority - why_this_item_exists: define how interpretation, orchestration and deterministic execution are sequenced without allowing probabilistic components to control the system - required_before: - runtime layer materialization - observability logic - tool execution and planning integration - hard_dependencies: - cas.md - cgs.md - sts.md - master_architecture_index.md - install_steps: 1. register cfc.md in the canonical root 2. bind the file to Phase 03 and architecture layer 3. expose the file in the Documentation Hub under Cognitive Flow Canon - config_steps: 1. define orchestration stages 2. define deterministic control boundaries 3. define allowed interaction with interpretation layers 4. define downstream runtime implications - validation_gates: - file exists in /panel/data - file is registered in the master - file is mapped to Phase 03 - DH loads the file without error - observable_evidence: - /panel/data/cfc.md exists - DH renders CFC under Cognitive Flow Canon - failure_modes: - missing file - orchestration undefined - probabilistic layer overriding deterministic flow - done_when: - CFC is registered, readable and treated as sovereign authority for cognitive flow - feeds_operational_ui: - category cards - contract drawer - dependency drawer - phase registry view ##### P03-02 Cognitive Component Context - authority_owner: ccc.md - canonical_role: contextual component reference - why_this_item_exists: describe cognitive components and contextual relationships used by the flow authority without redefining sovereign flow - required_before: - downstream runtime mapping - operator flow visualization - hard_dependencies: - cfc.md - cas.md - install_steps: 1. register ccc.md 2. bind the file to Phase 03 3. expose the file in DH as contextual support - config_steps: 1. define component roles 2. define contextual relationship boundaries 3. preserve sovereign authority ownership in cfc.md - validation_gates: - file exists - file is registered - file is presented as contextual, not sovereign - observable_evidence: - /panel/data/ccc.md exists - DH relation map shows contextual role - failure_modes: - contextual file missing - contextual file redefining sovereign flow - component role ambiguity - done_when: - contextual component reference is registered and bounded by CFC sovereignty - feeds_operational_ui: - relation map - dependency drawer - artifact view ##### P03-03 Latency and Performance Context - authority_owner: lpc.md - canonical_role: latency/performance contextual reference - why_this_item_exists: define performance-sensitive flow expectations that must be respected before runtime optimization phases are implemented - required_before: - latency monitoring - noise reduction - runtime optimization cards - hard_dependencies: - cfc.md - cas.md - cdms.md - install_steps: 1. register lpc.md 2. bind the file to Phase 03 3. expose latency/performance context in DH - config_steps: 1. define latency-sensitive path segments 2. define expected performance boundaries 3. define what later runtime phases must preserve - validation_gates: - file exists - file is registered - DH loads the file correctly - observable_evidence: - /panel/data/lpc.md exists - DH shows latency/performance context under Phase 03 - failure_modes: - performance context absent - runtime optimization later contradicting flow expectations - latency path ambiguity - done_when: - latency/performance context is explicitly registered and traceable to Phase 03 - feeds_operational_ui: - dependency drawer - timeline drawer - performance-related views downstream ##### P03-04 Noise and Runtime Context References - authority_owner: - nrc.md - oac.md - canonical_role: contextual runtime/noise references - why_this_item_exists: preserve upstream cognitive flow constraints when runtime noise and observability concerns are later materialized - required_before: - Phase 06 - Noise Reduction Canon - Phase 07 - Observability & Audit Canon - hard_dependencies: - cfc.md - lpc.md - ofms.md - install_steps: 1. register nrc.md and oac.md 2. bind both files to Phase 03 as contextual references 3. expose dependencies in DH - config_steps: 1. define noise-sensitive execution boundaries 2. define observability-sensitive checkpoints 3. preserve contextual status only - validation_gates: - both files exist - both files are registered - neither file overrides sovereign authority - observable_evidence: - /panel/data/nrc.md exists - /panel/data/oac.md exists - DH shows both as contextual references - failure_modes: - missing runtime-context files - contextual override - observability path undefined - done_when: - runtime/noise context references are registered and bounded - feeds_operational_ui: - dependency drawer - timeline drawer - observability-related downstream views ##### Phase 03 Category Completion - not_done_when: - cfc.md is missing - contextual support files are missing where declared - sovereign versus contextual separation is ambiguous - DH cannot load the registered source - deterministic flow boundaries remain undefined - canonization_gate: - Phase 03 is canonized only when sovereign flow authority and all declared contextual references satisfy done_when and expose observable evidence - promotion_gate: - downstream containerization, runtime optimization, observability and tool execution monitoring may not be treated as canonically safe until Phase 03 is materially valid ### Phase 04 - Containerization Canon Authority file: - cdms.md #### Phase 04 Process-Spec Purpose: canonize containerization, service isolation, networking, persistent state mounting and deployment topology so runtime execution starts from an explicit and monitorable infrastructure baseline. Mandatory implementation items: ##### P04-01 Container Topology Definition - authority_owner: cdms.md - canonical_role: deployment structure authority for container topology - why_this_item_exists: define which services must exist, how they are isolated and how they compose the canonical runtime baseline - required_before: - docker compose materialization - runtime status collection - observability wiring - hard_dependencies: - cas.md - cgs.md - acs.md - cfc.md - server_registry_canonical.json - install_steps: 1. register container topology authority under Phase 04 2. bind topology definition to architecture and runtime preparation 3. expose the file in the Documentation Hub - config_steps: 1. define required services 2. define service roles 3. define isolation boundaries 4. define which services are mandatory versus contextual - validation_gates: - topology authority exists - topology is registered in master - topology is mapped to Phase 04 - DH loads the source without error - observable_evidence: - deployment structure file exists in /panel/data - DH renders containerization references under Phase 04 - failure_modes: - topology undefined - missing service role definition - isolation boundary ambiguity - done_when: - container topology is explicit, registered and readable as canonical authority - feeds_operational_ui: - category cards - dependency drawer - contract drawer - phase registry view ##### P04-02 Service Networking and Reverse Proxy Boundaries - authority_owner: cdms.md - canonical_role: network and routing boundary authority - why_this_item_exists: define service communication paths, ingress/egress rules and reverse proxy expectations before runtime traffic exists - required_before: - exposed endpoints - runtime bridge - host/docker telemetry - hard_dependencies: - P04-01 Container Topology Definition - server_registry_canonical.json - sandbox_environment_canonical.json - install_steps: 1. bind network/routing expectations to Phase 04 2. register reverse proxy and networking references 3. expose them in DH - config_steps: 1. define internal networks 2. define ingress path 3. define reverse proxy scope 4. define allowed service-to-service communication - validation_gates: - network scope is documented - reverse proxy boundary is documented - service communication path is explicit - observable_evidence: - deployment/network references exist in canonical docs - DH shows network-related dependencies under Phase 04 - failure_modes: - routing ambiguity - unbounded service communication - reverse proxy undefined - done_when: - networking and routing boundaries are explicit and traceable - feeds_operational_ui: - dependency drawer - evidence drawer - server scope drawer ##### P04-03 Volumes, Persistent State and Artifact Storage - authority_owner: - cdms.md - acs.md - canonical_role: state persistence and artifact storage authority - why_this_item_exists: define what must persist across runs and where structured state, cache, vectors and artifacts are allowed to live - required_before: - runtime snapshots - memory lifecycle downstream - artifact generation and storage - hard_dependencies: - Artifact Canon and Structure - server_registry_canonical.json - sandbox_environment_canonical.json - install_steps: 1. register persistent-state expectations in Phase 04 2. bind volumes and storage classes to deployment structure 3. expose storage/state references in DH - config_steps: 1. define structured state locations 2. define cache locations 3. define vector/state locations 4. define artifact storage locations - validation_gates: - persistence rules are documented - storage classes are separated - storage paths remain consistent with canon - observable_evidence: - Phase 04 docs reference storage/state classes - DH relation map shows storage/state relevance - failure_modes: - state mixed without boundary - artifact storage undefined - persistence scope ambiguous - done_when: - persistent state and artifact storage rules are explicit and enforceable - feeds_operational_ui: - artifact view - evidence drawer - dependency drawer - memory/server scope downstream ##### P04-04 Runtime Bootstrap Readiness - authority_owner: - panel_runtime_bridge.json - host_runtime.json - docker_runtime.json - runtime_status.json - canonical_role: observable runtime bootstrap readiness reference - why_this_item_exists: connect containerization canon to observable runtime evidence without allowing runtime artifacts to redefine sovereign canon - required_before: - runtime layer monitoring - Operator Panel telemetry - host/docker/pipeline runtime views - hard_dependencies: - P04-01 Container Topology Definition - panel_data_contract.json - panel_sync_contract.json - panel_runtime_bridge.json - install_steps: 1. register runtime bridge/support artifacts in the master 2. bind them to Phase 04/Runtime preparation 3. expose them in DH as observable support, not sovereign canon - config_steps: 1. define bridge relationship between canon and runtime snapshots 2. define expected runtime entities 3. define monitoring source paths - validation_gates: - runtime bridge artifact exists - support runtime json artifacts exist - panel can read them as support evidence - no runtime artifact overrides sovereign canon - observable_evidence: - /panel/data/panel_runtime_bridge.json exists - /panel/data/host_runtime.json exists - /panel/data/docker_runtime.json exists - /panel/data/runtime_status.json exists - failure_modes: - missing runtime bridge - runtime support file missing - support artifact treated as sovereign canon - done_when: - runtime bootstrap evidence is wired and clearly bounded as support state - feeds_operational_ui: - host runtime view - docker runtime view - pipeline runtime view - evidence drawer - timeline drawer ##### Phase 04 Category Completion - not_done_when: - topology authority is missing - network/routing boundaries are undefined - persistence/state rules are undefined - runtime bridge/support artifacts are missing where declared - runtime support is being used to redefine canon - canonization_gate: - Phase 04 is canonized only when topology, networking, persistence and runtime-bootstrap references satisfy done_when and expose observable evidence - promotion_gate: - latency, noise reduction, observability and security monitoring may not be treated as canonically reliable until Phase 04 is materially valid ### Phase 05 - Latency & Performance Canon Authority file: - lpc.md ### Phase 06 - Noise Reduction Canon Authority file: - nrc.md ### Phase 07 - Observability & Audit Canon Authority file: - oac.md ### Phase 08 - Security Canon Authority file: - sec.md Structured implementation canon: - host_security_canonical.json - app_security_canonical.json - module_security_canonical.json - runtime_security_canonical.json - delivery_security_canonical.json - approval_canonization_policy.json - memory_isolation_canonical.json - security_monitoring_canonical.json Trust-bound memory expansion attached to Phase 08: - memory_canonical_architecture.json - memory_lifecycle_canonical.json - learning_governance_canonical.json - planning_reasoning_canonical.json - tool_execution_canonical.json - knowledge_ingestion_canonical.json ### Phase 09 - Operational Flows Canon Authority file: - ofc.md ### Phase 10 - Monitoring & Real-time Observability Authority files: - monitoring_canonical.json - sse_bridge_canonical.json Installation order: 85-86 Depends on: core_runtime (order 70), observability_audit_base (order 80) Purpose: real-time host, container and service monitoring with SSE transport to the Operator Panel. This phase must be complete before SSE bridge replaces the push_snapshot model. ## 10. CROSS-DOCUMENT RULES 1. A file not registered here does not exist canonically. 2. A satellite file may reference a concept, but may not redefine it. 3. A phase authority file may define a concept only if ownership is assigned here. 4. If a concept needs both narrative governance and structured enforcement: - narrative governance belongs to the authority document - machine-readable enforcement belongs to the structured canonical JSON 5. If state and flow conflict: - STS wins on state legitimacy 6. If security conflicts with flow, latency or convenience: - SEC wins 7. If naming conflicts with content: - NCS wins on naming 8. If latency conflicts with optional processing: - LPC wins on latency budget 9. If memory access scope is ambiguous: - deny by default 10. If retrieval scope exceeds memory boundary: - memory isolation canon wins 11. Memory lifecycle must respect memory isolation and security boundaries. 12. Learning cannot bypass validation layer. 13. Planning cannot override deterministic control. 14. Tool execution must respect security and scope boundaries. 15. Knowledge ingestion must be versioned and auditable. 16. Runtime/support JSON artifacts may report state, but may not redefine canon. 17. Panel artifacts may represent canon, but may not create sovereign canon by themselves. ## 11. COMPLETE CANONICAL FILE REGISTRY ### 11.1 Authority and Satellite Markdown Files - acs.md - brps.md - cas.md - ccc.md - cdms.md - cfc.md - cgs.md - css.md - devon_panel_chat_checkpoint.md - lpc.md - master_architecture_index.md - ncs.md - nrc.md - oac.md - ofc.md - ofms.md - ris.md - sec.md - sts.md ### 11.2 Structured Canonical JSON Files - app_security_canonical.json - approval_canonization_policy.json - canonical_matrix_v1.json - card_contract_minimums.json - delivery_security_canonical.json - deployment_order_canonical.json - host_security_canonical.json - knowledge_ingestion_canonical.json - learning_governance_canonical.json - memory_canonical_architecture.json - memory_isolation_canonical.json - memory_lifecycle_canonical.json - module_security_canonical.json - panel_canonical_tree.json - panel_component_contract.json - panel_content_index.json - panel_data_contract.json - panel_manifest.json - panel_navigation_spec.json - panel_runtime_bridge.json - panel_sync_contract.json - panel_ui_blueprint.json - planning_reasoning_canonical.json - project_scope_canonical.json - runtime_row_semantics_canonical.json - runtime_security_canonical.json - sandbox_environment_canonical.json - security_monitoring_canonical.json - server_registry_canonical.json - subcategory_pipelines.json - tool_execution_canonical.json - project_progress_canonical.json - project_progress_model.json - runtime_row_semantics_canonical.json ### 11.3 Runtime and Support JSON Files - docker_runtime.json - host_runtime.json - monitoring_runtime.json - project_progress.json - runtime_snapshot.json - runtime_status.json ## 12. CANONICAL DEPENDENCY MATRIX This section defines explicit dependencies between canonical domains. No domain operates in isolation. ### 12.1 Memory Domain - memory_lifecycle_canonical.json depends on: - memory_canonical_architecture.json - memory_isolation_canonical.json - learning_governance_canonical.json ### 12.2 Learning Domain - learning_governance_canonical.json depends on: - validation layer (implicit) - memory_lifecycle_canonical.json - security_monitoring_canonical.json ### 12.3 Planning / Reasoning Domain - planning_reasoning_canonical.json depends on: - deterministic control layer - tool_execution_canonical.json - project_scope_canonical.json ### 12.4 Tool Execution Domain - tool_execution_canonical.json depends on: - runtime_security_canonical.json - module_security_canonical.json - project_scope_canonical.json ### 12.5 Knowledge Ingestion Domain - knowledge_ingestion_canonical.json depends on: - memory_canonical_architecture.json - memory_lifecycle_canonical.json - canonical_matrix_v1.json ## 13. CANONICAL PROCESS SPEC MODEL This section defines the mandatory process model that every canonical category, section, card and implementation item must follow. Purpose: turn canonical documentation into an executable process reference for the Documentation Hub, Operator Panel and future real-time build monitoring. Rule: a category is not sufficiently documented if it only declares files, layers, phase origin or dependencies. A category becomes operationally valid only when its process is explicitly documented step by step. ### 13.0 Canonical execution hierarchy The canonical execution hierarchy for Devon documentation, Documentation Hub and Operator Panel is: 1. Phase 2. Category 3. Process bucket 4. Item Definitions: ### Canonical Navigation and Execution Hierarchy The canonical hierarchy for Devon documentation, execution mapping and panel rendering is: 1. Phase 2. Category 3. Subcategory 4. Bucket 5. Item #### Subcategory A Subcategory is the process-oriented subdivision inside a Category. Subcategories are additive organizational layers and do not replace Phase or Category sovereignty. Canonical subcategories are: - Prerequisites - Installation - Configuration - Validation - Observable Evidence - Failure Modes & Recovery - Completion & Promotion #### Bucket A Bucket is a grouped execution container inside a Subcategory. Buckets belong to a Subcategory and may not be attached directly to a Phase. #### Item An Item is the smallest executable process unit inside a Bucket. Items belong to a Bucket and represent the lowest executable unit in the canonical workflow model. #### Structural Adaptation Rule The existing sovereign structure remains valid: - Phase remains the primary macro execution layer - Category remains the second-level sovereign document grouping The hierarchy is extended, not replaced: - Phase - Category - Subcategory - Bucket - Item Rendering contract: - left navigation = Phase -> Category - center workflow = Subcategory -> Bucket -> Item Subcategories must not be promoted to primary left navigation unless a future canonical navigation contract explicitly changes that rule. #### Phase A Phase is the macro execution stage shown in left navigation. It preserves installation/configuration order and canonical progression. Examples: - Overview & Scope - Architecture & Engineering Canon - Cognitive Flow Canon - Containerization Canon #### Category A Category is a sovereign or supporting document group inside a selected Phase. Examples inside a phase: - Master Architecture Index - Panel Manifest - Project Scope Canonical - Contracts and Schemas - Governance Model Rule: a category is not the phase itself. A phase contains categories. #### Process bucket A Process bucket is the ordered operational subdivision inside a category. Mandatory canonical buckets are: 1. prerequisites 2. installation 3. configuration 4. validation 5. observable_evidence 6. failure_modes_recovery 7. completion_promotion Rule: process buckets must appear in execution order. The Documentation Hub and Operator Panel may summarize them visually, but may not change their order. #### Item An Item is the smallest executable process unit inside a process bucket. An item must describe: - what must be done - in which order - what input is required - what output is expected - how to validate it - what evidence proves it - what failure can occur - what recovery action is allowed Example hierarchy: Phase: - Overview & Scope Category: - Project Scope Canonical Process buckets: - prerequisites - installation - configuration - validation - observable_evidence - failure_modes_recovery - completion_promotion Items: - register file - bind file to phase - expose file in DH - validate source load - confirm category ownership Canonical rule: left navigation = phase registry. center workflow = categories inside the selected phase. category body = ordered process buckets. bucket body = executable items. ### 13.1 Mandatory process-spec fields Every canonical implementation item must define, at minimum: 1. identity - canonical_layer - phase_origin - category_id - section_id - card_id - item_id - authority_owner 2. process purpose - objective - canonical_role - why_this_item_exists 3. prerequisites - required_before - blockers - hard_dependencies - allowed_preconditions 4. installation process - install_steps - installation_order - installation_commands_or_actions - expected_install_result 5. configuration process - config_steps - configuration_inputs - configuration_outputs - expected_configuration_result 6. validation process - validation_gates - checks - pass_criteria - fail_criteria - missing_criteria 7. evidence model - observable_evidence - evidence_source - evidence_path_or_endpoint - evidence_frequency - last_validation_pointer 8. failure model - failure_modes - probable_root_causes - recovery_actions - rollback_or_safe_state 9. completion model - done_when - not_done_when - promotion_gate - canonization_gate 10. operational monitoring contract - feeds_operational_ui - runtime_monitoring_hooks - timeline_events - status_counter_impact - dependency_impact ### 13.2 Canonical process rules 1. No implementation item may be treated as complete without explicit done_when criteria. 2. No step may be considered valid without observable evidence. 3. Installation and configuration must remain separated when they are materially different actions. 4. Validation must be explicit and may not be inferred from file existence alone unless the item contract says so. 5. Runtime monitoring may report process state, but may not redefine the canonical process contract. 6. The Documentation Hub may summarize the process, but the master index remains the supreme authority. 7. The Operator Panel may visualize process execution, but may not invent missing steps. 8. If a process field is absent, its status is MISSING. 9. If an item cannot expose evidence, it cannot produce PASS. 10. If a category has files but no process spec, the category is documentation-incomplete. ### 13.3 Required DH and UI alignment Audit split rule: Documentation Hub responsibilities: - canonical/document audit - coverage against this master index - authority ownership visibility - phase binding visibility - layer binding visibility - depends_on / used_by visibility - sovereign versus satellite separation visibility - documentation completion gap visibility - PASS / FAIL / MISSING only for documentary and canonical evidence Operator Panel responsibilities: - operational/runtime audit - real implementation state - real server/runtime evidence - health, containers and process telemetry - pipeline execution evidence - sync/export/runtime bridge evidence - PASS / FAIL / MISSING only for materially observable execution evidence Boundary rule: - Documentation Hub may summarize canonical structure, but may not claim runtime implementation as complete unless runtime evidence is exposed through the operational side. - Operator Panel may summarize runtime state, but may not redefine canonical ownership, precedence, phase order or documentary authority. - A runtime-relevant concept is only fully auditable when its canonical definition exists in the master/documentation side and its material evidence exists in the operational side. The Documentation Hub must eventually expose, per category: - required_before - install_steps - config_steps - validation_gates - observable_evidence - failure_modes - done_when - feeds_operational_ui The Operator Panel must eventually consume the same process model for: - monitoring sequence - timeline events - evidence drawers - contract drawers - dependency drawers - status counters - real-time runtime tracking ### 13.4 Process-spec priority If there is conflict between: - file listing and process contract - visual convenience and validation rule - runtime report and canonical process definition then the canonical process definition wins. ## 14. CANONICAL INTEGRITY RULES 1. No canonical file can operate without declared dependencies. 2. Cross-domain interaction must follow declared dependency paths. 3. Violations = FAIL (even if implementation exists). 4. Missing dependency = MISSING (system incomplete). 5. Circular dependencies are forbidden unless explicitly declared. ## 15. FAILURE MODES The system must explicitly recognize invalid states: - orphan canonical file → FAIL - dependency missing → MISSING - dependency violated → FAIL - execution bypassing canonical rule → FAIL - undocumented canonical file → FAIL ## 16. ARCHITECTURAL COMPLETENESS CRITERIA The system is considered COMPLETE only if: - all canonical files are referenced in this document - all dependencies are declared - all rules are enforceable - all domains are isolated and governed - validation layer is respected globally ## 17. COMPLETENESS RULE A Documentation Hub update is complete only if: - the canonical/document audit scope is materially reflected in the Hub - the Hub makes clear what belongs to documentary authority versus operational/runtime verification - no Documentation Hub element implies that runtime implementation is complete without operational evidence - the file exists materially in `/panel/data` - the file is registered in this master index - the file has a defined role - the file does not violate precedence rules ## 18. MASTER RULE FOR FUTURE EXPANSION No new file may be introduced into the canonical root without: - unique responsibility - explicit registration in this master index - non-overlap with existing authority - observable justification ===== CONTINUITY ===== # DEVON CONTINUITY ## Checkpoint 2026-04-09 — Canon Cleanup + Monitoring Layer ### O que foi feito - Limpeza completa de arquivos órfãos no Waresite /panel/data - Limpeza de baks no Devon /opt/devon/bin e /opt/devon/canon - runtime_row_semantics_canonical.json criado no disco e registrado no master - monitoring_canonical.json criado — define CPU, memory, disk, network, containers, nginx, security - sse_bridge_canonical.json criado — transport SSE PLANNED, push_snapshot ainda ACTIVE - master_architecture_index.md atualizado: seção 8.7, Phase 10, 11.2, 11.3 - hub_index.json atualizado: 10 phases, 12 categories, monitoring_observability adicionado - project_progress_canonical.json e project_progress_model.json registrados em overview_scope - runtime_row_semantics_canonical registrado em observability_audit - Export script Devon corrigido para sincronizar canon completo (panel_export/current) - DH funcionando e refletindo tudo corretamente ### Próximo passo - Refatorar Operator Panel (UI) — novo chat - Após UI: implementar SSE bridge Devon → Waresite - Após SSE: remover export_panel_runtime.sh ## Checkpoint 2026-04-03 — Semantic Runtime Reading Canon ### Real state validated - Devon is already emitting real runtime for host, docker, pipeline and project progress. - Waresite is already consuming published runtime rows from Devon. - The UI numbers are not being filled manually. - The current problem is semantic, not cosmetic and not “manual digit editing”. ### Structural diagnosis - The Operator Panel is still grouping runtime rows with insufficient semantic separation. - Some visual groups are mixing rollup rows, matrix-derived rows and item-level runtime rows. - This makes some donuts mathematically calculated but semantically invalid. - The correct correction is not another ad hoc UI patch. - The correct correction is explicit semantic typing in the runtime publication contract. ### Sovereign rule now in force - Devon must publish runtime truth with explicit row semantics. - Waresite UI must only consume published runtime truth and declared row meaning. - Canon stays canonical. - Runtime stays operational. - UI stays render-only. - No manual UI recognition workflow is allowed as normal operating mode. - No ambiguous row grouping is allowed for completion semantics. ### Mandatory next correction - Canonize the runtime row semantics model. - Keep the probe-registry model as mandatory architecture. - Bind every emitted row to an explicit `row_kind` and `semantic_scope`. - Refactor `collect_runtime.py` and export artifacts to publish semantically typed rows. - Keep `Canon -> DH -> UI` intact, but eliminate semantic ambiguity in runtime consumption. ### Material Devon runtime-contract artifacts now validated The following files already exist materially on the Devon server and are the current runtime-contract base in force: - `/opt/devon/canon/runtime_expected_manifest.json` - `/opt/devon/canon/runtime_probe_registry.json` - `/opt/devon/bin/build_runtime_contracts.py` Operational reading: - `runtime_expected_manifest.json` is the expected-runtime manifest. - `runtime_probe_registry.json` is the probe registry. - `build_runtime_contracts.py` is the builder/compiler that generates these contracts. Rule now fixed: - Do not invent a parallel canonical file when the contract base already exists materially in Devon. - Any semantic/runtime correction must start from these files first. ## 1. MEMORY ### 1.1 Project Identity - Devon is the cognitive development control plane of the YEFF architecture. - Waresite server hosts the canonical documentation, Documentation Hub, and Operational UI. - Devon server is the origin of real runtime, host, container, and execution data. - The Operational UI does not define truth. It validates and exposes canonical truth. ### 1.2 Canonical References - Canonical root: `/home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/master_architecture_index.md` - Canonical child-files: markdown and JSON artifacts referenced by the canonical root - Canonical contracts: JSON/YAML files consumed by the Documentation Hub and Operational UI - Canonical continuity file: `/home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/devon_continuity.md` ### 1.3 Fixed Rules - Evidence first, patch after. - No guessing. - No fake status or fake progress. - Allowed status model is evidence-based and boolean. - If something does not exist observably, the only allowed status is `MISSING`. - Operational UI validates canonical contracts. It does not invent architecture. - Waresite hosts canonical documentation and UI. - Devon hosts real runtime and operational execution. - Any new operational discovery must follow canonical expansion order. - Canonical expansion order is mandatory: `Canon -> DH -> UI`. ### 1.4 Canonized Decisions - The project truth is defined by canonical documentation, not by chat memory. - `master_architecture_index.md` remains the canonical root. - `devon_continuity.md` is the canonical continuity layer between chats. - The continuity model is divided into two macrosections: `MEMORY` and `TODO`. - The Operational UI is the operational validation layer, not the source of truth. - Any new item discovered during server installation/configuration must be canonized before entering DH or UI. ### 1.5 Completed Milestones - Documentation Hub baseline is already established. - Operational UI baseline has been finalized as current operational reference. - The continuity strategy between chats has been defined. - Canonical expansion flow has been defined. - Waresite has been defined as the canonical documentation host. - Devon has been defined as the real runtime source. ### 1.6 Stable Context - There are two distinct servers in this architecture: - Waresite: canonical documentation, DH, Operational UI - Devon: runtime origin, host state, containers, execution - Server work must converge to canon already defined in Waresite. - Canon must always lead implementation. ## 2. TODO ### 2.1 Current Focus - Replace ambiguous UI/runtime reading with a sovereign Devon-side semantic publication model. - Canonize the runtime probe-registry pattern as mandatory architecture. - Canonize the runtime row semantics contract as mandatory architecture. - Prepare the collector refactor from hardcoded runtime logic to registry-driven, semantically typed publication. - Preserve existing `/opt/devon` runtime, export and bridge assets during the redesign. ### 2.2 Open Operational Fronts - Define the canonical runtime probe registry artifact and its schema. - Define the canonical runtime row semantics artifact and its schema. - Bind every observable stage/subcategory/item to a deterministic probe rule. - Bind every emitted runtime row to explicit semantic type and counting boundary. - Refactor `collect_runtime.py` to execute the registry instead of per-case hardcoded logic. - Stop any workflow where Waresite UI must be patched just to recognize an already-installed Devon component. - Stop any workflow where Waresite UI must guess row meaning from loose grouping. - Keep sync/export bridge stable while the collector model is upgraded. ### 2.3 Active Blockers - Runtime publication is still partially hardcoded in `collect_runtime.py`. - UI/runtime alignment still depends on case-specific downstream adjustments. - There is no sovereign registry-driven runtime publication contract yet. - There is no sovereign runtime row semantics contract yet. - Current runtime granularity is incomplete for several stage/subcategory views. - Current row grouping still allows semantic mixing between rollup rows and item rows. - This creates operational drag and wastes time/energy during Devon server setup. ### 2.4 Next Operational Step - The next technical deliverable is not another UI patch. - The next technical deliverable is to evolve the existing Devon contract base, not invent a parallel contract base. - Start from `/opt/devon/canon/runtime_expected_manifest.json`. - Start from `/opt/devon/canon/runtime_probe_registry.json`. - Start from `/opt/devon/bin/build_runtime_contracts.py`. - The next chat must start from the runtime publication architecture problem, not from another installation micro-fix. - Waresite UI must remain consumer-only while Devon becomes the complete runtime publisher. - UI completion semantics must only be computed from semantically typed rows emitted by Devon. ### 2.5 Deferred Items - Any DH/UI reflection not yet required for immediate continuity use. - Any runtime/service component not yet evidenced on the Devon server. - Any UI expansion for components that are not yet canonized. ### 2.6 Devon Host Real Status #### 2.6.1 Observed Host Baseline - Hostname observed: `Devon` / `vmi2858754` - OS observed: Ubuntu 22.04.5 LTS - Kernel observed: Linux 5.15.0-170-generic - Architecture observed: x86-64 - CPU observed: 6 vCPU - Memory observed: 11 GiB RAM - Disk observed: 100 GB total with approximately 94 GB available - Current exposed listening service observed: SSH on port 22 only #### 2.6.2 Observed Security/Network Status - Firewall status observed: `active` - UFW policy observed: `deny (incoming), allow (outgoing), disabled (routed)` - Allowed inbound rule observed: `22/tcp` - iptables default policy observed: `INPUT DROP`, `FORWARD DROP`, `OUTPUT ACCEPT` - Reverse proxy observed: `MISSING` - TLS baseline observed: `MISSING` #### 2.6.3 Observed Tooling Status - Python3: `PRESENT` - Git: `PRESENT` - Curl: `PRESENT` - Docker: `MISSING` - Docker Compose: `MISSING` by consequence of Docker absence - Nginx: `MISSING` #### 2.6.4 Observed Devon Paths and Assets - `/opt/devon`: `PRESENT` - `/opt/devon/bin`: `PRESENT` - `/opt/devon/runtime`: `PRESENT` - `/opt/devon/canon`: `PRESENT` - `/srv`: `PRESENT` - `/app`: `MISSING` #### 2.6.5 Observed Reusable Devon Runtime Assets - `/opt/devon/bin/collect_runtime.py` - `/opt/devon/bin/export_panel_runtime.sh` - `/opt/devon/runtime/host_runtime.json` - `/opt/devon/runtime/docker_runtime.json` - `/opt/devon/runtime/runtime_status.json` - `/opt/devon/runtime/panel_export/current` - `/opt/devon/canon/*.yaml` #### 2.6.6 Canonical Reading of Current Host - The Devon host already contains canonical/runtime/export structure under `/opt/devon`. - The Devon host does not yet contain container runtime baseline. - The Devon host does not yet contain reverse proxy/TLS baseline. - The Devon host must be expanded without breaking existing `/opt/devon` assets or the Waresite bridge. ### 2.7 Canonical Installation Plan #### 2.7.1 Installation Principle - Installation must follow evidence and canonical order. - Existing `/opt/devon` structure is treated as reusable operational base, not as disposable scaffold. - No component enters DH or UI before canon alignment if new architectural surface appears. #### 2.7.2 Layered Execution Order 1. Host baseline classification 2. Security baseline classification and hardening plan 3. Docker runtime installation plan 4. Container path and persistence plan 5. Reverse proxy/TLS plan 6. Preservation/alignment of current Devon runtime bridge 7. Only after that: service/container materialization #### 2.7.3 Initial Layer Matrix - Host OS baseline: `PASS` - CPU/RAM/Disk baseline: `PASS` - Network baseline: `PASS` - SSH access baseline: `PASS` - Python/Git/Curl baseline: `PASS` - Firewall baseline: `PASS` - Fail2ban baseline: `PASS` - Docker runtime baseline: `MISSING` - Docker Compose baseline: `MISSING` - Reverse proxy baseline: `MISSING` - TLS baseline: `MISSING` - Canon/runtime path baseline: `PASS` - `/app` runtime path baseline: `MISSING` #### 2.7.4 Operational Rule for Next Chat - The semantic runtime publication path is now validated end-to-end. - Do not reopen the old donut problem as an unresolved backend/UI ambiguity. - `collect_runtime.py` is now the canonical place that materializes semantically typed runtime rows. - `export_panel_runtime.sh` is now the validated publication bridge from Devon runtime to Waresite panel data. - `project_progress.json` remains sovereign for the global project donut. - `stage_rollup.progress_pct` remains sovereign for stage completion in the UI. - Subcategory cards must treat `0 eligible` as `not eligible`, never as `0%`. - Any future Devon installation/configuration must be reflected by: 1. observable server evidence 2. collector regeneration 3. export to Waresite 4. UI refresh ### 2.8 Bootstrap for New Chat Use the following block to resume work in a new chat: - Canonical root: `/home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/master_architecture_index.md` - Continuity file: `/home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/devon_continuity.md` - Waresite server: canonical docs, Documentation Hub, Operator Panel UI - Devon server: runtime origin, collector, exporter and operational truth - Semantic runtime closure status: `PASS` - Validated result: - `runtime_status.json` now preserves row semantics end-to-end - `project_progress.json` drives the global project donut - `stage_rollup.progress_pct` drives stage completion - subcards with `0 eligible` now render `MISSING / not eligible` - Operational rule: - after any Devon installation/configuration change, run: - `python3 /opt/devon/bin/collect_runtime.py` - `bash /opt/devon/bin/export_panel_runtime.sh` - only then validate the Waresite Operator Panel - Next mission: - return to Devon server configuration - continue host/runtime baseline expansion in canonical order - prioritize missing layers still blocking real Devon materialization: 1. Docker runtime baseline 2. Docker Compose baseline 3. reverse proxy baseline 4. TLS baseline 5. `/app` runtime path baseline ## 3. CANON EXPANSION RULE ### 3.1 Mandatory Order Whenever a new item appears during Devon server installation, configuration, runtime validation, or host discovery, the following order is mandatory: 1. Canon 2. Documentation Hub 3. Operational UI ### 3.2 Canon First Before anything enters DH or UI, it must be classified and canonized through: - `master_architecture_index.md` - child-files if deeper detailing is required - explicit definition of purpose, dependency, observable evidence, and operational impact ### 3.3 DH Second After canonization, the item must be reflected in the Documentation Hub for navigable architectural/documental visibility. ### 3.4 UI Last Only after canon and DH alignment may the item be reflected in the Operational UI. ### 3.5 Governance Rule If an item exists operationally but is not yet canonized: - it is not a final operational reference - it must not be treated as fully integrated architecture - it must not go directly into UI ## 4. DISCOVERY INTAKE TEMPLATE Use this template whenever a new operational item is discovered during Devon host work: ### 4.1 Discovery Record - Item name: - Category: - Why it appeared: - Dependencies: - Evidence of presence: - Evidence of functionality: - Canon impact: - Needs child-file? `YES|NO` - Needs DH reflection? `YES|NO` - Needs UI reflection? `YES|NO` - Current status: `PASS|FAIL|MISSING` ===== DH EXECUTION LAW ===== # DOCUMENTATION HUB EXECUTION LAW Core law: Documentation Hub is simultaneously: 1. canonical documentation 2. execution system 3. contract base for the future operational panel DH structural transition law: Textual validation is transitional only. The future operational panel must consume structural contract, not textual inference. Strategic rule: Documentation Hub is canonical execution guidance, not decorative documentation. ===== DH JSON MIRROR LAW ===== # DOCUMENTATION HUB JSON MIRROR LAW Core law: A category that is already structurally mature in Documentation Hub may be materialized as a JSON mirror. Current meaning: - DH remains the canonical human-readable reference - category JSON is the machine-readable mirror of the current DH execution contract - this JSON is not yet the final sovereign engine contract Status rule: When a category JSON is still a DH mirror, its status must communicate transition rather than final sovereignty. Current valid transition status: - ACTIVE_DH_MIRROR Boundary rule: Do not redesign category macrostructure once the DH category architecture is stable. After macrostructure is stable, the next step is hardening, not redesign. Hardening law: The correct next step after category JSON materialization is: - strengthen weak evidence - replace semantic/textual validation where possible - migrate toward structural evidence, fixed bindings, key paths and schema-backed validation - do not reopen the category architecture unless there is a real canonical error Bucket-boundary law: The following bucket roles must remain rigidly separated: Validation: - test conformity against the declared contract Observable Evidence: - prove material evidence exists Completion & Promotion: - decide whether category status may be promoted Invalid state: If these three buckets begin to overlap semantically, the category loses execution clarity and future panel consumption becomes weaker. Parser-readiness law: Classification must obey real technical properties, not conservative guessing. engine_grade_final = true only when: - evidence is structural - validation is parseable - fail state is deterministic - no human semantic reading is required parser_readiness = high only when: - the engine can resolve the check without textual interpretation validation_mode = semantic_transitional only when: - the check depends on language interpretation instead of structural keys, bindings or machine-readable contracts Recalibration rule: Strong structural checks must not be underclassified merely because the category still contains transitional fields elsewhere. Item classification must reflect the real strength of that item's own evidence and validation path. Transition rule: Current category JSON may be: - strong for governance - strong for DH mirroring - strong for operational contract intent - partial for parser determinism This is valid during transition. It only becomes invalid if DH mirror status is falsely presented as final engine-grade sovereignty. Strategic direction: Final architecture target is: - DH = canonical human-readable execution reference - category JSON = machine-readable execution mirror - future operational panel = consumer of hardened structural category contracts ===== DOCUMENTATION HUB SNAPSHOT ===== PHASE COUNT: 10 - phase-01 | Overview & Scope - phase-02 | Architecture & Engineering Canon - phase-03 | Cognitive Flow Canon - phase-04 | Containerization Canon - phase-05 | Latency & Performance Canon - phase-06 | Noise Reduction Canon - phase-07 | Observability & Audit Canon - phase-08 | Security Canon - phase-09 | Operational Flows Canon - phase-10 | Monitoring & Real-time Observability CATEGORY COUNT: 12 CATEGORY: overview_scope | LABEL: Overview & Scope | PHASE: phase-01 | DOCS: 8 DOC: master_architecture_index | LABEL: Master Architecture Index | TYPE: text DOC: panel_manifest | LABEL: Panel Manifest | TYPE: json DOC: project_scope | LABEL: Project Scope Canonical | TYPE: json DOC: deployment_order | LABEL: Deployment Order Canonical | TYPE: json DOC: sandbox_environment | LABEL: Sandbox Environment Canonical | TYPE: json DOC: server_registry | LABEL: Server Registry Canonical | TYPE: json DOC: project_progress_canonical | LABEL: Project Progress Canonical | TYPE: json DOC: project_progress_model | LABEL: Project Progress Model | TYPE: json CATEGORY: architecture_engineering_core | LABEL: Architecture & Engineering Canon | PHASE: phase-02 | DOCS: 18 DOC: cas | LABEL: CAS · Cognitive Architecture Spec | TYPE: text DOC: cgs | LABEL: CGS · Canonical Governance Spec | TYPE: text DOC: acs | LABEL: ACS · Artifact Canon Structure | TYPE: text DOC: css | LABEL: CSS · Contracts & Schemas Spec | TYPE: text DOC: ncs | LABEL: NCS · Naming Canon Spec | TYPE: text DOC: sts | LABEL: STS · State Transition Spec | TYPE: text DOC: brps | LABEL: BRPS · Build Release Promotion Spec | TYPE: text DOC: cdms | LABEL: CDMS · Canonical Deployment Model Spec | TYPE: text DOC: ris | LABEL: RIS · Role Interaction Spec | TYPE: text DOC: ofms | LABEL: OFMS · Operational Flow Mapping Spec | TYPE: text DOC: card_contract_minimums | LABEL: Card Contract Minimums | TYPE: json DOC: panel_data_contract | LABEL: Panel Data Contract | TYPE: json DOC: panel_component_contract | LABEL: Panel Component Contract | TYPE: json DOC: panel_sync_contract | LABEL: Panel Sync Contract | TYPE: json DOC: panel_canonical_tree | LABEL: Panel Canonical Tree | TYPE: json DOC: panel_navigation_spec | LABEL: Panel Navigation Spec | TYPE: json DOC: panel_ui_blueprint | LABEL: Panel UI Blueprint | TYPE: json DOC: canonical_matrix_v1 | LABEL: Canonical Matrix v1 | TYPE: json CATEGORY: cognitive_flow | LABEL: Cognitive Flow Canon | PHASE: phase-03 | DOCS: 2 DOC: cfc | LABEL: CFC · Cognitive Flow Canon | TYPE: text DOC: ccc | LABEL: CCC · Cognitive Component Context | TYPE: text CATEGORY: containerization | LABEL: Containerization Canon | PHASE: phase-04 | DOCS: 1 DOC: cdms | LABEL: CDMS · Canonical Deployment Model Spec | TYPE: text CATEGORY: latency_performance | LABEL: Latency & Performance Canon | PHASE: phase-05 | DOCS: 1 DOC: lpc | LABEL: LPC · Latency & Performance Canon | TYPE: text CATEGORY: noise_reduction | LABEL: Noise Reduction Canon | PHASE: phase-06 | DOCS: 1 DOC: nrc | LABEL: NRC · Noise Reduction Canon | TYPE: text CATEGORY: observability_audit | LABEL: Observability & Audit Canon | PHASE: phase-07 | DOCS: 6 DOC: oac | LABEL: OAC · Observability & Audit Canon | TYPE: text DOC: panel_runtime_bridge | LABEL: Panel Runtime Bridge | TYPE: json DOC: host_runtime_support | LABEL: Host Runtime Support | TYPE: json DOC: docker_runtime_support | LABEL: Docker Runtime Support | TYPE: json DOC: runtime_status_support | LABEL: Runtime Status Support | TYPE: json DOC: runtime_row_semantics | LABEL: Runtime Row Semantics Canonical | TYPE: json CATEGORY: security_governance | LABEL: Security Canon | PHASE: phase-08 | DOCS: 9 DOC: sec | LABEL: SEC · Security Canon | TYPE: text DOC: host_security | LABEL: Host Security Canonical | TYPE: json DOC: app_security | LABEL: App Security Canonical | TYPE: json DOC: module_security | LABEL: Module Security Canonical | TYPE: json DOC: runtime_security | LABEL: Runtime Security Canonical | TYPE: json DOC: delivery_security | LABEL: Delivery Security Canonical | TYPE: json DOC: approval_policy | LABEL: Approval Canonization Policy | TYPE: json DOC: memory_isolation | LABEL: Memory Isolation Canonical | TYPE: json DOC: security_monitoring | LABEL: Security Monitoring Canonical | TYPE: json CATEGORY: operational_flows | LABEL: Operational Flows Canon | PHASE: phase-09 | DOCS: 1 DOC: ofc | LABEL: OFC · Operational Flows Canon | TYPE: text CATEGORY: delivery_layer | LABEL: Delivery Layer | PHASE: phase-09 | DOCS: 2 DOC: subcategory_pipelines | LABEL: Subcategory Pipelines | TYPE: json DOC: panel_content_index | LABEL: Panel Content Index | TYPE: json CATEGORY: memory_learning_reasoning | LABEL: Memory, Learning & Reasoning Governance | PHASE: phase-08 | DOCS: 6 DOC: memory_arch | LABEL: Memory Canonical Architecture | TYPE: json DOC: memory_lifecycle | LABEL: Memory Lifecycle Canonical | TYPE: json DOC: learning_gov | LABEL: Learning Governance Canonical | TYPE: json DOC: planning_reasoning | LABEL: Planning Reasoning Canonical | TYPE: json DOC: tool_execution | LABEL: Tool Execution Canonical | TYPE: json DOC: knowledge_ingestion | LABEL: Knowledge Ingestion Canonical | TYPE: json CATEGORY: monitoring_observability | LABEL: Monitoring & Real-time Observability | PHASE: phase-10 | DOCS: 2 DOC: monitoring_canonical | LABEL: Monitoring Canonical | TYPE: json DOC: sse_bridge_canonical | LABEL: SSE Bridge Canonical | TYPE: json ===== PHASE 01 + PHASE 02 DOC MAP ===== [phase-01] overview_scope => Overview & Scope - master_architecture_index => Master Architecture Index - panel_manifest => Panel Manifest - project_scope => Project Scope Canonical - deployment_order => Deployment Order Canonical - sandbox_environment => Sandbox Environment Canonical - server_registry => Server Registry Canonical - project_progress_canonical => Project Progress Canonical - project_progress_model => Project Progress Model [phase-02] architecture_engineering_core => Architecture & Engineering Canon - cas => CAS · Cognitive Architecture Spec - cgs => CGS · Canonical Governance Spec - acs => ACS · Artifact Canon Structure - css => CSS · Contracts & Schemas Spec - ncs => NCS · Naming Canon Spec - sts => STS · State Transition Spec - brps => BRPS · Build Release Promotion Spec - cdms => CDMS · Canonical Deployment Model Spec - ris => RIS · Role Interaction Spec - ofms => OFMS · Operational Flow Mapping Spec - card_contract_minimums => Card Contract Minimums - panel_data_contract => Panel Data Contract - panel_component_contract => Panel Component Contract - panel_sync_contract => Panel Sync Contract - panel_canonical_tree => Panel Canonical Tree - panel_navigation_spec => Panel Navigation Spec - panel_ui_blueprint => Panel UI Blueprint - canonical_matrix_v1 => Canonical Matrix v1 ===== DOCS INDEX CUSTOM BRANCHES ===== 1967: if (doc.id === "cas" && state.categoryId === "architecture_engineering_core") { 3247: if (doc.id === "cgs" && state.categoryId === "architecture_engineering_core") { 4886: if (doc.id === "acs" && state.categoryId === "architecture_engineering_core") { 6517: if (doc.id === "css" && state.categoryId === "architecture_engineering_core") { 8180: if (doc.id === "ncs" && state.categoryId === "architecture_engineering_core") { 9848: if (doc.id === "sts" && state.categoryId === "architecture_engineering_core") { 11508: if (doc.id === "brps" && state.categoryId === "architecture_engineering_core") { 13210: if (doc.id === "cdms" && state.categoryId === "architecture_engineering_core") { 14923: if (doc.id === "ris" && state.categoryId === "architecture_engineering_core") { 16837: if (doc.id === "ofms" && state.categoryId === "architecture_engineering_core") { 18724:if (doc.id === "card_contract_minimums" && state.categoryId === "architecture_engineering_core") { 20645:if (doc.id === "panel_data_contract" && state.categoryId === "architecture_engineering_core") { 22591:if (doc.id === "panel_component_contract" && state.categoryId === "architecture_engineering_core") { 24552:if (doc.id === "panel_sync_contract" && state.categoryId === "architecture_engineering_core") { 26538:if (doc.id === "panel_canonical_tree" && state.categoryId === "architecture_engineering_core") { 28507:if (doc.id === "panel_navigation_spec" && state.categoryId === "architecture_engineering_core") { 30526:if (doc.id === "panel_ui_blueprint" && state.categoryId === "architecture_engineering_core") { 32678:if (doc.id === "canonical_matrix_v1" && state.categoryId === "architecture_engineering_core") { 34774:if (doc.id === "cfc" && state.categoryId === "cognitive_flow") { 34875:if (doc.id === "ccc" && state.categoryId === "cognitive_flow") { 34976:if (doc.id === "cdms" && state.categoryId === "containerization") { 35078:if (doc.id === "lpc" && state.categoryId === "latency_performance") { 35180:if (doc.id === "nrc" && state.categoryId === "noise_reduction") { 35282:if (doc.id === "oac" && state.categoryId === "observability_audit") { 35384:if (doc.id === "panel_runtime_bridge" && state.categoryId === "observability_audit") { 35486:if (doc.id === "host_runtime_support" && state.categoryId === "observability_audit") { 35588:if (doc.id === "docker_runtime_support" && state.categoryId === "observability_audit") { 35690:if (doc.id === "runtime_status_support" && state.categoryId === "observability_audit") { 35792:if (doc.id === "runtime_row_semantics" && state.categoryId === "observability_audit") { 35894:if (doc.id === "sec" && state.categoryId === "security_governance") { 35996:if (doc.id === "host_security" && state.categoryId === "security_governance") { 36098:if (doc.id === "app_security" && state.categoryId === "security_governance") { 36200:if (doc.id === "module_security" && state.categoryId === "security_governance") { 36302:if (doc.id === "runtime_security" && state.categoryId === "security_governance") { 36404:if (doc.id === "delivery_security" && state.categoryId === "security_governance") { 36506:if (doc.id === "approval_policy" && state.categoryId === "security_governance") { 36608:if (doc.id === "memory_isolation" && state.categoryId === "security_governance") { 36710:if (doc.id === "security_monitoring" && state.categoryId === "security_governance") { 36812:if (doc.id === "ofc" && state.categoryId === "operational_flows") { 36914:if (doc.id === "subcategory_pipelines" && state.categoryId === "delivery_layer") { 37016:if (doc.id === "panel_content_index" && state.categoryId === "delivery_layer") { 37118:if (doc.id === "memory_arch" && state.categoryId === "memory_learning_reasoning") { 37224:if (doc.id === "memory_lifecycle" && state.categoryId === "memory_learning_reasoning") { 37325:if (doc.id === "learning_gov" && state.categoryId === "memory_learning_reasoning") { 37426:if (doc.id === "planning_reasoning" && state.categoryId === "memory_learning_reasoning") { 37526:if (doc.id === "tool_execution" && state.categoryId === "memory_learning_reasoning") { 37627:if (doc.id === "knowledge_ingestion" && state.categoryId === "memory_learning_reasoning") { 37728:if (doc.id === "monitoring_canonical" && state.categoryId === "monitoring_observability") { 37828:if (doc.id === "sse_bridge_canonical" && state.categoryId === "monitoring_observability") { 37927:if (doc.id === "master_architecture_index" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope") { 38053:- expected_binding: if (doc.id === "master_architecture_index" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope") { 38264:- expected_binding: if (doc.id === "master_architecture_index" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope") { 38496:- expected_binding: if (doc.id === "master_architecture_index" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope") { 38613:- expected_binding: if (doc.id === "master_architecture_index" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope") { 39214:if (doc.id === "project_scope" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope") { 39374:- expected_binding: if (doc.id === "project_scope" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope") { 39610:- expected_binding: if (doc.id === "project_scope" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope") { 39847:- expected_binding: if (doc.id === "project_scope" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope") { 40548:if (doc.id === "deployment_order" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope") { 40708:- expected_binding: if (doc.id === "deployment_order" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope") { 40944:- expected_binding: if (doc.id === "deployment_order" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope") { 41181:- expected_binding: if (doc.id === "deployment_order" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope") { 41950:if (doc.id === "sandbox_environment" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope") { 42110:- expected_binding: if (doc.id === "sandbox_environment" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope") { 42346:- expected_binding: if (doc.id === "sandbox_environment" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope") { 42583:- expected_binding: if (doc.id === "sandbox_environment" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope") { 43312:if (doc.id === "panel_manifest" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope") { 43415:- expected_binding: if (doc.id === "panel_manifest" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope") { 43917:- expected_binding: if (doc.id === "panel_manifest" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope") { 44534:- expected_binding: if (doc.id === "panel_manifest" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope") { 44660:if (doc.id === "server_registry" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope") { 44820:- expected_binding: if (doc.id === "server_registry" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope") { 45056:- expected_binding: if (doc.id === "server_registry" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope") { 45457:- expected_binding: if (doc.id === "server_registry" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope") { 46182:if (doc.id === "project_progress_canonical" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope") { 48218: if (doc.id === "master_architecture_index" && state.categoryId === "project_progress_model") { 48309:if (doc.id === "project_progress_model" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope") { ===== DOCS INDEX forceDirectArchitectureRender ===== const forceDirectArchitectureRender = (doc.id === "panel_manifest" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope") || (doc.id === "master_architecture_index" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope") || (doc.id === "project_scope" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope") || (doc.id === "deployment_order" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope") || (doc.id === "sandbox_environment" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope") || (doc.id === "server_registry" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope") || (doc.id === "project_progress_canonical" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope") || (doc.id === "project_progress_model" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope") || (doc.id === "cas" && state.categoryId === "architecture_engineering_core") || (doc.id === "cgs" && state.categoryId === "architecture_engineering_core") || (doc.id === "acs" && state.categoryId === "architecture_engineering_core") || (doc.id === "css" && state.categoryId === "architecture_engineering_core") || (doc.id === "ncs" && state.categoryId === "architecture_engineering_core") || (doc.id === "sts" && state.categoryId === "architecture_engineering_core") || (doc.id === "brps" && state.categoryId === "architecture_engineering_core") || (doc.id === "cdms" && state.categoryId === "architecture_engineering_core") || (doc.id === "ris" && state.categoryId === "architecture_engineering_core") || (doc.id === "ofms" && state.categoryId === "architecture_engineering_core") || (doc.id === "card_contract_minimums" && state.categoryId === "architecture_engineering_core") || (doc.id === "panel_data_contract" && state.categoryId === "architecture_engineering_core") || (doc.id === "panel_component_contract" && state.categoryId === "architecture_engineering_core") || (doc.id === "panel_sync_contract" && state.categoryId === "architecture_engineering_core") || (doc.id === "panel_canonical_tree" && state.categoryId === "architecture_engineering_core") || (doc.id === "panel_navigation_spec" && state.categoryId === "architecture_engineering_core") || (doc.id === "panel_ui_blueprint" && state.categoryId === "architecture_engineering_core") || (doc.id === "canonical_matrix_v1" && state.categoryId === "architecture_engineering_core") || (doc.id === "cfc" && state.categoryId === "cognitive_flow") || (doc.id === "ccc" && state.categoryId === "cognitive_flow") || (doc.id === "cdms" && state.categoryId === "containerization") || (doc.id === "lpc" && state.categoryId === "latency_performance") || (doc.id === "nrc" && state.categoryId === "noise_reduction") || (doc.id === "oac" && state.categoryId === "observability_audit") || (doc.id === "panel_runtime_bridge" && state.categoryId === "observability_audit") || (doc.id === "host_runtime_support" && state.categoryId === "observability_audit") || (doc.id === "docker_runtime_support" && state.categoryId === "observability_audit") || (doc.id === "runtime_status_support" && state.categoryId === "observability_audit") || (doc.id === "runtime_row_semantics" && state.categoryId === "observability_audit") || (doc.id === "sec" && state.categoryId === "security_governance") || (doc.id === "host_security" && state.categoryId === "security_governance") || (doc.id === "app_security" && state.categoryId === "security_governance") || (doc.id === "module_security" && state.categoryId === "security_governance") || (doc.id === "runtime_security" && state.categoryId === "security_governance") || (doc.id === "delivery_security" && state.categoryId === "security_governance") || (doc.id === "approval_policy" && state.categoryId === "security_governance") || (doc.id === "memory_isolation" && state.categoryId === "security_governance") || (doc.id === "security_monitoring" && state.categoryId === "security_governance") || (doc.id === "ofc" && state.categoryId === "operational_flows") || (doc.id === "subcategory_pipelines" && state.categoryId === "delivery_layer") || (doc.id === "panel_content_index" && state.categoryId === "delivery_layer") || (doc.id === "memory_arch" && state.categoryId === "memory_learning_reasoning"); ===== DOCS INDEX PHASE STATUS SNAPSHOT ===== PHASE-01: CATEGORY: overview_scope | Overview & Scope - master_architecture_index: CUSTOM_BRANCH - panel_manifest: CUSTOM_BRANCH - project_scope: CUSTOM_BRANCH - deployment_order: CUSTOM_BRANCH - sandbox_environment: CUSTOM_BRANCH - server_registry: CUSTOM_BRANCH - project_progress_canonical: CUSTOM_BRANCH - project_progress_model: CUSTOM_BRANCH PHASE-02: CATEGORY: architecture_engineering_core | Architecture & Engineering Canon - cas: CUSTOM_BRANCH - cgs: CUSTOM_BRANCH - acs: CUSTOM_BRANCH - css: CUSTOM_BRANCH - ncs: CUSTOM_BRANCH - sts: CUSTOM_BRANCH - brps: CUSTOM_BRANCH - cdms: CUSTOM_BRANCH - ris: CUSTOM_BRANCH - ofms: CUSTOM_BRANCH - card_contract_minimums: CUSTOM_BRANCH - panel_data_contract: CUSTOM_BRANCH - panel_component_contract: CUSTOM_BRANCH - panel_sync_contract: CUSTOM_BRANCH - panel_canonical_tree: CUSTOM_BRANCH - panel_navigation_spec: CUSTOM_BRANCH - panel_ui_blueprint: CUSTOM_BRANCH - canonical_matrix_v1: CUSTOM_BRANCH ===== DOCS INDEX SYNTAX ===== No syntax errors detected in /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php ===== DUMP STATUS ===== PASS: canonical + docs + hub context reconstructed from server evidence ===== PHASE 01 DOC MAP ===== PHASE_ID: phase-01 CATEGORY_ID: overview_scope CATEGORY_TITLE: Overview & Scope DOC_ID: master_architecture_index | LABEL: Master Architecture Index | TYPE: text DOC_ID: panel_manifest | LABEL: Panel Manifest | TYPE: json DOC_ID: project_scope | LABEL: Project Scope Canonical | TYPE: json DOC_ID: deployment_order | LABEL: Deployment Order Canonical | TYPE: json DOC_ID: sandbox_environment | LABEL: Sandbox Environment Canonical | TYPE: json DOC_ID: server_registry | LABEL: Server Registry Canonical | TYPE: json DOC_ID: project_progress_canonical | LABEL: Project Progress Canonical | TYPE: json DOC_ID: project_progress_model | LABEL: Project Progress Model | TYPE: json ===== CUSTOM BRANCH RAW ANCHOR EXTRACTION ===== ======================================================================================================================== DOC_ID: master_architecture_index LABEL: Master Architecture Index STATUS: CUSTOM_BRANCH BRANCH_START_INDEX: 2052555 BRANCH_END_INDEX: 2061451 BRANCH_START_LINE: 37927 BRANCH_SIZE_CHARS: 8896 ----- ARRAY / BUCKET-LIKE DECLARATIONS ----- DECL: prerequisitesBuckets | line=38015 | index=2058817 DECL: configured | line=37999 | index=2057950 ----- BUCKET LABEL / KEY OCCURRENCES ----- Prerequisites: PASS | occurrences=1 | first_line=38015 | first_index=2058823 Installation: MISSING Configuration: MISSING Validation: PASS | occurrences=1 | first_line=38031 | first_index=2059988 Observable Evidence: MISSING Failure Modes & Recovery: MISSING Completion & Promotion: MISSING ----- TARGETED INSERTION CONTEXTS ----- TOKEN: prerequisites | OCCURRENCES: 1 --- prerequisites occurrence 1 | line=38015 | index=2058823 --- "master-architecture-index-overview-toggle" role="button" tabindex="0" aria-expanded="false" style="display:inline-block;cursor:pointer;color:var(--text);font-size:14px;line-height:1.4;text-decoration:underline;text-underline-offset:3px;" >mais... `; const prerequisitesBuckets = [ { title: "Sovereign Architecture File Must Be Present Before Any Devon Topology Claim", items: [ `WHAT: Master Architecture Index begins only when the sovereign architecture file is physically present as the root document that names Devon's structural order. This prerequisite proves that the project has a canonical index before any phase, category or downstream authority can be read as part of a governed system. WHY: This category is not a supporting reference. It is the first structural authority that lets Devon say where every later canon, panel contract, deployment rule and progress model belongs. Without the file, the project has no verified spine; it only has isolated documents waiting to be interpreted without a master coordinate system. EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/master_architecture_index.md - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/master_architecture_index.md - expected_binding: doc.id === "master_architecture_index" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope" - expected_scope: sovereign root architecture source for Overview & Scope VALIDATION: - /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel --- end prerequisites occurrence 1 --- TOKEN: validation | OCCURRENCES: 1 --- validation occurrence 1 | line=38031 | index=2059988 --- fied spine; it only has isolated documents waiting to be interpreted without a master coordinate system. EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/master_architecture_index.md - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/master_architecture_index.md - expected_binding: doc.id === "master_architecture_index" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope" - expected_scope: sovereign root architecture source for Overview & Scope VALIDATION: - /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/master_architecture_index.md must exist before this category can authorize any architectural reading in the Documentation Hub FAIL: - Missing master_architecture_index.md means Devon has no verified root index from which structural authority can be assigned IMPACT: The entire documentation system loses its topological anchor. Categories may still appear on screen, but their position inside Devon cannot be proven from the master architecture authority.` ] }, { title: "Overview Scope Must Bind The Master Index To Its Only Root Category", items: [ `WHAT: The Master Architecture Index prerequisite requires the root architecture document to resolve through Overview & Scope, because this is the phase-one category that owns Devon's opening structural frame. The binding proves that the index is being read from its correct governance position, not as a loose document or generic artifact. WHY: Master Architecture Index defines the sovereign map, while Overview & Scope is the category slot where that map becomes the project baseline. If this relation is wrong, the architecture sour --- end validation occurrence 1 --- TOKEN: evidence | OCCURRENCES: 3 --- evidence occurrence 1 | line=37999 | index=2058033 --- n:0;">${escapeHtml("This means the buckets below cannot behave like reusable bucket prose. They must decompose the mechanics that make Devon structurally governable as a whole: what must already exist before the architecture index can be treated as sovereign, how that structural map is installed into Documentation Hub, how the hierarchy and authority relations are configured, how the structural frame is validated against ambiguity or drift, what evidence proves that the map the project is using is the same map canon declares, what failure patterns corrupt the architecture spine and when the index is complete enough to support every downstream category without structural guesswork.")}

