{
  "doc_id": "project_progress_canonical",
  "category_id": "overview_scope",
  "category_title": "Project Progress Canonical",
  "source_file": "/home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_progress_canonical.json",
  "docs_branch": "doc.id === \"project_progress_canonical\" && state.categoryId === \"overview_scope\"",
  "phase": "phase_01",
  "export_type": "documentation_bucket_content",
  "buckets": [
    {
      "bucket": "Overview",
      "status": "PASS",
      "cards": [
        {
          "title": "Progress State Authority",
          "content": "Inside Documentation Hub, Project Progress Model defines progress as a governed state machine, not as a visual checklist.\n\nOperationally, this category owns the rules that decide when Devon work is pending, active, blocked, completed or eligible for promotion. It does not measure productivity. It defines whether a progress state is structurally valid inside the project and whether that state can be trusted by downstream documentation, canon and monitoring layers.\n\nThis means Project Progress Model protects Devon from fake advancement. If this category fails, the system can show movement without authority, completion without evidence and promotion without a valid state transition.\n\nEvidence:\n- file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/master_architecture_index.md\n- file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data\n- expected_binding: project_progress_model\n- expected_scope: progress state authority for phase, category and bucket movement"
        },
        {
          "title": "Transition Legitimacy",
          "content": "Inside Project Progress Model, a progress transition only exists when the state change is allowed by the model and supported by evidence.\n\nOperationally, this bucket separates declared progress from valid progress. A bucket, category or phase cannot become complete just because text was written or a card was rendered. The transition must be compatible with the canonical project structure and must preserve the difference between work that is merely present and work that is ready to promote.\n\nThis means Devon cannot treat progress as a loose editorial label. If this bucket fails, the project can accumulate completed-looking documentation that has no deterministic relationship with actual readiness.\n\nEvidence:\n- file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/master_architecture_index.md\n- file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/canon\n- expected_binding: progress transitions must remain bound to canonical state\n- expected_scope: no promotion without valid transition semantics"
        },
        {
          "title": "Progress Integrity Boundary",
          "content": "Inside Devon, Project Progress Model is the boundary that prevents the architecture from confusing visibility with advancement.\n\nOperationally, this bucket defines that rendered progress must reflect canonical state, not interface appearance. A visible category is not automatically active. A filled bucket is not automatically complete. A documented section is not automatically promotable. The model keeps those meanings separate so Devon can read its own progress without semantic inflation.\n\nThis means the category protects the whole project from false velocity. If this bucket fails, the system can look organized while its progress map no longer represents governed execution.\n\nEvidence:\n- file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data\n- file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php\n- expected_binding: rendered progress must resolve through Project Progress Model authority\n- expected_scope: progress meaning must remain exclusive to this category"
        },
        {
          "title": "Promotion Readiness Gate",
          "content": "Inside Project Progress Model, promotion readiness is the final state boundary before progress can influence another layer of Devon.\n\nOperationally, this bucket defines that completed work is not automatically promotable. The model must prove that the state is valid, the evidence is bound, the category role is exclusive and the downstream layer can consume the result without inheriting an unfinished or ambiguous progress signal.\n\nThis means Project Progress Model is the gate that prevents premature advancement from contaminating canon, monitoring or execution views. If this bucket fails, Devon can promote states that were never structurally ready.\n\nEvidence:\n- aggregate result of Project Progress Model overview checks\n- file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/master_architecture_index.md\n- file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/canon\n- expected_binding: promotion readiness must derive from valid project_progress_model state"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "bucket": "Prerequisites",
      "status": "PASS",
      "cards": [
        {
          "title": "Canonical existence of progress authority",
          "content": "WHAT:\nPrerequisites must establish that Project Progress Canonical already exists as the declared authority that owns advancement legitimacy inside Devon before any work is interpreted as official progress\n\nWHY:\nthis bucket is the entry gate of the category because the project cannot judge progress by execution noise, implementation volume or operator belief; it first needs a sovereign authority that says who is allowed to decide whether something truly moved the program forward\n\nEVIDENCE:\n- file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_progress_canonical.json\n\nVALIDATION:\n- exists(file_path) == true\n\nFAIL:\n- exists(file_path) == false -> MISSING\n\nIMPACT:\n- the category loses material authority before it even starts\n- progress becomes vulnerable to informal interpretation\n- the project can keep working but cannot conclude advancement canonically"
        },
        {
          "title": "Root-architecture admission of progress governance",
          "content": "WHAT:\nPrerequisites must prove that progress governance is admitted into the sovereign architecture baseline of the project rather than existing as an orphan file with no formal standing\n\nWHY:\nthe role of this bucket is not merely to confirm file presence; it has to guarantee that progress authority is recognized by the root model that organizes Devon, otherwise completion truth would exist outside the same structural law that governs the rest of the program\n\nEVIDENCE:\n- file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/master_architecture_index.md\n- search_term: Project Progress Canonical\n\nVALIDATION:\n- master_registration_present == true\n\nFAIL:\n- master_registration_present == false -> FAIL\n\nIMPACT:\n- advancement law becomes detached from project architecture\n- later operational surfaces can reference progress without sovereign admission\n- the project loses continuity between structure and conclusion"
        },
        {
          "title": "Phase-01 placement before downstream interpretation",