`; const prerequisitesBuckets = [ { title: "Sovereign Architecture File Must Be Present Before Any Devon Topology Claim", items: [ `WHAT: Master Architecture Index begins only when the sovereign architecture file is physically present as the root document that names Devon's structural order. This prerequisite proves that the project has a canonical index before any phase, category or --- end evidence occurrence 1 --- --- evidence occurrence 2 | line=38025 | index=2059644 --- canonical index before any phase, category or downstream authority can be read as part of a governed system. WHY: This category is not a supporting reference. It is the first structural authority that lets Devon say where every later canon, panel contract, deployment rule and progress model belongs. Without the file, the project has no verified spine; it only has isolated documents waiting to be interpreted without a master coordinate system. EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/master_architecture_index.md - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/master_architecture_index.md - expected_binding: doc.id === "master_architecture_index" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope" - expected_scope: sovereign root architecture source for Overview & Scope VALIDATION: - /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/master_architecture_index.md must exist before this category can authorize any architectural reading in the Documentation Hub FAIL: - Missing master_architecture_index.md means Devon has no verified root index from which structural authority can be assigned IMPACT: The entire documentation system loses its topological anchor. Categories may still appear on screen, but their position inside Devon cannot be proven from the master architecture authority.` ] }, { title: "Overview Scope Must Bind The Master Index To Its Only Root Category", items: [ `WHAT: The Master Architecture Index prerequisite requires the root architecture document to resolve through Overview & Scope, because this is the phase-one category that owns Devon's opening --- end evidence occurrence 2 --- --- evidence occurrence 3 | line=38050 | index=2061312 --- l frame. The binding proves that the index is being read from its correct governance position, not as a loose document or generic artifact. WHY: Master Architecture Index defines the sovereign map, while Overview & Scope is the category slot where that map becomes the project baseline. If this relation is wrong, the architecture source may still exist, but its authority is detached from the category that gives Devon its initial scope boundary. EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_binding: --- end evidence occurrence 3 --- ----- LAST CARD-LIKE OBJECTS IN BRANCH ----- CARD_OBJECT_COUNT: 2 --- CARD_OBJECT #1 | line=38016 | index=2058860 --- `; const prerequisitesBuckets = [ { title: "Sovereign Architecture File Must Be Present Before Any Devon Topology Claim", items: [ `WHAT: Master Architecture Index begins only when the sovereign architecture file is physically present as the root document that names Devon's structural order. This prerequisite proves that the project has a canonical index before any phase, category or downstream authority can be read as part of a governed system. WHY: This category is not a supporting reference. It is the first structural authority that lets Devon say where every later canon, panel contract, deployment rule and progress model belongs. Without the file, the project has no verified spine; it only has isolated documents waiting to be interpreted without a master coordinate system. EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/master_architecture_index.md - file: /home/yeff/publi --- end CARD_OBJECT #1 --- --- CARD_OBJECT #2 | line=38041 | index=2060544 --- ition inside Devon cannot be proven from the master architecture authority.` ] }, { title: "Overview Scope Must Bind The Master Index To Its Only Root Category", items: [ `WHAT: The Master Architecture Index prerequisite requires the root architecture document to resolve through Overview & Scope, because this is the phase-one category that owns Devon's opening structural frame. The binding proves that the index is being read from its correct governance position, not as a loose document or generic artifact. WHY: Master Architecture Index defines the sovereign map, while Overview & Scope is the category slot where that map becomes the project baseline. If this relation is wrong, the architecture source may still exist, but its authority is detached from the category that gives Devon its initial scope boundary. EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_bi --- end CARD_OBJECT #2 --- ----- RECOMMENDED NEXT ACTION ----- Use this report to build one REPLACE patch for this DOC_ID only. Insert new card objects into existing bucket arrays where anchors are unambiguous. Do not replace existing card text. Do not create a new visual bucket. ======================================================================================================================== DOC_ID: panel_manifest LABEL: Panel Manifest STATUS: CUSTOM_BRANCH BRANCH_START_INDEX: 2320214 BRANCH_END_INDEX: 2325494 BRANCH_START_LINE: 43312 BRANCH_SIZE_CHARS: 5280 ----- ARRAY / BUCKET-LIKE DECLARATIONS ----- DECL: prerequisitesBuckets | line=43373 | index=2323017 ----- BUCKET LABEL / KEY OCCURRENCES ----- Prerequisites: PASS | occurrences=2 | first_line=43373 | first_index=2323023 Installation: MISSING Configuration: MISSING Validation: PASS | occurrences=1 | first_line=43389 | first_index=2324095 Observable Evidence: MISSING Failure Modes & Recovery: MISSING Completion & Promotion: MISSING ----- TARGETED INSERTION CONTEXTS ----- TOKEN: prerequisites | OCCURRENCES: 2 --- prerequisites occurrence 1 | line=43373 | index=2323023 --- ="bucket-card">
${escapeHtml(bucket.title)}
`).join("")} `; const prerequisitesBuckets = [ { title: "Panel Manifest Source Must Exist Before Interface Authority Can Be Claimed", items: [ `WHAT: Panel Manifest prerequisites begin with the presence of the file that describes how Devon's panel surface is allowed to expose project structure. This bucket proves that the interface contract has a source before any visible navigation, panel section or documentation entry is treated as governed. WHY: Panel Manifest is not the root architecture spine; it is the authority that turns structural intent into panel-readable interface order. Without its source, the panel can still display elements, but Devon cannot prove that the displayed surface follows a manifest instead of incidental markup. EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/panel_manifest.json - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/panel_manifest.json - expected_binding: doc.id === "panel_manifest" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope" - expected_scope: panel interface manifest for Overview & Scope VALIDATION: - PASS if /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/panel_manifest.json exists - FAIL if /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/pa --- end prerequisites occurrence 1 --- --- prerequisites occurrence 2 | line=43378 | index=2323206 --- .map(item => `
  • ${renderExecutionItem(item)}
    • `).join("")} `).join("")} `; const prerequisitesBuckets = [ { title: "Panel Manifest Source Must Exist Before Interface Authority Can Be Claimed", items: [ `WHAT: Panel Manifest prerequisites begin with the presence of the file that describes how Devon's panel surface is allowed to expose project structure. This bucket proves that the interface contract has a source before any visible navigation, panel section or documentation entry is treated as governed. WHY: Panel Manifest is not the root architecture spine; it is the authority that turns structural intent into panel-readable interface order. Without its source, the panel can still display elements, but Devon cannot prove that the displayed surface follows a manifest instead of incidental markup. EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/panel_manifest.json - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/panel_manifest.json - expected_binding: doc.id === "panel_manifest" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope" - expected_scope: panel interface manifest for Overview & Scope VALIDATION: - PASS if /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/panel_manifest.json exists - FAIL if /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/panel_manifest.json does not exist - MISSING if the path cannot be evaluated FAIL: - FAIL if panel_manifest.json is absent - FAIL if the manifest source is unreadable - FAIL if evidenc --- end prerequisites occurrence 2 --- TOKEN: validation | OCCURRENCES: 1 --- validation occurrence 1 | line=43389 | index=2324095 --- ource, the panel can still display elements, but Devon cannot prove that the displayed surface follows a manifest instead of incidental markup. EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/panel_manifest.json - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/panel_manifest.json - expected_binding: doc.id === "panel_manifest" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope" - expected_scope: panel interface manifest for Overview & Scope VALIDATION: - PASS if /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/panel_manifest.json exists - FAIL if /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/panel_manifest.json does not exist - MISSING if the path cannot be evaluated FAIL: - FAIL if panel_manifest.json is absent - FAIL if the manifest source is unreadable - FAIL if evidence points to a file that is not panel_manifest.json IMPACT: If this prerequisite fails, Devon loses the file-level authority that explains how the panel surface should organize and expose the project interface.` ] }, { title: "Overview Scope Must Bind Panel Manifest To The Interface Governance Slot", items: [ `WHAT: This prerequisite verifies that Panel Manifest is read from Overview & Scope, the phase-one slot where Devon establishes its first interface contract. The binding must connect the panel manifest document to the category position that introduces how the project is surfaced to operators. WHY: The manifest has to be located before it can govern. If Panel Manifest renders outside the Overview & Scope frame, the UI contract becomes detached from the opening project context that explains why the panel --- end validation occurrence 1 --- TOKEN: evidence | OCCURRENCES: 3 --- evidence occurrence 1 | line=43383 | index=2323790 --- s bucket proves that the interface contract has a source before any visible navigation, panel section or documentation entry is treated as governed. WHY: Panel Manifest is not the root architecture spine; it is the authority that turns structural intent into panel-readable interface order. Without its source, the panel can still display elements, but Devon cannot prove that the displayed surface follows a manifest instead of incidental markup. EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/panel_manifest.json - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/panel_manifest.json - expected_binding: doc.id === "panel_manifest" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope" - expected_scope: panel interface manifest for Overview & Scope VALIDATION: - PASS if /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/panel_manifest.json exists - FAIL if /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/panel_manifest.json does not exist - MISSING if the path cannot be evaluated FAIL: - FAIL if panel_manifest.json is absent - FAIL if the manifest source is unreadable - FAIL if evidence points to a file that is not panel_manifest.json IMPACT: If this prerequisite fails, Devon loses the file-level authority that explains how the panel surface should organize and expose the project interface.` ] }, { title: "Overview Scope Must Bind Panel Manifest To The Interface Governance Slot", items: [ `WHAT: This prerequisite verifies that Panel Manifest is read from Overview & Scope, the phase-one slot where Devon establishes its first interface contract. The binding must connect the panel manifest --- end evidence occurrence 1 --- --- evidence occurrence 2 | line=43397 | index=2324412 --- oc.id === "panel_manifest" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope" - expected_scope: panel interface manifest for Overview & Scope VALIDATION: - PASS if /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/panel_manifest.json exists - FAIL if /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/panel_manifest.json does not exist - MISSING if the path cannot be evaluated FAIL: - FAIL if panel_manifest.json is absent - FAIL if the manifest source is unreadable - FAIL if evidence points to a file that is not panel_manifest.json IMPACT: If this prerequisite fails, Devon loses the file-level authority that explains how the panel surface should organize and expose the project interface.` ] }, { title: "Overview Scope Must Bind Panel Manifest To The Interface Governance Slot", items: [ `WHAT: This prerequisite verifies that Panel Manifest is read from Overview & Scope, the phase-one slot where Devon establishes its first interface contract. The binding must connect the panel manifest document to the category position that introduces how the project is surfaced to operators. WHY: The manifest has to be located before it can govern. If Panel Manifest renders outside the Overview & Scope frame, the UI contract becomes detached from the opening project context that explains why the panel surface exists and what it is allowed to expose. EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_binding: --- end evidence occurrence 2 --- --- evidence occurrence 3 | line=43412 | index=2325355 --- Devon establishes its first interface contract. The binding must connect the panel manifest document to the category position that introduces how the project is surfaced to operators. WHY: The manifest has to be located before it can govern. If Panel Manifest renders outside the Overview & Scope frame, the UI contract becomes detached from the opening project context that explains why the panel surface exists and what it is allowed to expose. EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_binding: --- end evidence occurrence 3 --- ----- LAST CARD-LIKE OBJECTS IN BRANCH ----- CARD_OBJECT_COUNT: 2 --- CARD_OBJECT #1 | line=43374 | index=2323060 --- `; const prerequisitesBuckets = [ { title: "Panel Manifest Source Must Exist Before Interface Authority Can Be Claimed", items: [ `WHAT: Panel Manifest prerequisites begin with the presence of the file that describes how Devon's panel surface is allowed to expose project structure. This bucket proves that the interface contract has a source before any visible navigation, panel section or documentation entry is treated as governed. WHY: Panel Manifest is not the root architecture spine; it is the authority that turns structural intent into panel-readable interface order. Without its source, the panel can still display elements, but Devon cannot prove that the displayed surface follows a manifest instead of incidental markup. EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/panel_manifest.json - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/panel_manifest.json - expected_binding: --- end CARD_OBJECT #1 --- --- CARD_OBJECT #2 | line=43403 | index=2324674 --- ins how the panel surface should organize and expose the project interface.` ] }, { title: "Overview Scope Must Bind Panel Manifest To The Interface Governance Slot", items: [ `WHAT: This prerequisite verifies that Panel Manifest is read from Overview & Scope, the phase-one slot where Devon establishes its first interface contract. The binding must connect the panel manifest document to the category position that introduces how the project is surfaced to operators. WHY: The manifest has to be located before it can govern. If Panel Manifest renders outside the Overview & Scope frame, the UI contract becomes detached from the opening project context that explains why the panel surface exists and what it is allowed to expose. EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_binding: --- end CARD_OBJECT #2 --- ----- RECOMMENDED NEXT ACTION ----- Use this report to build one REPLACE patch for this DOC_ID only. Insert new card objects into existing bucket arrays where anchors are unambiguous. Do not replace existing card text. Do not create a new visual bucket. ======================================================================================================================== DOC_ID: project_scope LABEL: Project Scope Canonical STATUS: CUSTOM_BRANCH BRANCH_START_INDEX: 2117614 BRANCH_END_INDEX: 2127644 BRANCH_START_LINE: 39214 BRANCH_SIZE_CHARS: 10030 ----- ARRAY / BUCKET-LIKE DECLARATIONS ----- DECL: prerequisitesBuckets | line=39332 | index=2125089 DECL: configured | line=39286 | index=2123069 ----- BUCKET LABEL / KEY OCCURRENCES ----- Prerequisites: PASS | occurrences=2 | first_line=39332 | first_index=2125095 Installation: MISSING Configuration: MISSING Validation: PASS | occurrences=1 | first_line=39348 | first_index=2126213 Observable Evidence: MISSING Failure Modes & Recovery: MISSING Completion & Promotion: MISSING ----- TARGETED INSERTION CONTEXTS ----- TOKEN: prerequisites | OCCURRENCES: 2 --- prerequisites occurrence 1 | line=39332 | index=2125095 --- ); btn.addEventListener("keydown", (event) => { if (event.key === "Enter" || event.key === " ") { event.preventDefault(); toggle(); } }); } btn.setAttribute("aria-expanded", "false"); btn.textContent = "mais..."; more.hidden = true; more.style.display = "none"; }); const prerequisitesBuckets = [ { title: "Scope Canon Must Exist Before Devon Can Accept Project Boundaries", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites for Project Scope Canonical begin with the existence of the canonical scope file that defines what Devon is allowed to include, exclude and treat as part of the project boundary. This bucket proves that scope is not being inferred from implementation activity, panel visibility or accumulated documentation. WHY: Project Scope Canonical is the authority that prevents Devon from drifting beyond its declared project frame. Before any bucket can describe execution, evidence or promotion, the system must prove that the project has a fixed scope source capable of separating legitimate work from uncontrolled expansion. EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_scope_canonical.json - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_scope_canonical.json - expected_binding: doc.id === "project_scope" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope" - expected_scope: canonical project boundary for Overview & Scope VALIDATION: - PASS: test -f /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_scope_canonical.jso --- end prerequisites occurrence 1 --- --- prerequisites occurrence 2 | line=39337 | index=2125254 --- Default(); toggle(); } }); } btn.setAttribute("aria-expanded", "false"); btn.textContent = "mais..."; more.hidden = true; more.style.display = "none"; }); const prerequisitesBuckets = [ { title: "Scope Canon Must Exist Before Devon Can Accept Project Boundaries", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites for Project Scope Canonical begin with the existence of the canonical scope file that defines what Devon is allowed to include, exclude and treat as part of the project boundary. This bucket proves that scope is not being inferred from implementation activity, panel visibility or accumulated documentation. WHY: Project Scope Canonical is the authority that prevents Devon from drifting beyond its declared project frame. Before any bucket can describe execution, evidence or promotion, the system must prove that the project has a fixed scope source capable of separating legitimate work from uncontrolled expansion. EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_scope_canonical.json - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_scope_canonical.json - expected_binding: doc.id === "project_scope" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope" - expected_scope: canonical project boundary for Overview & Scope VALIDATION: - PASS: test -f /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_scope_canonical.json - FAIL: test ! -f /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_scope_canonical.json - MISSING: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data cannot be evaluated --- end prerequisites occurrence 2 --- TOKEN: validation | OCCURRENCES: 1 --- validation occurrence 1 | line=39348 | index=2126213 --- stem must prove that the project has a fixed scope source capable of separating legitimate work from uncontrolled expansion. EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_scope_canonical.json - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_scope_canonical.json - expected_binding: doc.id === "project_scope" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope" - expected_scope: canonical project boundary for Overview & Scope VALIDATION: - PASS: test -f /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_scope_canonical.json - FAIL: test ! -f /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_scope_canonical.json - MISSING: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data cannot be evaluated FAIL: - FAIL: project_scope_canonical.json absent - FAIL: project_scope_canonical.json unreadable - FAIL: evidence path resolves to a non-scope file IMPACT: If this prerequisite fails, Devon has no inspectable boundary document to decide whether project work belongs inside the authorized scope or represents uncontrolled drift.` ] }, { title: "Overview Scope Binding Must Hold The Canonical Boundary In Its Opening Frame", items: [ `WHAT: This prerequisite verifies that Project Scope Canonical is bound to Overview & Scope, the category frame where Devon defines the project before downstream execution categories start making operational claims. WHY: Scope only governs correctly when it is read at the beginning of the architecture sequence. If the scope canon is detached from Overview & Scope, Devon can still possess a scope file, but it loses the phase-one position that makes t --- end validation occurrence 1 --- TOKEN: evidence | OCCURRENCES: 5 --- evidence occurrence 1 | line=39286 | index=2123131 --- ion.")}

    ${escapeHtml("This means the buckets below cannot behave like reusable bucket prose. They must decompose the mechanics that make Devon boundary-safe as a whole: what must already exist before the project perimeter can be treated as canonical, how that perimeter is installed into Documentation Hub, how inclusion and exclusion rules are configured, how the boundary is validated against drift, what evidence proves that the project is operating inside the declared scope and not outside it, what failure patterns corrupt perimeter truth and when scope maturity is complete enough to support every downstream category without mandate ambiguity.")}