          "content": "WHAT:\nPrerequisites must place Project Progress Canonical inside Phase 01 Overview & Scope so the meaning of progress is established before runtime, reporting, monitoring or panel interpretation starts consuming advancement signals\n\nWHY:\nthe bucket exists to force sequencing discipline: Devon must define what counts as progress before it starts reasoning about the state of the project, otherwise downstream layers inherit ungoverned maturity assumptions\n\nEVIDENCE:\n- file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/hub_index.json\n- expected_phase_id: phase-01\n- expected_category_id: overview_scope\n- expected_doc_id: project_progress_canonical\n\nVALIDATION:\n- phase_binding_present == true\n- category_binding_present == true\n- doc_id_present == true\n\nFAIL:\n- phase_binding_present == false -> FAIL\n- category_binding_present == false -> FAIL\n- doc_id_present == false -> MISSING\n\nIMPACT:\n- progress semantics enter the project too late\n- downstream categories can start emitting maturity interpretations without prior completion law\n- the project loses ordering discipline between definition and operational consumption"
        },
        {
          "title": "Documentation Hub reachability of progress law",
          "content": "WHAT:\nPrerequisites must guarantee that the category is reachable from Documentation Hub as an operator-consultable source of truth for advancement legitimacy\n\nWHY:\nthe bucket has to ensure that progress authority is not trapped in storage; if the category cannot be reached where operators inspect project state, then completion truth remains declared but not governable in practice\n\nEVIDENCE:\n- file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/hub_index.json\n- expected_doc_id: project_progress_canonical\n- expected_category_id: overview_scope\n\nVALIDATION:\n- nav_doc_entry_present == true\n- nav_category_binding_present == true\n\nFAIL:\n- nav_doc_entry_present == false -> MISSING\n- nav_category_binding_present == false -> FAIL\n\nIMPACT:\n- operators lose access to the category that should decide whether progress is real\n- DH stops serving as the execution-facing interface of completion law\n- the project drifts back toward memory-based progress judgment"
        },
        {
          "title": "Dedicated rendering readiness for progress semantics",
          "content": "WHAT:\nPrerequisites must ensure that Project Progress Canonical is prepared to render through its own custom DH branch so progress authority can be expressed as category-specific execution logic instead of generic document output\n\nWHY:\nthis bucket exists because progress is not a passive note; the project needs the category to speak in its own operational language, otherwise the semantics of advancement legitimacy get flattened before the category even begins to execute\n\nEVIDENCE:\n- file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php\n- expected_branch_signature: doc.id === \"project_progress_canonical\" && state.categoryId === \"overview_scope\"\n\nVALIDATION:\n- custom_branch_exists == true\n\nFAIL:\n- custom_branch_exists == false -> FAIL\n\nIMPACT:\n- the category can exist but still fail to present its own governance logic\n- DH reduces progress authority to generic content exposure\n- the project loses semantic precision exactly where conclusion rules should become explicit"
        },
        {
          "title": "Runtime dispatch admission of the category",
          "content": "WHAT:\nPrerequisites must verify that the DH render dispatcher actually routes Project Progress Canonical into its dedicated branch instead of bypassing it during runtime\n\nWHY:\nthe bucket exists to close the gap between declared category presence and actual execution; if dispatch does not admit the category, the project has nominal progress governance but no live delivery of it\n\nEVIDENCE:\n- file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php\n- expected_dispatch_gate:\n  - doc.id === \"project_progress_canonical\" && state.categoryId === \"overview_scope\"\n\nVALIDATION:\n- direct_render_dispatch_includes_project_progress_canonical == true\n\nFAIL:\n- direct_render_dispatch_includes_project_progress_canonical == false -> FAIL\n\nIMPACT:\n- progress authority remains declared but non-operational\n- DH can silently route around the category that should govern advancement legitimacy\n- the project loses trust in the bridge between canon and runtime behavior"
        },
        {
          "title": "Declared boundary between progress and mere activity",
          "content": "WHAT:\nPrerequisites must show that the category already declares a boundary between work that happened and work that deserves canonical recognition as advancement, including the difference between partial movement, valid progress and concluded completion\n\nWHY:\nthis bucket exists because the category cannot govern anything if it does not first announce what domain it is supposed to separate; the project needs a declared frontier between motion and advancement before later stages can configure, validate or prove anything\n\nEVIDENCE:\n- file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_progress_canonical.json\n- expected_progress_controls:\n  - advancement legitimacy\n  - partial versus valid distinction\n  - completion recognition boundary\n  - non-progress exclusions\n\nVALIDATION:\n- transitional_validation_only == true\n- advancement_legitimacy_boundary_present == true\n- partial_vs_valid_distinction_present == true\n- completion_recognition_boundary_present == true\n- non_progress_exclusions_present == true\n\nFAIL:\n- advancement_legitimacy_boundary_present == false -> FAIL\n- partial_vs_valid_distinction_present == false -> FAIL\n- completion_recognition_boundary_present == false -> FAIL\n- non_progress_exclusions_present == false -> FAIL\n\nIMPACT:\n- the category starts without its own semantic perimeter\n- later stages would configure and validate an undefined notion of progress\n- the whole project becomes exposed to ambiguous completion language\n\nTRANSITION_NOTE:\n- this remains transitional because the boundary is still being validated from declared canonical content rather than enforced through machine-readable progress-state rules"
        },
        {
          "title": "Authority separation from sibling categories",
          "content": "WHAT:\nPrerequisites must establish that Project Progress Canonical governs only advancement legitimacy and completion recognition, without absorbing ownership from scope, architecture, deployment, sandbox, server identity, runtime or delivery categories\n\nWHY:\nthe role of this bucket is to protect the category from starting in the wrong place; if progress authority expands into sibling domains, the project loses a clean governance map and progress stops being a conclusion category and becomes a semantic mess\n\nEVIDENCE:\n- file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php\n- source_scope: Project Progress Canonical overview and prerequisite definitions\n\nVALIDATION:\n- transitional_validation_only == true\n- progress_authority_scope_is_clean == true\n- no_scope_absorption == true\n- no_architecture_absorption == true\n- no_deployment_absorption == true\n- no_sandbox_absorption == true\n- no_server_registry_absorption == true\n- no_runtime_absorption == true\n- no_delivery_absorption == true\n\nFAIL:\n- progress_authority_scope_is_clean == false -> FAIL\n- any sibling authority absorption == true -> FAIL\n\nIMPACT:\n- the category begins with corrupted ownership boundaries\n- DH governance becomes harder to trust because responsibilities overlap\n- the project loses determinism about who defines advancement and who merely contributes inputs to it\n\nTRANSITION_NOTE:\n- this remains transitional because authority separation is still being validated from rendered contract semantics rather than formal structural ownership bindings"