    `; queueMicrotask(() => { const btn = document.getElementById("project-scope-overview-toggle"); const more = document.getElementById("project-scope-overview-more"); if (!btn || !more) return; const toggle = () => { const expanded = btn.getAttribute("aria-expanded") === "true"; btn.setAttribute("aria-expanded", expanded ? "false" : "true"); m --- end evidence occurrence 1 --- --- evidence occurrence 2 | line=39340 | index=2125734 --- e Canonical begin with the existence of the canonical scope file that defines what Devon is allowed to include, exclude and treat as part of the project boundary. This bucket proves that scope is not being inferred from implementation activity, panel visibility or accumulated documentation. WHY: Project Scope Canonical is the authority that prevents Devon from drifting beyond its declared project frame. Before any bucket can describe execution, evidence or promotion, the system must prove that the project has a fixed scope source capable of separating legitimate work from uncontrolled expansion. EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_scope_canonical.json - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_scope_canonical.json - expected_binding: doc.id === "project_scope" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope" - expected_scope: canonical project boundary for Overview & Scope VALIDATION: - PASS: test -f /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_scope_canonical.json - FAIL: test ! -f /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_scope_canonical.json - MISSING: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data cannot be evaluated FAIL: - FAIL: project_scope_canonical.json absent - FAIL: project_scope_canonical.json unreadable - FAIL: evidence path resolves to a non-scope file IMPACT: If this prerequisite fails, Devon has no inspectable boundary document to decide whether project work belongs inside the authorized scope or represents uncontrolled drift.` ] }, { title: "Overview Scope Binding Must Hold The Canonical Boundary In Its Opening Fram --- end evidence occurrence 2 --- --- evidence occurrence 3 | line=39342 | index=2125889 --- undary. This bucket proves that scope is not being inferred from implementation activity, panel visibility or accumulated documentation. WHY: Project Scope Canonical is the authority that prevents Devon from drifting beyond its declared project frame. Before any bucket can describe execution, evidence or promotion, the system must prove that the project has a fixed scope source capable of separating legitimate work from uncontrolled expansion. EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_scope_canonical.json - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_scope_canonical.json - expected_binding: doc.id === "project_scope" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope" - expected_scope: canonical project boundary for Overview & Scope VALIDATION: - PASS: test -f /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_scope_canonical.json - FAIL: test ! -f /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_scope_canonical.json - MISSING: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data cannot be evaluated FAIL: - FAIL: project_scope_canonical.json absent - FAIL: project_scope_canonical.json unreadable - FAIL: evidence path resolves to a non-scope file IMPACT: If this prerequisite fails, Devon has no inspectable boundary document to decide whether project work belongs inside the authorized scope or represents uncontrolled drift.` ] }, { title: "Overview Scope Binding Must Hold The Canonical Boundary In Its Opening Frame", items: [ `WHAT: This prerequisite verifies that Project Scope Canonical is bound to Overview & Scope, the category frame where Devon defi --- end evidence occurrence 3 --- --- evidence occurrence 4 | line=39356 | index=2126575 --- === "overview_scope" - expected_scope: canonical project boundary for Overview & Scope VALIDATION: - PASS: test -f /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_scope_canonical.json - FAIL: test ! -f /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_scope_canonical.json - MISSING: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data cannot be evaluated FAIL: - FAIL: project_scope_canonical.json absent - FAIL: project_scope_canonical.json unreadable - FAIL: evidence path resolves to a non-scope file IMPACT: If this prerequisite fails, Devon has no inspectable boundary document to decide whether project work belongs inside the authorized scope or represents uncontrolled drift.` ] }, { title: "Overview Scope Binding Must Hold The Canonical Boundary In Its Opening Frame", items: [ `WHAT: This prerequisite verifies that Project Scope Canonical is bound to Overview & Scope, the category frame where Devon defines the project before downstream execution categories start making operational claims. WHY: Scope only governs correctly when it is read at the beginning of the architecture sequence. If the scope canon is detached from Overview & Scope, Devon can still possess a scope file, but it loses the phase-one position that makes that file the project boundary before implementation and deployment logic begins. EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_binding: --- end evidence occurrence 4 --- --- evidence occurrence 5 | line=39371 | index=2127505 --- Scope, the category frame where Devon defines the project before downstream execution categories start making operational claims. WHY: Scope only governs correctly when it is read at the beginning of the architecture sequence. If the scope canon is detached from Overview & Scope, Devon can still possess a scope file, but it loses the phase-one position that makes that file the project boundary before implementation and deployment logic begins. EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_binding: --- end evidence occurrence 5 --- TOKEN: completion | OCCURRENCES: 1 --- completion occurrence 1 | line=39284 | index=2121554 ---
    `; queueMicrotask(() => { const btn = document.getElementById("deployment-order-overview-toggle"); const more = document.getElementById("deployment-order-overview-more"); if (!btn || !more) return; const toggle = () => { const expanded = btn.getAttribute("aria-expanded") === "true"; btn.setAttribute("aria-expanded", expanded ? "false" : "true"); --- end evidence occurrence 1 --- --- evidence occurrence 2 | line=40674 | index=2189896 --- [ `WHAT: Prerequisites for Deployment Order Canonical begin with the source that defines Devon's allowed deployment sequence. This bucket proves that runtime execution order is not being inferred from habit, terminal history, operator memory or whichever script happened to run first. WHY: Deployment Order Canonical is the authority that prevents Devon from deploying components out of sequence. Before any installation, configuration, validation, evidence, recovery or promotion claim can stand, the system must prove that deployment order has a canonical source capable of governing execution flow. EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/deployment_order_canonical.json - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/deployment_order_canonical.json - expected_binding: doc.id === "deployment_order" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope" - expected_scope: canonical deployment sequence for Overview & Scope VALIDATION: - PASS: test -f /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/deployment_order_canonical.json - FAIL: test ! -f /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/deployment_order_canonical.json - MISSING: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data cannot be evaluated FAIL: - FAIL: deployment_order_canonical.json absent - FAIL: deployment_order_canonical.json unreadable - FAIL: evidence path resolves to a non-deployment-order file IMPACT: If this prerequisite fails, Devon has no inspectable authority for deciding which runtime step must precede another, allowing deployment activity to become orderless execution.` ] }, { title: "Overview Scope Binding Must Hold The --- end evidence occurrence 2 --- --- evidence occurrence 3 | line=40676 | index=2190050 --- ime execution order is not being inferred from habit, terminal history, operator memory or whichever script happened to run first. WHY: Deployment Order Canonical is the authority that prevents Devon from deploying components out of sequence. Before any installation, configuration, validation, evidence, recovery or promotion claim can stand, the system must prove that deployment order has a canonical source capable of governing execution flow. EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/deployment_order_canonical.json - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/deployment_order_canonical.json - expected_binding: doc.id === "deployment_order" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope" - expected_scope: canonical deployment sequence for Overview & Scope VALIDATION: - PASS: test -f /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/deployment_order_canonical.json - FAIL: test ! -f /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/deployment_order_canonical.json - MISSING: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data cannot be evaluated FAIL: - FAIL: deployment_order_canonical.json absent - FAIL: deployment_order_canonical.json unreadable - FAIL: evidence path resolves to a non-deployment-order file IMPACT: If this prerequisite fails, Devon has no inspectable authority for deciding which runtime step must precede another, allowing deployment activity to become orderless execution.` ] }, { title: "Overview Scope Binding Must Hold The Deployment Canon In Its Declared Category Path", items: [ `WHAT: This prerequisite verifies that Deployment Order Canonical is bound throug --- end evidence occurrence 3 --- --- evidence occurrence 4 | line=40690 | index=2190760 --- cope" - expected_scope: canonical deployment sequence for Overview & Scope VALIDATION: - PASS: test -f /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/deployment_order_canonical.json - FAIL: test ! -f /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/deployment_order_canonical.json - MISSING: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data cannot be evaluated FAIL: - FAIL: deployment_order_canonical.json absent - FAIL: deployment_order_canonical.json unreadable - FAIL: evidence path resolves to a non-deployment-order file IMPACT: If this prerequisite fails, Devon has no inspectable authority for deciding which runtime step must precede another, allowing deployment activity to become orderless execution.` ] }, { title: "Overview Scope Binding Must Hold The Deployment Canon In Its Declared Category Path", items: [ `WHAT: This prerequisite verifies that Deployment Order Canonical is bound through Overview & Scope, the current category path where Devon exposes this phase-one deployment authority in the Documentation Hub. WHY: Deployment order only governs documentation and execution when its source is read from the active category branch that owns its rendered authority. If the order canon is detached from Overview & Scope, Devon can still store an order file, but the docs surface loses the branch position that makes the file operationally auditable. EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_binding: --- end evidence occurrence 4 --- --- evidence occurrence 5 | line=40705 | index=2191724 --- pe, the current category path where Devon exposes this phase-one deployment authority in the Documentation Hub. WHY: Deployment order only governs documentation and execution when its source is read from the active category branch that owns its rendered authority. If the order canon is detached from Overview & Scope, Devon can still store an order file, but the docs surface loses the branch position that makes the file operationally auditable. EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_binding: --- end evidence occurrence 5 --- TOKEN: recovery | OCCURRENCES: 1 --- recovery occurrence 1 | line=40674 | index=2189906 --- rerequisites for Deployment Order Canonical begin with the source that defines Devon's allowed deployment sequence. This bucket proves that runtime execution order is not being inferred from habit, terminal history, operator memory or whichever script happened to run first. WHY: Deployment Order Canonical is the authority that prevents Devon from deploying components out of sequence. Before any installation, configuration, validation, evidence, recovery or promotion claim can stand, the system must prove that deployment order has a canonical source capable of governing execution flow. EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/deployment_order_canonical.json - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/deployment_order_canonical.json - expected_binding: doc.id === "deployment_order" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope" - expected_scope: canonical deployment sequence for Overview & Scope VALIDATION: - PASS: test -f /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/deployment_order_canonical.json - FAIL: test ! -f /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/deployment_order_canonical.json - MISSING: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data cannot be evaluated FAIL: - FAIL: deployment_order_canonical.json absent - FAIL: deployment_order_canonical.json unreadable - FAIL: evidence path resolves to a non-deployment-order file IMPACT: If this prerequisite fails, Devon has no inspectable authority for deciding which runtime step must precede another, allowing deployment activity to become orderless execution.` ] }, { title: "Overview Scope Binding Must Hold The Deploymen --- end recovery occurrence 1 --- ----- LAST CARD-LIKE OBJECTS IN BRANCH ----- CARD_OBJECT_COUNT: 2 --- CARD_OBJECT #1 | line=40667 | index=2189325 --- en = true; more.style.display = "none"; }); const prerequisitesBuckets = [ { title: "Deployment Sequence Source Must Exist Before Runtime Order Can Be Trusted", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites for Deployment Order Canonical begin with the source that defines Devon's allowed deployment sequence. This bucket proves that runtime execution order is not being inferred from habit, terminal history, operator memory or whichever script happened to run first. WHY: Deployment Order Canonical is the authority that prevents Devon from deploying components out of sequence. Before any installation, configuration, validation, evidence, recovery or promotion claim can stand, the system must prove that deployment order has a canonical source capable of governing execution flow. EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/deployment_order_canonical.json - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/deployment_order_canonical.json --- end CARD_OBJECT #1 --- --- CARD_OBJECT #2 | line=40696 | index=2191044 --- recede another, allowing deployment activity to become orderless execution.` ] }, { title: "Overview Scope Binding Must Hold The Deployment Canon In Its Declared Category Path", items: [ `WHAT: This prerequisite verifies that Deployment Order Canonical is bound through Overview & Scope, the current category path where Devon exposes this phase-one deployment authority in the Documentation Hub. WHY: Deployment order only governs documentation and execution when its source is read from the active category branch that owns its rendered authority. If the order canon is detached from Overview & Scope, Devon can still store an order file, but the docs surface loses the branch position that makes the file operationally auditable. EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_binding: --- end CARD_OBJECT #2 --- ----- RECOMMENDED NEXT ACTION ----- Use this report to build one REPLACE patch for this DOC_ID only. Insert new card objects into existing bucket arrays where anchors are unambiguous. Do not replace existing card text. Do not create a new visual bucket. ======================================================================================================================== DOC_ID: sandbox_environment LABEL: Sandbox Environment Canonical STATUS: CUSTOM_BRANCH BRANCH_START_INDEX: 2251181 BRANCH_END_INDEX: 2261470 BRANCH_START_LINE: 41950 BRANCH_SIZE_CHARS: 10289 ----- ARRAY / BUCKET-LIKE DECLARATIONS ----- DECL: prerequisitesBuckets | line=42068 | index=2258770 DECL: installed | line=42016 | index=2254475 DECL: configured | line=42022 | index=2256695 DECL: installation | line=42076 | index=2259387 DECL: configuration | line=42076 | index=2259401 DECL: validation | line=42076 | index=2259416 DECL: evidence | line=42076 | index=2259428 ----- BUCKET LABEL / KEY OCCURRENCES ----- Prerequisites: PASS | occurrences=2 | first_line=42068 | first_index=2258776 Installation: PASS | occurrences=1 | first_line=42076 | first_index=2259387 Configuration: PASS | occurrences=1 | first_line=42076 | first_index=2259401 Validation: PASS | occurrences=2 | first_line=42076 | first_index=2259416 Observable Evidence: MISSING Failure Modes & Recovery: MISSING Completion & Promotion: MISSING ----- TARGETED INSERTION CONTEXTS ----- TOKEN: prerequisites | OCCURRENCES: 2 --- prerequisites occurrence 1 | line=42068 | index=2258776 --- ); btn.addEventListener("keydown", (event) => { if (event.key === "Enter" || event.key === " ") { event.preventDefault(); toggle(); } }); } btn.setAttribute("aria-expanded", "false"); btn.textContent = "mais..."; more.hidden = true; more.style.display = "none"; }); const prerequisitesBuckets = [ { title: "Sandbox Environment Source Must Exist Before Isolation Claims Are Accepted", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites for Sandbox Environment Canonical begin with the source that defines Devon's controlled execution environment. This bucket proves that sandbox behavior is not being inferred from local habit, server convenience, temporary folder state or whatever environment happened to be available during a patch. WHY: Sandbox Environment Canonical is the authority that separates safe execution space from production-facing risk. Before any installation, configuration, validation, evidence, recovery or promotion claim can stand, Devon must prove that sandbox rules have a canonical source capable of governing where tests, patches and operational checks are allowed to run. EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/sandbox_environment_canonical.json - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/sandbox_environment_canonical.json - expected_binding: doc.id === "sandbox_environment" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope" - expected_scope: canonical sandbox environment boundary for Overview & Scope VALIDATION: --- end prerequisites occurrence 1 --- --- prerequisites occurrence 2 | line=42073 | index=2258944 --- ; toggle(); } }); } btn.setAttribute("aria-expanded", "false"); btn.textContent = "mais..."; more.hidden = true; more.style.display = "none"; }); const prerequisitesBuckets = [ { title: "Sandbox Environment Source Must Exist Before Isolation Claims Are Accepted", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites for Sandbox Environment Canonical begin with the source that defines Devon's controlled execution environment. This bucket proves that sandbox behavior is not being inferred from local habit, server convenience, temporary folder state or whatever environment happened to be available during a patch. WHY: Sandbox Environment Canonical is the authority that separates safe execution space from production-facing risk. Before any installation, configuration, validation, evidence, recovery or promotion claim can stand, Devon must prove that sandbox rules have a canonical source capable of governing where tests, patches and operational checks are allowed to run. EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/sandbox_environment_canonical.json - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/sandbox_environment_canonical.json - expected_binding: doc.id === "sandbox_environment" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope" - expected_scope: canonical sandbox environment boundary for Overview & Scope VALIDATION: - PASS: test -f /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/sandbox_environment_canonical.json - FAIL: test ! -f /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/sandbox_environment --- end prerequisites occurrence 2 --- TOKEN: installation | OCCURRENCES: 1 --- installation occurrence 1 | line=42076 | index=2259387 --- `WHAT: Prerequisites for Sandbox Environment Canonical begin with the source that defines Devon's controlled execution environment. This bucket proves that sandbox behavior is not being inferred from local habit, server convenience, temporary folder state or whatever environment happened to be available during a patch. WHY: Sandbox Environment Canonical is the authority that separates safe execution space from production-facing risk. Before any installation, configuration, validation, evidence, recovery or promotion claim can stand, Devon must prove that sandbox rules have a canonical source capable of governing where tests, patches and operational checks are allowed to run. EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/sandbox_environment_canonical.json - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/sandbox_environment_canonical.json - expected_binding: doc.id === "sandbox_environment" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope" - expected_scope: canonical sandbox environment boundary for Overview & Scope VALIDATION: - PASS: test -f /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/sandbox_environment_canonical.json - FAIL: test ! -f /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/sandbox_environment_canonical.json - MISSING: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data cannot be evaluated FAIL: - FAIL: sandbox_environment_canonical.json absent - FAIL: sandbox_environment_canonical.json unreadable - FAIL: evidence path resolves to a non-sandbox file IMPACT: If this prerequisite fails, Devon has no inspectable authority for deciding whether an operation is running inside the intended controlled environment or leaking into unsafe executio --- end installation occurrence 1 --- TOKEN: configuration | OCCURRENCES: 1 --- configuration occurrence 1 | line=42076 | index=2259401 --- isites for Sandbox Environment Canonical begin with the source that defines Devon's controlled execution environment. This bucket proves that sandbox behavior is not being inferred from local habit, server convenience, temporary folder state or whatever environment happened to be available during a patch. WHY: Sandbox Environment Canonical is the authority that separates safe execution space from production-facing risk. Before any installation, configuration, validation, evidence, recovery or promotion claim can stand, Devon must prove that sandbox rules have a canonical source capable of governing where tests, patches and operational checks are allowed to run. EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/sandbox_environment_canonical.json - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/sandbox_environment_canonical.json - expected_binding: doc.id === "sandbox_environment" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope" - expected_scope: canonical sandbox environment boundary for Overview & Scope VALIDATION: - PASS: test -f /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/sandbox_environment_canonical.json - FAIL: test ! -f /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/sandbox_environment_canonical.json - MISSING: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data cannot be evaluated FAIL: - FAIL: sandbox_environment_canonical.json absent - FAIL: sandbox_environment_canonical.json unreadable - FAIL: evidence path resolves to a non-sandbox file IMPACT: If this prerequisite fails, Devon has no inspectable authority for deciding whether an operation is running inside the intended controlled environment or leaking into unsafe execution space.` --- end configuration occurrence 1 --- TOKEN: validation | OCCURRENCES: 2 --- validation occurrence 1 | line=42076 | index=2259416 --- box Environment Canonical begin with the source that defines Devon's controlled execution environment. This bucket proves that sandbox behavior is not being inferred from local habit, server convenience, temporary folder state or whatever environment happened to be available during a patch. WHY: Sandbox Environment Canonical is the authority that separates safe execution space from production-facing risk. Before any installation, configuration, validation, evidence, recovery or promotion claim can stand, Devon must prove that sandbox rules have a canonical source capable of governing where tests, patches and operational checks are allowed to run. EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/sandbox_environment_canonical.json - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/sandbox_environment_canonical.json - expected_binding: doc.id === "sandbox_environment" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope" - expected_scope: canonical sandbox environment boundary for Overview & Scope VALIDATION: - PASS: test -f /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/sandbox_environment_canonical.json - FAIL: test ! -f /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/sandbox_environment_canonical.json - MISSING: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data cannot be evaluated FAIL: - FAIL: sandbox_environment_canonical.json absent - FAIL: sandbox_environment_canonical.json unreadable - FAIL: evidence path resolves to a non-sandbox file IMPACT: If this prerequisite fails, Devon has no inspectable authority for deciding whether an operation is running inside the intended controlled environment or leaking into unsafe execution space.` ] --- end validation occurrence 1 --- --- validation occurrence 2 | line=42084 | index=2259977 --- al source capable of governing where tests, patches and operational checks are allowed to run. EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/sandbox_environment_canonical.json - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/sandbox_environment_canonical.json - expected_binding: doc.id === "sandbox_environment" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope" - expected_scope: canonical sandbox environment boundary for Overview & Scope VALIDATION: - PASS: test -f /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/sandbox_environment_canonical.json - FAIL: test ! -f /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/sandbox_environment_canonical.json - MISSING: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data cannot be evaluated FAIL: - FAIL: sandbox_environment_canonical.json absent - FAIL: sandbox_environment_canonical.json unreadable - FAIL: evidence path resolves to a non-sandbox file IMPACT: If this prerequisite fails, Devon has no inspectable authority for deciding whether an operation is running inside the intended controlled environment or leaking into unsafe execution space.` ] }, { title: "Overview Scope Binding Must Hold The Sandbox Canon In Its Declared Category Path", items: [ `WHAT: This prerequisite verifies that Sandbox Environment Canonical is bound through Overview & Scope, the category path where Devon exposes this environment-control authority in the Documentation Hub. WHY: The sandbox canon only governs execution safely when it is reachable from the active documentation branch that owns its rendered authority. If the environment canon is detached from Overview & Sco --- end validation occurrence 2 --- TOKEN: evidence | OCCURRENCES: 5 --- evidence occurrence 1 | line=42022 | index=2256779 --- e="margin:0;">${escapeHtml("This means the buckets below cannot behave like reusable bucket prose. They must decompose the mechanics that make Devon contamination-safe as a whole: what must already exist before the sandbox can be treated as canonical, how that isolated environment is installed into Documentation Hub, how containment rules and trust boundaries are configured, how the isolation model is validated against leakage or ambiguity, what evidence proves that sandbox work is staying inside the declared boundary and not escaping into trusted state, what failure patterns corrupt that separation and when sandbox maturity is complete enough to support downstream categories without trust confusion.")}

    `; queueMicrotask(() => { const btn = document.getElementById("sandbox-environment-overview-toggle"); const more = document.getElementById("sandbox-environment-overview-more"); if (!btn || !more) return; const toggle = () => { const expanded = btn.getAttribute("aria-expanded") === "true"; btn.setAttribute("aria-expanded", expanded ? " --- end evidence occurrence 1 --- --- evidence occurrence 2 | line=42076 | index=2259428 --- ent Canonical begin with the source that defines Devon's controlled execution environment. This bucket proves that sandbox behavior is not being inferred from local habit, server convenience, temporary folder state or whatever environment happened to be available during a patch. WHY: Sandbox Environment Canonical is the authority that separates safe execution space from production-facing risk. Before any installation, configuration, validation, evidence, recovery or promotion claim can stand, Devon must prove that sandbox rules have a canonical source capable of governing where tests, patches and operational checks are allowed to run. EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/sandbox_environment_canonical.json - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/sandbox_environment_canonical.json - expected_binding: doc.id === "sandbox_environment" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope" - expected_scope: canonical sandbox environment boundary for Overview & Scope VALIDATION: - PASS: test -f /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/sandbox_environment_canonical.json - FAIL: test ! -f /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/sandbox_environment_canonical.json - MISSING: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data cannot be evaluated FAIL: - FAIL: sandbox_environment_canonical.json absent - FAIL: sandbox_environment_canonical.json unreadable - FAIL: evidence path resolves to a non-sandbox file IMPACT: If this prerequisite fails, Devon has no inspectable authority for deciding whether an operation is running inside the intended controlled environment or leaking into unsafe execution space.` ] --- end evidence occurrence 2 --- --- evidence occurrence 3 | line=42078 | index=2259623 --- porary folder state or whatever environment happened to be available during a patch. WHY: Sandbox Environment Canonical is the authority that separates safe execution space from production-facing risk. Before any installation, configuration, validation, evidence, recovery or promotion claim can stand, Devon must prove that sandbox rules have a canonical source capable of governing where tests, patches and operational checks are allowed to run. EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/sandbox_environment_canonical.json - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/sandbox_environment_canonical.json - expected_binding: doc.id === "sandbox_environment" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope" - expected_scope: canonical sandbox environment boundary for Overview & Scope VALIDATION: - PASS: test -f /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/sandbox_environment_canonical.json - FAIL: test ! -f /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/sandbox_environment_canonical.json - MISSING: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data cannot be evaluated FAIL: - FAIL: sandbox_environment_canonical.json absent - FAIL: sandbox_environment_canonical.json unreadable - FAIL: evidence path resolves to a non-sandbox file IMPACT: If this prerequisite fails, Devon has no inspectable authority for deciding whether an operation is running inside the intended controlled environment or leaking into unsafe execution space.` ] }, { title: "Overview Scope Binding Must Hold The Sandbox Canon In Its Declared Category Path", items: [ `WHAT: This prerequisite verifies that Sandbox En --- end evidence occurrence 3 --- --- evidence occurrence 4 | line=42092 | index=2260363 --- e: canonical sandbox environment boundary for Overview & Scope VALIDATION: - PASS: test -f /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/sandbox_environment_canonical.json - FAIL: test ! -f /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/sandbox_environment_canonical.json - MISSING: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data cannot be evaluated FAIL: - FAIL: sandbox_environment_canonical.json absent - FAIL: sandbox_environment_canonical.json unreadable - FAIL: evidence path resolves to a non-sandbox file IMPACT: If this prerequisite fails, Devon has no inspectable authority for deciding whether an operation is running inside the intended controlled environment or leaking into unsafe execution space.` ] }, { title: "Overview Scope Binding Must Hold The Sandbox Canon In Its Declared Category Path", items: [ `WHAT: This prerequisite verifies that Sandbox Environment Canonical is bound through Overview & Scope, the category path where Devon exposes this environment-control authority in the Documentation Hub. WHY: The sandbox canon only governs execution safely when it is reachable from the active documentation branch that owns its rendered authority. If the environment canon is detached from Overview & Scope, Devon can still store the file, but the docs surface loses the branch position that lets operators audit sandbox boundaries before acting. EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_binding: --- end evidence occurrence 4 --- --- evidence occurrence 5 | line=42107 | index=2261331 --- ope, the category path where Devon exposes this environment-control authority in the Documentation Hub. WHY: The sandbox canon only governs execution safely when it is reachable from the active documentation branch that owns its rendered authority. If the environment canon is detached from Overview & Scope, Devon can still store the file, but the docs surface loses the branch position that lets operators audit sandbox boundaries before acting. EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_binding: --- end evidence occurrence 5 --- TOKEN: recovery | OCCURRENCES: 1 --- recovery occurrence 1 | line=42076 | index=2259438 --- cal begin with the source that defines Devon's controlled execution environment. This bucket proves that sandbox behavior is not being inferred from local habit, server convenience, temporary folder state or whatever environment happened to be available during a patch. WHY: Sandbox Environment Canonical is the authority that separates safe execution space from production-facing risk. Before any installation, configuration, validation, evidence, recovery or promotion claim can stand, Devon must prove that sandbox rules have a canonical source capable of governing where tests, patches and operational checks are allowed to run. EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/sandbox_environment_canonical.json - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/sandbox_environment_canonical.json - expected_binding: doc.id === "sandbox_environment" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope" - expected_scope: canonical sandbox environment boundary for Overview & Scope VALIDATION: - PASS: test -f /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/sandbox_environment_canonical.json - FAIL: test ! -f /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/sandbox_environment_canonical.json - MISSING: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data cannot be evaluated FAIL: - FAIL: sandbox_environment_canonical.json absent - FAIL: sandbox_environment_canonical.json unreadable - FAIL: evidence path resolves to a non-sandbox file IMPACT: If this prerequisite fails, Devon has no inspectable authority for deciding whether an operation is running inside the intended controlled environment or leaking into unsafe execution space.` ] }, --- end recovery occurrence 1 --- ----- LAST CARD-LIKE OBJECTS IN BRANCH ----- CARD_OBJECT_COUNT: 2 --- CARD_OBJECT #1 | line=42069 | index=2258813 --- en = true; more.style.display = "none"; }); const prerequisitesBuckets = [ { title: "Sandbox Environment Source Must Exist Before Isolation Claims Are Accepted", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites for Sandbox Environment Canonical begin with the source that defines Devon's controlled execution environment. This bucket proves that sandbox behavior is not being inferred from local habit, server convenience, temporary folder state or whatever environment happened to be available during a patch. WHY: Sandbox Environment Canonical is the authority that separates safe execution space from production-facing risk. Before any installation, configuration, validation, evidence, recovery or promotion claim can stand, Devon must prove that sandbox rules have a canonical source capable of governing where tests, patches and operational checks are allowed to run. EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/sandbox_environment_canonic --- end CARD_OBJECT #1 --- --- CARD_OBJECT #2 | line=42098 | index=2260652 --- the intended controlled environment or leaking into unsafe execution space.` ] }, { title: "Overview Scope Binding Must Hold The Sandbox Canon In Its Declared Category Path", items: [ `WHAT: This prerequisite verifies that Sandbox Environment Canonical is bound through Overview & Scope, the category path where Devon exposes this environment-control authority in the Documentation Hub. WHY: The sandbox canon only governs execution safely when it is reachable from the active documentation branch that owns its rendered authority. If the environment canon is detached from Overview & Scope, Devon can still store the file, but the docs surface loses the branch position that lets operators audit sandbox boundaries before acting. EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_binding: --- end CARD_OBJECT #2 --- ----- RECOMMENDED NEXT ACTION ----- Use this report to build one REPLACE patch for this DOC_ID only. Insert new card objects into existing bucket arrays where anchors are unambiguous. Do not replace existing card text. Do not create a new visual bucket. ======================================================================================================================== DOC_ID: server_registry LABEL: Server Registry Canonical STATUS: CUSTOM_BRANCH BRANCH_START_INDEX: 2382584 BRANCH_END_INDEX: 2392769 BRANCH_START_LINE: 44660 BRANCH_SIZE_CHARS: 10185 ----- ARRAY / BUCKET-LIKE DECLARATIONS ----- DECL: prerequisitesBuckets | line=44778 | index=2390126 DECL: configured | line=44732 | index=2388061 DECL: installation | line=44786 | index=2390732 DECL: configuration | line=44786 | index=2390746 DECL: validation | line=44786 | index=2390761 DECL: evidence | line=44786 | index=2390773 ----- BUCKET LABEL / KEY OCCURRENCES ----- Prerequisites: PASS | occurrences=2 | first_line=44778 | first_index=2390132 Installation: PASS | occurrences=1 | first_line=44786 | first_index=2390732 Configuration: PASS | occurrences=1 | first_line=44786 | first_index=2390746 Validation: PASS | occurrences=2 | first_line=44786 | first_index=2390761 Observable Evidence: MISSING Failure Modes & Recovery: MISSING Completion & Promotion: MISSING ----- TARGETED INSERTION CONTEXTS ----- TOKEN: prerequisites | OCCURRENCES: 2 --- prerequisites occurrence 1 | line=44778 | index=2390132 --- ); btn.addEventListener("keydown", (event) => { if (event.key === "Enter" || event.key === " ") { event.preventDefault(); toggle(); } }); } btn.setAttribute("aria-expanded", "false"); btn.textContent = "mais..."; more.hidden = true; more.style.display = "none"; }); const prerequisitesBuckets = [ { title: "Server Registry Source Must Exist Before Infrastructure Identity Is Trusted", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites for Server Registry Canonical begin with the source that defines Devon's known server identity surface. This bucket proves that server references are not being inferred from SSH habit, remembered hostnames, terminal prompts, panel labels or whichever machine was touched last. WHY: Server Registry Canonical is the authority that prevents Devon from treating infrastructure targets as informal knowledge. Before any installation, configuration, validation, evidence, recovery or promotion claim can stand, the project must prove that server identity has a canonical source capable of governing where runtime and operational actions are allowed to point. EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/server_registry_canonical.json - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/server_registry_canonical.json - expected_binding: doc.id === "server_registry" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope" - expected_scope: canonical server identity registry for Overview & Scope VALIDATION: - PASS: test -f /home/ye --- end prerequisites occurrence 1 --- --- prerequisites occurrence 2 | line=44783 | index=2390301 --- toggle(); } }); } btn.setAttribute("aria-expanded", "false"); btn.textContent = "mais..."; more.hidden = true; more.style.display = "none"; }); const prerequisitesBuckets = [ { title: "Server Registry Source Must Exist Before Infrastructure Identity Is Trusted", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites for Server Registry Canonical begin with the source that defines Devon's known server identity surface. This bucket proves that server references are not being inferred from SSH habit, remembered hostnames, terminal prompts, panel labels or whichever machine was touched last. WHY: Server Registry Canonical is the authority that prevents Devon from treating infrastructure targets as informal knowledge. Before any installation, configuration, validation, evidence, recovery or promotion claim can stand, the project must prove that server identity has a canonical source capable of governing where runtime and operational actions are allowed to point. EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/server_registry_canonical.json - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/server_registry_canonical.json - expected_binding: doc.id === "server_registry" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope" - expected_scope: canonical server identity registry for Overview & Scope VALIDATION: - PASS: test -f /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/server_registry_canonical.json - FAIL: test ! -f /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/server_registry_canonical.json - MISSING: /home/ --- end prerequisites occurrence 2 --- TOKEN: installation | OCCURRENCES: 1 --- installation occurrence 1 | line=44786 | index=2390732 --- items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites for Server Registry Canonical begin with the source that defines Devon's known server identity surface. This bucket proves that server references are not being inferred from SSH habit, remembered hostnames, terminal prompts, panel labels or whichever machine was touched last. WHY: Server Registry Canonical is the authority that prevents Devon from treating infrastructure targets as informal knowledge. Before any installation, configuration, validation, evidence, recovery or promotion claim can stand, the project must prove that server identity has a canonical source capable of governing where runtime and operational actions are allowed to point. EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/server_registry_canonical.json - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/server_registry_canonical.json - expected_binding: doc.id === "server_registry" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope" - expected_scope: canonical server identity registry for Overview & Scope VALIDATION: - PASS: test -f /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/server_registry_canonical.json - FAIL: test ! -f /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/server_registry_canonical.json - MISSING: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data cannot be evaluated FAIL: - FAIL: server_registry_canonical.json absent - FAIL: server_registry_canonical.json unreadable - FAIL: evidence path resolves to a non-registry file IMPACT: If this prerequisite fails, Devon has no inspectable authority for deciding whether a server, path or operational target belongs to the registered infrastructure surface.` ] }, --- end installation occurrence 1 --- TOKEN: configuration | OCCURRENCES: 1 --- configuration occurrence 1 | line=44786 | index=2390746 --- HAT: Prerequisites for Server Registry Canonical begin with the source that defines Devon's known server identity surface. This bucket proves that server references are not being inferred from SSH habit, remembered hostnames, terminal prompts, panel labels or whichever machine was touched last. WHY: Server Registry Canonical is the authority that prevents Devon from treating infrastructure targets as informal knowledge. Before any installation, configuration, validation, evidence, recovery or promotion claim can stand, the project must prove that server identity has a canonical source capable of governing where runtime and operational actions are allowed to point. EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/server_registry_canonical.json - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/server_registry_canonical.json - expected_binding: doc.id === "server_registry" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope" - expected_scope: canonical server identity registry for Overview & Scope VALIDATION: - PASS: test -f /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/server_registry_canonical.json - FAIL: test ! -f /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/server_registry_canonical.json - MISSING: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data cannot be evaluated FAIL: - FAIL: server_registry_canonical.json absent - FAIL: server_registry_canonical.json unreadable - FAIL: evidence path resolves to a non-registry file IMPACT: If this prerequisite fails, Devon has no inspectable authority for deciding whether a server, path or operational target belongs to the registered infrastructure surface.` ] }, { --- end configuration occurrence 1 --- TOKEN: validation | OCCURRENCES: 2 --- validation occurrence 1 | line=44786 | index=2390761 --- tes for Server Registry Canonical begin with the source that defines Devon's known server identity surface. This bucket proves that server references are not being inferred from SSH habit, remembered hostnames, terminal prompts, panel labels or whichever machine was touched last. WHY: Server Registry Canonical is the authority that prevents Devon from treating infrastructure targets as informal knowledge. Before any installation, configuration, validation, evidence, recovery or promotion claim can stand, the project must prove that server identity has a canonical source capable of governing where runtime and operational actions are allowed to point. EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/server_registry_canonical.json - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/server_registry_canonical.json - expected_binding: doc.id === "server_registry" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope" - expected_scope: canonical server identity registry for Overview & Scope VALIDATION: - PASS: test -f /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/server_registry_canonical.json - FAIL: test ! -f /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/server_registry_canonical.json - MISSING: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data cannot be evaluated FAIL: - FAIL: server_registry_canonical.json absent - FAIL: server_registry_canonical.json unreadable - FAIL: evidence path resolves to a non-registry file IMPACT: If this prerequisite fails, Devon has no inspectable authority for deciding whether a server, path or operational target belongs to the registered infrastructure surface.` ] }, { title: --- end validation occurrence 1 --- --- validation occurrence 2 | line=44794 | index=2391309 --- entity has a canonical source capable of governing where runtime and operational actions are allowed to point. EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/server_registry_canonical.json - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/server_registry_canonical.json - expected_binding: doc.id === "server_registry" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope" - expected_scope: canonical server identity registry for Overview & Scope VALIDATION: - PASS: test -f /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/server_registry_canonical.json - FAIL: test ! -f /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/server_registry_canonical.json - MISSING: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data cannot be evaluated FAIL: - FAIL: server_registry_canonical.json absent - FAIL: server_registry_canonical.json unreadable - FAIL: evidence path resolves to a non-registry file IMPACT: If this prerequisite fails, Devon has no inspectable authority for deciding whether a server, path or operational target belongs to the registered infrastructure surface.` ] }, { title: "Overview Scope Binding Must Hold The Registry Canon In Its Declared Category Path", items: [ `WHAT: This prerequisite verifies that Server Registry Canonical is bound through Overview & Scope, the category path where Devon exposes this infrastructure-identity authority in the Documentation Hub. WHY: The server registry only governs infrastructure safely when it is reachable from the active documentation branch that owns its rendered authority. If the registry canon is detached from Overview & Scope, Devon can still store the --- end validation occurrence 2 --- TOKEN: evidence | OCCURRENCES: 5 --- evidence occurrence 1 | line=44732 | index=2388143 --- "margin:0;">${escapeHtml("This means the buckets below cannot behave like reusable bucket prose. They must decompose the mechanics that make Devon inventory-safe as a whole: what must already exist before the server registry can be treated as canonical, how that registry surface is installed into Documentation Hub, how server identity fields and role boundaries are configured, how machine registration is validated against omission or drift, what evidence proves that the infrastructure being referenced is actually the infrastructure canon declares, what failure patterns corrupt machine identity truth and when registry maturity is complete enough to support every downstream category without host ambiguity.")}

    `; queueMicrotask(() => { const btn = document.getElementById("server-registry-overview-toggle"); const more = document.getElementById("server-registry-overview-more"); if (!btn || !more) return; const toggle = () => { const expanded = btn.getAttribute("aria-expanded") === "true"; btn.setAttribute("aria-expanded", expanded ? "false" : --- end evidence occurrence 1 --- --- evidence occurrence 2 | line=44786 | index=2390773 --- er Registry Canonical begin with the source that defines Devon's known server identity surface. This bucket proves that server references are not being inferred from SSH habit, remembered hostnames, terminal prompts, panel labels or whichever machine was touched last. WHY: Server Registry Canonical is the authority that prevents Devon from treating infrastructure targets as informal knowledge. Before any installation, configuration, validation, evidence, recovery or promotion claim can stand, the project must prove that server identity has a canonical source capable of governing where runtime and operational actions are allowed to point. EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/server_registry_canonical.json - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/server_registry_canonical.json - expected_binding: doc.id === "server_registry" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope" - expected_scope: canonical server identity registry for Overview & Scope VALIDATION: - PASS: test -f /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/server_registry_canonical.json - FAIL: test ! -f /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/server_registry_canonical.json - MISSING: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data cannot be evaluated FAIL: - FAIL: server_registry_canonical.json absent - FAIL: server_registry_canonical.json unreadable - FAIL: evidence path resolves to a non-registry file IMPACT: If this prerequisite fails, Devon has no inspectable authority for deciding whether a server, path or operational target belongs to the registered infrastructure surface.` ] }, { title: "Overview --- end evidence occurrence 2 --- --- evidence occurrence 3 | line=44788 | index=2390971 --- terminal prompts, panel labels or whichever machine was touched last. WHY: Server Registry Canonical is the authority that prevents Devon from treating infrastructure targets as informal knowledge. Before any installation, configuration, validation, evidence, recovery or promotion claim can stand, the project must prove that server identity has a canonical source capable of governing where runtime and operational actions are allowed to point. EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/server_registry_canonical.json - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/server_registry_canonical.json - expected_binding: doc.id === "server_registry" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope" - expected_scope: canonical server identity registry for Overview & Scope VALIDATION: - PASS: test -f /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/server_registry_canonical.json - FAIL: test ! -f /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/server_registry_canonical.json - MISSING: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data cannot be evaluated FAIL: - FAIL: server_registry_canonical.json absent - FAIL: server_registry_canonical.json unreadable - FAIL: evidence path resolves to a non-registry file IMPACT: If this prerequisite fails, Devon has no inspectable authority for deciding whether a server, path or operational target belongs to the registered infrastructure surface.` ] }, { title: "Overview Scope Binding Must Hold The Registry Canon In Its Declared Category Path", items: [ `WHAT: This prerequisite verifies that Server Registry Canonical is bound through Overview & Scope, --- end evidence occurrence 3 --- --- evidence occurrence 4 | line=44802 | index=2391679 --- ope" - expected_scope: canonical server identity registry for Overview & Scope VALIDATION: - PASS: test -f /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/server_registry_canonical.json - FAIL: test ! -f /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/server_registry_canonical.json - MISSING: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data cannot be evaluated FAIL: - FAIL: server_registry_canonical.json absent - FAIL: server_registry_canonical.json unreadable - FAIL: evidence path resolves to a non-registry file IMPACT: If this prerequisite fails, Devon has no inspectable authority for deciding whether a server, path or operational target belongs to the registered infrastructure surface.` ] }, { title: "Overview Scope Binding Must Hold The Registry Canon In Its Declared Category Path", items: [ `WHAT: This prerequisite verifies that Server Registry Canonical is bound through Overview & Scope, the category path where Devon exposes this infrastructure-identity authority in the Documentation Hub. WHY: The server registry only governs infrastructure safely when it is reachable from the active documentation branch that owns its rendered authority. If the registry canon is detached from Overview & Scope, Devon can still store the file, but the docs surface loses the branch position that lets operators audit server identity before acting. EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_binding: --- end evidence occurrence 4 --- --- evidence occurrence 5 | line=44817 | index=2392630 --- the category path where Devon exposes this infrastructure-identity authority in the Documentation Hub. WHY: The server registry only governs infrastructure safely when it is reachable from the active documentation branch that owns its rendered authority. If the registry canon is detached from Overview & Scope, Devon can still store the file, but the docs surface loses the branch position that lets operators audit server identity before acting. EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_binding: --- end evidence occurrence 5 --- TOKEN: recovery | OCCURRENCES: 1 --- recovery occurrence 1 | line=44786 | index=2390783 --- y Canonical begin with the source that defines Devon's known server identity surface. This bucket proves that server references are not being inferred from SSH habit, remembered hostnames, terminal prompts, panel labels or whichever machine was touched last. WHY: Server Registry Canonical is the authority that prevents Devon from treating infrastructure targets as informal knowledge. Before any installation, configuration, validation, evidence, recovery or promotion claim can stand, the project must prove that server identity has a canonical source capable of governing where runtime and operational actions are allowed to point. EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/server_registry_canonical.json - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/server_registry_canonical.json - expected_binding: doc.id === "server_registry" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope" - expected_scope: canonical server identity registry for Overview & Scope VALIDATION: - PASS: test -f /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/server_registry_canonical.json - FAIL: test ! -f /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/server_registry_canonical.json - MISSING: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data cannot be evaluated FAIL: - FAIL: server_registry_canonical.json absent - FAIL: server_registry_canonical.json unreadable - FAIL: evidence path resolves to a non-registry file IMPACT: If this prerequisite fails, Devon has no inspectable authority for deciding whether a server, path or operational target belongs to the registered infrastructure surface.` ] }, { title: "Overview Scope Bin --- end recovery occurrence 1 --- TOKEN: completion | OCCURRENCES: 1 --- completion occurrence 1 | line=44731 | index=2387415 ---

    ${escapeHtml("Operationally, Server Registry Canonical is the anti-phantom-infrastructure layer of Devon. Other categories may define structure, scope, sequencing, sandbox trust, lawful advancement and modeled progress, but those authorities still need one canonical answer to which servers are real members of the system and which ones are not. This category does not decide project scope, rollout order, sandbox law or completion truth. It decides which machines are officially inside the program, how they are named and bounded and how the rest of the project avoids drifting into host-level folklore, undocumented inventory or inferred infrastructure identity.")}

    ${escapeHtml("This means the buckets below cannot behave like reusable bucket prose. They must decompose the mechanics that make Devon inventory-safe as a whole: what must already exist before the server registry can be treated as canonical, how that registry surface is installed into Documentation Hub, how server identity fields and role boundaries are configured, how machine registration is validated against omission or drift, what evidence proves that the infrastructure being referenced is actually the infrastructure canon declares, what failure patterns corrupt machine identity truth and when registry maturity is complete enough to support every downstream category without host ambiguity.")}

    { if (event.key === "Enter" || event.key === " ") { event.preventDefault(); toggle(); } }); more.hidden = true; more.style.display = "none"; }); const prerequisitesBuckets = [ { title: "Canonical existence of progress authority", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites must establish that Project Progress Canonical already exists as the declared authority that owns advancement legitimacy inside Devon before any work is interpreted as official progress WHY: this bucket is the entry gate of the category because the project cannot judge progress by execution noise, implementation volume or operator belief; it first needs a sovereign authority that says who is allowed to decide whether something truly moved the program forward EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_progress_canonical.json VALIDATION: - exists(file_path) == true FAIL: - exists(file_path) == false -> MISSING IMPACT: - the category loses material authority before it even starts - progress becomes vulnerable to informal interpretation - the project can keep working but cannot conclude advancement canonically` ] }, { title: "Root-architecture admission of progress governance", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites must prove that progress governance is admitted --- end prerequisites occurrence 1 --- --- prerequisites occurrence 2 | line=46304 | index=2464367 --- btn.addEventListener("keydown", (event) => { if (event.key === "Enter" || event.key === " ") { event.preventDefault(); toggle(); } }); more.hidden = true; more.style.display = "none"; }); const prerequisitesBuckets = [ { title: "Canonical existence of progress authority", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites must establish that Project Progress Canonical already exists as the declared authority that owns advancement legitimacy inside Devon before any work is interpreted as official progress WHY: this bucket is the entry gate of the category because the project cannot judge progress by execution noise, implementation volume or operator belief; it first needs a sovereign authority that says who is allowed to decide whether something truly moved the program forward EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_progress_canonical.json VALIDATION: - exists(file_path) == true FAIL: - exists(file_path) == false -> MISSING IMPACT: - the category loses material authority before it even starts - progress becomes vulnerable to informal interpretation - the project can keep working but cannot conclude advancement canonically` ] }, { title: "Root-architecture admission of progress governance", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites must prove that progress governance is admitted into the sovereign architecture baseline of the project rather than existing as an orphan file with no formal standing WHY: the role o --- end prerequisites occurrence 2 --- --- prerequisites occurrence 3 | line=46328 | index=2465383 --- al.json VALIDATION: - exists(file_path) == true FAIL: - exists(file_path) == false -> MISSING IMPACT: - the category loses material authority before it even starts - progress becomes vulnerable to informal interpretation - the project can keep working but cannot conclude advancement canonically` ] }, { title: "Root-architecture admission of progress governance", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites must prove that progress governance is admitted into the sovereign architecture baseline of the project rather than existing as an orphan file with no formal standing WHY: the role of this bucket is not merely to confirm file presence; it has to guarantee that progress authority is recognized by the root model that organizes Devon, otherwise completion truth would exist outside the same structural law that governs the rest of the program EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/master_architecture_index.md - search_term: Project Progress Canonical VALIDATION: - master_registration_present == true FAIL: - master_registration_present == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - advancement law becomes detached from project architecture - later operational surfaces can reference progress without sovereign admission - the project loses continuity between structure and conclusion` ] }, { title: "Phase-01 placement before downstream interpretation", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites must place Project Progress Canonical inside Phase 01 Overview & Scope so the meaning of progress is established before runtime, reporting, m --- end prerequisites occurrence 3 --- --- prerequisites occurrence 4 | line=46353 | index=2466441 --- _registration_present == true FAIL: - master_registration_present == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - advancement law becomes detached from project architecture - later operational surfaces can reference progress without sovereign admission - the project loses continuity between structure and conclusion` ] }, { title: "Phase-01 placement before downstream interpretation", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites must place Project Progress Canonical inside Phase 01 Overview & Scope so the meaning of progress is established before runtime, reporting, monitoring or panel interpretation starts consuming advancement signals WHY: the bucket exists to force sequencing discipline: Devon must define what counts as progress before it starts reasoning about the state of the project, otherwise downstream layers inherit ungoverned maturity assumptions EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/hub_index.json - expected_phase_id: phase-01 - expected_category_id: overview_scope - expected_doc_id: project_progress_canonical VALIDATION: - phase_binding_present == true - category_binding_present == true - doc_id_present == true FAIL: - phase_binding_present == false -> FAIL - category_binding_present == false -> FAIL - doc_id_present == false -> MISSING IMPACT: - progress semantics enter the project too late - downstream categories can start emitting maturity interpretations without prior completion law - the project loses ordering discipline between definition and operational consumption` ] }, { title: "Documentation Hub reachability --- end prerequisites occurrence 4 --- --- prerequisites occurrence 5 | line=46384 | index=2467703 --- present == false -> FAIL - doc_id_present == false -> MISSING IMPACT: - progress semantics enter the project too late - downstream categories can start emitting maturity interpretations without prior completion law - the project loses ordering discipline between definition and operational consumption` ] }, { title: "Documentation Hub reachability of progress law", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites must guarantee that the category is reachable from Documentation Hub as an operator-consultable source of truth for advancement legitimacy WHY: the bucket has to ensure that progress authority is not trapped in storage; if the category cannot be reached where operators inspect project state, then completion truth remains declared but not governable in practice EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/hub_index.json - expected_doc_id: project_progress_canonical - expected_category_id: overview_scope VALIDATION: - nav_doc_entry_present == true - nav_category_binding_present == true FAIL: - nav_doc_entry_present == false -> MISSING - nav_category_binding_present == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - operators lose access to the category that should decide whether progress is real - DH stops serving as the execution-facing interface of completion law - the project drifts back toward memory-based progress judgment` ] }, { title: "Dedicated rendering readiness for progress semantics", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites must ensure that Project Progress Canonical is prepared to render through its own custom DH branch --- end prerequisites occurrence 5 --- --- prerequisites occurrence 6 | line=46412 | index=2468804 --- == false -> MISSING - nav_category_binding_present == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - operators lose access to the category that should decide whether progress is real - DH stops serving as the execution-facing interface of completion law - the project drifts back toward memory-based progress judgment` ] }, { title: "Dedicated rendering readiness for progress semantics", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites must ensure that Project Progress Canonical is prepared to render through its own custom DH branch so progress authority can be expressed as category-specific execution logic instead of generic document output WHY: this bucket exists because progress is not a passive note; the project needs the category to speak in its own operational language, otherwise the semantics of advancement legitimacy get flattened before the category even begins to execute EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_branch_signature: doc.id === "project_progress_canonical" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope" VALIDATION: - custom_branch_exists == true FAIL: - custom_branch_exists == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category can exist but still fail to present its own governance logic - DH reduces progress authority to generic content exposure - the project loses semantic precision exactly where conclusion rules should become explicit` ] }, { title: "Runtime dispatch admission of the category", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites must verify that the DH render dispatcher actually routes Project Progress Canonical --- end prerequisites occurrence 6 --- --- prerequisites occurrence 7 | line=46437 | index=2469918 --- branch_exists == true FAIL: - custom_branch_exists == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category can exist but still fail to present its own governance logic - DH reduces progress authority to generic content exposure - the project loses semantic precision exactly where conclusion rules should become explicit` ] }, { title: "Runtime dispatch admission of the category", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites must verify that the DH render dispatcher actually routes Project Progress Canonical into its dedicated branch instead of bypassing it during runtime WHY: the bucket exists to close the gap between declared category presence and actual execution; if dispatch does not admit the category, the project has nominal progress governance but no live delivery of it EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_dispatch_gate: - doc.id === "project_progress_canonical" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope" VALIDATION: - direct_render_dispatch_includes_project_progress_canonical == true FAIL: - direct_render_dispatch_includes_project_progress_canonical == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - progress authority remains declared but non-operational - DH can silently route around the category that should govern advancement legitimacy - the project loses trust in the bridge between canon and runtime behavior` ] }, { title: "Declared boundary between progress and mere activity", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites must show that the category already declares a boundary between work that happened and work that deserv --- end prerequisites occurrence 7 --- --- prerequisites occurrence 8 | line=46463 | index=2471014 --- render_dispatch_includes_project_progress_canonical == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - progress authority remains declared but non-operational - DH can silently route around the category that should govern advancement legitimacy - the project loses trust in the bridge between canon and runtime behavior` ] }, { title: "Declared boundary between progress and mere activity", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites must show that the category already declares a boundary between work that happened and work that deserves canonical recognition as advancement, including the difference between partial movement, valid progress and concluded completion WHY: this bucket exists because the category cannot govern anything if it does not first announce what domain it is supposed to separate; the project needs a declared frontier between motion and advancement before later stages can configure, validate or prove anything EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_progress_canonical.json - expected_progress_controls: - advancement legitimacy - partial versus valid distinction - completion recognition boundary - non-progress exclusions VALIDATION: - transitional_validation_only == true - advancement_legitimacy_boundary_present == true - partial_vs_valid_distinction_present == true - completion_recognition_boundary_present == true - non_progress_exclusions_present == true FAIL: - advancement_legitimacy_boundary_present == false -> FAIL - partial_vs_valid_distinction_present == false -> FAIL - completion_recognition_boundary_present == false -> FAIL - non_progress_exc --- end prerequisites occurrence 8 --- TOKEN: installation | OCCURRENCES: 63 --- installation occurrence 1 | line=46542 | index=2474792 --- ] }, { title: "Process-stage skeleton availability", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites must confirm that the category already exposes the full stage skeleton required to evolve from declared progress authority into a complete execution contract WHY: this bucket exists because Project Progress Canonical is not finished by merely existing; the project needs the category to be structurally ready for installation, configuration, validation, evidence, failure handling and promotion or else progress governance cannot mature into usable project control EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_bucket_names: - Prerequisites - Installation - Configuration - Validation - Observable Evidence - Failure Modes & Recovery - Completion & Promotion VALIDATION: - bucket_name_prerequisites == true - bucket_name_installation == true - bucket_name_configuration == true - bucket_name_validation == true - bucket_name_observable_evidence == true - bucket_name_failure_modes_recovery == true - bucket_name_completion_promotion == true FAIL: - any expected bucket missing -> MISSING IMPACT: - the category cannot mature through an ordered execution path - DH loses the operational skeleton needed to turn progress semantics into project governance - the project remains stuck with declared authority but no staged conclusion model` ] }, { title: "Prerequisites exit condition for progress governance", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites are complete only when progress authority materially exists, is architectural --- end installation occurrence 1 --- --- installation occurrence 2 | line=46548 | index=2475054 --- o a complete execution contract WHY: this bucket exists because Project Progress Canonical is not finished by merely existing; the project needs the category to be structurally ready for installation, configuration, validation, evidence, failure handling and promotion or else progress governance cannot mature into usable project control EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_bucket_names: - Prerequisites - Installation - Configuration - Validation - Observable Evidence - Failure Modes & Recovery - Completion & Promotion VALIDATION: - bucket_name_prerequisites == true - bucket_name_installation == true - bucket_name_configuration == true - bucket_name_validation == true - bucket_name_observable_evidence == true - bucket_name_failure_modes_recovery == true - bucket_name_completion_promotion == true FAIL: - any expected bucket missing -> MISSING IMPACT: - the category cannot mature through an ordered execution path - DH loses the operational skeleton needed to turn progress semantics into project governance - the project remains stuck with declared authority but no staged conclusion model` ] }, { title: "Prerequisites exit condition for progress governance", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites are complete only when progress authority materially exists, is architecturally admitted, is placed in Phase 01, is reachable in DH, is render-ready, is dispatch-admitted, already declares the boundary between advancement and activity, preserves clean category authority and exposes the stage skeleton needed for downstream execution WHY: --- end installation occurrence 2 --- --- installation occurrence 3 | line=46557 | index=2475243 --- nstallation, configuration, validation, evidence, failure handling and promotion or else progress governance cannot mature into usable project control EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_bucket_names: - Prerequisites - Installation - Configuration - Validation - Observable Evidence - Failure Modes & Recovery - Completion & Promotion VALIDATION: - bucket_name_prerequisites == true - bucket_name_installation == true - bucket_name_configuration == true - bucket_name_validation == true - bucket_name_observable_evidence == true - bucket_name_failure_modes_recovery == true - bucket_name_completion_promotion == true FAIL: - any expected bucket missing -> MISSING IMPACT: - the category cannot mature through an ordered execution path - DH loses the operational skeleton needed to turn progress semantics into project governance - the project remains stuck with declared authority but no staged conclusion model` ] }, { title: "Prerequisites exit condition for progress governance", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites are complete only when progress authority materially exists, is architecturally admitted, is placed in Phase 01, is reachable in DH, is render-ready, is dispatch-admitted, already declares the boundary between advancement and activity, preserves clean category authority and exposes the stage skeleton needed for downstream execution WHY: this bucket closes the entrance of the category by ensuring Devon has a lawful starting position for progress governance before any later stage tries to install criteria, validate claims, --- end installation occurrence 3 --- --- installation occurrence 4 | line=46592 | index=2476705 --- ution WHY: this bucket closes the entrance of the category by ensuring Devon has a lawful starting position for progress governance before any later stage tries to install criteria, validate claims, demand proof, handle corruption or promote completion EVIDENCE: - aggregate result of all previous prerequisite checks VALIDATION: - all_previous_prerequisite_checks == true FAIL: - any previous prerequisite check false -> NOT COMPLETE IMPACT: - Installation cannot start from a legitimate baseline - the category remains only partially constituted as a project-level authority - Devon keeps executing work without a trustworthy canonical entrance into conclusion truth` ] } ]; const configurationBuckets = [ { title: "Configuration of advancement admissibility rules", items: [ `WHAT: Configuration must define the exact admissibility rules that decide when executed work is allowed to enter Project Progress Canonical as legitimate advancement instead of remaining mere activity, partial movement or unresolved implementation WHY: the role of Configuration in this category is to parameterize progress judgment; Prerequisites only establish authority and Installation only materializes the surface, but Configuration is where Devon determines the rule set that converts raw work into governable progress meaning EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_progress_canonical.json - expected_progress_controls: - advancement admissibility rules - activity versus progress distinction - partial versus valid progress distinction - comp --- end installation occurrence 4 --- --- installation occurrence 5 | line=46606 | index=2477503 --- figuration of advancement admissibility rules", items: [ `WHAT: Configuration must define the exact admissibility rules that decide when executed work is allowed to enter Project Progress Canonical as legitimate advancement instead of remaining mere activity, partial movement or unresolved implementation WHY: the role of Configuration in this category is to parameterize progress judgment; Prerequisites only establish authority and Installation only materializes the surface, but Configuration is where Devon determines the rule set that converts raw work into governable progress meaning EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_progress_canonical.json - expected_progress_controls: - advancement admissibility rules - activity versus progress distinction - partial versus valid progress distinction - completion-entry conditions VALIDATION: - transitional_validation_only == true - advancement_admissibility_rules_present == true - activity_vs_progress_distinction_present == true - partial_vs_valid_progress_distinction_present == true - completion_entry_conditions_present == true FAIL: - advancement_admissibility_rules_present == false -> FAIL - activity_vs_progress_distinction_present == false -> FAIL - partial_vs_valid_progress_distinction_present == false -> FAIL - completion_entry_conditions_present == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category stays installed but semantically undefined - DH can expose progress authority without rules for deciding what qualifies - the project loses a deterministic basis for recognizing real advancement TRANSITION_NOTE: - this remains transitional because --- end installation occurrence 5 --- --- installation occurrence 6 | line=46775 | index=2484944 --- ry stays installed but under-configured - DH exposes progress authority without declaring how it should make decisions - the project inherits a governance surface with no configured logic for advancement legitimacy` ] }, { title: "Configuration continuity with upstream and downstream stages", items: [ `WHAT: Configuration must connect the authority established in Prerequisites and Installation to the later stages of Validation, Observable Evidence, Failure Modes & Recovery and Completion & Promotion through one coherent progress-governance rule model WHY: the role of this bucket is not isolated rule writing; it has to become the semantic hinge of the category, turning installed authority into a downstream-operable contract that the rest of the stage flow can actually use EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - stage_context: - Prerequisites - Installation - Configuration - Validation - Observable Evidence - Failure Modes & Recovery - Completion & Promotion VALIDATION: - upstream_to_configuration_continuity_present == true - configuration_to_downstream_stages_continuity_present == true - coherent_progress_rule_model_present == true FAIL: - upstream_to_configuration_continuity_present == false -> FAIL - configuration_to_downstream_stages_continuity_present == false -> FAIL - coherent_progress_rule_model_present == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category fragments into disconnected cards instead of one execution contract - DH loses the semantic bridge between declared authority and later decision stages - the project cannot rely on o --- end installation occurrence 6 --- --- installation occurrence 7 | line=46784 | index=2485445 --- ervable Evidence, Failure Modes & Recovery and Completion & Promotion through one coherent progress-governance rule model WHY: the role of this bucket is not isolated rule writing; it has to become the semantic hinge of the category, turning installed authority into a downstream-operable contract that the rest of the stage flow can actually use EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - stage_context: - Prerequisites - Installation - Configuration - Validation - Observable Evidence - Failure Modes & Recovery - Completion & Promotion VALIDATION: - upstream_to_configuration_continuity_present == true - configuration_to_downstream_stages_continuity_present == true - coherent_progress_rule_model_present == true FAIL: - upstream_to_configuration_continuity_present == false -> FAIL - configuration_to_downstream_stages_continuity_present == false -> FAIL - coherent_progress_rule_model_present == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category fragments into disconnected cards instead of one execution contract - DH loses the semantic bridge between declared authority and later decision stages - the project cannot rely on one continuous model of progress legitimacy from entry to conclusion` ] }, { title: "Configuration authority discipline", items: [ `WHAT: Configuration must define only the rules of advancement legitimacy and completion recognition for Project Progress Canonical, without configuring scope perimeter, architecture structure, sandbox behavior, server identity, runtime mechanics or delivery closure criteria WHY: this bucket exists to k --- end installation occurrence 7 --- --- installation occurrence 8 | line=46818 | index=2486969 --- r, architecture structure, sandbox behavior, server identity, runtime mechanics or delivery closure criteria WHY: this bucket exists to keep the category honest at the moment its rules are written; if Configuration absorbs sibling governance, the project will encode distorted ownership directly into its progress law EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - source_scope: Project Progress Canonical overview, prerequisites, installation and configuration definitions VALIDATION: - transitional_validation_only == true - configuration_respects_progress_authority == true - no_scope_configuration_absorption == true - no_architecture_configuration_absorption == true - no_sandbox_configuration_absorption == true - no_server_registry_configuration_absorption == true - no_runtime_configuration_absorption == true - no_delivery_configuration_absorption == true FAIL: - configuration_respects_progress_authority == false -> FAIL - any sibling configuration absorption == true -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category writes corrupted ownership into its own operating rules - DH governance boundaries become unstable at the configuration layer - the project loses determinism about which category defines progress and which categories only provide context to it TRANSITION_NOTE: - this remains transitional because authority discipline is still being validated from rendered contract semantics rather than enforced through structural ownership bindings` ] }, { title: "Configuration exit condition for progress governance", items: [ `WHAT: Configuration is complete only when Proje --- end installation occurrence 8 --- TOKEN: configuration | OCCURRENCES: 65 --- configuration occurrence 1 | line=46542 | index=2474806 --- }, { title: "Process-stage skeleton availability", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites must confirm that the category already exposes the full stage skeleton required to evolve from declared progress authority into a complete execution contract WHY: this bucket exists because Project Progress Canonical is not finished by merely existing; the project needs the category to be structurally ready for installation, configuration, validation, evidence, failure handling and promotion or else progress governance cannot mature into usable project control EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_bucket_names: - Prerequisites - Installation - Configuration - Validation - Observable Evidence - Failure Modes & Recovery - Completion & Promotion VALIDATION: - bucket_name_prerequisites == true - bucket_name_installation == true - bucket_name_configuration == true - bucket_name_validation == true - bucket_name_observable_evidence == true - bucket_name_failure_modes_recovery == true - bucket_name_completion_promotion == true FAIL: - any expected bucket missing -> MISSING IMPACT: - the category cannot mature through an ordered execution path - DH loses the operational skeleton needed to turn progress semantics into project governance - the project remains stuck with declared authority but no staged conclusion model` ] }, { title: "Prerequisites exit condition for progress governance", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites are complete only when progress authority materially exists, is architecturally admitted, is --- end configuration occurrence 1 --- --- configuration occurrence 2 | line=46549 | index=2475071 --- ution contract WHY: this bucket exists because Project Progress Canonical is not finished by merely existing; the project needs the category to be structurally ready for installation, configuration, validation, evidence, failure handling and promotion or else progress governance cannot mature into usable project control EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_bucket_names: - Prerequisites - Installation - Configuration - Validation - Observable Evidence - Failure Modes & Recovery - Completion & Promotion VALIDATION: - bucket_name_prerequisites == true - bucket_name_installation == true - bucket_name_configuration == true - bucket_name_validation == true - bucket_name_observable_evidence == true - bucket_name_failure_modes_recovery == true - bucket_name_completion_promotion == true FAIL: - any expected bucket missing -> MISSING IMPACT: - the category cannot mature through an ordered execution path - DH loses the operational skeleton needed to turn progress semantics into project governance - the project remains stuck with declared authority but no staged conclusion model` ] }, { title: "Prerequisites exit condition for progress governance", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites are complete only when progress authority materially exists, is architecturally admitted, is placed in Phase 01, is reachable in DH, is render-ready, is dispatch-admitted, already declares the boundary between advancement and activity, preserves clean category authority and exposes the stage skeleton needed for downstream execution WHY: this bucket close --- end configuration occurrence 2 --- --- configuration occurrence 3 | line=46558 | index=2475278 --- ion, evidence, failure handling and promotion or else progress governance cannot mature into usable project control EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_bucket_names: - Prerequisites - Installation - Configuration - Validation - Observable Evidence - Failure Modes & Recovery - Completion & Promotion VALIDATION: - bucket_name_prerequisites == true - bucket_name_installation == true - bucket_name_configuration == true - bucket_name_validation == true - bucket_name_observable_evidence == true - bucket_name_failure_modes_recovery == true - bucket_name_completion_promotion == true FAIL: - any expected bucket missing -> MISSING IMPACT: - the category cannot mature through an ordered execution path - DH loses the operational skeleton needed to turn progress semantics into project governance - the project remains stuck with declared authority but no staged conclusion model` ] }, { title: "Prerequisites exit condition for progress governance", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites are complete only when progress authority materially exists, is architecturally admitted, is placed in Phase 01, is reachable in DH, is render-ready, is dispatch-admitted, already declares the boundary between advancement and activity, preserves clean category authority and exposes the stage skeleton needed for downstream execution WHY: this bucket closes the entrance of the category by ensuring Devon has a lawful starting position for progress governance before any later stage tries to install criteria, validate claims, demand proof, handle corruption or p --- end configuration occurrence 3 --- --- configuration occurrence 4 | line=46598 | index=2476989 --- of all previous prerequisite checks VALIDATION: - all_previous_prerequisite_checks == true FAIL: - any previous prerequisite check false -> NOT COMPLETE IMPACT: - Installation cannot start from a legitimate baseline - the category remains only partially constituted as a project-level authority - Devon keeps executing work without a trustworthy canonical entrance into conclusion truth` ] } ]; const configurationBuckets = [ { title: "Configuration of advancement admissibility rules", items: [ `WHAT: Configuration must define the exact admissibility rules that decide when executed work is allowed to enter Project Progress Canonical as legitimate advancement instead of remaining mere activity, partial movement or unresolved implementation WHY: the role of Configuration in this category is to parameterize progress judgment; Prerequisites only establish authority and Installation only materializes the surface, but Configuration is where Devon determines the rule set that converts raw work into governable progress meaning EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_progress_canonical.json - expected_progress_controls: - advancement admissibility rules - activity versus progress distinction - partial versus valid progress distinction - completion-entry conditions VALIDATION: - transitional_validation_only == true - advancement_admissibility_rules_present == true - activity_vs_progress_distinction_present == true - partial_vs_valid_progress_distinction_present == true - completion_entry_conditions_present == true FAIL: --- end configuration occurrence 4 --- --- configuration occurrence 5 | line=46600 | index=2477050 --- us_prerequisite_checks == true FAIL: - any previous prerequisite check false -> NOT COMPLETE IMPACT: - Installation cannot start from a legitimate baseline - the category remains only partially constituted as a project-level authority - Devon keeps executing work without a trustworthy canonical entrance into conclusion truth` ] } ]; const configurationBuckets = [ { title: "Configuration of advancement admissibility rules", items: [ `WHAT: Configuration must define the exact admissibility rules that decide when executed work is allowed to enter Project Progress Canonical as legitimate advancement instead of remaining mere activity, partial movement or unresolved implementation WHY: the role of Configuration in this category is to parameterize progress judgment; Prerequisites only establish authority and Installation only materializes the surface, but Configuration is where Devon determines the rule set that converts raw work into governable progress meaning EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_progress_canonical.json - expected_progress_controls: - advancement admissibility rules - activity versus progress distinction - partial versus valid progress distinction - completion-entry conditions VALIDATION: - transitional_validation_only == true - advancement_admissibility_rules_present == true - activity_vs_progress_distinction_present == true - partial_vs_valid_progress_distinction_present == true - completion_entry_conditions_present == true FAIL: - advancement_admissibility_rules_present == false -> FAIL - --- end configuration occurrence 5 --- --- configuration occurrence 6 | line=46603 | index=2477131 --- NOT COMPLETE IMPACT: - Installation cannot start from a legitimate baseline - the category remains only partially constituted as a project-level authority - Devon keeps executing work without a trustworthy canonical entrance into conclusion truth` ] } ]; const configurationBuckets = [ { title: "Configuration of advancement admissibility rules", items: [ `WHAT: Configuration must define the exact admissibility rules that decide when executed work is allowed to enter Project Progress Canonical as legitimate advancement instead of remaining mere activity, partial movement or unresolved implementation WHY: the role of Configuration in this category is to parameterize progress judgment; Prerequisites only establish authority and Installation only materializes the surface, but Configuration is where Devon determines the rule set that converts raw work into governable progress meaning EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_progress_canonical.json - expected_progress_controls: - advancement admissibility rules - activity versus progress distinction - partial versus valid progress distinction - completion-entry conditions VALIDATION: - transitional_validation_only == true - advancement_admissibility_rules_present == true - activity_vs_progress_distinction_present == true - partial_vs_valid_progress_distinction_present == true - completion_entry_conditions_present == true FAIL: - advancement_admissibility_rules_present == false -> FAIL - activity_vs_progress_distinction_present == false -> FAIL - partial_vs_valid_pro --- end configuration occurrence 6 --- --- configuration occurrence 7 | line=46606 | index=2477391 --- ] } ]; const configurationBuckets = [ { title: "Configuration of advancement admissibility rules", items: [ `WHAT: Configuration must define the exact admissibility rules that decide when executed work is allowed to enter Project Progress Canonical as legitimate advancement instead of remaining mere activity, partial movement or unresolved implementation WHY: the role of Configuration in this category is to parameterize progress judgment; Prerequisites only establish authority and Installation only materializes the surface, but Configuration is where Devon determines the rule set that converts raw work into governable progress meaning EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_progress_canonical.json - expected_progress_controls: - advancement admissibility rules - activity versus progress distinction - partial versus valid progress distinction - completion-entry conditions VALIDATION: - transitional_validation_only == true - advancement_admissibility_rules_present == true - activity_vs_progress_distinction_present == true - partial_vs_valid_progress_distinction_present == true - completion_entry_conditions_present == true FAIL: - advancement_admissibility_rules_present == false -> FAIL - activity_vs_progress_distinction_present == false -> FAIL - partial_vs_valid_progress_distinction_present == false -> FAIL - completion_entry_conditions_present == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category stays installed but semantically undefined - DH can expose progress authority without rules for deciding what qualifies - the project lose --- end configuration occurrence 7 --- --- configuration occurrence 8 | line=46606 | index=2477551 --- items: [ `WHAT: Configuration must define the exact admissibility rules that decide when executed work is allowed to enter Project Progress Canonical as legitimate advancement instead of remaining mere activity, partial movement or unresolved implementation WHY: the role of Configuration in this category is to parameterize progress judgment; Prerequisites only establish authority and Installation only materializes the surface, but Configuration is where Devon determines the rule set that converts raw work into governable progress meaning EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_progress_canonical.json - expected_progress_controls: - advancement admissibility rules - activity versus progress distinction - partial versus valid progress distinction - completion-entry conditions VALIDATION: - transitional_validation_only == true - advancement_admissibility_rules_present == true - activity_vs_progress_distinction_present == true - partial_vs_valid_progress_distinction_present == true - completion_entry_conditions_present == true FAIL: - advancement_admissibility_rules_present == false -> FAIL - activity_vs_progress_distinction_present == false -> FAIL - partial_vs_valid_progress_distinction_present == false -> FAIL - completion_entry_conditions_present == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category stays installed but semantically undefined - DH can expose progress authority without rules for deciding what qualifies - the project loses a deterministic basis for recognizing real advancement TRANSITION_NOTE: - this remains transitional because admissibility rules are still being validated fro --- end configuration occurrence 8 --- TOKEN: validation | OCCURRENCES: 197 --- validation occurrence 1 | line=46254 | index=2462241 --- ion of executed work into recognized project progress and blocks everything that has not yet earned that status.")}

    ${escapeHtml("This means the buckets below must not behave like generic lifecycle cards. They must decompose the real mechanics of progress legitimacy for the project: what has to exist before progress can be judged at all, how the category installs and configures advancement criteria, how validation decides acceptance or rejection of a progress claim, what observable evidence makes that decision defensible, what failure patterns corrupt progress truth and how recovery restores it, and under which exact conditions validated work is finally promoted into official project completion state. If that chain is weak, the whole project loses conclusion integrity.")}

    `; queueMicrotask(() => { const btn = document.getElementById("project-progress-canonical-overview-toggle"); const more = document.getElementById("project-progress-canonical-overview-more"); if (!btn || !more || btn.dataset.bound === "true") return; --- end validation occurrence 1 --- --- validation occurrence 2 | line=46312 | index=2464942 --- egitimacy inside Devon before any work is interpreted as official progress WHY: this bucket is the entry gate of the category because the project cannot judge progress by execution noise, implementation volume or operator belief; it first needs a sovereign authority that says who is allowed to decide whether something truly moved the program forward EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_progress_canonical.json VALIDATION: - exists(file_path) == true FAIL: - exists(file_path) == false -> MISSING IMPACT: - the category loses material authority before it even starts - progress becomes vulnerable to informal interpretation - the project can keep working but cannot conclude advancement canonically` ] }, { title: "Root-architecture admission of progress governance", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites must prove that progress governance is admitted into the sovereign architecture baseline of the project rather than existing as an orphan file with no formal standing WHY: the role of this bucket is not merely to confirm file presence; it has to guarantee that progress authority is recognized by the root model that organizes Devon, otherwise completion truth would exist outside the same structural law that governs the rest of the program EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/master_architecture_index.md - search_term: Project Progress Canonical VALIDATION: - master_registration_present == true FAIL: - master_registration_present == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - advancement law becomes detached from project architecture - later --- end validation occurrence 2 --- --- validation occurrence 3 | line=46337 | index=2465971 --- as an orphan file with no formal standing WHY: the role of this bucket is not merely to confirm file presence; it has to guarantee that progress authority is recognized by the root model that organizes Devon, otherwise completion truth would exist outside the same structural law that governs the rest of the program EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/master_architecture_index.md - search_term: Project Progress Canonical VALIDATION: - master_registration_present == true FAIL: - master_registration_present == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - advancement law becomes detached from project architecture - later operational surfaces can reference progress without sovereign admission - the project loses continuity between structure and conclusion` ] }, { title: "Phase-01 placement before downstream interpretation", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites must place Project Progress Canonical inside Phase 01 Overview & Scope so the meaning of progress is established before runtime, reporting, monitoring or panel interpretation starts consuming advancement signals WHY: the bucket exists to force sequencing discipline: Devon must define what counts as progress before it starts reasoning about the state of the project, otherwise downstream layers inherit ungoverned maturity assumptions EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/hub_index.json - expected_phase_id: phase-01 - expected_category_id: overview_scope - expected_doc_id: project_progress_canonical VALIDATION: - phase_binding_present == true - category_binding_present == true - doc_id_present == --- end validation occurrence 3 --- --- validation occurrence 4 | line=46364 | index=2467082 --- arts consuming advancement signals WHY: the bucket exists to force sequencing discipline: Devon must define what counts as progress before it starts reasoning about the state of the project, otherwise downstream layers inherit ungoverned maturity assumptions EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/hub_index.json - expected_phase_id: phase-01 - expected_category_id: overview_scope - expected_doc_id: project_progress_canonical VALIDATION: - phase_binding_present == true - category_binding_present == true - doc_id_present == true FAIL: - phase_binding_present == false -> FAIL - category_binding_present == false -> FAIL - doc_id_present == false -> MISSING IMPACT: - progress semantics enter the project too late - downstream categories can start emitting maturity interpretations without prior completion law - the project loses ordering discipline between definition and operational consumption` ] }, { title: "Documentation Hub reachability of progress law", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites must guarantee that the category is reachable from Documentation Hub as an operator-consultable source of truth for advancement legitimacy WHY: the bucket has to ensure that progress authority is not trapped in storage; if the category cannot be reached where operators inspect project state, then completion truth remains declared but not governable in practice EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/hub_index.json - expected_doc_id: project_progress_canonical - expected_category_id: overview_scope VALIDATION: - nav_doc_entry_present == true - nav_c --- end validation occurrence 4 --- --- validation occurrence 5 | line=46394 | index=2468241 --- operator-consultable source of truth for advancement legitimacy WHY: the bucket has to ensure that progress authority is not trapped in storage; if the category cannot be reached where operators inspect project state, then completion truth remains declared but not governable in practice EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/hub_index.json - expected_doc_id: project_progress_canonical - expected_category_id: overview_scope VALIDATION: - nav_doc_entry_present == true - nav_category_binding_present == true FAIL: - nav_doc_entry_present == false -> MISSING - nav_category_binding_present == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - operators lose access to the category that should decide whether progress is real - DH stops serving as the execution-facing interface of completion law - the project drifts back toward memory-based progress judgment` ] }, { title: "Dedicated rendering readiness for progress semantics", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites must ensure that Project Progress Canonical is prepared to render through its own custom DH branch so progress authority can be expressed as category-specific execution logic instead of generic document output WHY: this bucket exists because progress is not a passive note; the project needs the category to speak in its own operational language, otherwise the semantics of advancement legitimacy get flattened before the category even begins to execute EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_branch_signature: doc.id === "project_progress_canonical" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope" VALI --- end validation occurrence 5 --- --- validation occurrence 6 | line=46421 | index=2469447 --- ead of generic document output WHY: this bucket exists because progress is not a passive note; the project needs the category to speak in its own operational language, otherwise the semantics of advancement legitimacy get flattened before the category even begins to execute EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_branch_signature: doc.id === "project_progress_canonical" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope" VALIDATION: - custom_branch_exists == true FAIL: - custom_branch_exists == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category can exist but still fail to present its own governance logic - DH reduces progress authority to generic content exposure - the project loses semantic precision exactly where conclusion rules should become explicit` ] }, { title: "Runtime dispatch admission of the category", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites must verify that the DH render dispatcher actually routes Project Progress Canonical into its dedicated branch instead of bypassing it during runtime WHY: the bucket exists to close the gap between declared category presence and actual execution; if dispatch does not admit the category, the project has nominal progress governance but no live delivery of it EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_dispatch_gate: - doc.id === "project_progress_canonical" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope" VALIDATION: - direct_render_dispatch_includes_project_progress_canonical == true FAIL: - direct_render_dispatch_includes_project_progress_canonical == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - progress auth --- end validation occurrence 6 --- --- validation occurrence 7 | line=46447 | index=2470467 --- into its dedicated branch instead of bypassing it during runtime WHY: the bucket exists to close the gap between declared category presence and actual execution; if dispatch does not admit the category, the project has nominal progress governance but no live delivery of it EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_dispatch_gate: - doc.id === "project_progress_canonical" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope" VALIDATION: - direct_render_dispatch_includes_project_progress_canonical == true FAIL: - direct_render_dispatch_includes_project_progress_canonical == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - progress authority remains declared but non-operational - DH can silently route around the category that should govern advancement legitimacy - the project loses trust in the bridge between canon and runtime behavior` ] }, { title: "Declared boundary between progress and mere activity", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites must show that the category already declares a boundary between work that happened and work that deserves canonical recognition as advancement, including the difference between partial movement, valid progress and concluded completion WHY: this bucket exists because the category cannot govern anything if it does not first announce what domain it is supposed to separate; the project needs a declared frontier between motion and advancement before later stages can configure, validate or prove anything EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_progress_canonical.json - expected_progress_controls: - advancement le --- end validation occurrence 7 --- --- validation occurrence 8 | line=46476 | index=2471788 --- does not first announce what domain it is supposed to separate; the project needs a declared frontier between motion and advancement before later stages can configure, validate or prove anything EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_progress_canonical.json - expected_progress_controls: - advancement legitimacy - partial versus valid distinction - completion recognition boundary - non-progress exclusions VALIDATION: - transitional_validation_only == true - advancement_legitimacy_boundary_present == true - partial_vs_valid_distinction_present == true - completion_recognition_boundary_present == true - non_progress_exclusions_present == true FAIL: - advancement_legitimacy_boundary_present == false -> FAIL - partial_vs_valid_distinction_present == false -> FAIL - completion_recognition_boundary_present == false -> FAIL - non_progress_exclusions_present == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category starts without its own semantic perimeter - later stages would configure and validate an undefined notion of progress - the whole project becomes exposed to ambiguous completion language TRANSITION_NOTE: - this remains transitional because the boundary is still being validated from declared canonical content rather than enforced through machine-readable progress-state rules` ] }, { title: "Authority separation from sibling categories", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites must establish that Project Progress Canonical governs only advancement legitimacy and completion recognition, without absorbing ownership from scope, architecture, deployment, --- end validation occurrence 8 --- TOKEN: observableEvidence | OCCURRENCES: 3 --- observableEvidence occurrence 1 | line=46868 | index=2489252 --- VALIDATION: - all_previous_configuration_checks == true FAIL: - any previous configuration check false -> NOT COMPLETE IMPACT: - Validation cannot begin from a configured decision model - Project Progress Canonical remains operationally visible but semantically incomplete - the project continues without a trustworthy configured basis for deciding whether work really advanced anything` ] } ]; const observableEvidenceBuckets = [ { title: "Observable proof that accepted progress is real", items: [ `WHAT: Observable Evidence must expose the concrete proof basis that shows an advancement claim accepted by Project Progress Canonical is not merely believed, narrated or inferred, but materially grounded in observable project reality WHY: the role of Observable Evidence in this category is to make validated progress defensible; Validation may decide that a claim can be accepted, but this bucket must show what makes that acceptance traceable, inspectable and resistant to interpretation drift across the project EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_progress_canonical.json - expected_evidence_scope: - observable proof for accepted advancement - traceable basis for progress recognition - non-narrative support for project movement VALIDATION: - transitional_validation_only == true - accepted_advancement_observable_proof_present == true - traceable_progress_recognition_basis_present == true - non_narrative_project_movement_support_present == true FAIL: - accepted_advancement_observable_proof_present == false -> FAIL - traceab --- end observableEvidence occurrence 1 --- --- observableEvidence occurrence 2 | line=47020 | index=2496731 --- the left-column workflow instead of remaining a placeholder pending card WHY: this bucket exists because the category cannot claim evidence-backed progress governance while leaving the stage that exposes proof empty; Observable Evidence is where accepted advancement becomes externally defensible within the project EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_renderer_call: renderStructuredCard("Observable Evidence", observableEvidenceBuckets) VALIDATION: - observable_evidence_bucket_structured == true FAIL: - observable_evidence_bucket_structured == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category stays validated but under-evidenced - DH exposes judgment without the proof surface that should support it - the project inherits a progress-governance contract that cannot show the basis of its own accepted claims` ] }, { title: "Observable evidence continuity with upstream and downstream stages", items: [ `WHAT: Observable Evidence must connect the judgment made in Validation to the final decision logic of Completion & Promotion so proof remains part of one continuous advancement-recognition chain inside the category WHY: the role of this bucket is to stop evidence from becoming decorative afterthought; it has to remain structurally connected to both the acceptance decision behind it and the promotion decision ahead of it or else the category loses conclusion integrity EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - stage_context: - Validation - Observable Evidence - Completion & Promotion VALIDATION: - validation_to_observable_evidenc --- end observableEvidence occurrence 2 --- --- observableEvidence occurrence 3 | line=47388 | index=2514493 --- nalyze progress without being able to canonize its final recognition state - the project continues without a dependable final gate for lawful advancement and completion truth` ] } ]; const leftHtml = [ renderStructuredCard("Prerequisites", prerequisitesBuckets), renderStructuredCard("Configuration", configurationBuckets), renderStructuredCard("Observable Evidence", observableEvidenceBuckets), renderStructuredCard("Completion & Promotion", completionPromotionBuckets) ].join(""); const installationBuckets = [ { title: "Documentation Hub installation of progress authority", items: [ `WHAT: Installation must materialize Project Progress Canonical inside Documentation Hub as a live category surface where Devon can consult, expose and operate the official rules of advancement legitimacy WHY: the role of Installation in this category is not to define progress itself but to make progress authority operationally present; without installation, completion law may exist in storage yet remain absent from the place where project state is actually interpreted EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_branch_signature: doc.id === "project_progress_canonical" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope" - expected_return_kind: html VALIDATION: - custom_branch_exists == true - branch_returns_html_contract == true FAIL: - custom_branch_exists == false -> FAIL - branch_returns_html_contract == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - progress authority remains declared but not installed as --- end observableEvidence occurrence 3 --- TOKEN: observable_evidence | OCCURRENCES: 19 --- observable_evidence occurrence 1 | line=46560 | index=2475347 --- ance cannot mature into usable project control EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_bucket_names: - Prerequisites - Installation - Configuration - Validation - Observable Evidence - Failure Modes & Recovery - Completion & Promotion VALIDATION: - bucket_name_prerequisites == true - bucket_name_installation == true - bucket_name_configuration == true - bucket_name_validation == true - bucket_name_observable_evidence == true - bucket_name_failure_modes_recovery == true - bucket_name_completion_promotion == true FAIL: - any expected bucket missing -> MISSING IMPACT: - the category cannot mature through an ordered execution path - DH loses the operational skeleton needed to turn progress semantics into project governance - the project remains stuck with declared authority but no staged conclusion model` ] }, { title: "Prerequisites exit condition for progress governance", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites are complete only when progress authority materially exists, is architecturally admitted, is placed in Phase 01, is reachable in DH, is render-ready, is dispatch-admitted, already declares the boundary between advancement and activity, preserves clean category authority and exposes the stage skeleton needed for downstream execution WHY: this bucket closes the entrance of the category by ensuring Devon has a lawful starting position for progress governance before any later stage tries to install criteria, validate claims, demand proof, handle corruption or promote completion EVIDENCE: - aggregate result of all previous prerequisit --- end observable_evidence occurrence 1 --- --- observable_evidence occurrence 2 | line=46994 | index=2495384 --- ing before evidence is surfaced WHY: this bucket exists because Validation alone is not enough for project trust; Devon needs a stage that turns accepted judgment into observable support, otherwise validated progress becomes a black-box decision with no visible proof chain EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - stage_context: - Validation - Observable Evidence - Completion & Promotion VALIDATION: - validation_to_observable_evidence_proof_bridge_present == true - observable_evidence_to_completion_promotion_bridge_present == true - validated_progress_not_self_justifying_present == true FAIL: - validation_to_observable_evidence_proof_bridge_present == false -> FAIL - observable_evidence_to_completion_promotion_bridge_present == false -> FAIL - validated_progress_not_self_justifying_present == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category breaks the proof chain between accepted progress and promoted completion state - DH loses continuity between judgment and evidence - the project cannot trust that validated advancement has actually been made observable before conclusion decisions` ] }, { title: "Observable Evidence bucket materialization", items: [ `WHAT: Observable Evidence itself must be materialized as a real structured bucket inside the left-column workflow instead of remaining a placeholder pending card WHY: this bucket exists because the category cannot claim evidence-backed progress governance while leaving the stage that exposes proof empty; Observable Evidence is where accepted advancement becomes externally defensible within the project EVID --- end observable_evidence occurrence 2 --- --- observable_evidence occurrence 3 | line=46995 | index=2495435 --- xists because Validation alone is not enough for project trust; Devon needs a stage that turns accepted judgment into observable support, otherwise validated progress becomes a black-box decision with no visible proof chain EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - stage_context: - Validation - Observable Evidence - Completion & Promotion VALIDATION: - validation_to_observable_evidence_proof_bridge_present == true - observable_evidence_to_completion_promotion_bridge_present == true - validated_progress_not_self_justifying_present == true FAIL: - validation_to_observable_evidence_proof_bridge_present == false -> FAIL - observable_evidence_to_completion_promotion_bridge_present == false -> FAIL - validated_progress_not_self_justifying_present == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category breaks the proof chain between accepted progress and promoted completion state - DH loses continuity between judgment and evidence - the project cannot trust that validated advancement has actually been made observable before conclusion decisions` ] }, { title: "Observable Evidence bucket materialization", items: [ `WHAT: Observable Evidence itself must be materialized as a real structured bucket inside the left-column workflow instead of remaining a placeholder pending card WHY: this bucket exists because the category cannot claim evidence-backed progress governance while leaving the stage that exposes proof empty; Observable Evidence is where accepted advancement becomes externally defensible within the project EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/ind --- end observable_evidence occurrence 3 --- --- observable_evidence occurrence 4 | line=46999 | index=2495582 --- validated progress becomes a black-box decision with no visible proof chain EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - stage_context: - Validation - Observable Evidence - Completion & Promotion VALIDATION: - validation_to_observable_evidence_proof_bridge_present == true - observable_evidence_to_completion_promotion_bridge_present == true - validated_progress_not_self_justifying_present == true FAIL: - validation_to_observable_evidence_proof_bridge_present == false -> FAIL - observable_evidence_to_completion_promotion_bridge_present == false -> FAIL - validated_progress_not_self_justifying_present == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category breaks the proof chain between accepted progress and promoted completion state - DH loses continuity between judgment and evidence - the project cannot trust that validated advancement has actually been made observable before conclusion decisions` ] }, { title: "Observable Evidence bucket materialization", items: [ `WHAT: Observable Evidence itself must be materialized as a real structured bucket inside the left-column workflow instead of remaining a placeholder pending card WHY: this bucket exists because the category cannot claim evidence-backed progress governance while leaving the stage that exposes proof empty; Observable Evidence is where accepted advancement becomes externally defensible within the project EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_renderer_call: renderStructuredCard("Observable Evidence", observableEvidenceBuckets) VALIDATION: - observable_evidence_bucket_s --- end observable_evidence occurrence 4 --- --- observable_evidence occurrence 5 | line=47000 | index=2495642 --- ible proof chain EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - stage_context: - Validation - Observable Evidence - Completion & Promotion VALIDATION: - validation_to_observable_evidence_proof_bridge_present == true - observable_evidence_to_completion_promotion_bridge_present == true - validated_progress_not_self_justifying_present == true FAIL: - validation_to_observable_evidence_proof_bridge_present == false -> FAIL - observable_evidence_to_completion_promotion_bridge_present == false -> FAIL - validated_progress_not_self_justifying_present == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category breaks the proof chain between accepted progress and promoted completion state - DH loses continuity between judgment and evidence - the project cannot trust that validated advancement has actually been made observable before conclusion decisions` ] }, { title: "Observable Evidence bucket materialization", items: [ `WHAT: Observable Evidence itself must be materialized as a real structured bucket inside the left-column workflow instead of remaining a placeholder pending card WHY: this bucket exists because the category cannot claim evidence-backed progress governance while leaving the stage that exposes proof empty; Observable Evidence is where accepted advancement becomes externally defensible within the project EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_renderer_call: renderStructuredCard("Observable Evidence", observableEvidenceBuckets) VALIDATION: - observable_evidence_bucket_structured == true FAIL: - observable_evidence_bucket_struct --- end observable_evidence occurrence 5 --- --- observable_evidence occurrence 6 | line=47023 | index=2496773 --- ing a placeholder pending card WHY: this bucket exists because the category cannot claim evidence-backed progress governance while leaving the stage that exposes proof empty; Observable Evidence is where accepted advancement becomes externally defensible within the project EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_renderer_call: renderStructuredCard("Observable Evidence", observableEvidenceBuckets) VALIDATION: - observable_evidence_bucket_structured == true FAIL: - observable_evidence_bucket_structured == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category stays validated but under-evidenced - DH exposes judgment without the proof surface that should support it - the project inherits a progress-governance contract that cannot show the basis of its own accepted claims` ] }, { title: "Observable evidence continuity with upstream and downstream stages", items: [ `WHAT: Observable Evidence must connect the judgment made in Validation to the final decision logic of Completion & Promotion so proof remains part of one continuous advancement-recognition chain inside the category WHY: the role of this bucket is to stop evidence from becoming decorative afterthought; it has to remain structurally connected to both the acceptance decision behind it and the promotion decision ahead of it or else the category loses conclusion integrity EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - stage_context: - Validation - Observable Evidence - Completion & Promotion VALIDATION: - validation_to_observable_evidence_continuity_present == true - observable_e --- end observable_evidence occurrence 6 --- --- observable_evidence occurrence 7 | line=47026 | index=2496828 --- because the category cannot claim evidence-backed progress governance while leaving the stage that exposes proof empty; Observable Evidence is where accepted advancement becomes externally defensible within the project EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_renderer_call: renderStructuredCard("Observable Evidence", observableEvidenceBuckets) VALIDATION: - observable_evidence_bucket_structured == true FAIL: - observable_evidence_bucket_structured == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category stays validated but under-evidenced - DH exposes judgment without the proof surface that should support it - the project inherits a progress-governance contract that cannot show the basis of its own accepted claims` ] }, { title: "Observable evidence continuity with upstream and downstream stages", items: [ `WHAT: Observable Evidence must connect the judgment made in Validation to the final decision logic of Completion & Promotion so proof remains part of one continuous advancement-recognition chain inside the category WHY: the role of this bucket is to stop evidence from becoming decorative afterthought; it has to remain structurally connected to both the acceptance decision behind it and the promotion decision ahead of it or else the category loses conclusion integrity EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - stage_context: - Validation - Observable Evidence - Completion & Promotion VALIDATION: - validation_to_observable_evidence_continuity_present == true - observable_evidence_to_completion_promotion_continuity_present == t --- end observable_evidence occurrence 7 --- --- observable_evidence occurrence 8 | line=47051 | index=2497931 --- ide the category WHY: the role of this bucket is to stop evidence from becoming decorative afterthought; it has to remain structurally connected to both the acceptance decision behind it and the promotion decision ahead of it or else the category loses conclusion integrity EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - stage_context: - Validation - Observable Evidence - Completion & Promotion VALIDATION: - validation_to_observable_evidence_continuity_present == true - observable_evidence_to_completion_promotion_continuity_present == true - continuous_advancement_recognition_chain_present == true FAIL: - validation_to_observable_evidence_continuity_present == false -> FAIL - observable_evidence_to_completion_promotion_continuity_present == false -> FAIL - continuous_advancement_recognition_chain_present == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category fragments between acceptance, proof and conclusion - DH loses the chain that makes recognized progress operationally trustworthy - the project becomes exposed to disconnected decisions where evidence no longer carries forward into official completion logic` ] }, { title: "Observable Evidence authority discipline", items: [ `WHAT: Observable Evidence must expose proof only for advancement legitimacy and completion-readiness inside Project Progress Canonical, without becoming the evidentiary owner of scope perimeter, architecture structure, sandbox trust, server identity, runtime behavior or delivery closure WHY: this bucket exists to keep the category from overreaching at the proof layer; if evidence authority e --- end observable_evidence occurrence 8 --- TOKEN: evidence | OCCURRENCES: 159 --- evidence occurrence 1 | line=46254 | index=2462321 --- has not yet earned that status.")}

    ${escapeHtml("This means the buckets below must not behave like generic lifecycle cards. They must decompose the real mechanics of progress legitimacy for the project: what has to exist before progress can be judged at all, how the category installs and configures advancement criteria, how validation decides acceptance or rejection of a progress claim, what observable evidence makes that decision defensible, what failure patterns corrupt progress truth and how recovery restores it, and under which exact conditions validated work is finally promoted into official project completion state. If that chain is weak, the whole project loses conclusion integrity.")}