        },
        {
          "title": "Process-stage skeleton availability",
          "content": "WHAT:\nPrerequisites must confirm that the category already exposes the full stage skeleton required to evolve from declared progress authority into a complete execution contract\n\nWHY:\nthis bucket exists because Project Progress Canonical is not finished by merely existing; the project needs the category to be structurally ready for installation, configuration, validation, evidence, failure handling and promotion or else progress governance cannot mature into usable project control\n\nEVIDENCE:\n- file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php\n- expected_bucket_names:\n  - Prerequisites\n  - Installation\n  - Configuration\n  - Validation\n  - Observable Evidence\n  - Failure Modes & Recovery\n  - Completion & Promotion\n\nVALIDATION:\n- bucket_name_prerequisites == true\n- bucket_name_installation == true\n- bucket_name_configuration == true\n- bucket_name_validation == true\n- bucket_name_observable_evidence == true\n- bucket_name_failure_modes_recovery == true\n- bucket_name_completion_promotion == true\n\nFAIL:\n- any expected bucket missing -> MISSING\n\nIMPACT:\n- the category cannot mature through an ordered execution path\n- DH loses the operational skeleton needed to turn progress semantics into project governance\n- the project remains stuck with declared authority but no staged conclusion model"
        },
        {
          "title": "Prerequisites exit condition for progress governance",
          "content": "WHAT:\nPrerequisites are complete only when progress authority materially exists, is architecturally admitted, is placed in Phase 01, is reachable in DH, is render-ready, is dispatch-admitted, already declares the boundary between advancement and activity, preserves clean category authority and exposes the stage skeleton needed for downstream execution\n\nWHY:\nthis bucket closes the entrance of the category by ensuring Devon has a lawful starting position for progress governance before any later stage tries to install criteria, validate claims, demand proof, handle corruption or promote completion\n\nEVIDENCE:\n- aggregate result of all previous prerequisite checks\n\nVALIDATION:\n- all_previous_prerequisite_checks == true\n\nFAIL:\n- any previous prerequisite check false -> NOT COMPLETE\n\nIMPACT:\n- Installation cannot start from a legitimate baseline\n- the category remains only partially constituted as a project-level authority\n- Devon keeps executing work without a trustworthy canonical entrance into conclusion truth"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "bucket": "Installation",
      "status": "PASS",
      "cards": [
        {
          "title": "Documentation Hub installation of progress authority",
          "content": "WHAT:\nInstallation must materialize Project Progress Canonical inside Documentation Hub as a live category surface where Devon can consult, expose and operate the official rules of advancement legitimacy\n\nWHY:\nthe role of Installation in this category is not to define progress itself but to make progress authority operationally present; without installation, completion law may exist in storage yet remain absent from the place where project state is actually interpreted\n\nEVIDENCE:\n- file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php\n- expected_branch_signature: doc.id === \"project_progress_canonical\" && state.categoryId === \"overview_scope\"\n- expected_return_kind: html\n\nVALIDATION:\n- custom_branch_exists == true\n- branch_returns_html_contract == true\n\nFAIL:\n- custom_branch_exists == false -> FAIL\n- branch_returns_html_contract == false -> FAIL\n\nIMPACT:\n- progress authority remains declared but not installed as an execution surface\n- DH cannot serve as the operational entrypoint for conclusion truth\n- the project keeps producing work without an installed place to judge whether that work advanced anything"
        },
        {
          "title": "Installation of the category overview as authority entrypoint",
          "content": "WHAT:\nInstallation must expose the Project Progress Canonical overview as the first authority layer that tells the operator what this category governs, where its boundary starts and why it exists in the project\n\nWHY:\nthis bucket exists because installation is not complete when a category merely renders; it is complete when the category becomes intelligible as a governing surface and can introduce its own role before downstream buckets are consumed\n\nEVIDENCE:\n- file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php\n- expected_ids:\n  - project-progress-canonical-overview-toggle\n  - project-progress-canonical-overview-more\n\nVALIDATION:\n- overview_block_present == true\n- overview_toggle_present == true\n- overview_expandable_content_present == true\n\nFAIL:\n- overview_block_present == false -> FAIL\n- overview_toggle_present == false -> FAIL\n- overview_expandable_content_present == false -> FAIL\n\nIMPACT:\n- the category renders without installing its own governing frame\n- operators can see stages without first understanding what progress authority means\n- the project loses clarity at the point where conclusion law should first become readable"
        },
        {
          "title": "Installation into the category workflow layout",
          "content": "WHAT:\nInstallation must place Project Progress Canonical into the structured category workflow layout so progress governance is installed as an ordered operational system rather than a loose text surface\n\nWHY:\nthe purpose of this bucket is to make the category inhabit the same execution grammar used by Documentation Hub; otherwise progress law would appear as content but not as governed workflow inside the project documentation system\n\nEVIDENCE:\n- file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php\n- expected_layout_tokens:\n  - master-two-col\n  - master-col-left\n  - master-col-right\n\nVALIDATION:\n- two_column_wrapper_present == true\n- left_column_present == true\n- right_column_present == true\n\nFAIL:\n- two_column_wrapper_present == false -> FAIL\n- left_column_present == false -> FAIL\n- right_column_present == false -> FAIL\n\nIMPACT:\n- the category is displayed but not structurally installed as workflow\n- DH loses continuity between progress authority and staged execution\n- the project inherits a weaker operational surface for governing advancement"
        },
        {
          "title": "Installation of the stage sequence for progress governance",
          "content": "WHAT:\nInstallation must expose the full execution path of the category so Project Progress Canonical is installed as a staged governance flow from prerequisites through completion and promotion\n\nWHY:\nthis bucket exists because progress legitimacy in Devon is not one statement; it is a chain of governed decisions, and installation must make that chain visibly available before the category can mature into project control\n\nEVIDENCE:\n- file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php\n- expected_bucket_names:\n  - Prerequisites\n  - Installation\n  - Configuration\n  - Validation\n  - Observable Evidence\n  - Failure Modes & Recovery\n  - Completion & Promotion\n\nVALIDATION:\n- bucket_name_prerequisites == true\n- bucket_name_installation == true\n- bucket_name_configuration == true\n- bucket_name_validation == true\n- bucket_name_observable_evidence == true\n- bucket_name_failure_modes_recovery == true\n- bucket_name_completion_promotion == true\n\nFAIL:\n- any expected bucket missing -> MISSING\n\nIMPACT:\n- the category cannot install as an ordered progress-governance pipeline\n- DH loses the stage skeleton required to operationalize conclusion truth\n- the project stays with a declared category but no installed decision flow"
        },
        {
          "title": "Installation bucket materialization",
          "content": "WHAT:\nInstallation itself must be materialized as a real structured bucket inside the right-column workflow instead of remaining a placeholder pending card\n\nWHY:\nthis bucket exists to declare how the category becomes operationally present, so leaving Installation as placeholder means the category skipped the very stage that should explain its own materialization inside the project\n\nEVIDENCE:\n- file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php\n- expected_renderer_call: renderStructuredCard(\"Installation\", installationBuckets)\n\nVALIDATION:\n- installation_bucket_structured == true\n\nFAIL:\n- installation_bucket_structured == false -> FAIL\n\nIMPACT:\n- the category claims staged execution but omits its own installation contract\n- DH keeps a gap where operational presence should be governed\n- the project gets progress authority text without explicit installation semantics"
        },
        {
          "title": "Installation linkage between canonical artifact and rendered category",
          "content": "WHAT:\nInstallation must bind the canonical artifact /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_progress_canonical.json to the rendered DH category so the progress contract exists both as source-of-truth file and as operator-facing execution surface\n\nWHY:\nthe role of this bucket is to prevent split reality between stored canon and rendered governance; if installation does not bind the two, the project can end up with one progress definition in data and another in practical consultation\n\nEVIDENCE:\n- file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_progress_canonical.json\n- file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php\n- installed_surface: Project Progress Canonical custom branch\n\nVALIDATION:\n- canonical_artifact_present == true\n- installed_surface_present == true\n- artifact_to_surface_linkage_present == true\n\nFAIL:\n- canonical_artifact_present == false -> MISSING\n- installed_surface_present == false -> FAIL\n- artifact_to_surface_linkage_present == false -> FAIL\n\nIMPACT:\n- progress authority becomes fragmented between storage and presentation\n- DH can render the category without being anchored to the canonical artifact\n- the project loses trust that the visible progress rules are the same ones officially declared"
        },
        {
          "title": "Installation boundary discipline",
          "content": "WHAT:\nInstallation must install Project Progress Canonical strictly as the surface for advancement legitimacy and completion recognition, without installing scope ownership, architecture meaning, sandbox law, server identity, runtime behavior or delivery closure into this category\n\nWHY:\nthis bucket exists because installation can corrupt a category before configuration even starts; if the wrong authority is installed here, the whole project inherits a distorted governance map from the moment the category becomes visible\n\nEVIDENCE:\n- file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php\n- source_scope: Project Progress Canonical overview and installation definitions\n\nVALIDATION:\n- transitional_validation_only == true\n- installation_respects_progress_authority == true\n- no_scope_installation_absorption == true\n- no_architecture_installation_absorption == true\n- no_sandbox_installation_absorption == true\n- no_server_registry_installation_absorption == true\n- no_runtime_installation_absorption == true\n- no_delivery_installation_absorption == true\n\nFAIL:\n- installation_respects_progress_authority == false -> FAIL\n- any sibling installation absorption == true -> FAIL\n\nIMPACT:\n- the category is installed with corrupted ownership boundaries\n- DH starts exposing overlapping governance responsibilities\n- the project loses clarity about what this category is actually allowed to govern\n\nTRANSITION_NOTE:\n- this remains transitional because installation-boundary discipline is still being validated from rendered contract semantics rather than enforced by structural ownership rules"
        },
        {
          "title": "Installation exit condition for progress governance",
          "content": "WHAT:\nInstallation is complete only when Project Progress Canonical is rendered as a live DH surface, exposes its overview as authority entrypoint, occupies the workflow layout, presents the full stage sequence, materializes Installation as a structured bucket, binds the canonical artifact to the rendered category and preserves clean installation boundaries\n\nWHY:\nthis bucket closes the installation stage by ensuring the category is no longer only declared in canon but is actually present as a usable governance surface through which Devon can interpret whether executed work deserves recognition as progress\n\nEVIDENCE:\n- aggregate result of all previous installation checks\n\nVALIDATION:\n- all_previous_installation_checks == true\n\nFAIL:\n- any previous installation check false -> NOT COMPLETE\n\nIMPACT:\n- Configuration cannot begin from a properly installed category\n- Project Progress Canonical remains only partially operational inside DH\n- the project keeps lacking a stable installed surface for governing advancement legitimacy"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "bucket": "Configuration",
      "status": "PASS",
      "cards": [
        {
          "title": "Configuration of advancement admissibility rules",
          "content": "WHAT:\nConfiguration must define the exact admissibility rules that decide when executed work is allowed to enter Project Progress Canonical as legitimate advancement instead of remaining mere activity, partial movement or unresolved implementation\n\nWHY:\nthe role of Configuration in this category is to parameterize progress judgment; Prerequisites only establish authority and Installation only materializes the surface, but Configuration is where Devon determines the rule set that converts raw work into governable progress meaning\n\nEVIDENCE:\n- file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_progress_canonical.json\n- expected_progress_controls:\n  - advancement admissibility rules\n  - activity versus progress distinction\n  - partial versus valid progress distinction\n  - completion-entry conditions\n\nVALIDATION:\n- transitional_validation_only == true\n- advancement_admissibility_rules_present == true\n- activity_vs_progress_distinction_present == true\n- partial_vs_valid_progress_distinction_present == true\n- completion_entry_conditions_present == true\n\nFAIL:\n- advancement_admissibility_rules_present == false -> FAIL\n- activity_vs_progress_distinction_present == false -> FAIL\n- partial_vs_valid_progress_distinction_present == false -> FAIL\n- completion_entry_conditions_present == false -> FAIL\n\nIMPACT:\n- the category stays installed but semantically undefined\n- DH can expose progress authority without rules for deciding what qualifies\n- the project loses a deterministic basis for recognizing real advancement\n\nTRANSITION_NOTE:\n- this remains transitional because admissibility rules are still being validated from declared canonical content rather than enforced through machine-readable progress-state logic"