    `; queueMicrotask(() => { const btn = document.getElementById("project-progress-canonical-overview-toggle"); const more = document.getElementById("project-progress-canonical-overview-more"); if (!btn || !more || btn.dataset.bound === "true") return; const toggle = () => { const expanded = btn.getAttribute("ar --- end evidence occurrence 1 --- --- evidence occurrence 2 | line=46309 | index=2464846 --- that Project Progress Canonical already exists as the declared authority that owns advancement legitimacy inside Devon before any work is interpreted as official progress WHY: this bucket is the entry gate of the category because the project cannot judge progress by execution noise, implementation volume or operator belief; it first needs a sovereign authority that says who is allowed to decide whether something truly moved the program forward EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_progress_canonical.json VALIDATION: - exists(file_path) == true FAIL: - exists(file_path) == false -> MISSING IMPACT: - the category loses material authority before it even starts - progress becomes vulnerable to informal interpretation - the project can keep working but cannot conclude advancement canonically` ] }, { title: "Root-architecture admission of progress governance", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites must prove that progress governance is admitted into the sovereign architecture baseline of the project rather than existing as an orphan file with no formal standing WHY: the role of this bucket is not merely to confirm file presence; it has to guarantee that progress authority is recognized by the root model that organizes Devon, otherwise completion truth would exist outside the same structural law that governs the rest of the program EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/master_architecture_index.md - search_term: Project Progress Canonical VALIDATION: - master_registration_present == true FAIL: - master_registration_pres --- end evidence occurrence 2 --- --- evidence occurrence 3 | line=46333 | index=2465841 --- sites must prove that progress governance is admitted into the sovereign architecture baseline of the project rather than existing as an orphan file with no formal standing WHY: the role of this bucket is not merely to confirm file presence; it has to guarantee that progress authority is recognized by the root model that organizes Devon, otherwise completion truth would exist outside the same structural law that governs the rest of the program EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/master_architecture_index.md - search_term: Project Progress Canonical VALIDATION: - master_registration_present == true FAIL: - master_registration_present == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - advancement law becomes detached from project architecture - later operational surfaces can reference progress without sovereign admission - the project loses continuity between structure and conclusion` ] }, { title: "Phase-01 placement before downstream interpretation", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites must place Project Progress Canonical inside Phase 01 Overview & Scope so the meaning of progress is established before runtime, reporting, monitoring or panel interpretation starts consuming advancement signals WHY: the bucket exists to force sequencing discipline: Devon must define what counts as progress before it starts reasoning about the state of the project, otherwise downstream layers inherit ungoverned maturity assumptions EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/hub_index.json - expected_phase_id: phase-01 - expected_category_id: overview_scope - expected_doc --- end evidence occurrence 3 --- --- evidence occurrence 4 | line=46358 | index=2466893 --- erequisites must place Project Progress Canonical inside Phase 01 Overview & Scope so the meaning of progress is established before runtime, reporting, monitoring or panel interpretation starts consuming advancement signals WHY: the bucket exists to force sequencing discipline: Devon must define what counts as progress before it starts reasoning about the state of the project, otherwise downstream layers inherit ungoverned maturity assumptions EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/hub_index.json - expected_phase_id: phase-01 - expected_category_id: overview_scope - expected_doc_id: project_progress_canonical VALIDATION: - phase_binding_present == true - category_binding_present == true - doc_id_present == true FAIL: - phase_binding_present == false -> FAIL - category_binding_present == false -> FAIL - doc_id_present == false -> MISSING IMPACT: - progress semantics enter the project too late - downstream categories can start emitting maturity interpretations without prior completion law - the project loses ordering discipline between definition and operational consumption` ] }, { title: "Documentation Hub reachability of progress law", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites must guarantee that the category is reachable from Documentation Hub as an operator-consultable source of truth for advancement legitimacy WHY: the bucket has to ensure that progress authority is not trapped in storage; if the category cannot be reached where operators inspect project state, then completion truth remains declared but not governable in practice EVIDENCE: - file: / --- end evidence occurrence 4 --- --- evidence occurrence 5 | line=46389 | index=2468082 --- ation Hub reachability of progress law", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites must guarantee that the category is reachable from Documentation Hub as an operator-consultable source of truth for advancement legitimacy WHY: the bucket has to ensure that progress authority is not trapped in storage; if the category cannot be reached where operators inspect project state, then completion truth remains declared but not governable in practice EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/hub_index.json - expected_doc_id: project_progress_canonical - expected_category_id: overview_scope VALIDATION: - nav_doc_entry_present == true - nav_category_binding_present == true FAIL: - nav_doc_entry_present == false -> MISSING - nav_category_binding_present == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - operators lose access to the category that should decide whether progress is real - DH stops serving as the execution-facing interface of completion law - the project drifts back toward memory-based progress judgment` ] }, { title: "Dedicated rendering readiness for progress semantics", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites must ensure that Project Progress Canonical is prepared to render through its own custom DH branch so progress authority can be expressed as category-specific execution logic instead of generic document output WHY: this bucket exists because progress is not a passive note; the project needs the category to speak in its own operational language, otherwise the semantics of advancement legitimacy get flattened before the category even begins to execute EVIDENCE: - file --- end evidence occurrence 5 --- --- evidence occurrence 6 | line=46417 | index=2469274 --- nsure that Project Progress Canonical is prepared to render through its own custom DH branch so progress authority can be expressed as category-specific execution logic instead of generic document output WHY: this bucket exists because progress is not a passive note; the project needs the category to speak in its own operational language, otherwise the semantics of advancement legitimacy get flattened before the category even begins to execute EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_branch_signature: doc.id === "project_progress_canonical" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope" VALIDATION: - custom_branch_exists == true FAIL: - custom_branch_exists == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category can exist but still fail to present its own governance logic - DH reduces progress authority to generic content exposure - the project loses semantic precision exactly where conclusion rules should become explicit` ] }, { title: "Runtime dispatch admission of the category", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites must verify that the DH render dispatcher actually routes Project Progress Canonical into its dedicated branch instead of bypassing it during runtime WHY: the bucket exists to close the gap between declared category presence and actual execution; if dispatch does not admit the category, the project has nominal progress governance but no live delivery of it EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_dispatch_gate: - doc.id === "project_progress_canonical" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope" VALIDATION: - d --- end evidence occurrence 6 --- --- evidence occurrence 7 | line=46442 | index=2470293 --- Runtime dispatch admission of the category", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites must verify that the DH render dispatcher actually routes Project Progress Canonical into its dedicated branch instead of bypassing it during runtime WHY: the bucket exists to close the gap between declared category presence and actual execution; if dispatch does not admit the category, the project has nominal progress governance but no live delivery of it EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_dispatch_gate: - doc.id === "project_progress_canonical" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope" VALIDATION: - direct_render_dispatch_includes_project_progress_canonical == true FAIL: - direct_render_dispatch_includes_project_progress_canonical == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - progress authority remains declared but non-operational - DH can silently route around the category that should govern advancement legitimacy - the project loses trust in the bridge between canon and runtime behavior` ] }, { title: "Declared boundary between progress and mere activity", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites must show that the category already declares a boundary between work that happened and work that deserves canonical recognition as advancement, including the difference between partial movement, valid progress and concluded completion WHY: this bucket exists because the category cannot govern anything if it does not first announce what domain it is supposed to separate; the project needs a declared frontier between motion and advancement before later stages can config --- end evidence occurrence 7 --- --- evidence occurrence 8 | line=46468 | index=2471534 --- between work that happened and work that deserves canonical recognition as advancement, including the difference between partial movement, valid progress and concluded completion WHY: this bucket exists because the category cannot govern anything if it does not first announce what domain it is supposed to separate; the project needs a declared frontier between motion and advancement before later stages can configure, validate or prove anything EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_progress_canonical.json - expected_progress_controls: - advancement legitimacy - partial versus valid distinction - completion recognition boundary - non-progress exclusions VALIDATION: - transitional_validation_only == true - advancement_legitimacy_boundary_present == true - partial_vs_valid_distinction_present == true - completion_recognition_boundary_present == true - non_progress_exclusions_present == true FAIL: - advancement_legitimacy_boundary_present == false -> FAIL - partial_vs_valid_distinction_present == false -> FAIL - completion_recognition_boundary_present == false -> FAIL - non_progress_exclusions_present == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category starts without its own semantic perimeter - later stages would configure and validate an undefined notion of progress - the whole project becomes exposed to ambiguous completion language TRANSITION_NOTE: - this remains transitional because the boundary is still being validated from declared canonical content rather than enforced through machine-readable progress-state rules` ] }, { title: "Authority se --- end evidence occurrence 8 --- TOKEN: failureModes | OCCURRENCES: 3 --- failureModes occurrence 1 | line=47904 | index=2537128 --- ll previous validation checks VALIDATION: - all_previous_validation_checks == true FAIL: - any previous validation check false -> NOT COMPLETE IMPACT: - Observable Evidence cannot begin from a trustworthy validated state - Project Progress Canonical remains configured but not operationally decisive - the project continues without a dependable judgment layer for advancement legitimacy` ] } ]; const failureModesRecoveryBuckets = [ { title: "Collapse of the recognition boundary", items: [ `WHAT: This bucket must define the failure state in which Project Progress Canonical stops separating executed work from recognized progress and begins treating motion, busyness or visible implementation as if they had already earned canonical advancement status WHY: the exclusive role of Failure Modes & Recovery in this category is to protect the recognition boundary itself; if that line collapses, Devon loses the only contract that tells the project when work has merely happened and when it has legitimately advanced the program EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_progress_canonical.json - failure_focus: - execution mistaken for advancement - activity mistaken for recognized progress - visible movement mistaken for canonical gain VALIDATION: - transitional_validation_only == true - recognition_boundary_collapse_defined == true - execution_as_advancement_drift_defined == true - visible_movement_as_canonical_gain_defined == true FAIL: - recognition_boundary_collapse_defined == false -> FAIL - execution_as_advancement_drift --- end failureModes occurrence 1 --- --- failureModes occurrence 2 | line=48125 | index=2547604 --- ght-column workflow instead of remaining a placeholder pending card WHY: this bucket must exist as an explicit stage because progress truth in Devon is not only something to recognize but something to defend and repair; without this stage the category has no declared mechanism for protecting its own integrity EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_renderer_call: renderStructuredCard("Failure Modes & Recovery", failureModesRecoveryBuckets) VALIDATION: - failure_modes_recovery_bucket_structured == true FAIL: - failure_modes_recovery_bucket_structured == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category may define recognition law but cannot govern corruption of that law - DH keeps a structural hole exactly where canonical progress integrity should be defended - the project inherits a progress-governance contract that cannot respond to its own breakdown` ] }, { title: "Failure Modes & Recovery authority discipline", items: [ `WHAT: This bucket must remain limited to corruption and restoration of progress recognition, evidentiary integrity and completion-readiness inside Project Progress Canonical, without absorbing failures owned by scope, architecture, sandbox, server registry, runtime or delivery categories WHY: the exclusive role here is to repair the truth of advancement, not to become the universal repair desk of Devon; once this bucket starts owning sibling failures, the project loses clean governance boundaries exactly where corrective authority needs to stay precise EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - source_sc --- end failureModes occurrence 2 --- --- failureModes occurrence 3 | line=48203 | index=2551519 --- ns able to recognize advancement but not to defend its integrity - the project continues without a dependable category-level correction layer for corrupted progress recognition` ] } ]; const rightHtml = [ renderStructuredCard("Installation", installationBuckets), renderStructuredCard("Validation", validationBuckets), renderStructuredCard("Failure Modes & Recovery", failureModesRecoveryBuckets) ].join(""); return { kind: "html", content: overviewHtml + `
    ${leftHtml}
    ${rightHtml}
    ` }; } --- end failureModes occurrence 3 --- TOKEN: failure_modes | OCCURRENCES: 4 --- failure_modes occurrence 1 | line=46561 | index=2475389 --- trol EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_bucket_names: - Prerequisites - Installation - Configuration - Validation - Observable Evidence - Failure Modes & Recovery - Completion & Promotion VALIDATION: - bucket_name_prerequisites == true - bucket_name_installation == true - bucket_name_configuration == true - bucket_name_validation == true - bucket_name_observable_evidence == true - bucket_name_failure_modes_recovery == true - bucket_name_completion_promotion == true FAIL: - any expected bucket missing -> MISSING IMPACT: - the category cannot mature through an ordered execution path - DH loses the operational skeleton needed to turn progress semantics into project governance - the project remains stuck with declared authority but no staged conclusion model` ] }, { title: "Prerequisites exit condition for progress governance", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites are complete only when progress authority materially exists, is architecturally admitted, is placed in Phase 01, is reachable in DH, is render-ready, is dispatch-admitted, already declares the boundary between advancement and activity, preserves clean category authority and exposes the stage skeleton needed for downstream execution WHY: this bucket closes the entrance of the category by ensuring Devon has a lawful starting position for progress governance before any later stage tries to install criteria, validate claims, demand proof, handle corruption or promote completion EVIDENCE: - aggregate result of all previous prerequisite checks VALIDATION: - all_previous --- end failure_modes occurrence 1 --- --- failure_modes occurrence 2 | line=47513 | index=2519432 --- trol EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_bucket_names: - Prerequisites - Installation - Configuration - Validation - Observable Evidence - Failure Modes & Recovery - Completion & Promotion VALIDATION: - bucket_name_prerequisites == true - bucket_name_installation == true - bucket_name_configuration == true - bucket_name_validation == true - bucket_name_observable_evidence == true - bucket_name_failure_modes_recovery == true - bucket_name_completion_promotion == true FAIL: - any expected bucket missing -> MISSING IMPACT: - the category cannot install as an ordered progress-governance pipeline - DH loses the stage skeleton required to operationalize conclusion truth - the project stays with a declared category but no installed decision flow` ] }, { title: "Installation bucket materialization", items: [ `WHAT: Installation itself must be materialized as a real structured bucket inside the right-column workflow instead of remaining a placeholder pending card WHY: this bucket exists to declare how the category becomes operationally present, so leaving Installation as placeholder means the category skipped the very stage that should explain its own materialization inside the project EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_renderer_call: renderStructuredCard("Installation", installationBuckets) VALIDATION: - installation_bucket_structured == true FAIL: - installation_bucket_structured == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category claims staged execution but omits its own installation contract --- end failure_modes occurrence 2 --- --- failure_modes occurrence 3 | line=48128 | index=2547648 --- laceholder pending card WHY: this bucket must exist as an explicit stage because progress truth in Devon is not only something to recognize but something to defend and repair; without this stage the category has no declared mechanism for protecting its own integrity EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_renderer_call: renderStructuredCard("Failure Modes & Recovery", failureModesRecoveryBuckets) VALIDATION: - failure_modes_recovery_bucket_structured == true FAIL: - failure_modes_recovery_bucket_structured == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category may define recognition law but cannot govern corruption of that law - DH keeps a structural hole exactly where canonical progress integrity should be defended - the project inherits a progress-governance contract that cannot respond to its own breakdown` ] }, { title: "Failure Modes & Recovery authority discipline", items: [ `WHAT: This bucket must remain limited to corruption and restoration of progress recognition, evidentiary integrity and completion-readiness inside Project Progress Canonical, without absorbing failures owned by scope, architecture, sandbox, server registry, runtime or delivery categories WHY: the exclusive role here is to repair the truth of advancement, not to become the universal repair desk of Devon; once this bucket starts owning sibling failures, the project loses clean governance boundaries exactly where corrective authority needs to stay precise EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - source_scope: Project Progress Canonical overview, pre --- end failure_modes occurrence 3 --- --- failure_modes occurrence 4 | line=48131 | index=2547706 --- explicit stage because progress truth in Devon is not only something to recognize but something to defend and repair; without this stage the category has no declared mechanism for protecting its own integrity EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_renderer_call: renderStructuredCard("Failure Modes & Recovery", failureModesRecoveryBuckets) VALIDATION: - failure_modes_recovery_bucket_structured == true FAIL: - failure_modes_recovery_bucket_structured == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category may define recognition law but cannot govern corruption of that law - DH keeps a structural hole exactly where canonical progress integrity should be defended - the project inherits a progress-governance contract that cannot respond to its own breakdown` ] }, { title: "Failure Modes & Recovery authority discipline", items: [ `WHAT: This bucket must remain limited to corruption and restoration of progress recognition, evidentiary integrity and completion-readiness inside Project Progress Canonical, without absorbing failures owned by scope, architecture, sandbox, server registry, runtime or delivery categories WHY: the exclusive role here is to repair the truth of advancement, not to become the universal repair desk of Devon; once this bucket starts owning sibling failures, the project loses clean governance boundaries exactly where corrective authority needs to stay precise EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - source_scope: Project Progress Canonical overview, prerequisites, installation, configuration, validation, obser --- end failure_modes occurrence 4 --- TOKEN: failure_modes_recovery | OCCURRENCES: 4 --- failure_modes_recovery occurrence 1 | line=46561 | index=2475389 --- trol EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_bucket_names: - Prerequisites - Installation - Configuration - Validation - Observable Evidence - Failure Modes & Recovery - Completion & Promotion VALIDATION: - bucket_name_prerequisites == true - bucket_name_installation == true - bucket_name_configuration == true - bucket_name_validation == true - bucket_name_observable_evidence == true - bucket_name_failure_modes_recovery == true - bucket_name_completion_promotion == true FAIL: - any expected bucket missing -> MISSING IMPACT: - the category cannot mature through an ordered execution path - DH loses the operational skeleton needed to turn progress semantics into project governance - the project remains stuck with declared authority but no staged conclusion model` ] }, { title: "Prerequisites exit condition for progress governance", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites are complete only when progress authority materially exists, is architecturally admitted, is placed in Phase 01, is reachable in DH, is render-ready, is dispatch-admitted, already declares the boundary between advancement and activity, preserves clean category authority and exposes the stage skeleton needed for downstream execution WHY: this bucket closes the entrance of the category by ensuring Devon has a lawful starting position for progress governance before any later stage tries to install criteria, validate claims, demand proof, handle corruption or promote completion EVIDENCE: - aggregate result of all previous prerequisite checks VALIDATION: - all_previous_prerequi --- end failure_modes_recovery occurrence 1 --- --- failure_modes_recovery occurrence 2 | line=47513 | index=2519432 --- trol EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_bucket_names: - Prerequisites - Installation - Configuration - Validation - Observable Evidence - Failure Modes & Recovery - Completion & Promotion VALIDATION: - bucket_name_prerequisites == true - bucket_name_installation == true - bucket_name_configuration == true - bucket_name_validation == true - bucket_name_observable_evidence == true - bucket_name_failure_modes_recovery == true - bucket_name_completion_promotion == true FAIL: - any expected bucket missing -> MISSING IMPACT: - the category cannot install as an ordered progress-governance pipeline - DH loses the stage skeleton required to operationalize conclusion truth - the project stays with a declared category but no installed decision flow` ] }, { title: "Installation bucket materialization", items: [ `WHAT: Installation itself must be materialized as a real structured bucket inside the right-column workflow instead of remaining a placeholder pending card WHY: this bucket exists to declare how the category becomes operationally present, so leaving Installation as placeholder means the category skipped the very stage that should explain its own materialization inside the project EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_renderer_call: renderStructuredCard("Installation", installationBuckets) VALIDATION: - installation_bucket_structured == true FAIL: - installation_bucket_structured == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category claims staged execution but omits its own installation contract - DH kee --- end failure_modes_recovery occurrence 2 --- --- failure_modes_recovery occurrence 3 | line=48128 | index=2547648 --- laceholder pending card WHY: this bucket must exist as an explicit stage because progress truth in Devon is not only something to recognize but something to defend and repair; without this stage the category has no declared mechanism for protecting its own integrity EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_renderer_call: renderStructuredCard("Failure Modes & Recovery", failureModesRecoveryBuckets) VALIDATION: - failure_modes_recovery_bucket_structured == true FAIL: - failure_modes_recovery_bucket_structured == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category may define recognition law but cannot govern corruption of that law - DH keeps a structural hole exactly where canonical progress integrity should be defended - the project inherits a progress-governance contract that cannot respond to its own breakdown` ] }, { title: "Failure Modes & Recovery authority discipline", items: [ `WHAT: This bucket must remain limited to corruption and restoration of progress recognition, evidentiary integrity and completion-readiness inside Project Progress Canonical, without absorbing failures owned by scope, architecture, sandbox, server registry, runtime or delivery categories WHY: the exclusive role here is to repair the truth of advancement, not to become the universal repair desk of Devon; once this bucket starts owning sibling failures, the project loses clean governance boundaries exactly where corrective authority needs to stay precise EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - source_scope: Project Progress Canonical overview, prerequisite --- end failure_modes_recovery occurrence 3 --- --- failure_modes_recovery occurrence 4 | line=48131 | index=2547706 --- explicit stage because progress truth in Devon is not only something to recognize but something to defend and repair; without this stage the category has no declared mechanism for protecting its own integrity EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_renderer_call: renderStructuredCard("Failure Modes & Recovery", failureModesRecoveryBuckets) VALIDATION: - failure_modes_recovery_bucket_structured == true FAIL: - failure_modes_recovery_bucket_structured == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category may define recognition law but cannot govern corruption of that law - DH keeps a structural hole exactly where canonical progress integrity should be defended - the project inherits a progress-governance contract that cannot respond to its own breakdown` ] }, { title: "Failure Modes & Recovery authority discipline", items: [ `WHAT: This bucket must remain limited to corruption and restoration of progress recognition, evidentiary integrity and completion-readiness inside Project Progress Canonical, without absorbing failures owned by scope, architecture, sandbox, server registry, runtime or delivery categories WHY: the exclusive role here is to repair the truth of advancement, not to become the universal repair desk of Devon; once this bucket starts owning sibling failures, the project loses clean governance boundaries exactly where corrective authority needs to stay precise EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - source_scope: Project Progress Canonical overview, prerequisites, installation, configuration, validation, observable evi --- end failure_modes_recovery occurrence 4 --- TOKEN: recovery | OCCURRENCES: 46 --- recovery occurrence 1 | line=46254 | index=2462415 --- his means the buckets below must not behave like generic lifecycle cards. They must decompose the real mechanics of progress legitimacy for the project: what has to exist before progress can be judged at all, how the category installs and configures advancement criteria, how validation decides acceptance or rejection of a progress claim, what observable evidence makes that decision defensible, what failure patterns corrupt progress truth and how recovery restores it, and under which exact conditions validated work is finally promoted into official project completion state. If that chain is weak, the whole project loses conclusion integrity.")}