        },
        {
          "title": "Configuration of the boundary between progress and completion",
          "content": "WHAT:\nConfiguration must define how Project Progress Canonical separates valid advancement from fully recognized completion so the project can distinguish work that is progressing from work that has earned final canonical conclusion status\n\nWHY:\nthis bucket exists because the category governs both movement and conclusion, and those are not the same thing; without configuring that boundary, Devon can mistake good progress for finished work or treat unfinished work as complete\n\nEVIDENCE:\n- file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_progress_canonical.json\n- expected_progress_controls:\n  - progress versus completion boundary\n  - valid advancement state\n  - completion recognition state\n\nVALIDATION:\n- transitional_validation_only == true\n- progress_vs_completion_boundary_present == true\n- valid_advancement_state_present == true\n- completion_recognition_state_present == true\n\nFAIL:\n- progress_vs_completion_boundary_present == false -> FAIL\n- valid_advancement_state_present == false -> FAIL\n- completion_recognition_state_present == false -> FAIL\n\nIMPACT:\n- the category cannot tell whether a unit is moving forward or already concluded\n- DH loses precision at the boundary between advancement and official finish\n- the project becomes exposed to premature completion claims and muddled maturity signals\n\nTRANSITION_NOTE:\n- this remains transitional because the boundary is still being validated from canonical semantics rather than bound to formal state-transition criteria"
        },
        {
          "title": "Configuration of non-progress exclusions",
          "content": "WHAT:\nConfiguration must declare which kinds of signals are categorically excluded from counting as progress, including narrative optimism, visible effort, undocumented status language, decorative percentages and other forms of non-canonical advancement theater\n\nWHY:\nthe role of this bucket is defensive: progress governance only becomes credible when Devon configures not just what may count as advancement but also what must never be admitted into progress truth\n\nEVIDENCE:\n- file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_progress_canonical.json\n- expected_progress_controls:\n  - non-progress exclusions\n  - prohibited progress surrogates\n  - invalid advancement signals\n\nVALIDATION:\n- transitional_validation_only == true\n- non_progress_exclusions_present == true\n- prohibited_progress_surrogates_present == true\n- invalid_advancement_signals_present == true\n\nFAIL:\n- non_progress_exclusions_present == false -> FAIL\n- prohibited_progress_surrogates_present == false -> FAIL\n- invalid_advancement_signals_present == false -> FAIL\n\nIMPACT:\n- the category cannot defend itself against fake progress inputs\n- DH becomes vulnerable to decorative project narratives being treated as advancement\n- the project loses the negative boundary that keeps conclusion truth clean\n\nTRANSITION_NOTE:\n- this remains transitional because exclusion logic is still being validated from declared canonical language rather than enforced through executable rejection policy"
        },
        {
          "title": "Configuration of proof dependency for accepted progress",
          "content": "WHAT:\nConfiguration must establish that no advancement is allowed to count as legitimate unless it is structurally dependent on proof that can later be surfaced by Observable Evidence\n\nWHY:\nthis bucket exists because Project Progress Canonical cannot operate as opinion-based governance; accepted progress has to be configured from the start as something that will require substantiation, not merely later decoration\n\nEVIDENCE:\n- file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_progress_canonical.json\n- supporting_context:\n  - proof dependency\n  - evidence-backed advancement\n  - observable substantiation requirement\n\nVALIDATION:\n- transitional_validation_only == true\n- proof_dependency_present == true\n- evidence_backed_advancement_requirement_present == true\n- unsubtantiated_progress_forbidden == true\n\nFAIL:\n- proof_dependency_present == false -> FAIL\n- evidence_backed_advancement_requirement_present == false -> FAIL\n- unsubtantiated_progress_forbidden == false -> FAIL\n\nIMPACT:\n- Validation would be forced to judge progress without configured proof expectations\n- DH would separate progress acceptance from evidentiary discipline\n- the project could approve advancement states that were never designed to be defensible\n\nTRANSITION_NOTE:\n- this remains transitional because proof dependency is still being validated from declared contract semantics rather than a formal evidence-binding model"
        },
        {
          "title": "Configuration bucket materialization",
          "content": "WHAT:\nConfiguration itself must be materialized as a real structured bucket inside the left-column workflow instead of remaining a placeholder pending card\n\nWHY:\nthis bucket exists because the category cannot claim staged progress governance while leaving the stage that defines its decision parameters empty; Configuration is where authority stops being generic and becomes operationally specific\n\nEVIDENCE:\n- file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php\n- expected_renderer_call: renderStructuredCard(\"Configuration\", configurationBuckets)\n\nVALIDATION:\n- configuration_bucket_structured == true\n\nFAIL:\n- configuration_bucket_structured == false -> FAIL\n\nIMPACT:\n- the category stays installed but under-configured\n- DH exposes progress authority without declaring how it should make decisions\n- the project inherits a governance surface with no configured logic for advancement legitimacy"
        },
        {
          "title": "Configuration continuity with upstream and downstream stages",
          "content": "WHAT:\nConfiguration must connect the authority established in Prerequisites and Installation to the later stages of Validation, Observable Evidence, Failure Modes & Recovery and Completion & Promotion through one coherent progress-governance rule model\n\nWHY:\nthe role of this bucket is not isolated rule writing; it has to become the semantic hinge of the category, turning installed authority into a downstream-operable contract that the rest of the stage flow can actually use\n\nEVIDENCE:\n- file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php\n- stage_context:\n  - Prerequisites\n  - Installation\n  - Configuration\n  - Validation\n  - Observable Evidence\n  - Failure Modes & Recovery\n  - Completion & Promotion\n\nVALIDATION:\n- upstream_to_configuration_continuity_present == true\n- configuration_to_downstream_stages_continuity_present == true\n- coherent_progress_rule_model_present == true\n\nFAIL:\n- upstream_to_configuration_continuity_present == false -> FAIL\n- configuration_to_downstream_stages_continuity_present == false -> FAIL\n- coherent_progress_rule_model_present == false -> FAIL\n\nIMPACT:\n- the category fragments into disconnected cards instead of one execution contract\n- DH loses the semantic bridge between declared authority and later decision stages\n- the project cannot rely on one continuous model of progress legitimacy from entry to conclusion"
        },
        {
          "title": "Configuration authority discipline",
          "content": "WHAT:\nConfiguration must define only the rules of advancement legitimacy and completion recognition for Project Progress Canonical, without configuring scope perimeter, architecture structure, sandbox behavior, server identity, runtime mechanics or delivery closure criteria\n\nWHY:\nthis bucket exists to keep the category honest at the moment its rules are written; if Configuration absorbs sibling governance, the project will encode distorted ownership directly into its progress law\n\nEVIDENCE:\n- file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php\n- source_scope: Project Progress Canonical overview, prerequisites, installation and configuration definitions\n\nVALIDATION:\n- transitional_validation_only == true\n- configuration_respects_progress_authority == true\n- no_scope_configuration_absorption == true\n- no_architecture_configuration_absorption == true\n- no_sandbox_configuration_absorption == true\n- no_server_registry_configuration_absorption == true\n- no_runtime_configuration_absorption == true\n- no_delivery_configuration_absorption == true\n\nFAIL:\n- configuration_respects_progress_authority == false -> FAIL\n- any sibling configuration absorption == true -> FAIL\n\nIMPACT:\n- the category writes corrupted ownership into its own operating rules\n- DH governance boundaries become unstable at the configuration layer\n- the project loses determinism about which category defines progress and which categories only provide context to it\n\nTRANSITION_NOTE:\n- this remains transitional because authority discipline is still being validated from rendered contract semantics rather than enforced through structural ownership bindings"
        },
        {
          "title": "Configuration exit condition for progress governance",
          "content": "WHAT:\nConfiguration is complete only when Project Progress Canonical defines admissibility rules for advancement, configures the boundary between progress and completion, excludes non-progress signals, establishes proof dependency, materializes Configuration as a structured bucket, preserves continuity across the stage flow and respects category authority limits\n\nWHY:\nthis bucket closes the configuration stage by ensuring Devon no longer has only an installed progress surface, but a configured system of judgment capable of supporting later validation, evidence, recovery and promotion decisions\n\nEVIDENCE:\n- aggregate result of all previous configuration checks\n\nVALIDATION:\n- all_previous_configuration_checks == true\n\nFAIL:\n- any previous configuration check false -> NOT COMPLETE\n\nIMPACT:\n- Validation cannot begin from a configured decision model\n- Project Progress Canonical remains operationally visible but semantically incomplete\n- the project continues without a trustworthy configured basis for deciding whether work really advanced anything"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "bucket": "Validation",
      "status": "PASS",
      "cards": [
        {
          "title": "Validation of advancement admissibility",
          "content": "WHAT:\nValidation must determine whether a claimed project movement actually satisfies the configured admissibility rules required to be recognized as legitimate advancement inside Project Progress Canonical\n\nWHY:\nthe role of Validation in this category is to stop progress from being accepted just because work happened; this is the stage where Devon decides whether executed effort has truly crossed from raw activity into canonically acceptable advancement\n\nEVIDENCE:\n- file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_progress_canonical.json\n- expected_validation_targets:\n  - advancement admissibility rules\n  - activity versus progress distinction\n  - partial versus valid progress distinction\n\nVALIDATION:\n- transitional_validation_only == true\n- advancement_admissibility_validation_present == true\n- activity_vs_progress_validation_present == true\n- partial_vs_valid_progress_validation_present == true\n\nFAIL:\n- advancement_admissibility_validation_present == false -> FAIL\n- activity_vs_progress_validation_present == false -> FAIL\n- partial_vs_valid_progress_validation_present == false -> FAIL\n\nIMPACT:\n- the category cannot tell whether movement is real progress or just ongoing work\n- DH loses the decision layer that should protect conclusion truth from weak claims\n- the project becomes exposed to unverified advancement entering canonical interpretation\n\nTRANSITION_NOTE:\n- this remains transitional because admissibility validation is still being checked from declared canonical semantics rather than by machine-executed progress-state evaluation"
        },
        {
          "title": "Validation of the progress-to-completion boundary",
          "content": "WHAT:\nValidation must verify whether a claimed advancement remains valid progress or has actually satisfied the configured boundary that allows it to be treated as completion-ready inside the project\n\nWHY:\nthis bucket exists because Project Progress Canonical must not confuse forward movement with finished state; Devon needs an explicit validation point that tests whether a unit is still progressing, already complete or being promoted too early\n\nEVIDENCE:\n- file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_progress_canonical.json\n- expected_validation_targets:\n  - progress versus completion boundary\n  - valid advancement state\n  - completion recognition state\n\nVALIDATION:\n- transitional_validation_only == true\n- progress_vs_completion_boundary_validation_present == true\n- valid_advancement_state_validation_present == true\n- completion_recognition_state_validation_present == true\n\nFAIL:\n- progress_vs_completion_boundary_validation_present == false -> FAIL\n- valid_advancement_state_validation_present == false -> FAIL\n- completion_recognition_state_validation_present == false -> FAIL\n\nIMPACT:\n- the category loses control over when progress stops being movement and becomes finish\n- DH can validate work without knowing whether it is merely advancing or already concluded\n- the project becomes vulnerable to premature completion interpretation\n\nTRANSITION_NOTE:\n- this remains transitional because progress-versus-completion validation is still being derived from declared canonical rules rather than formal state-transition enforcement"
        },
        {
          "title": "Validation of excluded non-progress signals",
          "content": "WHAT:\nValidation must test whether the category can reject signals that were configured as non-progress, including decorative percentages, optimism language, undocumented status claims and other advancement surrogates that do not satisfy canonical rules\n\nWHY:\nthe role of this bucket is to operationalize the defensive side of progress governance; Configuration may declare exclusions, but Validation is where Devon proves those exclusions are actually being applied against bad claims\n\nEVIDENCE:\n- file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_progress_canonical.json\n- expected_validation_targets:\n  - non-progress exclusions\n  - prohibited progress surrogates\n  - invalid advancement signals\n\nVALIDATION:\n- transitional_validation_only == true\n- non_progress_exclusion_validation_present == true\n- prohibited_progress_surrogate_validation_present == true\n- invalid_advancement_signal_validation_present == true\n\nFAIL:\n- non_progress_exclusion_validation_present == false -> FAIL\n- prohibited_progress_surrogate_validation_present == false -> FAIL\n- invalid_advancement_signal_validation_present == false -> FAIL\n\nIMPACT:\n- the category cannot defend itself against false progress inputs in practice\n- DH becomes a place where fake advancement can survive despite declared exclusions\n- the project loses operational resistance against inflated maturity claims\n\nTRANSITION_NOTE:\n- this remains transitional because exclusion validation is still being checked from declared contract language rather than executable rejection policy"