    `; queueMicrotask(() => { const btn = document.getElementById("project-progress-canonical-overview-toggle"); const more = document.getElementById("project-progress-canonical-overview-more"); if (!btn || !more || btn.dataset.bound === "true") return; const toggle = () => { const expanded = btn.getAttribute("aria-expanded") === "true"; btn.setAttribute("aria-expanded", expanded ? "false" : --- end recovery occurrence 1 --- --- recovery occurrence 2 | line=46552 | index=2475144 --- l is not finished by merely existing; the project needs the category to be structurally ready for installation, configuration, validation, evidence, failure handling and promotion or else progress governance cannot mature into usable project control EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_bucket_names: - Prerequisites - Installation - Configuration - Validation - Observable Evidence - Failure Modes & Recovery - Completion & Promotion VALIDATION: - bucket_name_prerequisites == true - bucket_name_installation == true - bucket_name_configuration == true - bucket_name_validation == true - bucket_name_observable_evidence == true - bucket_name_failure_modes_recovery == true - bucket_name_completion_promotion == true FAIL: - any expected bucket missing -> MISSING IMPACT: - the category cannot mature through an ordered execution path - DH loses the operational skeleton needed to turn progress semantics into project governance - the project remains stuck with declared authority but no staged conclusion model` ] }, { title: "Prerequisites exit condition for progress governance", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites are complete only when progress authority materially exists, is architecturally admitted, is placed in Phase 01, is reachable in DH, is render-ready, is dispatch-admitted, already declares the boundary between advancement and activity, preserves clean category authority and exposes the stage skeleton needed for downstream execution WHY: this bucket closes the entrance of the category by ensuring Devon has a lawful starti --- end recovery occurrence 2 --- --- recovery occurrence 3 | line=46561 | index=2475403 --- : - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_bucket_names: - Prerequisites - Installation - Configuration - Validation - Observable Evidence - Failure Modes & Recovery - Completion & Promotion VALIDATION: - bucket_name_prerequisites == true - bucket_name_installation == true - bucket_name_configuration == true - bucket_name_validation == true - bucket_name_observable_evidence == true - bucket_name_failure_modes_recovery == true - bucket_name_completion_promotion == true FAIL: - any expected bucket missing -> MISSING IMPACT: - the category cannot mature through an ordered execution path - DH loses the operational skeleton needed to turn progress semantics into project governance - the project remains stuck with declared authority but no staged conclusion model` ] }, { title: "Prerequisites exit condition for progress governance", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites are complete only when progress authority materially exists, is architecturally admitted, is placed in Phase 01, is reachable in DH, is render-ready, is dispatch-admitted, already declares the boundary between advancement and activity, preserves clean category authority and exposes the stage skeleton needed for downstream execution WHY: this bucket closes the entrance of the category by ensuring Devon has a lawful starting position for progress governance before any later stage tries to install criteria, validate claims, demand proof, handle corruption or promote completion EVIDENCE: - aggregate result of all previous prerequisite checks VALIDATION: - all_previous_prerequi --- end recovery occurrence 3 --- --- recovery occurrence 4 | line=46775 | index=2485029 --- ring how it should make decisions - the project inherits a governance surface with no configured logic for advancement legitimacy` ] }, { title: "Configuration continuity with upstream and downstream stages", items: [ `WHAT: Configuration must connect the authority established in Prerequisites and Installation to the later stages of Validation, Observable Evidence, Failure Modes & Recovery and Completion & Promotion through one coherent progress-governance rule model WHY: the role of this bucket is not isolated rule writing; it has to become the semantic hinge of the category, turning installed authority into a downstream-operable contract that the rest of the stage flow can actually use EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - stage_context: - Prerequisites - Installation - Configuration - Validation - Observable Evidence - Failure Modes & Recovery - Completion & Promotion VALIDATION: - upstream_to_configuration_continuity_present == true - configuration_to_downstream_stages_continuity_present == true - coherent_progress_rule_model_present == true FAIL: - upstream_to_configuration_continuity_present == false -> FAIL - configuration_to_downstream_stages_continuity_present == false -> FAIL - coherent_progress_rule_model_present == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category fragments into disconnected cards instead of one execution contract - DH loses the semantic bridge between declared authority and later decision stages - the project cannot rely on one continuous model of progress legitimacy from entry to conclusion` --- end recovery occurrence 4 --- --- recovery occurrence 5 | line=46788 | index=2485535 --- progress-governance rule model WHY: the role of this bucket is not isolated rule writing; it has to become the semantic hinge of the category, turning installed authority into a downstream-operable contract that the rest of the stage flow can actually use EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - stage_context: - Prerequisites - Installation - Configuration - Validation - Observable Evidence - Failure Modes & Recovery - Completion & Promotion VALIDATION: - upstream_to_configuration_continuity_present == true - configuration_to_downstream_stages_continuity_present == true - coherent_progress_rule_model_present == true FAIL: - upstream_to_configuration_continuity_present == false -> FAIL - configuration_to_downstream_stages_continuity_present == false -> FAIL - coherent_progress_rule_model_present == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category fragments into disconnected cards instead of one execution contract - DH loses the semantic bridge between declared authority and later decision stages - the project cannot rely on one continuous model of progress legitimacy from entry to conclusion` ] }, { title: "Configuration authority discipline", items: [ `WHAT: Configuration must define only the rules of advancement legitimacy and completion recognition for Project Progress Canonical, without configuring scope perimeter, architecture structure, sandbox behavior, server identity, runtime mechanics or delivery closure criteria WHY: this bucket exists to keep the category honest at the moment its rules are written; if Configuration absorbs --- end recovery occurrence 5 --- --- recovery occurrence 6 | line=46850 | index=2488702 --- igures the boundary between progress and completion, excludes non-progress signals, establishes proof dependency, materializes Configuration as a structured bucket, preserves continuity across the stage flow and respects category authority limits WHY: this bucket closes the configuration stage by ensuring Devon no longer has only an installed progress surface, but a configured system of judgment capable of supporting later validation, evidence, recovery and promotion decisions EVIDENCE: - aggregate result of all previous configuration checks VALIDATION: - all_previous_configuration_checks == true FAIL: - any previous configuration check false -> NOT COMPLETE IMPACT: - Validation cannot begin from a configured decision model - Project Progress Canonical remains operationally visible but semantically incomplete - the project continues without a trustworthy configured basis for deciding whether work really advanced anything` ] } ]; const observableEvidenceBuckets = [ { title: "Observable proof that accepted progress is real", items: [ `WHAT: Observable Evidence must expose the concrete proof basis that shows an advancement claim accepted by Project Progress Canonical is not merely believed, narrated or inferred, but materially grounded in observable project reality WHY: the role of Observable Evidence in this category is to make validated progress defensible; Validation may decide that a claim can be accepted, but this bucket must show what makes that acceptance traceable, inspectable and resistant to interpretation drift across the project E --- end recovery occurrence 6 --- --- recovery occurrence 7 | line=47272 | index=2508610 --- losure before the work is actually concluded TRANSITION_NOTE: - this remains transitional because exclusion of non-promotable states is still being validated from declared canonical language rather than executable promotion policy` ] }, { title: "Promotion continuity with upstream resilience", items: [ `WHAT: This bucket must define that promotion is downstream of Failure Modes & Recovery, so no damaged, revoked, downgraded or still-contaminated advancement state is allowed to become official conclusion for the project WHY: the exclusive role here is to ensure the final gate obeys the correction logic of the category; if promotion can bypass failure and recovery, then Devon can detect corrupted progress and still finalize it as trusted completion EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - stage_context: - Failure Modes & Recovery - Completion & Promotion VALIDATION: - failure_recovery_dependency_for_promotion_defined == true - revoked_or_downgraded_state_promotion_block_defined == true - contaminated_advancement_finalization_block_defined == true FAIL: - failure_recovery_dependency_for_promotion_defined == false -> FAIL - revoked_or_downgraded_state_promotion_block_defined == false -> FAIL - contaminated_advancement_finalization_block_defined == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category can repair corrupted progress upstream while still letting it become official finish downstream - DH loses final-gate integrity at the exact point where trust should be strongest - the project becomes exposed to canonically completed states built on already- --- end recovery occurrence 7 --- --- recovery occurrence 8 | line=47275 | index=2508890 --- title: "Promotion continuity with upstream resilience", items: [ `WHAT: This bucket must define that promotion is downstream of Failure Modes & Recovery, so no damaged, revoked, downgraded or still-contaminated advancement state is allowed to become official conclusion for the project WHY: the exclusive role here is to ensure the final gate obeys the correction logic of the category; if promotion can bypass failure and recovery, then Devon can detect corrupted progress and still finalize it as trusted completion EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - stage_context: - Failure Modes & Recovery - Completion & Promotion VALIDATION: - failure_recovery_dependency_for_promotion_defined == true - revoked_or_downgraded_state_promotion_block_defined == true - contaminated_advancement_finalization_block_defined == true FAIL: - failure_recovery_dependency_for_promotion_defined == false -> FAIL - revoked_or_downgraded_state_promotion_block_defined == false -> FAIL - contaminated_advancement_finalization_block_defined == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category can repair corrupted progress upstream while still letting it become official finish downstream - DH loses final-gate integrity at the exact point where trust should be strongest - the project becomes exposed to canonically completed states built on already-compromised advancement truth` ] }, { title: "Completion & Promotion bucket materialization", items: [ `WHAT: Completion & Promotion itself must be materialized as a real structured bucket inside the left-column wo --- end recovery occurrence 8 --- TOKEN: completion | OCCURRENCES: 146 --- completion occurrence 1 | line=46252 | index=2460865 ---
    `; queueMicrotask(() => { const btn = document.getElementById("project-progress-canonical-overview-toggle"); const more = document.getElementById("project-progress-canonical-overview-more"); if (!btn || !more || btn.dataset.bound === "true") return; const toggle = () => { const expanded = btn.getAttribute("aria-expanded") === "true"; btn.setAttribute("aria-expanded", expanded ? "false" : "true"); more.hidden = expanded; more.style.display = expanded ? "none" : "grid"; --- end completion occurrence 3 --- --- completion occurrence 4 | line=46331 | index=2465742 --- title: "Root-architecture admission of progress governance", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites must prove that progress governance is admitted into the sovereign architecture baseline of the project rather than existing as an orphan file with no formal standing WHY: the role of this bucket is not merely to confirm file presence; it has to guarantee that progress authority is recognized by the root model that organizes Devon, otherwise completion truth would exist outside the same structural law that governs the rest of the program EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/master_architecture_index.md - search_term: Project Progress Canonical VALIDATION: - master_registration_present == true FAIL: - master_registration_present == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - advancement law becomes detached from project architecture - later operational surfaces can reference progress without sovereign admission - the project loses continuity between structure and conclusion` ] }, { title: "Phase-01 placement before downstream interpretation", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites must place Project Progress Canonical inside Phase 01 Overview & Scope so the meaning of progress is established before runtime, reporting, monitoring or panel interpretation starts consuming advancement signals WHY: the bucket exists to force sequencing discipline: Devon must define what counts as progress before it starts reasoning about the state of the project, otherwise downstream layers inherit ungoverned maturity assumptions EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/h --- end completion occurrence 4 --- --- completion occurrence 5 | line=46376 | index=2467454 --- ed_category_id: overview_scope - expected_doc_id: project_progress_canonical VALIDATION: - phase_binding_present == true - category_binding_present == true - doc_id_present == true FAIL: - phase_binding_present == false -> FAIL - category_binding_present == false -> FAIL - doc_id_present == false -> MISSING IMPACT: - progress semantics enter the project too late - downstream categories can start emitting maturity interpretations without prior completion law - the project loses ordering discipline between definition and operational consumption` ] }, { title: "Documentation Hub reachability of progress law", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites must guarantee that the category is reachable from Documentation Hub as an operator-consultable source of truth for advancement legitimacy WHY: the bucket has to ensure that progress authority is not trapped in storage; if the category cannot be reached where operators inspect project state, then completion truth remains declared but not governable in practice EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/hub_index.json - expected_doc_id: project_progress_canonical - expected_category_id: overview_scope VALIDATION: - nav_doc_entry_present == true - nav_category_binding_present == true FAIL: - nav_doc_entry_present == false -> MISSING - nav_category_binding_present == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - operators lose access to the category that should decide whether progress is real - DH stops serving as the execution-facing interface of completion law - the project drifts back toward memory-based progress judgment` --- end completion occurrence 5 --- --- completion occurrence 6 | line=46387 | index=2468016 --- ] }, { title: "Documentation Hub reachability of progress law", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites must guarantee that the category is reachable from Documentation Hub as an operator-consultable source of truth for advancement legitimacy WHY: the bucket has to ensure that progress authority is not trapped in storage; if the category cannot be reached where operators inspect project state, then completion truth remains declared but not governable in practice EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/hub_index.json - expected_doc_id: project_progress_canonical - expected_category_id: overview_scope VALIDATION: - nav_doc_entry_present == true - nav_category_binding_present == true FAIL: - nav_doc_entry_present == false -> MISSING - nav_category_binding_present == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - operators lose access to the category that should decide whether progress is real - DH stops serving as the execution-facing interface of completion law - the project drifts back toward memory-based progress judgment` ] }, { title: "Dedicated rendering readiness for progress semantics", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites must ensure that Project Progress Canonical is prepared to render through its own custom DH branch so progress authority can be expressed as category-specific execution logic instead of generic document output WHY: this bucket exists because progress is not a passive note; the project needs the category to speak in its own operational language, otherwise the semantics of advancement legitimacy get flatte --- end completion occurrence 6 --- --- completion occurrence 7 | line=46404 | index=2468572 --- /devon/panel/data/hub_index.json - expected_doc_id: project_progress_canonical - expected_category_id: overview_scope VALIDATION: - nav_doc_entry_present == true - nav_category_binding_present == true FAIL: - nav_doc_entry_present == false -> MISSING - nav_category_binding_present == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - operators lose access to the category that should decide whether progress is real - DH stops serving as the execution-facing interface of completion law - the project drifts back toward memory-based progress judgment` ] }, { title: "Dedicated rendering readiness for progress semantics", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites must ensure that Project Progress Canonical is prepared to render through its own custom DH branch so progress authority can be expressed as category-specific execution logic instead of generic document output WHY: this bucket exists because progress is not a passive note; the project needs the category to speak in its own operational language, otherwise the semantics of advancement legitimacy get flattened before the category even begins to execute EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_branch_signature: doc.id === "project_progress_canonical" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope" VALIDATION: - custom_branch_exists == true FAIL: - custom_branch_exists == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category can exist but still fail to present its own governance logic - DH reduces progress authority to generic content exposure - the project loses semantic precision exactly where conclusion rules should become explicit` --- end completion occurrence 7 --- --- completion occurrence 8 | line=46463 | index=2471252 --- ses trust in the bridge between canon and runtime behavior` ] }, { title: "Declared boundary between progress and mere activity", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites must show that the category already declares a boundary between work that happened and work that deserves canonical recognition as advancement, including the difference between partial movement, valid progress and concluded completion WHY: this bucket exists because the category cannot govern anything if it does not first announce what domain it is supposed to separate; the project needs a declared frontier between motion and advancement before later stages can configure, validate or prove anything EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_progress_canonical.json - expected_progress_controls: - advancement legitimacy - partial versus valid distinction - completion recognition boundary - non-progress exclusions VALIDATION: - transitional_validation_only == true - advancement_legitimacy_boundary_present == true - partial_vs_valid_distinction_present == true - completion_recognition_boundary_present == true - non_progress_exclusions_present == true FAIL: - advancement_legitimacy_boundary_present == false -> FAIL - partial_vs_valid_distinction_present == false -> FAIL - completion_recognition_boundary_present == false -> FAIL - non_progress_exclusions_present == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category starts without its own semantic perimeter - later stages would configure and validate an undefined notion of progress - the whole project becomes exposed to ambiguous completion --- end completion occurrence 8 --- TOKEN: completionPromotion | OCCURRENCES: 3 --- completionPromotion occurrence 1 | line=47127 | index=2501729 --- cks VALIDATION: - all_previous_observable_evidence_checks == true FAIL: - any previous observable evidence check false -> NOT COMPLETE IMPACT: - Completion & Promotion cannot begin from a trustworthy proof-backed state - Project Progress Canonical remains validated but not evidentially defensible - the project continues without a dependable observable basis for recognized advancement` ] } ]; const completionPromotionBuckets = [ { title: "Admission into official project advancement state", items: [ `WHAT: This bucket must define the exact point at which validated and evidenced work is no longer treated as merely acceptable progress signal and is formally admitted into Devon's official advancement state as recognized project gain WHY: the exclusive role of Completion & Promotion in this category is to convert defensible advancement into canonical status; everything upstream exists to judge and support progress, but this bucket decides when that progress is allowed to become part of the project's official forward state EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_progress_canonical.json - promotion_focus: - admission into recognized advancement state - official project gain - canonical forward-state inclusion VALIDATION: - transitional_validation_only == true - official_advancement_state_admission_defined == true - recognized_project_gain_defined == true - canonical_forward_state_inclusion_defined == true FAIL: - official_advancement_state_admission_defined == false -> FAIL - recognized_project_gain_defined == false -> FA --- end completionPromotion occurrence 1 --- --- completionPromotion occurrence 2 | line=47310 | index=2510537 --- t-column workflow instead of remaining a placeholder pending card WHY: this bucket must exist as an explicit stage because Project Progress Canonical is incomplete until it declares how lawful advancement becomes official project recognition; without this stage the category governs evaluation but not conclusion EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_renderer_call: renderStructuredCard("Completion & Promotion", completionPromotionBuckets) VALIDATION: - completion_promotion_bucket_structured == true FAIL: - completion_promotion_bucket_structured == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category can judge progress but cannot finish the recognition cycle it was built to govern - DH keeps a structural hole exactly where official advancement and completion should be canonized - the project inherits a progress-governance contract with no declared final gate` ] }, { title: "Completion & Promotion authority discipline", items: [ `WHAT: This bucket must remain limited to promotion of lawful advancement and recognition of lawful completion inside Project Progress Canonical, without absorbing scope closure, architecture closure, sandbox graduation, server registration finalization, runtime readiness or delivery acceptance owned by sibling categories WHY: the exclusive role of this bucket is to finalize progress truth, not to finalize every kind of truth in Devon; once promotion starts owning sibling completion domains, the category stops representing advancement law and starts corrupting the governance map of the whole project EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/pu --- end completionPromotion occurrence 2 --- --- completionPromotion occurrence 3 | line=47389 | index=2514580 --- t continues without a dependable final gate for lawful advancement and completion truth` ] } ]; const leftHtml = [ renderStructuredCard("Prerequisites", prerequisitesBuckets), renderStructuredCard("Configuration", configurationBuckets), renderStructuredCard("Observable Evidence", observableEvidenceBuckets), renderStructuredCard("Completion & Promotion", completionPromotionBuckets) ].join(""); const installationBuckets = [ { title: "Documentation Hub installation of progress authority", items: [ `WHAT: Installation must materialize Project Progress Canonical inside Documentation Hub as a live category surface where Devon can consult, expose and operate the official rules of advancement legitimacy WHY: the role of Installation in this category is not to define progress itself but to make progress authority operationally present; without installation, completion law may exist in storage yet remain absent from the place where project state is actually interpreted EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_branch_signature: doc.id === "project_progress_canonical" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope" - expected_return_kind: html VALIDATION: - custom_branch_exists == true - branch_returns_html_contract == true FAIL: - custom_branch_exists == false -> FAIL - branch_returns_html_contract == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - progress authority remains declared but not installed as an execution surface - DH cannot serve as the operational entrypoint for conclusion trut --- end completionPromotion occurrence 3 --- TOKEN: completion_promotion | OCCURRENCES: 13 --- completion_promotion occurrence 1 | line=46562 | index=2475434 --- l/devon/docs/index.php - expected_bucket_names: - Prerequisites - Installation - Configuration - Validation - Observable Evidence - Failure Modes & Recovery - Completion & Promotion VALIDATION: - bucket_name_prerequisites == true - bucket_name_installation == true - bucket_name_configuration == true - bucket_name_validation == true - bucket_name_observable_evidence == true - bucket_name_failure_modes_recovery == true - bucket_name_completion_promotion == true FAIL: - any expected bucket missing -> MISSING IMPACT: - the category cannot mature through an ordered execution path - DH loses the operational skeleton needed to turn progress semantics into project governance - the project remains stuck with declared authority but no staged conclusion model` ] }, { title: "Prerequisites exit condition for progress governance", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites are complete only when progress authority materially exists, is architecturally admitted, is placed in Phase 01, is reachable in DH, is render-ready, is dispatch-admitted, already declares the boundary between advancement and activity, preserves clean category authority and exposes the stage skeleton needed for downstream execution WHY: this bucket closes the entrance of the category by ensuring Devon has a lawful starting position for progress governance before any later stage tries to install criteria, validate claims, demand proof, handle corruption or promote completion EVIDENCE: - aggregate result of all previous prerequisite checks VALIDATION: - all_previous_prerequisite_checks == true FAIL: - any previous p --- end completion_promotion occurrence 1 --- --- completion_promotion occurrence 2 | line=46995 | index=2495458 --- n alone is not enough for project trust; Devon needs a stage that turns accepted judgment into observable support, otherwise validated progress becomes a black-box decision with no visible proof chain EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - stage_context: - Validation - Observable Evidence - Completion & Promotion VALIDATION: - validation_to_observable_evidence_proof_bridge_present == true - observable_evidence_to_completion_promotion_bridge_present == true - validated_progress_not_self_justifying_present == true FAIL: - validation_to_observable_evidence_proof_bridge_present == false -> FAIL - observable_evidence_to_completion_promotion_bridge_present == false -> FAIL - validated_progress_not_self_justifying_present == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category breaks the proof chain between accepted progress and promoted completion state - DH loses continuity between judgment and evidence - the project cannot trust that validated advancement has actually been made observable before conclusion decisions` ] }, { title: "Observable Evidence bucket materialization", items: [ `WHAT: Observable Evidence itself must be materialized as a real structured bucket inside the left-column workflow instead of remaining a placeholder pending card WHY: this bucket exists because the category cannot claim evidence-backed progress governance while leaving the stage that exposes proof empty; Observable Evidence is where accepted advancement becomes externally defensible within the project EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_render --- end completion_promotion occurrence 2 --- --- completion_promotion occurrence 3 | line=47000 | index=2495665 --- NCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - stage_context: - Validation - Observable Evidence - Completion & Promotion VALIDATION: - validation_to_observable_evidence_proof_bridge_present == true - observable_evidence_to_completion_promotion_bridge_present == true - validated_progress_not_self_justifying_present == true FAIL: - validation_to_observable_evidence_proof_bridge_present == false -> FAIL - observable_evidence_to_completion_promotion_bridge_present == false -> FAIL - validated_progress_not_self_justifying_present == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category breaks the proof chain between accepted progress and promoted completion state - DH loses continuity between judgment and evidence - the project cannot trust that validated advancement has actually been made observable before conclusion decisions` ] }, { title: "Observable Evidence bucket materialization", items: [ `WHAT: Observable Evidence itself must be materialized as a real structured bucket inside the left-column workflow instead of remaining a placeholder pending card WHY: this bucket exists because the category cannot claim evidence-backed progress governance while leaving the stage that exposes proof empty; Observable Evidence is where accepted advancement becomes externally defensible within the project EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_renderer_call: renderStructuredCard("Observable Evidence", observableEvidenceBuckets) VALIDATION: - observable_evidence_bucket_structured == true FAIL: - observable_evidence_bucket_structured == false -> FAIL I --- end completion_promotion occurrence 3 --- --- completion_promotion occurrence 4 | line=47052 | index=2498003 --- becoming decorative afterthought; it has to remain structurally connected to both the acceptance decision behind it and the promotion decision ahead of it or else the category loses conclusion integrity EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - stage_context: - Validation - Observable Evidence - Completion & Promotion VALIDATION: - validation_to_observable_evidence_continuity_present == true - observable_evidence_to_completion_promotion_continuity_present == true - continuous_advancement_recognition_chain_present == true FAIL: - validation_to_observable_evidence_continuity_present == false -> FAIL - observable_evidence_to_completion_promotion_continuity_present == false -> FAIL - continuous_advancement_recognition_chain_present == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category fragments between acceptance, proof and conclusion - DH loses the chain that makes recognized progress operationally trustworthy - the project becomes exposed to disconnected decisions where evidence no longer carries forward into official completion logic` ] }, { title: "Observable Evidence authority discipline", items: [ `WHAT: Observable Evidence must expose proof only for advancement legitimacy and completion-readiness inside Project Progress Canonical, without becoming the evidentiary owner of scope perimeter, architecture structure, sandbox trust, server identity, runtime behavior or delivery closure WHY: this bucket exists to keep the category from overreaching at the proof layer; if evidence authority expands into sibling domains, Devon turns progress proof into a dumping gr --- end completion_promotion occurrence 4 --- --- completion_promotion occurrence 5 | line=47057 | index=2498214 --- E: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - stage_context: - Validation - Observable Evidence - Completion & Promotion VALIDATION: - validation_to_observable_evidence_continuity_present == true - observable_evidence_to_completion_promotion_continuity_present == true - continuous_advancement_recognition_chain_present == true FAIL: - validation_to_observable_evidence_continuity_present == false -> FAIL - observable_evidence_to_completion_promotion_continuity_present == false -> FAIL - continuous_advancement_recognition_chain_present == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category fragments between acceptance, proof and conclusion - DH loses the chain that makes recognized progress operationally trustworthy - the project becomes exposed to disconnected decisions where evidence no longer carries forward into official completion logic` ] }, { title: "Observable Evidence authority discipline", items: [ `WHAT: Observable Evidence must expose proof only for advancement legitimacy and completion-readiness inside Project Progress Canonical, without becoming the evidentiary owner of scope perimeter, architecture structure, sandbox trust, server identity, runtime behavior or delivery closure WHY: this bucket exists to keep the category from overreaching at the proof layer; if evidence authority expands into sibling domains, Devon turns progress proof into a dumping ground for truths that belong to other categories EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - source_scope: Project Progress Canonical overview, prerequisites, installation, configuration, val --- end completion_promotion occurrence 5 --- --- completion_promotion occurrence 6 | line=47313 | index=2510580 --- aceholder pending card WHY: this bucket must exist as an explicit stage because Project Progress Canonical is incomplete until it declares how lawful advancement becomes official project recognition; without this stage the category governs evaluation but not conclusion EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_renderer_call: renderStructuredCard("Completion & Promotion", completionPromotionBuckets) VALIDATION: - completion_promotion_bucket_structured == true FAIL: - completion_promotion_bucket_structured == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category can judge progress but cannot finish the recognition cycle it was built to govern - DH keeps a structural hole exactly where official advancement and completion should be canonized - the project inherits a progress-governance contract with no declared final gate` ] }, { title: "Completion & Promotion authority discipline", items: [ `WHAT: This bucket must remain limited to promotion of lawful advancement and recognition of lawful completion inside Project Progress Canonical, without absorbing scope closure, architecture closure, sandbox graduation, server registration finalization, runtime readiness or delivery acceptance owned by sibling categories WHY: the exclusive role of this bucket is to finalize progress truth, not to finalize every kind of truth in Devon; once promotion starts owning sibling completion domains, the category stops representing advancement law and starts corrupting the governance map of the whole project EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - source_scop --- end completion_promotion occurrence 6 --- --- completion_promotion occurrence 7 | line=47316 | index=2510636 --- n explicit stage because Project Progress Canonical is incomplete until it declares how lawful advancement becomes official project recognition; without this stage the category governs evaluation but not conclusion EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_renderer_call: renderStructuredCard("Completion & Promotion", completionPromotionBuckets) VALIDATION: - completion_promotion_bucket_structured == true FAIL: - completion_promotion_bucket_structured == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category can judge progress but cannot finish the recognition cycle it was built to govern - DH keeps a structural hole exactly where official advancement and completion should be canonized - the project inherits a progress-governance contract with no declared final gate` ] }, { title: "Completion & Promotion authority discipline", items: [ `WHAT: This bucket must remain limited to promotion of lawful advancement and recognition of lawful completion inside Project Progress Canonical, without absorbing scope closure, architecture closure, sandbox graduation, server registration finalization, runtime readiness or delivery acceptance owned by sibling categories WHY: the exclusive role of this bucket is to finalize progress truth, not to finalize every kind of truth in Devon; once promotion starts owning sibling completion domains, the category stops representing advancement law and starts corrupting the governance map of the whole project EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - source_scope: Project Progress Canonical overview, prerequisites, i --- end completion_promotion occurrence 7 --- --- completion_promotion occurrence 8 | line=47339 | index=2512025 --- rts owning sibling completion domains, the category stops representing advancement law and starts corrupting the governance map of the whole project EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - source_scope: Project Progress Canonical overview, prerequisites, installation, configuration, validation, observable evidence, failure/recovery and completion/promotion definitions VALIDATION: - transitional_validation_only == true - completion_promotion_respects_progress_authority == true - no_scope_completion_absorption == true - no_architecture_completion_absorption == true - no_sandbox_completion_absorption == true - no_server_registry_completion_absorption == true - no_runtime_completion_absorption == true - no_delivery_completion_absorption == true FAIL: - completion_promotion_respects_progress_authority == false -> FAIL - any sibling completion absorption == true -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category starts finalizing truths it does not own - DH governance boundaries collapse at the final recognition layer - the project loses determinism about what this category is allowed to officially conclude TRANSITION_NOTE: - this remains transitional because authority discipline is still being validated from rendered contract semantics rather than structural ownership enforcement` ] }, { title: "Completion & Promotion exit condition for progress governance", items: [ `WHAT: Completion & Promotion is complete only when Project Progress Canonical defines admission into official advancement state, defines the lawful threshold from progress to completion, requires preserved pro --- end completion_promotion occurrence 8 --- ----- LAST CARD-LIKE OBJECTS IN BRANCH ----- CARD_OBJECT_COUNT: 59 --- CARD_OBJECT #50 | line=47879 | index=2535946 --- ntract semantics rather than enforced through structural ownership bindings` ] }, { title: "Validation exit condition for progress governance", items: [ `WHAT: Validation is complete only when Project Progress Canonical can test advancement admissibility, verify the boundary between progress and completion, reject configured non-progress signals, preserve proof dependency, materialize Validation as a structured bucket, maintain continuity with configuration and evidence, and respect category authority limits WHY: this bucket closes the validation stage by ensuring Devon no longer has only configured progress rules, but an actual canonical judgment layer capable of deciding whether executed work deserves recognition as legitimate advancement EVIDENCE: - aggregate result of all previous validation checks VALIDATION: - all_previous_validation_checks == true FAIL: - any previous validation check false -> NOT COMPLETE IMPACT: - Observable E --- end CARD_OBJECT #50 --- --- CARD_OBJECT #51 | line=47905 | index=2537172 --- ment legitimacy` ] } ]; const failureModesRecoveryBuckets = [ { title: "Collapse of the recognition boundary", items: [ `WHAT: This bucket must define the failure state in which Project Progress Canonical stops separating executed work from recognized progress and begins treating motion, busyness or visible implementation as if they had already earned canonical advancement status WHY: the exclusive role of Failure Modes & Recovery in this category is to protect the recognition boundary itself; if that line collapses, Devon loses the only contract that tells the project when work has merely happened and when it has legitimately advanced the program EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_progress_canonical.json - failure_focus: - execution mistaken for advancement - activity mistaken for recognized progress - visible movement mistaken for canonical gain VALIDATION: - transitional_va --- end CARD_OBJECT #51 --- --- CARD_OBJECT #52 | line=47941 | index=2538944 --- ntics rather than detected through machine-enforced progress classification` ] }, { title: "Inflation of progress into premature completion truth", items: [ `WHAT: This bucket must define the failure state in which valid progress, partial attainment or promising movement is promoted beyond its lawful stage and starts appearing as if Devon had already reached canonical completion on that unit WHY: the bucket exists here to protect the final meaning of completion from being stolen by momentum; in this category the dangerous corruption is not only false progress entry but also unlawful enlargement of progress into official finish before the project has earned that conclusion EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_progress_canonical.json - failure_focus: - partial attainment elevated to completion - progress state enlarged into finish state - conclusion granted before completion law is satisfied VALIDATI --- end CARD_OBJECT #52 --- --- CARD_OBJECT #53 | line=47977 | index=2540690 --- lidated from canonical text rather than formal completion-state enforcement` ] }, { title: "Detachment of accepted progress from observable proof", items: [ `WHAT: This bucket must define the failure state in which a progress claim remains canonically accepted even though the proof chain that should justify that acceptance is missing, degraded, opaque or no longer traceable WHY: the role of this bucket is to defend the evidentiary integrity of progress truth; once accepted advancement can survive without proof, the category no longer governs recognizable project advancement but only preserves undocumented approval memory EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_progress_canonical.json - failure_focus: - accepted progress without traceable proof - proof chain degradation - opaque canonical acceptance VALIDATION: - transitional_validation_only == true - proof_detachment_failure_defined == true - traceabi --- end CARD_OBJECT #53 --- --- CARD_OBJECT #54 | line=48013 | index=2542341 --- ct semantics rather than enforced through formal evidence-to-state bindings` ] }, { title: "Recovery of canonical progress integrity", items: [ `WHAT: This bucket must define how Devon restores Project Progress Canonical after the truth of progress has been contaminated, specifically by re-establishing the lawful line between execution, advancement, completion-readiness and recognized finish WHY: Failure Modes & Recovery in this category is not generic remediation; its exclusive role is to restore integrity to the project's advancement truth so the system can once again decide what has genuinely moved forward and what must be pushed back out of recognition EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - recovery_focus: - restore advancement recognition boundary - restore lawful completion threshold - restore traceable progress truth VALIDATION: - transitional_validation_only == true - advancement_recognition_restora --- end CARD_OBJECT #54 --- --- CARD_OBJECT #55 | line=48049 | index=2544042 --- ed at contract level rather than implemented as executable remediation flow` ] }, { title: "Revocation of illegitimate recognition", items: [ `WHAT: This bucket must define how Project Progress Canonical removes, downgrades or reverses advancement states that were recognized without lawful basis, promoted too early or kept alive after their proof foundation collapsed WHY: the role of recovery here is materially corrective; this category is responsible for official recognition, so when recognition was granted illegitimately it must also define how that recognition is withdrawn from the canonical state of the project EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - recovery_focus: - remove unlawful recognized progress - downgrade premature completion states - reverse proof-collapsed recognition VALIDATION: - transitional_validation_only == true - unlawful_recognition_revocation_defined == true - premature_completion_do --- end CARD_OBJECT #55 --- --- CARD_OBJECT #56 | line=48082 | index=2545511 --- decisions on advancement states that should have been withdrawn from truth` ] }, { title: "Containment before promotion", items: [ `WHAT: This bucket must define how corrupted progress states are stopped from flowing forward into Completion & Promotion, so a damaged recognition state cannot harden into official conclusion for the project WHY: its role inside this category is to intercept corrupted advancement before the final gate; if recovery does not actively contain downstream spread, then Project Progress Canonical can acknowledge corruption and still let it become official completion truth EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - stage_context: - Observable Evidence - Failure Modes & Recovery - Completion & Promotion VALIDATION: - observable_evidence_to_failure_recovery_continuity_present == true - failure_recovery_to_completion_promotion_containment_present == true - corrupted_progress_promotion_block_ --- end CARD_OBJECT #56 --- --- CARD_OBJECT #57 | line=48114 | index=2546956 --- sed to final conclusions built on already-corrupted advancement recognition` ] }, { title: "Failure Modes & Recovery bucket materialization", items: [ `WHAT: Failure Modes & Recovery itself must be materialized as a real structured bucket inside the right-column workflow instead of remaining a placeholder pending card WHY: this bucket must exist as an explicit stage because progress truth in Devon is not only something to recognize but something to defend and repair; without this stage the category has no declared mechanism for protecting its own integrity EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_renderer_call: renderStructuredCard("Failure Modes & Recovery", failureModesRecoveryBuckets) VALIDATION: - failure_modes_recovery_bucket_structured == true FAIL: - failure_modes_recovery_bucket_structured == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category may define recognition law but cannot govern corruption of that law --- end CARD_OBJECT #57 --- --- CARD_OBJECT #58 | line=48139 | index=2548086 --- its a progress-governance contract that cannot respond to its own breakdown` ] }, { title: "Failure Modes & Recovery authority discipline", items: [ `WHAT: This bucket must remain limited to corruption and restoration of progress recognition, evidentiary integrity and completion-readiness inside Project Progress Canonical, without absorbing failures owned by scope, architecture, sandbox, server registry, runtime or delivery categories WHY: the exclusive role here is to repair the truth of advancement, not to become the universal repair desk of Devon; once this bucket starts owning sibling failures, the project loses clean governance boundaries exactly where corrective authority needs to stay precise EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - source_scope: Project Progress Canonical overview, prerequisites, installation, configuration, validation, observable evidence and failure/recovery definitions VALIDATION: - tran --- end CARD_OBJECT #58 --- --- CARD_OBJECT #59 | line=48175 | index=2549917 --- om rendered contract semantics rather than structural ownership enforcement` ] }, { title: "Failure Modes & Recovery exit condition for progress governance", items: [ `WHAT: Failure Modes & Recovery is complete only when Project Progress Canonical defines the collapse of the recognition boundary, defines inflation of progress into premature completion truth, defines detachment from proof, defines how canonical progress integrity is restored, defines how illegitimate recognition is revoked, defines how corruption is contained before promotion, materializes the bucket as a structured stage and preserves authority boundaries WHY: this bucket closes the resilience stage by ensuring Devon no longer has only a way to recognize progress, but also a category-specific mechanism for protecting, correcting and re-stabilizing the truth of project advancement when that truth is damaged EVIDENCE: - aggregate result of all previous failure and recovery --- end CARD_OBJECT #59 --- ----- RECOMMENDED NEXT ACTION ----- Use this report to build one REPLACE patch for this DOC_ID only. Insert new card objects into existing bucket arrays where anchors are unambiguous. Do not replace existing card text. Do not create a new visual bucket. ======================================================================================================================== DOC_ID: project_progress_model LABEL: Project Progress Model STATUS: CUSTOM_BRANCH BRANCH_START_INDEX: 2557177 BRANCH_END_INDEX: 2723028 BRANCH_START_LINE: 48309 BRANCH_SIZE_CHARS: 165851 ----- ARRAY / BUCKET-LIKE DECLARATIONS ----- DECL: prerequisitesBuckets | line=48423 | index=2564488 DECL: configurationBuckets | line=48723 | index=2578204 DECL: observableEvidenceBuckets | line=48994 | index=2590547 DECL: completionPromotionBuckets | line=49258 | index=2604143 DECL: installationBuckets | line=49524 | index=2617879 DECL: validationBuckets | line=49771 | index=2628684 DECL: failureModesRecoveryBuckets | line=50035 | index=2641411 DECL: configured | line=48381 | index=2562547 DECL: configure | line=48590 | index=2572312 DECL: installation | line=48667 | index=2575896 DECL: configuration | line=48667 | index=2575910 DECL: validation | line=48667 | index=2575925 DECL: evidence | line=48667 | index=2575937 DECL: Validation | line=48900 | index=2586095 DECL: Evidence | line=48900 | index=2586118 DECL: prerequisites | line=48943 | index=2588175 DECL: bucket | line=48973 | index=2589676 DECL: Recovery | line=49403 | index=2611577 DECL: recovery | line=49406 | index=2611872 DECL: failures | line=50277 | index=2653067 DECL: validated | line=50731 | index=2673165 ----- BUCKET LABEL / KEY OCCURRENCES ----- Prerequisites: PASS | occurrences=30 | first_line=48423 | first_index=2564494 Installation: PASS | occurrences=67 | first_line=48667 | first_index=2575896 Configuration: PASS | occurrences=68 | first_line=48667 | first_index=2575910 Validation: PASS | occurrences=200 | first_line=48436 | first_index=2565265 Observable Evidence: PASS | occurrences=46 | first_line=48381 | first_index=2562623 Failure Modes & Recovery: PASS | occurrences=20 | first_line=48677 | first_index=2576232 Completion & Promotion: PASS | occurrences=25 | first_line=48678 | first_index=2576261 ----- TARGETED INSERTION CONTEXTS ----- TOKEN: prerequisites | OCCURRENCES: 30 --- prerequisites occurrence 1 | line=48423 | index=2564494 --- ais..." : "menos"; }; btn.dataset.bound = "true"; btn.addEventListener("click", toggle); btn.addEventListener("keydown", (event) => { if (event.key === "Enter" || event.key === " ") { event.preventDefault(); toggle(); } }); more.hidden = true; more.style.display = "none"; }); const prerequisitesBuckets = [ { title: "Material existence of the progress modeling authority", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites must establish that Project Progress Model already exists as the declared category responsible for how Devon structurally represents progress once advancement has been recognized as real WHY: this bucket is the lawful entrypoint of the category because the project cannot consume progress consistently if the modeling authority itself is absent; before any state vocabulary, aggregation rule or representational surface can be trusted, Devon needs a sovereign artifact that owns the shape of progress representation EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_progress_model.json VALIDATION: - exists(file_path) == true FAIL: - exists(file_path) == false -> MISSING IMPACT: - the category has no material authority to define progress representation - progress remains exposed to ad-hoc modeling across docs, panel and review surfaces - the project can recognize advancement canonically but still fail to express it coherently` ] }, { title: "Admission of the progress --- end prerequisites occurrence 1 --- --- prerequisites occurrence 2 | line=48428 | index=2564641 --- entListener("keydown", (event) => { if (event.key === "Enter" || event.key === " ") { event.preventDefault(); toggle(); } }); more.hidden = true; more.style.display = "none"; }); const prerequisitesBuckets = [ { title: "Material existence of the progress modeling authority", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites must establish that Project Progress Model already exists as the declared category responsible for how Devon structurally represents progress once advancement has been recognized as real WHY: this bucket is the lawful entrypoint of the category because the project cannot consume progress consistently if the modeling authority itself is absent; before any state vocabulary, aggregation rule or representational surface can be trusted, Devon needs a sovereign artifact that owns the shape of progress representation EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_progress_model.json VALIDATION: - exists(file_path) == true FAIL: - exists(file_path) == false -> MISSING IMPACT: - the category has no material authority to define progress representation - progress remains exposed to ad-hoc modeling across docs, panel and review surfaces - the project can recognize advancement canonically but still fail to express it coherently` ] }, { title: "Admission of the progress model into the root architecture baseline", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites must prove that Project Progress Model is registered in the --- end prerequisites occurrence 2 --- --- prerequisites occurrence 3 | line=48452 | index=2565781 --- == false -> MISSING IMPACT: - the category has no material authority to define progress representation - progress remains exposed to ad-hoc modeling across docs, panel and review surfaces - the project can recognize advancement canonically but still fail to express it coherently` ] }, { title: "Admission of the progress model into the root architecture baseline", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites must prove that Project Progress Model is registered in the Master Architecture Index as an official Phase 01 category artifact instead of floating as an isolated file with no sovereign architectural standing WHY: the role of this bucket is to guarantee that progress representation is not treated as optional notation; it must be admitted into the same root baseline that governs the rest of Devon, otherwise the project can end up with lawful progress semantics but no architecturally recognized model for expressing them EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/master_architecture_index.md - search_term: Project Progress Model VALIDATION: - master_registration_present == true FAIL: - master_registration_present == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the progress model becomes architecturally orphaned - later surfaces may consume representational logic that was never sovereignly admitted - the project loses continuity between structural canon and modeled progress state` ] }, { title: "Phase-01 placement before downstream consumption", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites must place Project Progress Model inside Phase --- end prerequisites occurrence 3 --- --- prerequisites occurrence 4 | line=48477 | index=2566934 --- sent == true FAIL: - master_registration_present == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the progress model becomes architecturally orphaned - later surfaces may consume representational logic that was never sovereignly admitted - the project loses continuity between structural canon and modeled progress state` ] }, { title: "Phase-01 placement before downstream consumption", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites must place Project Progress Model inside Phase 01 Overview & Scope so Devon defines the representational grammar of progress before reporting, panel interpretation or operational review starts consuming progress state WHY: this bucket exists to force ordering discipline at the project level: the system must know how progress is represented before downstream surfaces read, compare or aggregate it, otherwise each consumer is tempted to invent its own state language EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/hub_index.json - expected_phase_id: phase-01 - expected_category_id: overview_scope - expected_doc_id: project_progress_model VALIDATION: - phase_binding_present == true - category_binding_present == true - doc_id_present == true FAIL: - phase_binding_present == false -> FAIL - category_binding_present == false -> FAIL - doc_id_present == false -> MISSING IMPACT: - progress representation enters the project too late - downstream surfaces may establish their own competing modeling logic first - the project loses sequencing discipline between definition and consumption of progress state` ] }, { title: "Document --- end prerequisites occurrence 4 --- --- prerequisites occurrence 5 | line=48508 | index=2568227 --- sent == false -> FAIL - doc_id_present == false -> MISSING IMPACT: - progress representation enters the project too late - downstream surfaces may establish their own competing modeling logic first - the project loses sequencing discipline between definition and consumption of progress state` ] }, { title: "Documentation Hub reachability of the modeling contract", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites must guarantee that Project Progress Model is reachable from Documentation Hub as the operator-facing source of truth for the structure, state vocabulary and aggregation grammar of progress WHY: the role of this bucket is to ensure that modeling authority is not trapped in storage; if operators cannot reach the category where progress representation is defined, then readable progress state remains declared in files but absent from practical project use EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/hub_index.json - expected_doc_id: project_progress_model - expected_category_id: overview_scope VALIDATION: - nav_doc_entry_present == true - nav_category_binding_present == true FAIL: - nav_doc_entry_present == false -> MISSING - nav_category_binding_present == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - operators lose access to the category that should standardize progress representation - DH stops serving as the execution-facing interface of modeled progress state - the project drifts back toward surface-specific progress vocabularies` ] }, { title: "Dedicated rendering readiness for progress representation", items: [ `WHA --- end prerequisites occurrence 5 --- --- prerequisites occurrence 6 | line=48536 | index=2569443 --- v_category_binding_present == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - operators lose access to the category that should standardize progress representation - DH stops serving as the execution-facing interface of modeled progress state - the project drifts back toward surface-specific progress vocabularies` ] }, { title: "Dedicated rendering readiness for progress representation", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites must ensure that Project Progress Model is prepared to render through its own custom DH branch so the category can expose a modeling contract instead of collapsing into generic document output WHY: this bucket exists because progress representation is not passive prose; the project needs the category to speak in its own operational language about states, units and modeled structure, otherwise representational authority is flattened before it even begins to function EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_branch_signature: doc.id === "project_progress_model" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope" VALIDATION: - custom_branch_exists == true FAIL: - custom_branch_exists == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category can exist while still failing to expose its own representational logic - DH reduces progress modeling authority to generic content exposure - the project loses semantic precision exactly where shared progress grammar should become explicit` ] }, { title: "Runtime dispatch admission of the progress model", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites must verify that the DH render dispatcher --- end prerequisites occurrence 6 --- --- prerequisites occurrence 7 | line=48561 | index=2570601 --- ustom_branch_exists == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category can exist while still failing to expose its own representational logic - DH reduces progress modeling authority to generic content exposure - the project loses semantic precision exactly where shared progress grammar should become explicit` ] }, { title: "Runtime dispatch admission of the progress model", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites must verify that the DH render dispatcher actually routes Project Progress Model into its dedicated branch instead of bypassing it during runtime WHY: the role of this bucket is to close the gap between declared category presence and live execution; if dispatch does not admit the category, Devon has nominal modeling authority but no actual delivery of that authority to the surfaces that should use it EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_dispatch_gate: - doc.id === "project_progress_model" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope" VALIDATION: - direct_render_dispatch_includes_project_progress_model == true FAIL: - direct_render_dispatch_includes_project_progress_model == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the progress model remains declared but non-operational - DH can silently route around the category that should standardize progress representation - the project loses trust in the bridge between canon and runtime behavior` ] }, { title: "Declared representational boundary of progress state", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites must show that the category already declares what a progress rep --- end prerequisites occurrence 7 --- --- prerequisites occurrence 8 | line=48587 | index=2571736 --- nder_dispatch_includes_project_progress_model == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the progress model remains declared but non-operational - DH can silently route around the category that should standardize progress representation - the project loses trust in the bridge between canon and runtime behavior` ] }, { title: "Declared representational boundary of progress state", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites must show that the category already declares what a progress representation is supposed to govern, including the units being modeled, the state vocabulary being used, the distinction between partial and completed representation and the rules that prevent representational drift across surfaces WHY: this bucket exists because Project Progress Model cannot govern representation if it does not first declare the perimeter of that representation; the project needs a visible boundary between modeled progress state and free-form narrative before later stages can configure, validate or prove the model EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_progress_model.json - expected_model_controls: - progress unit representation - state vocabulary definition - partial versus completed representation - anti-drift modeling boundary VALIDATION: - transitional_validation_only == true - progress_unit_representation_present == true - state_vocabulary_definition_present == true - partial_vs_completed_representation_present == true - anti_drift_modeling_boundary_present == true FAIL: - progress_unit_representation_present == false -> FAIL - state_vocabulary_definitio --- end prerequisites occurrence 8 --- TOKEN: installation | OCCURRENCES: 67 --- installation occurrence 1 | line=48667 | index=2575896 --- title: "Process-stage skeleton for modeled progress governance", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites must confirm that the category already exposes the full stage skeleton required to evolve from declared modeling authority into a complete execution contract for progress representation WHY: this bucket exists because Project Progress Model is not finished by merely existing; the project needs the category to be structurally ready for installation, configuration, validation, evidence, failure handling and promotion or else modeled progress never matures into a reusable system grammar EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_bucket_names: - Prerequisites - Installation - Configuration - Validation - Observable Evidence - Failure Modes & Recovery - Completion & Promotion VALIDATION: - bucket_name_prerequisites == true - bucket_name_installation == true - bucket_name_configuration == true - bucket_name_validation == true - bucket_name_observable_evidence == true - bucket_name_failure_modes_recovery == true - bucket_name_completion_promotion == true FAIL: - any expected bucket missing -> MISSING IMPACT: - the category cannot mature through an ordered execution path - DH loses the operational skeleton needed to turn progress representation into shared project grammar - the project remains stuck with declared modeling authority but no staged representational contract` ] }, { title: "Prerequisites exit condition for the progress model", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites are complete only when progress modeling authority --- end installation occurrence 1 --- --- installation occurrence 2 | line=48673 | index=2576158 --- ontract for progress representation WHY: this bucket exists because Project Progress Model is not finished by merely existing; the project needs the category to be structurally ready for installation, configuration, validation, evidence, failure handling and promotion or else modeled progress never matures into a reusable system grammar EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_bucket_names: - Prerequisites - Installation - Configuration - Validation - Observable Evidence - Failure Modes & Recovery - Completion & Promotion VALIDATION: - bucket_name_prerequisites == true - bucket_name_installation == true - bucket_name_configuration == true - bucket_name_validation == true - bucket_name_observable_evidence == true - bucket_name_failure_modes_recovery == true - bucket_name_completion_promotion == true FAIL: - any expected bucket missing -> MISSING IMPACT: - the category cannot mature through an ordered execution path - DH loses the operational skeleton needed to turn progress representation into shared project grammar - the project remains stuck with declared modeling authority but no staged representational contract` ] }, { title: "Prerequisites exit condition for the progress model", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites are complete only when progress modeling authority materially exists, is architecturally admitted, is placed in Phase 01, is reachable in DH, is render-ready, is dispatch-admitted, already declares the representational boundary of progress state, preserves clean category authority and exposes the stage skeleton --- end installation occurrence 2 --- --- installation occurrence 3 | line=48682 | index=2576347 --- nstallation, configuration, validation, evidence, failure handling and promotion or else modeled progress never matures into a reusable system grammar EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_bucket_names: - Prerequisites - Installation - Configuration - Validation - Observable Evidence - Failure Modes & Recovery - Completion & Promotion VALIDATION: - bucket_name_prerequisites == true - bucket_name_installation == true - bucket_name_configuration == true - bucket_name_validation == true - bucket_name_observable_evidence == true - bucket_name_failure_modes_recovery == true - bucket_name_completion_promotion == true FAIL: - any expected bucket missing -> MISSING IMPACT: - the category cannot mature through an ordered execution path - DH loses the operational skeleton needed to turn progress representation into shared project grammar - the project remains stuck with declared modeling authority but no staged representational contract` ] }, { title: "Prerequisites exit condition for the progress model", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites are complete only when progress modeling authority materially exists, is architecturally admitted, is placed in Phase 01, is reachable in DH, is render-ready, is dispatch-admitted, already declares the representational boundary of progress state, preserves clean category authority and exposes the stage skeleton needed for downstream execution WHY: this bucket closes the entrance of the category by ensuring Devon has a lawful starting position for modeled progress before any later stage tries to i --- end installation occurrence 3 --- --- installation occurrence 4 | line=48717 | index=2577902 --- ory by ensuring Devon has a lawful starting position for modeled progress before any later stage tries to install vocabulary, configure aggregation, validate representational consistency, prove surface alignment, handle drift or promote modeled maturity EVIDENCE: - aggregate result of all previous prerequisite checks VALIDATION: - all_previous_prerequisite_checks == true FAIL: - any previous prerequisite check false -> NOT COMPLETE IMPACT: - Installation cannot start from a legitimate baseline - the category remains only partially constituted as a project-level representational authority - Devon keeps producing progress signals without a trustworthy canonical model for expressing them` ] } ]; const configurationBuckets = [ { title: "Configuration of the progress state vocabulary", items: [ `WHAT: Configuration must define the official vocabulary that Project Progress Model uses to represent progress states across Devon, including how modeled units express movement, intermediate condition and recognized completion without semantic overlap WHY: the role of Configuration in this category is to turn modeling authority into usable language; without configured state vocabulary, each surface can describe the same progress differently and the project loses the ability to compare, aggregate or interpret progress consistently EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_progress_model.json - expected_model_controls: - state vocabulary - modeled progress states - completed representation - partial representation VALIDATI --- end installation occurrence 4 --- --- installation occurrence 5 | line=48900 | index=2586059 --- but under-configured - DH exposes modeling authority without declaring the representational rules it should apply - the project inherits a progress-model surface with no configured grammar for state interpretation` ] }, { title: "Configuration continuity with upstream and downstream stages", items: [ `WHAT: Configuration must connect the authority established in Prerequisites and Installation to the later stages of Validation, Observable Evidence, Failure Modes & Recovery and Completion & Promotion through one coherent representational contract for progress state WHY: the role of this bucket is not isolated rule writing; it has to become the semantic hinge of the category, turning installed modeling authority into a downstream-operable contract that the rest of the stage flow can actually use EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - stage_context: - Prerequisites - Installation - Configuration - Validation - Observable Evidence - Failure Modes & Recovery - Completion & Promotion VALIDATION: - upstream_to_configuration_continuity_present == true - configuration_to_downstream_stages_continuity_present == true - coherent_progress_model_contract_present == true FAIL: - upstream_to_configuration_continuity_present == false -> FAIL - configuration_to_downstream_stages_continuity_present == false -> FAIL - coherent_progress_model_contract_present == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category fragments into disconnected cards instead of one modeling contract - DH loses the semantic bridge between declared modeling authority and later verific --- end installation occurrence 5 --- --- installation occurrence 6 | line=48909 | index=2586583 --- re Modes & Recovery and Completion & Promotion through one coherent representational contract for progress state WHY: the role of this bucket is not isolated rule writing; it has to become the semantic hinge of the category, turning installed modeling authority into a downstream-operable contract that the rest of the stage flow can actually use EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - stage_context: - Prerequisites - Installation - Configuration - Validation - Observable Evidence - Failure Modes & Recovery - Completion & Promotion VALIDATION: - upstream_to_configuration_continuity_present == true - configuration_to_downstream_stages_continuity_present == true - coherent_progress_model_contract_present == true FAIL: - upstream_to_configuration_continuity_present == false -> FAIL - configuration_to_downstream_stages_continuity_present == false -> FAIL - coherent_progress_model_contract_present == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category fragments into disconnected cards instead of one modeling contract - DH loses the semantic bridge between declared modeling authority and later verification stages - the project cannot rely on one continuous grammar of progress representation from entry to maturity` ] }, { title: "Configuration authority discipline", items: [ `WHAT: Configuration must define only the rules of progress representation, state vocabulary, modeled units and aggregation grammar for Project Progress Model, without configuring lawful advancement decisions, scope perimeter, architecture structure, sandbox behavior, server ident --- end installation occurrence 6 --- --- installation occurrence 7 | line=48943 | index=2588190 --- architecture structure, sandbox behavior, server identity, runtime mechanics or delivery closure WHY: this bucket exists to keep the category honest at the moment its representational rules are written; if Configuration absorbs sibling governance, the project encodes distorted ownership directly into its progress model EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - source_scope: Project Progress Model overview, prerequisites, installation and configuration definitions VALIDATION: - transitional_validation_only == true - configuration_respects_progress_model_authority == true - no_progress_canonical_configuration_absorption == true - no_scope_configuration_absorption == true - no_architecture_configuration_absorption == true - no_sandbox_configuration_absorption == true - no_server_registry_configuration_absorption == true - no_runtime_configuration_absorption == true - no_delivery_configuration_absorption == true FAIL: - configuration_respects_progress_model_authority == false -> FAIL - any sibling configuration absorption == true -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category writes corrupted ownership into its own model rules - DH governance boundaries become unstable at the configuration layer - the project loses determinism about which category defines progress representation and which categories only provide inputs to it TRANSITION_NOTE: - this remains transitional because authority discipline is still being validated from rendered contract semantics rather than enforced through structural ownership bindings` ] }, { title: "Configuration exit condition for the progress m --- end installation occurrence 7 --- --- installation occurrence 8 | line=49207 | index=2601659 --- entity, runtime behavior or delivery closure WHY: the exclusive role of this bucket is to prove the model, not to prove every truth in Devon; once evidence authority expands into sibling domains, the category stops being the guardian of readable progress state and becomes a dumping ground for unrelated proof obligations EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - source_scope: Project Progress Model overview, prerequisites, installation, configuration, validation and observable evidence definitions VALIDATION: - transitional_validation_only == true - observable_evidence_respects_progress_model_authority == true - no_progress_canonical_evidence_absorption == true - no_scope_evidence_absorption == true - no_architecture_evidence_absorption == true - no_sandbox_evidence_absorption == true - no_server_registry_evidence_absorption == true - no_runtime_evidence_absorption == true - no_delivery_evidence_absorption == true FAIL: - observable_evidence_respects_progress_model_authority == false -> FAIL - any sibling evidence absorption == true -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category starts accumulating proof duties outside its lawful modeling domain - DH governance boundaries become unstable at the evidentiary layer - the project loses determinism about which category is responsible for proving which kind of representational truth TRANSITION_NOTE: - this remains transitional because authority discipline is still being validated from rendered contract semantics rather than enforced through structural ownership bindings` ] }, { title: "Observable Evidence exit condition for the --- end installation occurrence 8 --- TOKEN: configuration | OCCURRENCES: 68 --- configuration occurrence 1 | line=48667 | index=2575910 --- cess-stage skeleton for modeled progress governance", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites must confirm that the category already exposes the full stage skeleton required to evolve from declared modeling authority into a complete execution contract for progress representation WHY: this bucket exists because Project Progress Model is not finished by merely existing; the project needs the category to be structurally ready for installation, configuration, validation, evidence, failure handling and promotion or else modeled progress never matures into a reusable system grammar EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_bucket_names: - Prerequisites - Installation - Configuration - Validation - Observable Evidence - Failure Modes & Recovery - Completion & Promotion VALIDATION: - bucket_name_prerequisites == true - bucket_name_installation == true - bucket_name_configuration == true - bucket_name_validation == true - bucket_name_observable_evidence == true - bucket_name_failure_modes_recovery == true - bucket_name_completion_promotion == true FAIL: - any expected bucket missing -> MISSING IMPACT: - the category cannot mature through an ordered execution path - DH loses the operational skeleton needed to turn progress representation into shared project grammar - the project remains stuck with declared modeling authority but no staged representational contract` ] }, { title: "Prerequisites exit condition for the progress model", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites are complete only when progress modeling authority materially exis --- end configuration occurrence 1 --- --- configuration occurrence 2 | line=48674 | index=2576175 --- ess representation WHY: this bucket exists because Project Progress Model is not finished by merely existing; the project needs the category to be structurally ready for installation, configuration, validation, evidence, failure handling and promotion or else modeled progress never matures into a reusable system grammar EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_bucket_names: - Prerequisites - Installation - Configuration - Validation - Observable Evidence - Failure Modes & Recovery - Completion & Promotion VALIDATION: - bucket_name_prerequisites == true - bucket_name_installation == true - bucket_name_configuration == true - bucket_name_validation == true - bucket_name_observable_evidence == true - bucket_name_failure_modes_recovery == true - bucket_name_completion_promotion == true FAIL: - any expected bucket missing -> MISSING IMPACT: - the category cannot mature through an ordered execution path - DH loses the operational skeleton needed to turn progress representation into shared project grammar - the project remains stuck with declared modeling authority but no staged representational contract` ] }, { title: "Prerequisites exit condition for the progress model", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites are complete only when progress modeling authority materially exists, is architecturally admitted, is placed in Phase 01, is reachable in DH, is render-ready, is dispatch-admitted, already declares the representational boundary of progress state, preserves clean category authority and exposes the stage skeleton needed for downstr --- end configuration occurrence 2 --- --- configuration occurrence 3 | line=48683 | index=2576382 --- ion, evidence, failure handling and promotion or else modeled progress never matures into a reusable system grammar EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_bucket_names: - Prerequisites - Installation - Configuration - Validation - Observable Evidence - Failure Modes & Recovery - Completion & Promotion VALIDATION: - bucket_name_prerequisites == true - bucket_name_installation == true - bucket_name_configuration == true - bucket_name_validation == true - bucket_name_observable_evidence == true - bucket_name_failure_modes_recovery == true - bucket_name_completion_promotion == true FAIL: - any expected bucket missing -> MISSING IMPACT: - the category cannot mature through an ordered execution path - DH loses the operational skeleton needed to turn progress representation into shared project grammar - the project remains stuck with declared modeling authority but no staged representational contract` ] }, { title: "Prerequisites exit condition for the progress model", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites are complete only when progress modeling authority materially exists, is architecturally admitted, is placed in Phase 01, is reachable in DH, is render-ready, is dispatch-admitted, already declares the representational boundary of progress state, preserves clean category authority and exposes the stage skeleton needed for downstream execution WHY: this bucket closes the entrance of the category by ensuring Devon has a lawful starting position for modeled progress before any later stage tries to install vocabulary, configure aggrega --- end configuration occurrence 3 --- --- configuration occurrence 4 | line=48723 | index=2578210 --- site checks VALIDATION: - all_previous_prerequisite_checks == true FAIL: - any previous prerequisite check false -> NOT COMPLETE IMPACT: - Installation cannot start from a legitimate baseline - the category remains only partially constituted as a project-level representational authority - Devon keeps producing progress signals without a trustworthy canonical model for expressing them` ] } ]; const configurationBuckets = [ { title: "Configuration of the progress state vocabulary", items: [ `WHAT: Configuration must define the official vocabulary that Project Progress Model uses to represent progress states across Devon, including how modeled units express movement, intermediate condition and recognized completion without semantic overlap WHY: the role of Configuration in this category is to turn modeling authority into usable language; without configured state vocabulary, each surface can describe the same progress differently and the project loses the ability to compare, aggregate or interpret progress consistently EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_progress_model.json - expected_model_controls: - state vocabulary - modeled progress states - completed representation - partial representation VALIDATION: - transitional_validation_only == true - state_vocabulary_present == true - modeled_progress_states_present == true - completed_representation_present == true - partial_representation_present == true FAIL: - state_vocabulary_present == false -> FAIL - modeled_progress_states_present == false -> FAIL - c --- end configuration occurrence 4 --- --- configuration occurrence 5 | line=48725 | index=2578271 --- = true FAIL: - any previous prerequisite check false -> NOT COMPLETE IMPACT: - Installation cannot start from a legitimate baseline - the category remains only partially constituted as a project-level representational authority - Devon keeps producing progress signals without a trustworthy canonical model for expressing them` ] } ]; const configurationBuckets = [ { title: "Configuration of the progress state vocabulary", items: [ `WHAT: Configuration must define the official vocabulary that Project Progress Model uses to represent progress states across Devon, including how modeled units express movement, intermediate condition and recognized completion without semantic overlap WHY: the role of Configuration in this category is to turn modeling authority into usable language; without configured state vocabulary, each surface can describe the same progress differently and the project loses the ability to compare, aggregate or interpret progress consistently EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_progress_model.json - expected_model_controls: - state vocabulary - modeled progress states - completed representation - partial representation VALIDATION: - transitional_validation_only == true - state_vocabulary_present == true - modeled_progress_states_present == true - completed_representation_present == true - partial_representation_present == true FAIL: - state_vocabulary_present == false -> FAIL - modeled_progress_states_present == false -> FAIL - completed_representation_present == false -> FAIL - partial_re --- end configuration occurrence 5 --- --- configuration occurrence 6 | line=48728 | index=2578350 --- - Installation cannot start from a legitimate baseline - the category remains only partially constituted as a project-level representational authority - Devon keeps producing progress signals without a trustworthy canonical model for expressing them` ] } ]; const configurationBuckets = [ { title: "Configuration of the progress state vocabulary", items: [ `WHAT: Configuration must define the official vocabulary that Project Progress Model uses to represent progress states across Devon, including how modeled units express movement, intermediate condition and recognized completion without semantic overlap WHY: the role of Configuration in this category is to turn modeling authority into usable language; without configured state vocabulary, each surface can describe the same progress differently and the project loses the ability to compare, aggregate or interpret progress consistently EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_progress_model.json - expected_model_controls: - state vocabulary - modeled progress states - completed representation - partial representation VALIDATION: - transitional_validation_only == true - state_vocabulary_present == true - modeled_progress_states_present == true - completed_representation_present == true - partial_representation_present == true FAIL: - state_vocabulary_present == false -> FAIL - modeled_progress_states_present == false -> FAIL - completed_representation_present == false -> FAIL - partial_representation_present == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category stays installed b --- end configuration occurrence 6 --- --- configuration occurrence 7 | line=48731 | index=2578614 --- ] } ]; const configurationBuckets = [ { title: "Configuration of the progress state vocabulary", items: [ `WHAT: Configuration must define the official vocabulary that Project Progress Model uses to represent progress states across Devon, including how modeled units express movement, intermediate condition and recognized completion without semantic overlap WHY: the role of Configuration in this category is to turn modeling authority into usable language; without configured state vocabulary, each surface can describe the same progress differently and the project loses the ability to compare, aggregate or interpret progress consistently EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_progress_model.json - expected_model_controls: - state vocabulary - modeled progress states - completed representation - partial representation VALIDATION: - transitional_validation_only == true - state_vocabulary_present == true - modeled_progress_states_present == true - completed_representation_present == true - partial_representation_present == true FAIL: - state_vocabulary_present == false -> FAIL - modeled_progress_states_present == false -> FAIL - completed_representation_present == false -> FAIL - partial_representation_present == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category stays installed but linguistically undefined - DH can expose the progress model without a stable state language - the project becomes exposed to multiple incompatible ways of describing the same progress condition TRANSITION_NOTE: - this remains transitional because the state voc --- end configuration occurrence 7 --- --- configuration occurrence 8 | line=48764 | index=2580020 --- uistically undefined - DH can expose the progress model without a stable state language - the project becomes exposed to multiple incompatible ways of describing the same progress condition TRANSITION_NOTE: - this remains transitional because the state vocabulary is still being validated from declared canonical content rather than enforced through machine-readable model schemas` ] }, { title: "Configuration of modeled progress units", items: [ `WHAT: Configuration must define what the model treats as a progress unit, how those units are bounded and how they are distinguished from raw task noise, narrative summaries or unrelated operational fragments WHY: this bucket exists because progress state cannot be modeled without knowing what is being modeled; the project needs a configured representational unit so progress can be read as structured state instead of loose commentary or arbitrary fragments EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_progress_model.json - expected_model_controls: - progress unit definition - representational boundaries - unit distinction from raw activity VALIDATION: - transitional_validation_only == true - progress_unit_definition_present == true - representational_boundaries_present == true - unit_distinction_from_raw_activity_present == true FAIL: - progress_unit_definition_present == false -> FAIL - representational_boundaries_present == false -> FAIL - unit_distinction_from_raw_activity_present == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category cannot stabilize what a modeled state refers to - DH loses structural cl --- end configuration occurrence 8 --- TOKEN: validation | OCCURRENCES: 200 --- validation occurrence 1 | line=48436 | index=2565265 --- as been recognized as real WHY: this bucket is the lawful entrypoint of the category because the project cannot consume progress consistently if the modeling authority itself is absent; before any state vocabulary, aggregation rule or representational surface can be trusted, Devon needs a sovereign artifact that owns the shape of progress representation EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_progress_model.json VALIDATION: - exists(file_path) == true FAIL: - exists(file_path) == false -> MISSING IMPACT: - the category has no material authority to define progress representation - progress remains exposed to ad-hoc modeling across docs, panel and review surfaces - the project can recognize advancement canonically but still fail to express it coherently` ] }, { title: "Admission of the progress model into the root architecture baseline", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites must prove that Project Progress Model is registered in the Master Architecture Index as an official Phase 01 category artifact instead of floating as an isolated file with no sovereign architectural standing WHY: the role of this bucket is to guarantee that progress representation is not treated as optional notation; it must be admitted into the same root baseline that governs the rest of Devon, otherwise the project can end up with lawful progress semantics but no architecturally recognized model for expressing them EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/master_architecture_index.md - search_term: Project Progress Model VALIDATION: - master_registr --- end validation occurrence 1 --- --- validation occurrence 2 | line=48461 | index=2566447 --- anding WHY: the role of this bucket is to guarantee that progress representation is not treated as optional notation; it must be admitted into the same root baseline that governs the rest of Devon, otherwise the project can end up with lawful progress semantics but no architecturally recognized model for expressing them EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/master_architecture_index.md - search_term: Project Progress Model VALIDATION: - master_registration_present == true FAIL: - master_registration_present == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the progress model becomes architecturally orphaned - later surfaces may consume representational logic that was never sovereignly admitted - the project loses continuity between structural canon and modeled progress state` ] }, { title: "Phase-01 placement before downstream consumption", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites must place Project Progress Model inside Phase 01 Overview & Scope so Devon defines the representational grammar of progress before reporting, panel interpretation or operational review starts consuming progress state WHY: this bucket exists to force ordering discipline at the project level: the system must know how progress is represented before downstream surfaces read, compare or aggregate it, otherwise each consumer is tempted to invent its own state language EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/hub_index.json - expected_phase_id: phase-01 - expected_category_id: overview_scope - expected_doc_id: project_progress_model VALIDATION: - phase_binding_present == true - category --- end validation occurrence 2 --- --- validation occurrence 3 | line=48488 | index=2567603 --- ogress state WHY: this bucket exists to force ordering discipline at the project level: the system must know how progress is represented before downstream surfaces read, compare or aggregate it, otherwise each consumer is tempted to invent its own state language EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/hub_index.json - expected_phase_id: phase-01 - expected_category_id: overview_scope - expected_doc_id: project_progress_model VALIDATION: - phase_binding_present == true - category_binding_present == true - doc_id_present == true FAIL: - phase_binding_present == false -> FAIL - category_binding_present == false -> FAIL - doc_id_present == false -> MISSING IMPACT: - progress representation enters the project too late - downstream surfaces may establish their own competing modeling logic first - the project loses sequencing discipline between definition and consumption of progress state` ] }, { title: "Documentation Hub reachability of the modeling contract", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites must guarantee that Project Progress Model is reachable from Documentation Hub as the operator-facing source of truth for the structure, state vocabulary and aggregation grammar of progress WHY: the role of this bucket is to ensure that modeling authority is not trapped in storage; if operators cannot reach the category where progress representation is defined, then readable progress state remains declared in files but absent from practical project use EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/hub_index.json - expected_doc_id: project_progress_mode --- end validation occurrence 3 --- --- validation occurrence 4 | line=48518 | index=2568855 --- ation grammar of progress WHY: the role of this bucket is to ensure that modeling authority is not trapped in storage; if operators cannot reach the category where progress representation is defined, then readable progress state remains declared in files but absent from practical project use EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/hub_index.json - expected_doc_id: project_progress_model - expected_category_id: overview_scope VALIDATION: - nav_doc_entry_present == true - nav_category_binding_present == true FAIL: - nav_doc_entry_present == false -> MISSING - nav_category_binding_present == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - operators lose access to the category that should standardize progress representation - DH stops serving as the execution-facing interface of modeled progress state - the project drifts back toward surface-specific progress vocabularies` ] }, { title: "Dedicated rendering readiness for progress representation", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites must ensure that Project Progress Model is prepared to render through its own custom DH branch so the category can expose a modeling contract instead of collapsing into generic document output WHY: this bucket exists because progress representation is not passive prose; the project needs the category to speak in its own operational language about states, units and modeled structure, otherwise representational authority is flattened before it even begins to function EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_branch_signature: doc.id === "project_progress_model" && state. --- end validation occurrence 4 --- --- validation occurrence 5 | line=48545 | index=2570098 --- t WHY: this bucket exists because progress representation is not passive prose; the project needs the category to speak in its own operational language about states, units and modeled structure, otherwise representational authority is flattened before it even begins to function EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_branch_signature: doc.id === "project_progress_model" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope" VALIDATION: - custom_branch_exists == true FAIL: - custom_branch_exists == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category can exist while still failing to expose its own representational logic - DH reduces progress modeling authority to generic content exposure - the project loses semantic precision exactly where shared progress grammar should become explicit` ] }, { title: "Runtime dispatch admission of the progress model", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites must verify that the DH render dispatcher actually routes Project Progress Model into its dedicated branch instead of bypassing it during runtime WHY: the role of this bucket is to close the gap between declared category presence and live execution; if dispatch does not admit the category, Devon has nominal modeling authority but no actual delivery of that authority to the surfaces that should use it EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_dispatch_gate: - doc.id === "project_progress_model" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope" VALIDATION: - direct_render_dispatch_includes_project_progress_model == true FAIL: - direct_render_dispatch_includes --- end validation occurrence 5 --- --- validation occurrence 6 | line=48571 | index=2571191 --- g it during runtime WHY: the role of this bucket is to close the gap between declared category presence and live execution; if dispatch does not admit the category, Devon has nominal modeling authority but no actual delivery of that authority to the surfaces that should use it EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_dispatch_gate: - doc.id === "project_progress_model" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope" VALIDATION: - direct_render_dispatch_includes_project_progress_model == true FAIL: - direct_render_dispatch_includes_project_progress_model == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the progress model remains declared but non-operational - DH can silently route around the category that should standardize progress representation - the project loses trust in the bridge between canon and runtime behavior` ] }, { title: "Declared representational boundary of progress state", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites must show that the category already declares what a progress representation is supposed to govern, including the units being modeled, the state vocabulary being used, the distinction between partial and completed representation and the rules that prevent representational drift across surfaces WHY: this bucket exists because Project Progress Model cannot govern representation if it does not first declare the perimeter of that representation; the project needs a visible boundary between modeled progress state and free-form narrative before later stages can configure, validate or prove the model EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/dev --- end validation occurrence 6 --- --- validation occurrence 7 | line=48600 | index=2572613 --- erimeter of that representation; the project needs a visible boundary between modeled progress state and free-form narrative before later stages can configure, validate or prove the model EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_progress_model.json - expected_model_controls: - progress unit representation - state vocabulary definition - partial versus completed representation - anti-drift modeling boundary VALIDATION: - transitional_validation_only == true - progress_unit_representation_present == true - state_vocabulary_definition_present == true - partial_vs_completed_representation_present == true - anti_drift_modeling_boundary_present == true FAIL: - progress_unit_representation_present == false -> FAIL - state_vocabulary_definition_present == false -> FAIL - partial_vs_completed_representation_present == false -> FAIL - anti_drift_modeling_boundary_present == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category starts without its own representational perimeter - later stages would configure and validate an undefined model - the whole project becomes exposed to inconsistent progress-reading semantics TRANSITION_NOTE: - this remains transitional because the representational boundary is still being validated from declared canonical content rather than enforced through machine-readable model contracts` ] }, { title: "Authority separation from progress law and sibling categories", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites must establish that Project Progress Model governs only how progress is represented after recognition, without absorbing ownership of --- end validation occurrence 7 --- --- validation occurrence 8 | line=48601 | index=2572640 --- tion; the project needs a visible boundary between modeled progress state and free-form narrative before later stages can configure, validate or prove the model EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_progress_model.json - expected_model_controls: - progress unit representation - state vocabulary definition - partial versus completed representation - anti-drift modeling boundary VALIDATION: - transitional_validation_only == true - progress_unit_representation_present == true - state_vocabulary_definition_present == true - partial_vs_completed_representation_present == true - anti_drift_modeling_boundary_present == true FAIL: - progress_unit_representation_present == false -> FAIL - state_vocabulary_definition_present == false -> FAIL - partial_vs_completed_representation_present == false -> FAIL - anti_drift_modeling_boundary_present == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category starts without its own representational perimeter - later stages would configure and validate an undefined model - the whole project becomes exposed to inconsistent progress-reading semantics TRANSITION_NOTE: - this remains transitional because the representational boundary is still being validated from declared canonical content rather than enforced through machine-readable model contracts` ] }, { title: "Authority separation from progress law and sibling categories", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites must establish that Project Progress Model governs only how progress is represented after recognition, without absorbing ownership of lawful advancement decisio --- end validation occurrence 8 --- TOKEN: observableEvidence | OCCURRENCES: 3 --- observableEvidence occurrence 1 | line=48994 | index=2590553 --- VALIDATION: - all_previous_configuration_checks == true FAIL: - any previous configuration check false -> NOT COMPLETE IMPACT: - Validation cannot begin from a configured representational model - Project Progress Model remains operationally visible but semantically incomplete - the project continues without a trustworthy configured basis for expressing and aggregating progress state` ] } ]; const observableEvidenceBuckets = [ { title: "Observable proof that the progress vocabulary is actually the one in use", items: [ `WHAT: Observable Evidence must expose concrete proof that the state vocabulary declared by Project Progress Model is the same vocabulary being surfaced and consumed across Devon, rather than a canon-only definition that downstream surfaces silently replace WHY: the exclusive role of Observable Evidence in this category is to prove representational adoption, not representational intention; Validation may judge the model coherent, but this bucket must show that the project's visible progress language is in fact the modeled language and not an improvised substitute EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_progress_model.json - evidence_focus: - observable use of declared state vocabulary - surface-level consistency of progress labels - non-improvised representation of progress state VALIDATION: - transitional_validation_only == true - declared_state_vocabulary_usage_evidence_present == true - surface_level_progress_label_consistency_evidence_present == true - non_improvised_progress_representation_evid --- end observableEvidence occurrence 1 --- --- observableEvidence occurrence 2 | line=49150 | index=2598749 --- ide the left-column workflow instead of remaining a placeholder pending card WHY: this bucket exists because the category cannot claim evidence-backed progress representation while leaving the stage that surfaces proof empty; Observable Evidence is where the model becomes externally defensible to the whole project EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_renderer_call: renderStructuredCard("Observable Evidence", observableEvidenceBuckets) VALIDATION: - observable_evidence_bucket_structured == true FAIL: - observable_evidence_bucket_structured == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category stays validated but under-evidenced - DH exposes representational judgment without the proof surface that should support it - the project inherits a progress-model contract that cannot show why its representation should be trusted` ] }, { title: "Observable evidence continuity with validation and promotion", items: [ `WHAT: Observable Evidence must connect the representational judgment made in Validation to the final maturity logic of Completion & Promotion so proof remains part of one continuous modeled-progress chain instead of becoming decorative support detached from later decisions WHY: the role of this bucket is to stop evidence from being treated as commentary after validation; it has to remain structurally connected to both the judgment that accepted the model and the final stage that will decide whether the modeled representation is mature enough for trusted downstream use EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - stage_context: --- end observableEvidence occurrence 2 --- --- observableEvidence occurrence 3 | line=49520 | index=2617731 --- le to analyze the model without being able to canonize its trusted adoption state - the project continues without a dependable final gate for shared progress grammar maturity` ] } ]; const leftHtml = [ renderStructuredCard("Prerequisites", prerequisitesBuckets), renderStructuredCard("Configuration", configurationBuckets), renderStructuredCard("Observable Evidence", observableEvidenceBuckets), renderStructuredCard("Completion & Promotion", completionPromotionBuckets) ].join(""); const installationBuckets = [ { title: "Documentation Hub installation of the progress representation contract", items: [ `WHAT: Installation must materialize Project Progress Model inside Documentation Hub as the live surface where Devon exposes, reads and operates the official representation contract of progress state WHY: the role of Installation in this category is not to decide whether progress is lawful, but to make the modeling authority operationally present; without installation, the project may have a declared model file yet still lack a usable place where progress representation is actually delivered to operators and downstream interpretation layers EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_branch_signature: doc.id === "project_progress_model" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope" - expected_return_kind: html VALIDATION: - custom_branch_exists == true - branch_returns_html_contract == true FAIL: - custom_branch_exists == false -> FAIL - branch_returns_html_contract = --- end observableEvidence occurrence 3 --- TOKEN: observable_evidence | OCCURRENCES: 15 --- observable_evidence occurrence 1 | line=48685 | index=2576451 --- s never matures into a reusable system grammar EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_bucket_names: - Prerequisites - Installation - Configuration - Validation - Observable Evidence - Failure Modes & Recovery - Completion & Promotion VALIDATION: - bucket_name_prerequisites == true - bucket_name_installation == true - bucket_name_configuration == true - bucket_name_validation == true - bucket_name_observable_evidence == true - bucket_name_failure_modes_recovery == true - bucket_name_completion_promotion == true FAIL: - any expected bucket missing -> MISSING IMPACT: - the category cannot mature through an ordered execution path - DH loses the operational skeleton needed to turn progress representation into shared project grammar - the project remains stuck with declared modeling authority but no staged representational contract` ] }, { title: "Prerequisites exit condition for the progress model", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites are complete only when progress modeling authority materially exists, is architecturally admitted, is placed in Phase 01, is reachable in DH, is render-ready, is dispatch-admitted, already declares the representational boundary of progress state, preserves clean category authority and exposes the stage skeleton needed for downstream execution WHY: this bucket closes the entrance of the category by ensuring Devon has a lawful starting position for modeled progress before any later stage tries to install vocabulary, configure aggregation, validate representational consistency, prove surface alignment, handl --- end observable_evidence occurrence 1 --- --- observable_evidence occurrence 2 | line=49153 | index=2598791 --- maining a placeholder pending card WHY: this bucket exists because the category cannot claim evidence-backed progress representation while leaving the stage that surfaces proof empty; Observable Evidence is where the model becomes externally defensible to the whole project EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_renderer_call: renderStructuredCard("Observable Evidence", observableEvidenceBuckets) VALIDATION: - observable_evidence_bucket_structured == true FAIL: - observable_evidence_bucket_structured == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category stays validated but under-evidenced - DH exposes representational judgment without the proof surface that should support it - the project inherits a progress-model contract that cannot show why its representation should be trusted` ] }, { title: "Observable evidence continuity with validation and promotion", items: [ `WHAT: Observable Evidence must connect the representational judgment made in Validation to the final maturity logic of Completion & Promotion so proof remains part of one continuous modeled-progress chain instead of becoming decorative support detached from later decisions WHY: the role of this bucket is to stop evidence from being treated as commentary after validation; it has to remain structurally connected to both the judgment that accepted the model and the final stage that will decide whether the modeled representation is mature enough for trusted downstream use EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - stage_context: - Validation - Observable Evidence - --- end observable_evidence occurrence 2 --- --- observable_evidence occurrence 3 | line=49156 | index=2598846 --- ists because the category cannot claim evidence-backed progress representation while leaving the stage that surfaces proof empty; Observable Evidence is where the model becomes externally defensible to the whole project EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_renderer_call: renderStructuredCard("Observable Evidence", observableEvidenceBuckets) VALIDATION: - observable_evidence_bucket_structured == true FAIL: - observable_evidence_bucket_structured == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category stays validated but under-evidenced - DH exposes representational judgment without the proof surface that should support it - the project inherits a progress-model contract that cannot show why its representation should be trusted` ] }, { title: "Observable evidence continuity with validation and promotion", items: [ `WHAT: Observable Evidence must connect the representational judgment made in Validation to the final maturity logic of Completion & Promotion so proof remains part of one continuous modeled-progress chain instead of becoming decorative support detached from later decisions WHY: the role of this bucket is to stop evidence from being treated as commentary after validation; it has to remain structurally connected to both the judgment that accepted the model and the final stage that will decide whether the modeled representation is mature enough for trusted downstream use EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - stage_context: - Validation - Observable Evidence - Completion & Promotion VALIDATION: - validation_to_obs --- end observable_evidence occurrence 3 --- --- observable_evidence occurrence 4 | line=49181 | index=2600062 --- et is to stop evidence from being treated as commentary after validation; it has to remain structurally connected to both the judgment that accepted the model and the final stage that will decide whether the modeled representation is mature enough for trusted downstream use EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - stage_context: - Validation - Observable Evidence - Completion & Promotion VALIDATION: - validation_to_observable_evidence_continuity_present == true - observable_evidence_to_completion_promotion_continuity_present == true - continuous_modeled_progress_evidence_chain_present == true FAIL: - validation_to_observable_evidence_continuity_present == false -> FAIL - observable_evidence_to_completion_promotion_continuity_present == false -> FAIL - continuous_modeled_progress_evidence_chain_present == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category fragments between representational judgment, proof and maturity - DH loses the chain that makes the model operationally trustworthy across stages - the project becomes exposed to disconnected decisions where evidence no longer carries forward into final trust decisions` ] }, { title: "Observable Evidence authority discipline", items: [ `WHAT: Observable Evidence must expose proof only for progress representation integrity, modeled units, aggregation fidelity and anti-drift behavior inside Project Progress Model, without becoming the evidentiary owner of lawful advancement, scope perimeter, architecture structure, sandbox trust, server identity, runtime behavior or delivery closure WHY: the exclusive role of --- end observable_evidence occurrence 4 --- --- observable_evidence occurrence 5 | line=49182 | index=2600111 --- entary after validation; it has to remain structurally connected to both the judgment that accepted the model and the final stage that will decide whether the modeled representation is mature enough for trusted downstream use EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - stage_context: - Validation - Observable Evidence - Completion & Promotion VALIDATION: - validation_to_observable_evidence_continuity_present == true - observable_evidence_to_completion_promotion_continuity_present == true - continuous_modeled_progress_evidence_chain_present == true FAIL: - validation_to_observable_evidence_continuity_present == false -> FAIL - observable_evidence_to_completion_promotion_continuity_present == false -> FAIL - continuous_modeled_progress_evidence_chain_present == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category fragments between representational judgment, proof and maturity - DH loses the chain that makes the model operationally trustworthy across stages - the project becomes exposed to disconnected decisions where evidence no longer carries forward into final trust decisions` ] }, { title: "Observable Evidence authority discipline", items: [ `WHAT: Observable Evidence must expose proof only for progress representation integrity, modeled units, aggregation fidelity and anti-drift behavior inside Project Progress Model, without becoming the evidentiary owner of lawful advancement, scope perimeter, architecture structure, sandbox trust, server identity, runtime behavior or delivery closure WHY: the exclusive role of this bucket is to prove the model, not to prove --- end observable_evidence occurrence 5 --- --- observable_evidence occurrence 6 | line=49186 | index=2600266 --- the modeled representation is mature enough for trusted downstream use EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - stage_context: - Validation - Observable Evidence - Completion & Promotion VALIDATION: - validation_to_observable_evidence_continuity_present == true - observable_evidence_to_completion_promotion_continuity_present == true - continuous_modeled_progress_evidence_chain_present == true FAIL: - validation_to_observable_evidence_continuity_present == false -> FAIL - observable_evidence_to_completion_promotion_continuity_present == false -> FAIL - continuous_modeled_progress_evidence_chain_present == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category fragments between representational judgment, proof and maturity - DH loses the chain that makes the model operationally trustworthy across stages - the project becomes exposed to disconnected decisions where evidence no longer carries forward into final trust decisions` ] }, { title: "Observable Evidence authority discipline", items: [ `WHAT: Observable Evidence must expose proof only for progress representation integrity, modeled units, aggregation fidelity and anti-drift behavior inside Project Progress Model, without becoming the evidentiary owner of lawful advancement, scope perimeter, architecture structure, sandbox trust, server identity, runtime behavior or delivery closure WHY: the exclusive role of this bucket is to prove the model, not to prove every truth in Devon; once evidence authority expands into sibling domains, the category stops being the guardian of readable progress state and becomes a --- end observable_evidence occurrence 6 --- --- observable_evidence occurrence 7 | line=49187 | index=2600324 --- wnstream use EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - stage_context: - Validation - Observable Evidence - Completion & Promotion VALIDATION: - validation_to_observable_evidence_continuity_present == true - observable_evidence_to_completion_promotion_continuity_present == true - continuous_modeled_progress_evidence_chain_present == true FAIL: - validation_to_observable_evidence_continuity_present == false -> FAIL - observable_evidence_to_completion_promotion_continuity_present == false -> FAIL - continuous_modeled_progress_evidence_chain_present == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category fragments between representational judgment, proof and maturity - DH loses the chain that makes the model operationally trustworthy across stages - the project becomes exposed to disconnected decisions where evidence no longer carries forward into final trust decisions` ] }, { title: "Observable Evidence authority discipline", items: [ `WHAT: Observable Evidence must expose proof only for progress representation integrity, modeled units, aggregation fidelity and anti-drift behavior inside Project Progress Model, without becoming the evidentiary owner of lawful advancement, scope perimeter, architecture structure, sandbox trust, server identity, runtime behavior or delivery closure WHY: the exclusive role of this bucket is to prove the model, not to prove every truth in Devon; once evidence authority expands into sibling domains, the category stops being the guardian of readable progress state and becomes a dumping ground for unrelated proof obligations EVIDENCE: --- end observable_evidence occurrence 7 --- --- observable_evidence occurrence 8 | line=49211 | index=2601789 --- th in Devon; once evidence authority expands into sibling domains, the category stops being the guardian of readable progress state and becomes a dumping ground for unrelated proof obligations EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - source_scope: Project Progress Model overview, prerequisites, installation, configuration, validation and observable evidence definitions VALIDATION: - transitional_validation_only == true - observable_evidence_respects_progress_model_authority == true - no_progress_canonical_evidence_absorption == true - no_scope_evidence_absorption == true - no_architecture_evidence_absorption == true - no_sandbox_evidence_absorption == true - no_server_registry_evidence_absorption == true - no_runtime_evidence_absorption == true - no_delivery_evidence_absorption == true FAIL: - observable_evidence_respects_progress_model_authority == false -> FAIL - any sibling evidence absorption == true -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category starts accumulating proof duties outside its lawful modeling domain - DH governance boundaries become unstable at the evidentiary layer - the project loses determinism about which category is responsible for proving which kind of representational truth TRANSITION_NOTE: - this remains transitional because authority discipline is still being validated from rendered contract semantics rather than enforced through structural ownership bindings` ] }, { title: "Observable Evidence exit condition for the progress model", items: [ `WHAT: Observable Evidence is complete only when Project Progress Model can expose proof that the --- end observable_evidence occurrence 8 --- TOKEN: evidence | OCCURRENCES: 198 --- evidence occurrence 1 | line=48381 | index=2562634 --- /p>