        },
        {
          "title": "Validation of proof dependency before acceptance",
          "content": "WHAT:\nValidation must confirm that no advancement is accepted as legitimate unless it remains dependent on proof that can later be surfaced and examined by Observable Evidence\n\nWHY:\nthis bucket exists because progress governance is not allowed to validate by opinion; it has to test whether accepted advancement is being judged in a way that still preserves evidentiary discipline for the rest of the project\n\nEVIDENCE:\n- file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_progress_canonical.json\n- supporting_context:\n  - proof dependency\n  - evidence-backed advancement\n  - observable substantiation requirement\n\nVALIDATION:\n- transitional_validation_only == true\n- proof_dependency_validation_present == true\n- evidence_backed_advancement_validation_present == true\n- unsubtantiated_progress_rejection_present == true\n\nFAIL:\n- proof_dependency_validation_present == false -> FAIL\n- evidence_backed_advancement_validation_present == false -> FAIL\n- unsubtantiated_progress_rejection_present == false -> FAIL\n\nIMPACT:\n- the category can approve progress that will later be impossible to substantiate\n- DH loses continuity between acceptance and evidence\n- the project becomes exposed to canonically accepted advancement with no defensible proof basis\n\nTRANSITION_NOTE:\n- this remains transitional because proof dependency validation is still being checked from declared semantics rather than formal evidence-gated acceptance logic"
        },
        {
          "title": "Validation bucket materialization",
          "content": "WHAT:\nValidation itself must be materialized as a real structured bucket inside the right-column workflow instead of remaining a placeholder pending card\n\nWHY:\nthis bucket exists because the category cannot claim staged progress governance while leaving the stage that tests advancement legitimacy empty; Validation is where configured rules become an actual acceptance or rejection function\n\nEVIDENCE:\n- file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php\n- expected_renderer_call: renderStructuredCard(\"Validation\", validationBuckets)\n\nVALIDATION:\n- validation_bucket_structured == true\n\nFAIL:\n- validation_bucket_structured == false -> FAIL\n\nIMPACT:\n- the category stays configured but untested\n- DH exposes progress rules without the stage that should apply them\n- the project inherits a governance surface with no explicit validation contract"
        },
        {
          "title": "Validation continuity with configuration and evidence",
          "content": "WHAT:\nValidation must connect the configured progress rules upstream to the Observable Evidence stage downstream so accepted advancement remains part of one continuous project decision chain instead of becoming an isolated judgment\n\nWHY:\nthe role of this bucket is to make Validation the operational hinge between configured legitimacy rules and evidence-backed acceptance; if that continuity breaks, Devon stops having a coherent model for recognizing progress\n\nEVIDENCE:\n- file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php\n- stage_context:\n  - Configuration\n  - Validation\n  - Observable Evidence\n\nVALIDATION:\n- configuration_to_validation_continuity_present == true\n- validation_to_observable_evidence_continuity_present == true\n- continuous_progress_decision_chain_present == true\n\nFAIL:\n- configuration_to_validation_continuity_present == false -> FAIL\n- validation_to_observable_evidence_continuity_present == false -> FAIL\n- continuous_progress_decision_chain_present == false -> FAIL\n\nIMPACT:\n- the category fragments between rules, judgment and proof\n- DH loses the semantic bridge that makes validated progress defensible\n- the project cannot rely on one continuous chain from configured law to evidenced recognition"
        },
        {
          "title": "Validation authority discipline",
          "content": "WHAT:\nValidation must judge only advancement legitimacy and completion-readiness within Project Progress Canonical, without validating scope perimeter, architecture structure, sandbox trust, server identity, runtime mechanics or delivery ownership\n\nWHY:\nthis bucket exists to keep the category from overreaching at the exact point where it makes acceptance decisions; if Validation starts deciding sibling-domain truth, Devon encodes governance confusion directly into its conclusion process\n\nEVIDENCE:\n- file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php\n- source_scope: Project Progress Canonical overview, prerequisites, installation, configuration and validation definitions\n\nVALIDATION:\n- transitional_validation_only == true\n- validation_respects_progress_authority == true\n- no_scope_validation_absorption == true\n- no_architecture_validation_absorption == true\n- no_sandbox_validation_absorption == true\n- no_server_registry_validation_absorption == true\n- no_runtime_validation_absorption == true\n- no_delivery_validation_absorption == true\n\nFAIL:\n- validation_respects_progress_authority == false -> FAIL\n- any sibling validation absorption == true -> FAIL\n\nIMPACT:\n- the category makes corrupted decisions outside its lawful domain\n- DH governance boundaries become unstable at the judgment layer\n- the project loses determinism about which category is allowed to validate which kind of truth\n\nTRANSITION_NOTE:\n- this remains transitional because authority discipline is still being validated from rendered contract semantics rather than enforced through structural ownership bindings"
        },
        {
          "title": "Validation exit condition for progress governance",
          "content": "WHAT:\nValidation is complete only when Project Progress Canonical can test advancement admissibility, verify the boundary between progress and completion, reject configured non-progress signals, preserve proof dependency, materialize Validation as a structured bucket, maintain continuity with configuration and evidence, and respect category authority limits\n\nWHY:\nthis bucket closes the validation stage by ensuring Devon no longer has only configured progress rules, but an actual canonical judgment layer capable of deciding whether executed work deserves recognition as legitimate advancement\n\nEVIDENCE:\n- aggregate result of all previous validation checks\n\nVALIDATION:\n- all_previous_validation_checks == true\n\nFAIL:\n- any previous validation check false -> NOT COMPLETE\n\nIMPACT:\n- Observable Evidence cannot begin from a trustworthy validated state\n- Project Progress Canonical remains configured but not operationally decisive\n- the project continues without a dependable judgment layer for advancement legitimacy"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "bucket": "Observable Evidence",