    ${escapeHtml("This means the buckets below cannot be generic lifecycle labels. They must decompose the mechanics of progress representation for the whole project: what has to exist before a progress model can be trusted, how the model is installed into Documentation Hub, how state definitions and aggregation rules are configured, how the model is validated against representational drift, what observable evidence proves that the model reflects real tracked progress, what failure patterns corrupt progress readability and when modeled progress is mature enough to support consistent interpretation across Devon without inventing a new language on each surface.")}

    `; queueMicrotask(() => { const btn = document.getElementById("project-progress-model-overview-toggle"); const more = document.getElementById("project-progress-model-overview-more"); if (!btn || !more || btn.dataset.bound === "true") return; const toggle = () => { const expanded = btn.getAttribute("aria-expanded") === "true"; btn.setA --- end evidence occurrence 1 --- --- evidence occurrence 2 | line=48433 | index=2565173 --- lared category responsible for how Devon structurally represents progress once advancement has been recognized as real WHY: this bucket is the lawful entrypoint of the category because the project cannot consume progress consistently if the modeling authority itself is absent; before any state vocabulary, aggregation rule or representational surface can be trusted, Devon needs a sovereign artifact that owns the shape of progress representation EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_progress_model.json VALIDATION: - exists(file_path) == true FAIL: - exists(file_path) == false -> MISSING IMPACT: - the category has no material authority to define progress representation - progress remains exposed to ad-hoc modeling across docs, panel and review surfaces - the project can recognize advancement canonically but still fail to express it coherently` ] }, { title: "Admission of the progress model into the root architecture baseline", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites must prove that Project Progress Model is registered in the Master Architecture Index as an official Phase 01 category artifact instead of floating as an isolated file with no sovereign architectural standing WHY: the role of this bucket is to guarantee that progress representation is not treated as optional notation; it must be admitted into the same root baseline that governs the rest of Devon, otherwise the project can end up with lawful progress semantics but no architecturally recognized model for expressing them EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/ma --- end evidence occurrence 2 --- --- evidence occurrence 3 | line=48457 | index=2566321 --- ure Index as an official Phase 01 category artifact instead of floating as an isolated file with no sovereign architectural standing WHY: the role of this bucket is to guarantee that progress representation is not treated as optional notation; it must be admitted into the same root baseline that governs the rest of Devon, otherwise the project can end up with lawful progress semantics but no architecturally recognized model for expressing them EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/master_architecture_index.md - search_term: Project Progress Model VALIDATION: - master_registration_present == true FAIL: - master_registration_present == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the progress model becomes architecturally orphaned - later surfaces may consume representational logic that was never sovereignly admitted - the project loses continuity between structural canon and modeled progress state` ] }, { title: "Phase-01 placement before downstream consumption", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites must place Project Progress Model inside Phase 01 Overview & Scope so Devon defines the representational grammar of progress before reporting, panel interpretation or operational review starts consuming progress state WHY: this bucket exists to force ordering discipline at the project level: the system must know how progress is represented before downstream surfaces read, compare or aggregate it, otherwise each consumer is tempted to invent its own state language EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/hub_index.json - expected_phase_id: phase-01 - expect --- end evidence occurrence 3 --- --- evidence occurrence 4 | line=48482 | index=2567418 --- rogress Model inside Phase 01 Overview & Scope so Devon defines the representational grammar of progress before reporting, panel interpretation or operational review starts consuming progress state WHY: this bucket exists to force ordering discipline at the project level: the system must know how progress is represented before downstream surfaces read, compare or aggregate it, otherwise each consumer is tempted to invent its own state language EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/hub_index.json - expected_phase_id: phase-01 - expected_category_id: overview_scope - expected_doc_id: project_progress_model VALIDATION: - phase_binding_present == true - category_binding_present == true - doc_id_present == true FAIL: - phase_binding_present == false -> FAIL - category_binding_present == false -> FAIL - doc_id_present == false -> MISSING IMPACT: - progress representation enters the project too late - downstream surfaces may establish their own competing modeling logic first - the project loses sequencing discipline between definition and consumption of progress state` ] }, { title: "Documentation Hub reachability of the modeling contract", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites must guarantee that Project Progress Model is reachable from Documentation Hub as the operator-facing source of truth for the structure, state vocabulary and aggregation grammar of progress WHY: the role of this bucket is to ensure that modeling authority is not trapped in storage; if operators cannot reach the category where progress representation is defined, then readable progre --- end evidence occurrence 4 --- --- evidence occurrence 5 | line=48513 | index=2568700 --- antee that Project Progress Model is reachable from Documentation Hub as the operator-facing source of truth for the structure, state vocabulary and aggregation grammar of progress WHY: the role of this bucket is to ensure that modeling authority is not trapped in storage; if operators cannot reach the category where progress representation is defined, then readable progress state remains declared in files but absent from practical project use EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/hub_index.json - expected_doc_id: project_progress_model - expected_category_id: overview_scope VALIDATION: - nav_doc_entry_present == true - nav_category_binding_present == true FAIL: - nav_doc_entry_present == false -> MISSING - nav_category_binding_present == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - operators lose access to the category that should standardize progress representation - DH stops serving as the execution-facing interface of modeled progress state - the project drifts back toward surface-specific progress vocabularies` ] }, { title: "Dedicated rendering readiness for progress representation", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites must ensure that Project Progress Model is prepared to render through its own custom DH branch so the category can expose a modeling contract instead of collapsing into generic document output WHY: this bucket exists because progress representation is not passive prose; the project needs the category to speak in its own operational language about states, units and modeled structure, otherwise representational authority is flattened before it even --- end evidence occurrence 5 --- --- evidence occurrence 6 | line=48541 | index=2569929 --- ct Progress Model is prepared to render through its own custom DH branch so the category can expose a modeling contract instead of collapsing into generic document output WHY: this bucket exists because progress representation is not passive prose; the project needs the category to speak in its own operational language about states, units and modeled structure, otherwise representational authority is flattened before it even begins to function EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_branch_signature: doc.id === "project_progress_model" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope" VALIDATION: - custom_branch_exists == true FAIL: - custom_branch_exists == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category can exist while still failing to expose its own representational logic - DH reduces progress modeling authority to generic content exposure - the project loses semantic precision exactly where shared progress grammar should become explicit` ] }, { title: "Runtime dispatch admission of the progress model", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites must verify that the DH render dispatcher actually routes Project Progress Model into its dedicated branch instead of bypassing it during runtime WHY: the role of this bucket is to close the gap between declared category presence and live execution; if dispatch does not admit the category, Devon has nominal modeling authority but no actual delivery of that authority to the surfaces that should use it EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_dispatch_gate: - doc.id === "project_prog --- end evidence occurrence 6 --- --- evidence occurrence 7 | line=48566 | index=2571021 --- items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites must verify that the DH render dispatcher actually routes Project Progress Model into its dedicated branch instead of bypassing it during runtime WHY: the role of this bucket is to close the gap between declared category presence and live execution; if dispatch does not admit the category, Devon has nominal modeling authority but no actual delivery of that authority to the surfaces that should use it EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_dispatch_gate: - doc.id === "project_progress_model" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope" VALIDATION: - direct_render_dispatch_includes_project_progress_model == true FAIL: - direct_render_dispatch_includes_project_progress_model == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the progress model remains declared but non-operational - DH can silently route around the category that should standardize progress representation - the project loses trust in the bridge between canon and runtime behavior` ] }, { title: "Declared representational boundary of progress state", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites must show that the category already declares what a progress representation is supposed to govern, including the units being modeled, the state vocabulary being used, the distinction between partial and completed representation and the rules that prevent representational drift across surfaces WHY: this bucket exists because Project Progress Model cannot govern representation if it does not first declare the perimeter of that representation; the project needs a visible bound --- end evidence occurrence 7 --- --- evidence occurrence 8 | line=48592 | index=2572352 --- ry being used, the distinction between partial and completed representation and the rules that prevent representational drift across surfaces WHY: this bucket exists because Project Progress Model cannot govern representation if it does not first declare the perimeter of that representation; the project needs a visible boundary between modeled progress state and free-form narrative before later stages can configure, validate or prove the model EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_progress_model.json - expected_model_controls: - progress unit representation - state vocabulary definition - partial versus completed representation - anti-drift modeling boundary VALIDATION: - transitional_validation_only == true - progress_unit_representation_present == true - state_vocabulary_definition_present == true - partial_vs_completed_representation_present == true - anti_drift_modeling_boundary_present == true FAIL: - progress_unit_representation_present == false -> FAIL - state_vocabulary_definition_present == false -> FAIL - partial_vs_completed_representation_present == false -> FAIL - anti_drift_modeling_boundary_present == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category starts without its own representational perimeter - later stages would configure and validate an undefined model - the whole project becomes exposed to inconsistent progress-reading semantics TRANSITION_NOTE: - this remains transitional because the representational boundary is still being validated from declared canonical content rather than enforced through machine-readable model contracts` ] }, { --- end evidence occurrence 8 --- TOKEN: failureModes | OCCURRENCES: 3 --- failureModes occurrence 1 | line=50035 | index=2641417 --- alidation checks VALIDATION: - all_previous_validation_checks == true FAIL: - any previous validation check false -> NOT COMPLETE IMPACT: - Observable Evidence cannot begin from a trustworthy validated model state - Project Progress Model remains configured but not operationally verified - the project continues without a dependable judgment layer for progress representation integrity` ] } ]; const failureModesRecoveryBuckets = [ { title: "Vocabulary fracture across surfaces", items: [ `WHAT: This bucket must define the failure state in which Project Progress Model stops preserving one shared progress language and different surfaces begin naming the same modeled condition with divergent labels, meanings or implied maturity levels WHY: the exclusive role of Failure Modes & Recovery in this category is to protect representational unity; if the model fractures linguistically, Devon loses the very grammar that lets progress be read as one system state instead of several incompatible narratives EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_progress_model.json - failure_focus: - divergent labels for the same modeled condition - semantic mismatch between surfaces - loss of shared progress language VALIDATION: - transitional_validation_only == true - vocabulary_fracture_defined == true - semantic_mismatch_between_surfaces_defined == true - loss_of_shared_progress_language_defined == true FAIL: - vocabulary_fracture_defined == false -> FAIL - semantic_mismatch_between_surfaces_defined == false -> FAIL - loss_of_shared_prog --- end failureModes occurrence 1 --- --- failureModes occurrence 2 | line=50256 | index=2651951 --- instead of remaining a placeholder pending card WHY: this bucket must exist as an explicit stage because progress representation in Devon is not only something to define but something to defend and repair; without this stage the category has no declared mechanism for protecting the integrity of its own model EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_renderer_call: renderStructuredCard("Failure Modes & Recovery", failureModesRecoveryBuckets) VALIDATION: - failure_modes_recovery_bucket_structured == true FAIL: - failure_modes_recovery_bucket_structured == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category may define representation law but cannot govern corruption of that representation - DH keeps a structural hole exactly where modeled progress integrity should be defended - the project inherits a progress-model contract that cannot respond to its own representational breakdown` ] }, { title: "Failure Modes & Recovery authority discipline", items: [ `WHAT: This bucket must remain limited to corruption and restoration of progress representation, vocabulary integrity, modeled unit stability and aggregation fidelity inside Project Progress Model, without absorbing failures owned by lawful advancement, scope, architecture, sandbox, server registry, runtime or delivery categories WHY: the exclusive role here is to repair the readability and integrity of modeled progress, not to become the universal repair desk of Devon; once this bucket starts owning sibling failures, the project loses clean governance boundaries exactly where corrective authority needs --- end failureModes occurrence 2 --- --- failureModes occurrence 3 | line=50335 | index=2656049 --- ns able to represent progress but not to defend its integrity - the project continues without a dependable category-level correction layer for corrupted progress representation` ] } ]; const rightHtml = [ renderStructuredCard("Installation", installationBuckets), renderStructuredCard("Validation", validationBuckets), renderStructuredCard("Failure Modes & Recovery", failureModesRecoveryBuckets) ].join(""); return { kind: "html", content: overviewHtml + `
    ${leftHtml}
    ${rightHtml}
    ` }; } const structured = renderStructuredCategoryView(doc, sourceMeta); if (structured) { return { kind: "html", content: structured }; } return { kind: "html", content: renderArchitectureSummaryView(doc, sourceMeta) }; } function renderDocContent(payload){ if (payload && payload.kind === "html") { setStructuredMode(true, payload.content); docViewer.textContent = ""; return; } setStructuredMode(false, ""); docViewer.textContent = payload && payload.content ? payload.content : ""; } function renderContractView(doc, sourceMeta){ const contractObj = { label: doc.label, path: doc.path, phase: doc.phase, layer: doc.layer, --- end failureModes occurrence 3 --- TOKEN: failure_modes | OCCURRENCES: 4 --- failure_modes occurrence 1 | line=48686 | index=2576493 --- mmar EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_bucket_names: - Prerequisites - Installation - Configuration - Validation - Observable Evidence - Failure Modes & Recovery - Completion & Promotion VALIDATION: - bucket_name_prerequisites == true - bucket_name_installation == true - bucket_name_configuration == true - bucket_name_validation == true - bucket_name_observable_evidence == true - bucket_name_failure_modes_recovery == true - bucket_name_completion_promotion == true FAIL: - any expected bucket missing -> MISSING IMPACT: - the category cannot mature through an ordered execution path - DH loses the operational skeleton needed to turn progress representation into shared project grammar - the project remains stuck with declared modeling authority but no staged representational contract` ] }, { title: "Prerequisites exit condition for the progress model", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites are complete only when progress modeling authority materially exists, is architecturally admitted, is placed in Phase 01, is reachable in DH, is render-ready, is dispatch-admitted, already declares the representational boundary of progress state, preserves clean category authority and exposes the stage skeleton needed for downstream execution WHY: this bucket closes the entrance of the category by ensuring Devon has a lawful starting position for modeled progress before any later stage tries to install vocabulary, configure aggregation, validate representational consistency, prove surface alignment, handle drift or promote modeled maturity --- end failure_modes occurrence 1 --- --- failure_modes occurrence 2 | line=49642 | index=2622849 --- mmar EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_bucket_names: - Prerequisites - Installation - Configuration - Validation - Observable Evidence - Failure Modes & Recovery - Completion & Promotion VALIDATION: - bucket_name_prerequisites == true - bucket_name_installation == true - bucket_name_configuration == true - bucket_name_validation == true - bucket_name_observable_evidence == true - bucket_name_failure_modes_recovery == true - bucket_name_completion_promotion == true FAIL: - any expected bucket missing -> MISSING IMPACT: - the category cannot install as an ordered progress-modeling pipeline - DH loses the stage skeleton required to operationalize shared progress grammar - the project stays with a declared modeling category but no installed execution flow` ] }, { title: "Installation bucket materialization", items: [ `WHAT: Installation itself must be materialized as a real structured bucket inside the right-column workflow instead of remaining a placeholder pending card WHY: this bucket exists to declare how the category becomes operationally present, so leaving Installation as placeholder means the category skipped the stage that should explain its own materialization inside the project EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_renderer_call: renderStructuredCard("Installation", installationBuckets) VALIDATION: - installation_bucket_structured == true FAIL: - installation_bucket_structured == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category claims staged execution but omits its own installatio --- end failure_modes occurrence 2 --- --- failure_modes occurrence 3 | line=50259 | index=2651995 --- card WHY: this bucket must exist as an explicit stage because progress representation in Devon is not only something to define but something to defend and repair; without this stage the category has no declared mechanism for protecting the integrity of its own model EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_renderer_call: renderStructuredCard("Failure Modes & Recovery", failureModesRecoveryBuckets) VALIDATION: - failure_modes_recovery_bucket_structured == true FAIL: - failure_modes_recovery_bucket_structured == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category may define representation law but cannot govern corruption of that representation - DH keeps a structural hole exactly where modeled progress integrity should be defended - the project inherits a progress-model contract that cannot respond to its own representational breakdown` ] }, { title: "Failure Modes & Recovery authority discipline", items: [ `WHAT: This bucket must remain limited to corruption and restoration of progress representation, vocabulary integrity, modeled unit stability and aggregation fidelity inside Project Progress Model, without absorbing failures owned by lawful advancement, scope, architecture, sandbox, server registry, runtime or delivery categories WHY: the exclusive role here is to repair the readability and integrity of modeled progress, not to become the universal repair desk of Devon; once this bucket starts owning sibling failures, the project loses clean governance boundaries exactly where corrective authority needs to stay precise EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yef --- end failure_modes occurrence 3 --- --- failure_modes occurrence 4 | line=50262 | index=2652053 --- ause progress representation in Devon is not only something to define but something to defend and repair; without this stage the category has no declared mechanism for protecting the integrity of its own model EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_renderer_call: renderStructuredCard("Failure Modes & Recovery", failureModesRecoveryBuckets) VALIDATION: - failure_modes_recovery_bucket_structured == true FAIL: - failure_modes_recovery_bucket_structured == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category may define representation law but cannot govern corruption of that representation - DH keeps a structural hole exactly where modeled progress integrity should be defended - the project inherits a progress-model contract that cannot respond to its own representational breakdown` ] }, { title: "Failure Modes & Recovery authority discipline", items: [ `WHAT: This bucket must remain limited to corruption and restoration of progress representation, vocabulary integrity, modeled unit stability and aggregation fidelity inside Project Progress Model, without absorbing failures owned by lawful advancement, scope, architecture, sandbox, server registry, runtime or delivery categories WHY: the exclusive role here is to repair the readability and integrity of modeled progress, not to become the universal repair desk of Devon; once this bucket starts owning sibling failures, the project loses clean governance boundaries exactly where corrective authority needs to stay precise EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - source_scope: Project --- end failure_modes occurrence 4 --- TOKEN: failure_modes_recovery | OCCURRENCES: 4 --- failure_modes_recovery occurrence 1 | line=48686 | index=2576493 --- mmar EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_bucket_names: - Prerequisites - Installation - Configuration - Validation - Observable Evidence - Failure Modes & Recovery - Completion & Promotion VALIDATION: - bucket_name_prerequisites == true - bucket_name_installation == true - bucket_name_configuration == true - bucket_name_validation == true - bucket_name_observable_evidence == true - bucket_name_failure_modes_recovery == true - bucket_name_completion_promotion == true FAIL: - any expected bucket missing -> MISSING IMPACT: - the category cannot mature through an ordered execution path - DH loses the operational skeleton needed to turn progress representation into shared project grammar - the project remains stuck with declared modeling authority but no staged representational contract` ] }, { title: "Prerequisites exit condition for the progress model", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites are complete only when progress modeling authority materially exists, is architecturally admitted, is placed in Phase 01, is reachable in DH, is render-ready, is dispatch-admitted, already declares the representational boundary of progress state, preserves clean category authority and exposes the stage skeleton needed for downstream execution WHY: this bucket closes the entrance of the category by ensuring Devon has a lawful starting position for modeled progress before any later stage tries to install vocabulary, configure aggregation, validate representational consistency, prove surface alignment, handle drift or promote modeled maturity EVIDENCE --- end failure_modes_recovery occurrence 1 --- --- failure_modes_recovery occurrence 2 | line=49642 | index=2622849 --- mmar EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_bucket_names: - Prerequisites - Installation - Configuration - Validation - Observable Evidence - Failure Modes & Recovery - Completion & Promotion VALIDATION: - bucket_name_prerequisites == true - bucket_name_installation == true - bucket_name_configuration == true - bucket_name_validation == true - bucket_name_observable_evidence == true - bucket_name_failure_modes_recovery == true - bucket_name_completion_promotion == true FAIL: - any expected bucket missing -> MISSING IMPACT: - the category cannot install as an ordered progress-modeling pipeline - DH loses the stage skeleton required to operationalize shared progress grammar - the project stays with a declared modeling category but no installed execution flow` ] }, { title: "Installation bucket materialization", items: [ `WHAT: Installation itself must be materialized as a real structured bucket inside the right-column workflow instead of remaining a placeholder pending card WHY: this bucket exists to declare how the category becomes operationally present, so leaving Installation as placeholder means the category skipped the stage that should explain its own materialization inside the project EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_renderer_call: renderStructuredCard("Installation", installationBuckets) VALIDATION: - installation_bucket_structured == true FAIL: - installation_bucket_structured == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category claims staged execution but omits its own installation contrac --- end failure_modes_recovery occurrence 2 --- --- failure_modes_recovery occurrence 3 | line=50259 | index=2651995 --- card WHY: this bucket must exist as an explicit stage because progress representation in Devon is not only something to define but something to defend and repair; without this stage the category has no declared mechanism for protecting the integrity of its own model EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_renderer_call: renderStructuredCard("Failure Modes & Recovery", failureModesRecoveryBuckets) VALIDATION: - failure_modes_recovery_bucket_structured == true FAIL: - failure_modes_recovery_bucket_structured == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category may define representation law but cannot govern corruption of that representation - DH keeps a structural hole exactly where modeled progress integrity should be defended - the project inherits a progress-model contract that cannot respond to its own representational breakdown` ] }, { title: "Failure Modes & Recovery authority discipline", items: [ `WHAT: This bucket must remain limited to corruption and restoration of progress representation, vocabulary integrity, modeled unit stability and aggregation fidelity inside Project Progress Model, without absorbing failures owned by lawful advancement, scope, architecture, sandbox, server registry, runtime or delivery categories WHY: the exclusive role here is to repair the readability and integrity of modeled progress, not to become the universal repair desk of Devon; once this bucket starts owning sibling failures, the project loses clean governance boundaries exactly where corrective authority needs to stay precise EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_ --- end failure_modes_recovery occurrence 3 --- --- failure_modes_recovery occurrence 4 | line=50262 | index=2652053 --- ause progress representation in Devon is not only something to define but something to defend and repair; without this stage the category has no declared mechanism for protecting the integrity of its own model EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_renderer_call: renderStructuredCard("Failure Modes & Recovery", failureModesRecoveryBuckets) VALIDATION: - failure_modes_recovery_bucket_structured == true FAIL: - failure_modes_recovery_bucket_structured == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category may define representation law but cannot govern corruption of that representation - DH keeps a structural hole exactly where modeled progress integrity should be defended - the project inherits a progress-model contract that cannot respond to its own representational breakdown` ] }, { title: "Failure Modes & Recovery authority discipline", items: [ `WHAT: This bucket must remain limited to corruption and restoration of progress representation, vocabulary integrity, modeled unit stability and aggregation fidelity inside Project Progress Model, without absorbing failures owned by lawful advancement, scope, architecture, sandbox, server registry, runtime or delivery categories WHY: the exclusive role here is to repair the readability and integrity of modeled progress, not to become the universal repair desk of Devon; once this bucket starts owning sibling failures, the project loses clean governance boundaries exactly where corrective authority needs to stay precise EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - source_scope: Project Progress --- end failure_modes_recovery occurrence 4 --- TOKEN: recovery | OCCURRENCES: 60 --- recovery occurrence 1 | line=48677 | index=2576248 --- l is not finished by merely existing; the project needs the category to be structurally ready for installation, configuration, validation, evidence, failure handling and promotion or else modeled progress never matures into a reusable system grammar EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_bucket_names: - Prerequisites - Installation - Configuration - Validation - Observable Evidence - Failure Modes & Recovery - Completion & Promotion VALIDATION: - bucket_name_prerequisites == true - bucket_name_installation == true - bucket_name_configuration == true - bucket_name_validation == true - bucket_name_observable_evidence == true - bucket_name_failure_modes_recovery == true - bucket_name_completion_promotion == true FAIL: - any expected bucket missing -> MISSING IMPACT: - the category cannot mature through an ordered execution path - DH loses the operational skeleton needed to turn progress representation into shared project grammar - the project remains stuck with declared modeling authority but no staged representational contract` ] }, { title: "Prerequisites exit condition for the progress model", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites are complete only when progress modeling authority materially exists, is architecturally admitted, is placed in Phase 01, is reachable in DH, is render-ready, is dispatch-admitted, already declares the representational boundary of progress state, preserves clean category authority and exposes the stage skeleton needed for downstream execution WHY: this bucket closes the entrance of the category --- end recovery occurrence 1 --- --- recovery occurrence 2 | line=48686 | index=2576507 --- : - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_bucket_names: - Prerequisites - Installation - Configuration - Validation - Observable Evidence - Failure Modes & Recovery - Completion & Promotion VALIDATION: - bucket_name_prerequisites == true - bucket_name_installation == true - bucket_name_configuration == true - bucket_name_validation == true - bucket_name_observable_evidence == true - bucket_name_failure_modes_recovery == true - bucket_name_completion_promotion == true FAIL: - any expected bucket missing -> MISSING IMPACT: - the category cannot mature through an ordered execution path - DH loses the operational skeleton needed to turn progress representation into shared project grammar - the project remains stuck with declared modeling authority but no staged representational contract` ] }, { title: "Prerequisites exit condition for the progress model", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites are complete only when progress modeling authority materially exists, is architecturally admitted, is placed in Phase 01, is reachable in DH, is render-ready, is dispatch-admitted, already declares the representational boundary of progress state, preserves clean category authority and exposes the stage skeleton needed for downstream execution WHY: this bucket closes the entrance of the category by ensuring Devon has a lawful starting position for modeled progress before any later stage tries to install vocabulary, configure aggregation, validate representational consistency, prove surface alignment, handle drift or promote modeled maturity EVIDENCE --- end recovery occurrence 2 --- --- recovery occurrence 3 | line=48900 | index=2586144 --- ational rules it should apply - the project inherits a progress-model surface with no configured grammar for state interpretation` ] }, { title: "Configuration continuity with upstream and downstream stages", items: [ `WHAT: Configuration must connect the authority established in Prerequisites and Installation to the later stages of Validation, Observable Evidence, Failure Modes & Recovery and Completion & Promotion through one coherent representational contract for progress state WHY: the role of this bucket is not isolated rule writing; it has to become the semantic hinge of the category, turning installed modeling authority into a downstream-operable contract that the rest of the stage flow can actually use EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - stage_context: - Prerequisites - Installation - Configuration - Validation - Observable Evidence - Failure Modes & Recovery - Completion & Promotion VALIDATION: - upstream_to_configuration_continuity_present == true - configuration_to_downstream_stages_continuity_present == true - coherent_progress_model_contract_present == true FAIL: - upstream_to_configuration_continuity_present == false -> FAIL - configuration_to_downstream_stages_continuity_present == false -> FAIL - coherent_progress_model_contract_present == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category fragments into disconnected cards instead of one modeling contract - DH loses the semantic bridge between declared modeling authority and later verification stages - the project cannot rely on one continuous grammar of progress repr --- end recovery occurrence 3 --- --- recovery occurrence 4 | line=48913 | index=2586673 --- act for progress state WHY: the role of this bucket is not isolated rule writing; it has to become the semantic hinge of the category, turning installed modeling authority into a downstream-operable contract that the rest of the stage flow can actually use EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - stage_context: - Prerequisites - Installation - Configuration - Validation - Observable Evidence - Failure Modes & Recovery - Completion & Promotion VALIDATION: - upstream_to_configuration_continuity_present == true - configuration_to_downstream_stages_continuity_present == true - coherent_progress_model_contract_present == true FAIL: - upstream_to_configuration_continuity_present == false -> FAIL - configuration_to_downstream_stages_continuity_present == false -> FAIL - coherent_progress_model_contract_present == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category fragments into disconnected cards instead of one modeling contract - DH loses the semantic bridge between declared modeling authority and later verification stages - the project cannot rely on one continuous grammar of progress representation from entry to maturity` ] }, { title: "Configuration authority discipline", items: [ `WHAT: Configuration must define only the rules of progress representation, state vocabulary, modeled units and aggregation grammar for Project Progress Model, without configuring lawful advancement decisions, scope perimeter, architecture structure, sandbox behavior, server identity, runtime mechanics or delivery closure WHY: this bucket exists to keep the catego --- end recovery occurrence 4 --- --- recovery occurrence 5 | line=48976 | index=2589981 --- lary, defines modeled progress units, defines aggregation grammar, configures anti-drift constraints, materializes Configuration as a structured bucket, preserves continuity across the stage flow and respects category authority limits WHY: this bucket closes the configuration stage by ensuring Devon no longer has only an installed progress-model surface, but a configured system of representation capable of supporting later validation, evidence, recovery and promotion decisions without semantic drift EVIDENCE: - aggregate result of all previous configuration checks VALIDATION: - all_previous_configuration_checks == true FAIL: - any previous configuration check false -> NOT COMPLETE IMPACT: - Validation cannot begin from a configured representational model - Project Progress Model remains operationally visible but semantically incomplete - the project continues without a trustworthy configured basis for expressing and aggregating progress state` ] } ]; const observableEvidenceBuckets = [ { title: "Observable proof that the progress vocabulary is actually the one in use", items: [ `WHAT: Observable Evidence must expose concrete proof that the state vocabulary declared by Project Progress Model is the same vocabulary being surfaced and consumed across Devon, rather than a canon-only definition that downstream surfaces silently replace WHY: the exclusive role of Observable Evidence in this category is to prove representational adoption, not representational intention; Validation may judge the model coherent, but this bucket must show that the pr --- end recovery occurrence 5 --- --- recovery occurrence 6 | line=49403 | index=2611577 --- nguage is actually safe to standardize TRANSITION_NOTE: - this remains transitional because exclusion of non-promotable model states is still being validated from declared canonical language rather than executable promotion policy` ] }, { title: "Promotion continuity with upstream resilience", items: [ `WHAT: This bucket must define that promotion is downstream of Failure Modes & Recovery, so no fractured vocabulary, unstable unit, distorted aggregation or still-contaminated representation is allowed to become trusted project grammar WHY: the exclusive role here is to ensure the final gate obeys the corrective logic of the category; if promotion can bypass failure and recovery, then Devon can detect representational corruption and still finalize that corruption as the official language of progress EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - stage_context: - Failure Modes & Recovery - Completion & Promotion VALIDATION: - failure_recovery_dependency_for_model_promotion_defined == true - revoked_or_rewritten_model_state_promotion_block_defined == true - contaminated_representation_finalization_block_defined == true FAIL: - failure_recovery_dependency_for_model_promotion_defined == false -> FAIL - revoked_or_rewritten_model_state_promotion_block_defined == false -> FAIL - contaminated_representation_finalization_block_defined == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category can repair corrupted representation upstream while still letting it become trusted grammar downstream - DH loses final-gate integrity at the exact point where representational tr --- end recovery occurrence 6 --- --- recovery occurrence 7 | line=49406 | index=2611872 --- le: "Promotion continuity with upstream resilience", items: [ `WHAT: This bucket must define that promotion is downstream of Failure Modes & Recovery, so no fractured vocabulary, unstable unit, distorted aggregation or still-contaminated representation is allowed to become trusted project grammar WHY: the exclusive role here is to ensure the final gate obeys the corrective logic of the category; if promotion can bypass failure and recovery, then Devon can detect representational corruption and still finalize that corruption as the official language of progress EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - stage_context: - Failure Modes & Recovery - Completion & Promotion VALIDATION: - failure_recovery_dependency_for_model_promotion_defined == true - revoked_or_rewritten_model_state_promotion_block_defined == true - contaminated_representation_finalization_block_defined == true FAIL: - failure_recovery_dependency_for_model_promotion_defined == false -> FAIL - revoked_or_rewritten_model_state_promotion_block_defined == false -> FAIL - contaminated_representation_finalization_block_defined == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category can repair corrupted representation upstream while still letting it become trusted grammar downstream - DH loses final-gate integrity at the exact point where representational trust should be strongest - the project becomes exposed to official progress language built on already-compromised modeling states` ] }, { title: "Completion & Promotion bucket materialization", items: [ `WHAT: Completion & Promoti --- end recovery occurrence 7 --- --- recovery occurrence 8 | line=49411 | index=2612104 --- still-contaminated representation is allowed to become trusted project grammar WHY: the exclusive role here is to ensure the final gate obeys the corrective logic of the category; if promotion can bypass failure and recovery, then Devon can detect representational corruption and still finalize that corruption as the official language of progress EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - stage_context: - Failure Modes & Recovery - Completion & Promotion VALIDATION: - failure_recovery_dependency_for_model_promotion_defined == true - revoked_or_rewritten_model_state_promotion_block_defined == true - contaminated_representation_finalization_block_defined == true FAIL: - failure_recovery_dependency_for_model_promotion_defined == false -> FAIL - revoked_or_rewritten_model_state_promotion_block_defined == false -> FAIL - contaminated_representation_finalization_block_defined == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category can repair corrupted representation upstream while still letting it become trusted grammar downstream - DH loses final-gate integrity at the exact point where representational trust should be strongest - the project becomes exposed to official progress language built on already-compromised modeling states` ] }, { title: "Completion & Promotion bucket materialization", items: [ `WHAT: Completion & Promotion itself must be materialized as a real structured bucket inside the left-column workflow instead of remaining a placeholder pending card WHY: this bucket must exist as an explicit stage because Project Progress Model is incomplet --- end recovery occurrence 8 --- TOKEN: completion | OCCURRENCES: 53 --- completion occurrence 1 | line=48678 | index=2576261 --- shed by merely existing; the project needs the category to be structurally ready for installation, configuration, validation, evidence, failure handling and promotion or else modeled progress never matures into a reusable system grammar EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_bucket_names: - Prerequisites - Installation - Configuration - Validation - Observable Evidence - Failure Modes & Recovery - Completion & Promotion VALIDATION: - bucket_name_prerequisites == true - bucket_name_installation == true - bucket_name_configuration == true - bucket_name_validation == true - bucket_name_observable_evidence == true - bucket_name_failure_modes_recovery == true - bucket_name_completion_promotion == true FAIL: - any expected bucket missing -> MISSING IMPACT: - the category cannot mature through an ordered execution path - DH loses the operational skeleton needed to turn progress representation into shared project grammar - the project remains stuck with declared modeling authority but no staged representational contract` ] }, { title: "Prerequisites exit condition for the progress model", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites are complete only when progress modeling authority materially exists, is architecturally admitted, is placed in Phase 01, is reachable in DH, is render-ready, is dispatch-admitted, already declares the representational boundary of progress state, preserves clean category authority and exposes the stage skeleton needed for downstream execution WHY: this bucket closes the entrance of the category by ensuring Dev --- end completion occurrence 1 --- --- completion occurrence 2 | line=48687 | index=2576538 --- l/devon/docs/index.php - expected_bucket_names: - Prerequisites - Installation - Configuration - Validation - Observable Evidence - Failure Modes & Recovery - Completion & Promotion VALIDATION: - bucket_name_prerequisites == true - bucket_name_installation == true - bucket_name_configuration == true - bucket_name_validation == true - bucket_name_observable_evidence == true - bucket_name_failure_modes_recovery == true - bucket_name_completion_promotion == true FAIL: - any expected bucket missing -> MISSING IMPACT: - the category cannot mature through an ordered execution path - DH loses the operational skeleton needed to turn progress representation into shared project grammar - the project remains stuck with declared modeling authority but no staged representational contract` ] }, { title: "Prerequisites exit condition for the progress model", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites are complete only when progress modeling authority materially exists, is architecturally admitted, is placed in Phase 01, is reachable in DH, is render-ready, is dispatch-admitted, already declares the representational boundary of progress state, preserves clean category authority and exposes the stage skeleton needed for downstream execution WHY: this bucket closes the entrance of the category by ensuring Devon has a lawful starting position for modeled progress before any later stage tries to install vocabulary, configure aggregation, validate representational consistency, prove surface alignment, handle drift or promote modeled maturity EVIDENCE: - aggregate result of all previ --- end completion occurrence 2 --- --- completion occurrence 3 | line=48728 | index=2578560 --- thy canonical model for expressing them` ] } ]; const configurationBuckets = [ { title: "Configuration of the progress state vocabulary", items: [ `WHAT: Configuration must define the official vocabulary that Project Progress Model uses to represent progress states across Devon, including how modeled units express movement, intermediate condition and recognized completion without semantic overlap WHY: the role of Configuration in this category is to turn modeling authority into usable language; without configured state vocabulary, each surface can describe the same progress differently and the project loses the ability to compare, aggregate or interpret progress consistently EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_progress_model.json - expected_model_controls: - state vocabulary - modeled progress states - completed representation - partial representation VALIDATION: - transitional_validation_only == true - state_vocabulary_present == true - modeled_progress_states_present == true - completed_representation_present == true - partial_representation_present == true FAIL: - state_vocabulary_present == false -> FAIL - modeled_progress_states_present == false -> FAIL - completed_representation_present == false -> FAIL - partial_representation_present == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category stays installed but linguistically undefined - DH can expose the progress model without a stable state language - the project becomes exposed to multiple incompatible ways of describing the same progress condition TRANSITIO --- end completion occurrence 3 --- --- completion occurrence 4 | line=48900 | index=2586157 --- it should apply - the project inherits a progress-model surface with no configured grammar for state interpretation` ] }, { title: "Configuration continuity with upstream and downstream stages", items: [ `WHAT: Configuration must connect the authority established in Prerequisites and Installation to the later stages of Validation, Observable Evidence, Failure Modes & Recovery and Completion & Promotion through one coherent representational contract for progress state WHY: the role of this bucket is not isolated rule writing; it has to become the semantic hinge of the category, turning installed modeling authority into a downstream-operable contract that the rest of the stage flow can actually use EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - stage_context: - Prerequisites - Installation - Configuration - Validation - Observable Evidence - Failure Modes & Recovery - Completion & Promotion VALIDATION: - upstream_to_configuration_continuity_present == true - configuration_to_downstream_stages_continuity_present == true - coherent_progress_model_contract_present == true FAIL: - upstream_to_configuration_continuity_present == false -> FAIL - configuration_to_downstream_stages_continuity_present == false -> FAIL - coherent_progress_model_contract_present == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category fragments into disconnected cards instead of one modeling contract - DH loses the semantic bridge between declared modeling authority and later verification stages - the project cannot rely on one continuous grammar of progress representation from --- end completion occurrence 4 --- --- completion occurrence 5 | line=48914 | index=2586686 --- ess state WHY: the role of this bucket is not isolated rule writing; it has to become the semantic hinge of the category, turning installed modeling authority into a downstream-operable contract that the rest of the stage flow can actually use EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - stage_context: - Prerequisites - Installation - Configuration - Validation - Observable Evidence - Failure Modes & Recovery - Completion & Promotion VALIDATION: - upstream_to_configuration_continuity_present == true - configuration_to_downstream_stages_continuity_present == true - coherent_progress_model_contract_present == true FAIL: - upstream_to_configuration_continuity_present == false -> FAIL - configuration_to_downstream_stages_continuity_present == false -> FAIL - coherent_progress_model_contract_present == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category fragments into disconnected cards instead of one modeling contract - DH loses the semantic bridge between declared modeling authority and later verification stages - the project cannot rely on one continuous grammar of progress representation from entry to maturity` ] }, { title: "Configuration authority discipline", items: [ `WHAT: Configuration must define only the rules of progress representation, state vocabulary, modeled units and aggregation grammar for Project Progress Model, without configuring lawful advancement decisions, scope perimeter, architecture structure, sandbox behavior, server identity, runtime mechanics or delivery closure WHY: this bucket exists to keep the category honest at th --- end completion occurrence 5 --- --- completion occurrence 6 | line=49168 | index=2599430 --- entational judgment without the proof surface that should support it - the project inherits a progress-model contract that cannot show why its representation should be trusted` ] }, { title: "Observable evidence continuity with validation and promotion", items: [ `WHAT: Observable Evidence must connect the representational judgment made in Validation to the final maturity logic of Completion & Promotion so proof remains part of one continuous modeled-progress chain instead of becoming decorative support detached from later decisions WHY: the role of this bucket is to stop evidence from being treated as commentary after validation; it has to remain structurally connected to both the judgment that accepted the model and the final stage that will decide whether the modeled representation is mature enough for trusted downstream use EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - stage_context: - Validation - Observable Evidence - Completion & Promotion VALIDATION: - validation_to_observable_evidence_continuity_present == true - observable_evidence_to_completion_promotion_continuity_present == true - continuous_modeled_progress_evidence_chain_present == true FAIL: - validation_to_observable_evidence_continuity_present == false -> FAIL - observable_evidence_to_completion_promotion_continuity_present == false -> FAIL - continuous_modeled_progress_evidence_chain_present == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category fragments between representational judgment, proof and maturity - DH loses the chain that makes the model operationally trustworthy across sta --- end completion occurrence 6 --- --- completion occurrence 7 | line=49178 | index=2600010 --- hed from later decisions WHY: the role of this bucket is to stop evidence from being treated as commentary after validation; it has to remain structurally connected to both the judgment that accepted the model and the final stage that will decide whether the modeled representation is mature enough for trusted downstream use EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - stage_context: - Validation - Observable Evidence - Completion & Promotion VALIDATION: - validation_to_observable_evidence_continuity_present == true - observable_evidence_to_completion_promotion_continuity_present == true - continuous_modeled_progress_evidence_chain_present == true FAIL: - validation_to_observable_evidence_continuity_present == false -> FAIL - observable_evidence_to_completion_promotion_continuity_present == false -> FAIL - continuous_modeled_progress_evidence_chain_present == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category fragments between representational judgment, proof and maturity - DH loses the chain that makes the model operationally trustworthy across stages - the project becomes exposed to disconnected decisions where evidence no longer carries forward into final trust decisions` ] }, { title: "Observable Evidence authority discipline", items: [ `WHAT: Observable Evidence must expose proof only for progress representation integrity, modeled units, aggregation fidelity and anti-drift behavior inside Project Progress Model, without becoming the evidentiary owner of lawful advancement, scope perimeter, architecture structure, sandbox trust, server identity, run --- end completion occurrence 7 --- --- completion occurrence 8 | line=49182 | index=2600134 --- ; it has to remain structurally connected to both the judgment that accepted the model and the final stage that will decide whether the modeled representation is mature enough for trusted downstream use EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - stage_context: - Validation - Observable Evidence - Completion & Promotion VALIDATION: - validation_to_observable_evidence_continuity_present == true - observable_evidence_to_completion_promotion_continuity_present == true - continuous_modeled_progress_evidence_chain_present == true FAIL: - validation_to_observable_evidence_continuity_present == false -> FAIL - observable_evidence_to_completion_promotion_continuity_present == false -> FAIL - continuous_modeled_progress_evidence_chain_present == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category fragments between representational judgment, proof and maturity - DH loses the chain that makes the model operationally trustworthy across stages - the project becomes exposed to disconnected decisions where evidence no longer carries forward into final trust decisions` ] }, { title: "Observable Evidence authority discipline", items: [ `WHAT: Observable Evidence must expose proof only for progress representation integrity, modeled units, aggregation fidelity and anti-drift behavior inside Project Progress Model, without becoming the evidentiary owner of lawful advancement, scope perimeter, architecture structure, sandbox trust, server identity, runtime behavior or delivery closure WHY: the exclusive role of this bucket is to prove the model, not to prove every truth in --- end completion occurrence 8 --- TOKEN: completionPromotion | OCCURRENCES: 3 --- completionPromotion occurrence 1 | line=49258 | index=2604149 --- evious_observable_evidence_checks == true FAIL: - any previous observable evidence check false -> NOT COMPLETE IMPACT: - Completion & Promotion cannot begin from a trustworthy proof-backed model state - Project Progress Model remains validated but not evidentially defensible - the project continues without a dependable observable basis for trusting its progress representation contract` ] } ]; const completionPromotionBuckets = [ { title: "Promotion of the model into trusted project grammar", items: [ `WHAT: This bucket must define the exact point at which the validated and evidenced progress model stops being only a declared representation contract and becomes the trusted grammar that Devon is allowed to use for reading, comparing and communicating progress state across the project WHY: the exclusive role of Completion & Promotion in this category is not to promote lawful advancement itself, but to promote the maturity of its representation; everything upstream exists to define, test and prove the model, and this bucket decides when that model is stable enough to become the project's shared language for progress EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_progress_model.json - promotion_focus: - trusted project grammar - mature representational contract - official shared language of progress state VALIDATION: - transitional_validation_only == true - trusted_project_grammar_promotion_defined == true - mature_representational_contract_defined == true - official_shared_progress_language_defined == true FAIL: - trusted_pro --- end completionPromotion occurrence 1 --- --- completionPromotion occurrence 2 | line=49441 | index=2613632 --- remaining a placeholder pending card WHY: this bucket must exist as an explicit stage because Project Progress Model is incomplete until it declares how validated representation becomes trusted project grammar; without this stage the category governs representational evaluation but not representational adoption EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_renderer_call: renderStructuredCard("Completion & Promotion", completionPromotionBuckets) VALIDATION: - completion_promotion_bucket_structured == true FAIL: - completion_promotion_bucket_structured == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category can judge the model but cannot finish the trust cycle it was built to govern - DH keeps a structural hole exactly where modeled progress should become trusted shared grammar - the project inherits a representation contract with no declared final adoption gate` ] }, { title: "Completion & Promotion authority discipline", items: [ `WHAT: This bucket must remain limited to promotion of representational maturity and recognition of trusted progress grammar inside Project Progress Model, without absorbing lawful advancement conclusion, scope closure, architecture closure, sandbox graduation, server registration finalization, runtime readiness or delivery acceptance owned by sibling categories WHY: the exclusive role of this bucket is to finalize trust in the model, not to finalize every kind of truth in Devon; once promotion starts owning sibling completion domains, the category stops representing progress grammar and starts corrupting the governance map of the who --- end completionPromotion occurrence 2 --- --- completionPromotion occurrence 3 | line=49521 | index=2617818 --- project continues without a dependable final gate for shared progress grammar maturity` ] } ]; const leftHtml = [ renderStructuredCard("Prerequisites", prerequisitesBuckets), renderStructuredCard("Configuration", configurationBuckets), renderStructuredCard("Observable Evidence", observableEvidenceBuckets), renderStructuredCard("Completion & Promotion", completionPromotionBuckets) ].join(""); const installationBuckets = [ { title: "Documentation Hub installation of the progress representation contract", items: [ `WHAT: Installation must materialize Project Progress Model inside Documentation Hub as the live surface where Devon exposes, reads and operates the official representation contract of progress state WHY: the role of Installation in this category is not to decide whether progress is lawful, but to make the modeling authority operationally present; without installation, the project may have a declared model file yet still lack a usable place where progress representation is actually delivered to operators and downstream interpretation layers EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_branch_signature: doc.id === "project_progress_model" && state.categoryId === "overview_scope" - expected_return_kind: html VALIDATION: - custom_branch_exists == true - branch_returns_html_contract == true FAIL: - custom_branch_exists == false -> FAIL - branch_returns_html_contract == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the progress model remains declared but not installed as an e --- end completionPromotion occurrence 3 --- TOKEN: completion_promotion | OCCURRENCES: 11 --- completion_promotion occurrence 1 | line=48687 | index=2576538 --- l/devon/docs/index.php - expected_bucket_names: - Prerequisites - Installation - Configuration - Validation - Observable Evidence - Failure Modes & Recovery - Completion & Promotion VALIDATION: - bucket_name_prerequisites == true - bucket_name_installation == true - bucket_name_configuration == true - bucket_name_validation == true - bucket_name_observable_evidence == true - bucket_name_failure_modes_recovery == true - bucket_name_completion_promotion == true FAIL: - any expected bucket missing -> MISSING IMPACT: - the category cannot mature through an ordered execution path - DH loses the operational skeleton needed to turn progress representation into shared project grammar - the project remains stuck with declared modeling authority but no staged representational contract` ] }, { title: "Prerequisites exit condition for the progress model", items: [ `WHAT: Prerequisites are complete only when progress modeling authority materially exists, is architecturally admitted, is placed in Phase 01, is reachable in DH, is render-ready, is dispatch-admitted, already declares the representational boundary of progress state, preserves clean category authority and exposes the stage skeleton needed for downstream execution WHY: this bucket closes the entrance of the category by ensuring Devon has a lawful starting position for modeled progress before any later stage tries to install vocabulary, configure aggregation, validate representational consistency, prove surface alignment, handle drift or promote modeled maturity EVIDENCE: - aggregate result of all previous prereq --- end completion_promotion occurrence 1 --- --- completion_promotion occurrence 2 | line=49182 | index=2600134 --- ; it has to remain structurally connected to both the judgment that accepted the model and the final stage that will decide whether the modeled representation is mature enough for trusted downstream use EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - stage_context: - Validation - Observable Evidence - Completion & Promotion VALIDATION: - validation_to_observable_evidence_continuity_present == true - observable_evidence_to_completion_promotion_continuity_present == true - continuous_modeled_progress_evidence_chain_present == true FAIL: - validation_to_observable_evidence_continuity_present == false -> FAIL - observable_evidence_to_completion_promotion_continuity_present == false -> FAIL - continuous_modeled_progress_evidence_chain_present == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category fragments between representational judgment, proof and maturity - DH loses the chain that makes the model operationally trustworthy across stages - the project becomes exposed to disconnected decisions where evidence no longer carries forward into final trust decisions` ] }, { title: "Observable Evidence authority discipline", items: [ `WHAT: Observable Evidence must expose proof only for progress representation integrity, modeled units, aggregation fidelity and anti-drift behavior inside Project Progress Model, without becoming the evidentiary owner of lawful advancement, scope perimeter, architecture structure, sandbox trust, server identity, runtime behavior or delivery closure WHY: the exclusive role of this bucket is to prove the model, not to prove every truth in Devon; on --- end completion_promotion occurrence 2 --- --- completion_promotion occurrence 3 | line=49187 | index=2600347 --- - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - stage_context: - Validation - Observable Evidence - Completion & Promotion VALIDATION: - validation_to_observable_evidence_continuity_present == true - observable_evidence_to_completion_promotion_continuity_present == true - continuous_modeled_progress_evidence_chain_present == true FAIL: - validation_to_observable_evidence_continuity_present == false -> FAIL - observable_evidence_to_completion_promotion_continuity_present == false -> FAIL - continuous_modeled_progress_evidence_chain_present == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category fragments between representational judgment, proof and maturity - DH loses the chain that makes the model operationally trustworthy across stages - the project becomes exposed to disconnected decisions where evidence no longer carries forward into final trust decisions` ] }, { title: "Observable Evidence authority discipline", items: [ `WHAT: Observable Evidence must expose proof only for progress representation integrity, modeled units, aggregation fidelity and anti-drift behavior inside Project Progress Model, without becoming the evidentiary owner of lawful advancement, scope perimeter, architecture structure, sandbox trust, server identity, runtime behavior or delivery closure WHY: the exclusive role of this bucket is to prove the model, not to prove every truth in Devon; once evidence authority expands into sibling domains, the category stops being the guardian of readable progress state and becomes a dumping ground for unrelated proof obligations EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/publi --- end completion_promotion occurrence 3 --- --- completion_promotion occurrence 4 | line=49444 | index=2613675 --- this bucket must exist as an explicit stage because Project Progress Model is incomplete until it declares how validated representation becomes trusted project grammar; without this stage the category governs representational evaluation but not representational adoption EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_renderer_call: renderStructuredCard("Completion & Promotion", completionPromotionBuckets) VALIDATION: - completion_promotion_bucket_structured == true FAIL: - completion_promotion_bucket_structured == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category can judge the model but cannot finish the trust cycle it was built to govern - DH keeps a structural hole exactly where modeled progress should become trusted shared grammar - the project inherits a representation contract with no declared final adoption gate` ] }, { title: "Completion & Promotion authority discipline", items: [ `WHAT: This bucket must remain limited to promotion of representational maturity and recognition of trusted progress grammar inside Project Progress Model, without absorbing lawful advancement conclusion, scope closure, architecture closure, sandbox graduation, server registration finalization, runtime readiness or delivery acceptance owned by sibling categories WHY: the exclusive role of this bucket is to finalize trust in the model, not to finalize every kind of truth in Devon; once promotion starts owning sibling completion domains, the category stops representing progress grammar and starts corrupting the governance map of the whole project EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/pub --- end completion_promotion occurrence 4 --- --- completion_promotion occurrence 5 | line=49447 | index=2613731 --- ect Progress Model is incomplete until it declares how validated representation becomes trusted project grammar; without this stage the category governs representational evaluation but not representational adoption EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_renderer_call: renderStructuredCard("Completion & Promotion", completionPromotionBuckets) VALIDATION: - completion_promotion_bucket_structured == true FAIL: - completion_promotion_bucket_structured == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category can judge the model but cannot finish the trust cycle it was built to govern - DH keeps a structural hole exactly where modeled progress should become trusted shared grammar - the project inherits a representation contract with no declared final adoption gate` ] }, { title: "Completion & Promotion authority discipline", items: [ `WHAT: This bucket must remain limited to promotion of representational maturity and recognition of trusted progress grammar inside Project Progress Model, without absorbing lawful advancement conclusion, scope closure, architecture closure, sandbox graduation, server registration finalization, runtime readiness or delivery acceptance owned by sibling categories WHY: the exclusive role of this bucket is to finalize trust in the model, not to finalize every kind of truth in Devon; once promotion starts owning sibling completion domains, the category stops representing progress grammar and starts corrupting the governance map of the whole project EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - source_scope: Project Pr --- end completion_promotion occurrence 5 --- --- completion_promotion occurrence 6 | line=49470 | index=2615159 --- starts owning sibling completion domains, the category stops representing progress grammar and starts corrupting the governance map of the whole project EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - source_scope: Project Progress Model overview, prerequisites, installation, configuration, validation, observable evidence, failure/recovery and completion/promotion definitions VALIDATION: - transitional_validation_only == true - completion_promotion_respects_progress_model_authority == true - no_progress_canonical_completion_absorption == true - no_scope_completion_absorption == true - no_architecture_completion_absorption == true - no_sandbox_completion_absorption == true - no_server_registry_completion_absorption == true - no_runtime_completion_absorption == true - no_delivery_completion_absorption == true FAIL: - completion_promotion_respects_progress_model_authority == false -> FAIL - any sibling completion absorption == true -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category starts finalizing truths it does not own - DH governance boundaries collapse at the final representational trust layer - the project loses determinism about what this category is allowed to officially mature and conclude TRANSITION_NOTE: - this remains transitional because authority discipline is still being validated from rendered contract semantics rather than structural ownership enforcement` ] }, { title: "Completion & Promotion exit condition for the progress model", items: [ `WHAT: Completion & Promotion is complete only when Project Progress Model defines promotion into trusted project grammar, --- end completion_promotion occurrence 6 --- --- completion_promotion occurrence 7 | line=49480 | index=2615555 --- VALIDATION: - transitional_validation_only == true - completion_promotion_respects_progress_model_authority == true - no_progress_canonical_completion_absorption == true - no_scope_completion_absorption == true - no_architecture_completion_absorption == true - no_sandbox_completion_absorption == true - no_server_registry_completion_absorption == true - no_runtime_completion_absorption == true - no_delivery_completion_absorption == true FAIL: - completion_promotion_respects_progress_model_authority == false -> FAIL - any sibling completion absorption == true -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category starts finalizing truths it does not own - DH governance boundaries collapse at the final representational trust layer - the project loses determinism about what this category is allowed to officially mature and conclude TRANSITION_NOTE: - this remains transitional because authority discipline is still being validated from rendered contract semantics rather than structural ownership enforcement` ] }, { title: "Completion & Promotion exit condition for the progress model", items: [ `WHAT: Completion & Promotion is complete only when Project Progress Model defines promotion into trusted project grammar, defines the lawful threshold from workable model to trusted model, requires preserved representational proof and lawful judgment before promotion, excludes non-promotable model states, preserves dependency on Failure Modes & Recovery, materializes the bucket as a structured stage and respects category authority boundaries WHY: this bucket closes the category by ensuring Devon no longer has on --- end completion_promotion occurrence 7 --- --- completion_promotion occurrence 8 | line=49505 | index=2617065 --- aterializes the bucket as a structured stage and respects category authority boundaries WHY: this bucket closes the category by ensuring Devon no longer has only a way to describe progress representation, but also a category-specific mechanism for lawfully converting validated model integrity into trusted shared grammar for project-wide use EVIDENCE: - aggregate result of all previous completion and promotion checks VALIDATION: - all_previous_completion_promotion_checks == true FAIL: - any previous completion promotion check false -> NOT COMPLETE IMPACT: - Project Progress Model cannot act as a closed representational-governance contract - DH remains able to analyze the model without being able to canonize its trusted adoption state - the project continues without a dependable final gate for shared progress grammar maturity` ] } ]; const leftHtml = [ renderStructuredCard("Prerequisites", prerequisitesBuckets), renderStructuredCard("Configuration", configurationBuckets), renderStructuredCard("Observable Evidence", observableEvidenceBuckets), renderStructuredCard("Completion & Promotion", completionPromotionBuckets) ].join(""); const installationBuckets = [ { title: "Documentation Hub installation of the progress representation contract", items: [ `WHAT: Installation must materialize Project Progress Model inside Documentation Hub as the live surface where Devon exposes, reads and operates the official representation contract of progress state WHY: the role of Installation in this categ --- end completion_promotion occurrence 8 --- ----- LAST CARD-LIKE OBJECTS IN BRANCH ----- CARD_OBJECT_COUNT: 59 --- CARD_OBJECT #50 | line=50010 | index=2640226 --- ntract semantics rather than enforced through structural ownership bindings` ] }, { title: "Validation exit condition for the progress model", items: [ `WHAT: Validation is complete only when Project Progress Model can verify state vocabulary integrity, verify modeled unit consistency, verify aggregation fidelity, verify anti-drift behavior, materialize Validation as a structured bucket, maintain continuity with configuration and evidence, and respect category authority limits WHY: this bucket closes the validation stage by ensuring Devon no longer has only a configured progress model, but an actual representational judgment layer capable of deciding whether that model remains coherent and trustworthy across project consumption surfaces EVIDENCE: - aggregate result of all previous validation checks VALIDATION: - all_previous_validation_checks == true FAIL: - any previous validation check false -> NOT COMPLETE IMPACT: - Observable Evide --- end CARD_OBJECT #50 --- --- CARD_OBJECT #51 | line=50036 | index=2641461 --- ation integrity` ] } ]; const failureModesRecoveryBuckets = [ { title: "Vocabulary fracture across surfaces", items: [ `WHAT: This bucket must define the failure state in which Project Progress Model stops preserving one shared progress language and different surfaces begin naming the same modeled condition with divergent labels, meanings or implied maturity levels WHY: the exclusive role of Failure Modes & Recovery in this category is to protect representational unity; if the model fractures linguistically, Devon loses the very grammar that lets progress be read as one system state instead of several incompatible narratives EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_progress_model.json - failure_focus: - divergent labels for the same modeled condition - semantic mismatch between surfaces - loss of shared progress language VALIDATION: - transitional_validation_only == true - vocabular --- end CARD_OBJECT #51 --- --- CARD_OBJECT #52 | line=50072 | index=2643149 --- semantics rather than detected through executable cross-surface comparison` ] }, { title: "Mutation of modeled units under operational use", items: [ `WHAT: This bucket must define the failure state in which the objects that Project Progress Model is supposed to represent stop remaining stable units and begin mutating into raw tasks, narrative fragments or surface-specific pseudo-objects WHY: the role of this bucket is to protect the identity of what the model is actually modeling; if modeled units mutate under use, the category no longer represents progress state but a shifting mixture of unrelated artifacts that cannot be trusted as a common project object EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_progress_model.json - failure_focus: - modeled unit mutation - collapse into raw tasks or fragments - loss of stable representational object VALIDATION: - transitional_validation_only == true - modeled_unit --- end CARD_OBJECT #52 --- --- CARD_OBJECT #53 | line=50108 | index=2644870 --- dated from declared model semantics rather than formal identity enforcement` ] }, { title: "Aggregation drift that rewrites local meaning", items: [ `WHAT: This bucket must define the failure state in which Project Progress Model still appears to aggregate progress successfully while actually rewriting, flattening or exaggerating the meaning of the lower-level states it is summarizing WHY: the exclusive role of this bucket is to defend scale fidelity; in this category the dangerous corruption is not only wrong local representation, but the silent distortion that occurs when project-level views stop meaning what their source units originally meant EVIDENCE: - file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_progress_model.json - failure_focus: - aggregation that rewrites source meaning - flattened local state semantics - exaggerated summarized progress views VALIDATION: - transitional_validation_only == true - aggregation_ --- end CARD_OBJECT #53 --- --- CARD_OBJECT #54 | line=50144 | index=2646552 --- ed from declared model rules rather than formal rollup fidelity enforcement` ] }, { title: "Recovery of shared representational grammar", items: [ `WHAT: This bucket must define how Devon restores Project Progress Model after representational drift has contaminated the shared language of progress, specifically by re-establishing one vocabulary, one set of modeled units and one interpretable state grammar across surfaces WHY: Failure Modes & Recovery in this category is not generic remediation; its exclusive role is to restore readable common meaning to progress representation so the project can once again interpret progress through one model instead of several competing representations EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - recovery_focus: - restore shared progress language - restore stable modeled units - restore interpretable state grammar VALIDATION: - transitional_validation_only == true - shared_progre --- end CARD_OBJECT #54 --- --- CARD_OBJECT #55 | line=50180 | index=2648293 --- ed at contract level rather than implemented as executable remediation flow` ] }, { title: "Revocation of distorted modeled states", items: [ `WHAT: This bucket must define how Project Progress Model removes, rewrites or downgrades modeled states that became canonically visible through fractured vocabulary, unstable units or distorted aggregation WHY: the role of recovery here is materially corrective; this category is responsible for official progress representation, so when representation becomes illegible or misleading it must also define how that damaged model state is withdrawn from the project's readable surface EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - recovery_focus: - remove distorted modeled states - rewrite fractured representation - downgrade misleading aggregated views VALIDATION: - transitional_validation_only == true - distorted_modeled_state_revocation_defined == true - fractured_representation --- end CARD_OBJECT #55 --- --- CARD_OBJECT #56 | line=50213 | index=2649781 --- g decisions on representations that should have been withdrawn or corrected` ] }, { title: "Containment before modeled maturity is promoted", items: [ `WHAT: This bucket must define how corrupted modeled states are stopped from flowing forward into Completion & Promotion, so a damaged representation cannot harden into trusted project grammar or mature operational interpretation WHY: its role inside this category is to intercept representational corruption before the final gate; if recovery does not actively contain downstream spread, then Project Progress Model can acknowledge drift and still let that drift become the trusted language of the project EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - stage_context: - Observable Evidence - Failure Modes & Recovery - Completion & Promotion VALIDATION: - observable_evidence_to_failure_recovery_continuity_present == true - failure_recovery_to_completion_promotion_containmen --- end CARD_OBJECT #56 --- --- CARD_OBJECT #57 | line=50245 | index=2651284 --- to final interpretive surfaces built on already-corrupted progress grammar` ] }, { title: "Failure Modes & Recovery bucket materialization", items: [ `WHAT: Failure Modes & Recovery itself must be materialized as a real structured bucket inside the right-column workflow instead of remaining a placeholder pending card WHY: this bucket must exist as an explicit stage because progress representation in Devon is not only something to define but something to defend and repair; without this stage the category has no declared mechanism for protecting the integrity of its own model EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - expected_renderer_call: renderStructuredCard("Failure Modes & Recovery", failureModesRecoveryBuckets) VALIDATION: - failure_modes_recovery_bucket_structured == true FAIL: - failure_modes_recovery_bucket_structured == false -> FAIL IMPACT: - the category may define representation law but cannot govern c --- end CARD_OBJECT #57 --- --- CARD_OBJECT #58 | line=50270 | index=2652457 --- ss-model contract that cannot respond to its own representational breakdown` ] }, { title: "Failure Modes & Recovery authority discipline", items: [ `WHAT: This bucket must remain limited to corruption and restoration of progress representation, vocabulary integrity, modeled unit stability and aggregation fidelity inside Project Progress Model, without absorbing failures owned by lawful advancement, scope, architecture, sandbox, server registry, runtime or delivery categories WHY: the exclusive role here is to repair the readability and integrity of modeled progress, not to become the universal repair desk of Devon; once this bucket starts owning sibling failures, the project loses clean governance boundaries exactly where corrective authority needs to stay precise EVIDENCE: - file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php - source_scope: Project Progress Model overview, prerequisites, installation, configuration, validation, observabl --- end CARD_OBJECT #58 --- --- CARD_OBJECT #59 | line=50307 | index=2654421 --- om rendered contract semantics rather than structural ownership enforcement` ] }, { title: "Failure Modes & Recovery exit condition for the progress model", items: [ `WHAT: Failure Modes & Recovery is complete only when Project Progress Model defines vocabulary fracture across surfaces, defines mutation of modeled units under operational use, defines aggregation drift that rewrites local meaning, defines how shared representational grammar is restored, defines how distorted modeled states are revoked or rewritten, defines how corruption is contained before promotion, materializes the bucket as a structured stage and preserves authority boundaries WHY: this bucket closes the resilience stage by ensuring Devon no longer has only a way to model progress, but also a category-specific mechanism for protecting, correcting and re-stabilizing the readability of project progress when that readability is damaged EVIDENCE: - aggregate result of all --- end CARD_OBJECT #59 --- ----- RECOMMENDED NEXT ACTION ----- Use this report to build one REPLACE patch for this DOC_ID only. Insert new card objects into existing bucket arrays where anchors are unambiguous. Do not replace existing card text. Do not create a new visual bucket. ===== JSON MIRROR STATUS CHECK ===== FILE: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/hub_index.json JSON_PARSE: PASS technology_requirements: MISSING TOP_LEVEL_KEYS: phases, categories, canon_meta FILE: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/panel_manifest.json JSON_PARSE: PASS technology_requirements: MISSING TOP_LEVEL_KEYS: manifest_version, generated_at_utc, source_host, target_host, sync_status, export_set, source_hashes FILE: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_scope_canonical.json JSON_PARSE: PASS technology_requirements: MISSING TOP_LEVEL_KEYS: canon_meta, project_scope, scope, deployment_order_official, canonical_files_index, infrastructure_model, memory_policy_summary, sandbox_policy_summary, status_rules_global, next_canonical_step FILE: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/deployment_order_canonical.json JSON_PARSE: PASS technology_requirements: MISSING TOP_LEVEL_KEYS: canon_meta, deployment_order FILE: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/sandbox_environment_canonical.json JSON_PARSE: PASS technology_requirements: MISSING TOP_LEVEL_KEYS: canon_meta, sandbox_policy, sandbox_contract_schema, sandbox_types, future_hypothesis, status_rules FILE: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/server_registry_canonical.json JSON_PARSE: PASS technology_requirements: MISSING TOP_LEVEL_KEYS: canon_meta, server_registry_policy, server_contract_schema, allowed_roles, known_nodes FILE: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_progress_canonical.json JSON_PARSE: PASS technology_requirements: MISSING TOP_LEVEL_KEYS: canon_meta, project_progress_canonical FILE: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_progress_model.json JSON_PARSE: PASS technology_requirements: MISSING TOP_LEVEL_KEYS: canon_meta, project_progress_model ===== DECISION RULE ===== PASS: Additive-card strategy is safer than editing existing cards. MISSING: Need exact insert anchors per DOC_ID before generating content patch. PATCH STRATEGY: - 1 DOC_ID per patch - backup before modification - REPLACE anchored section only - add card objects inside current buckets - preserve existing cards - no new Technology bucket - no JSON mirror until DH card exists ===== AUDIT SAVED ===== /home/yeff/public_html/devon/_audit/phase01_card_insert_anchor_audit_20260428_192350.txt