      "status": "PASS",
      "cards": [
        {
          "title": "Observable proof that accepted progress is real",
          "content": "WHAT:\nObservable Evidence must expose the concrete proof basis that shows an advancement claim accepted by Project Progress Canonical is not merely believed, narrated or inferred, but materially grounded in observable project reality\n\nWHY:\nthe role of Observable Evidence in this category is to make validated progress defensible; Validation may decide that a claim can be accepted, but this bucket must show what makes that acceptance traceable, inspectable and resistant to interpretation drift across the project\n\nEVIDENCE:\n- file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_progress_canonical.json\n- expected_evidence_scope:\n  - observable proof for accepted advancement\n  - traceable basis for progress recognition\n  - non-narrative support for project movement\n\nVALIDATION:\n- transitional_validation_only == true\n- accepted_advancement_observable_proof_present == true\n- traceable_progress_recognition_basis_present == true\n- non_narrative_project_movement_support_present == true\n\nFAIL:\n- accepted_advancement_observable_proof_present == false -> FAIL\n- traceable_progress_recognition_basis_present == false -> FAIL\n- non_narrative_project_movement_support_present == false -> FAIL\n\nIMPACT:\n- the category can accept progress without showing why that acceptance is trustworthy\n- DH loses the proof layer that should anchor recognized advancement in visible reality\n- the project becomes exposed to canonically accepted movement that cannot be audited or defended\n\nTRANSITION_NOTE:\n- this remains transitional because observable proof is still being validated from declared canonical semantics rather than bound to a machine-readable evidence schema"
        },
        {
          "title": "Observable proof of the boundary between progress and completion",
          "content": "WHAT:\nObservable Evidence must show the concrete signals that distinguish advancement still in motion from advancement that has actually crossed into completion-ready or completion-recognized state inside the project\n\nWHY:\nthis bucket exists because Project Progress Canonical governs not just whether work moved, but whether it moved far enough to support completion conclusions; the project needs observable proof of that boundary, not only configured rules or validation language about it\n\nEVIDENCE:\n- file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_progress_canonical.json\n- expected_evidence_scope:\n  - progress-state proof\n  - completion-boundary proof\n  - completion-recognition support\n\nVALIDATION:\n- transitional_validation_only == true\n- progress_state_observable_proof_present == true\n- completion_boundary_observable_proof_present == true\n- completion_recognition_support_present == true\n\nFAIL:\n- progress_state_observable_proof_present == false -> FAIL\n- completion_boundary_observable_proof_present == false -> FAIL\n- completion_recognition_support_present == false -> FAIL\n\nIMPACT:\n- the category cannot prove whether a unit is merely advancing or actually ready for conclusion\n- DH loses observable control over the most sensitive semantic boundary in the category\n- the project becomes vulnerable to premature finish signals presented as evidenced progress\n\nTRANSITION_NOTE:\n- this remains transitional because the progress-to-completion proof boundary is still being validated from canonical text rather than formal state-evidence bindings"
        },
        {
          "title": "Observable proof against fake progress",
          "content": "WHAT:\nObservable Evidence must expose the proof basis that allows Devon to demonstrate why decorative percentages, optimism language, undocumented status claims, visible effort or other progress surrogates do not qualify as real advancement\n\nWHY:\nthe role of this bucket is not only to prove what counts, but to prove what does not count; without observable negative proof, the category can reject fake progress rhetorically yet still fail to defend that rejection across the project\n\nEVIDENCE:\n- file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_progress_canonical.json\n- expected_evidence_scope:\n  - proof against prohibited progress surrogates\n  - observable basis for rejection of invalid advancement signals\n  - non-acceptance support for fake progress\n\nVALIDATION:\n- transitional_validation_only == true\n- prohibited_progress_surrogate_rejection_proof_present == true\n- invalid_advancement_signal_rejection_basis_present == true\n- fake_progress_non_acceptance_support_present == true\n\nFAIL:\n- prohibited_progress_surrogate_rejection_proof_present == false -> FAIL\n- invalid_advancement_signal_rejection_basis_present == false -> FAIL\n- fake_progress_non_acceptance_support_present == false -> FAIL\n\nIMPACT:\n- the category can reject fake progress only as opinion, not as evidenced judgment\n- DH loses the ability to defend why a claim was excluded from progress truth\n- the project becomes weaker against inflated maturity narratives and decorative status theater\n\nTRANSITION_NOTE:\n- this remains transitional because fake-progress rejection proof is still being validated from declared canonical language rather than executable evidence-forensics"
        },
        {
          "title": "Observable evidence as proof bridge after validation",
          "content": "WHAT:\nObservable Evidence must operate as the proof bridge that carries an accepted advancement claim from Validation toward later promotion, ensuring that validated progress is not treated as self-justifying before evidence is surfaced\n\nWHY:\nthis bucket exists because Validation alone is not enough for project trust; Devon needs a stage that turns accepted judgment into observable support, otherwise validated progress becomes a black-box decision with no visible proof chain\n\nEVIDENCE:\n- file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php\n- stage_context:\n  - Validation\n  - Observable Evidence\n  - Completion & Promotion\n\nVALIDATION:\n- validation_to_observable_evidence_proof_bridge_present == true\n- observable_evidence_to_completion_promotion_bridge_present == true\n- validated_progress_not_self_justifying_present == true\n\nFAIL:\n- validation_to_observable_evidence_proof_bridge_present == false -> FAIL\n- observable_evidence_to_completion_promotion_bridge_present == false -> FAIL\n- validated_progress_not_self_justifying_present == false -> FAIL\n\nIMPACT:\n- the category breaks the proof chain between accepted progress and promoted completion state\n- DH loses continuity between judgment and evidence\n- the project cannot trust that validated advancement has actually been made observable before conclusion decisions"
        },
        {
          "title": "Observable Evidence bucket materialization",
          "content": "WHAT:\nObservable Evidence itself must be materialized as a real structured bucket inside the left-column workflow instead of remaining a placeholder pending card\n\nWHY:\nthis bucket exists because the category cannot claim evidence-backed progress governance while leaving the stage that exposes proof empty; Observable Evidence is where accepted advancement becomes externally defensible within the project\n\nEVIDENCE:\n- file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php\n- expected_renderer_call: renderStructuredCard(\"Observable Evidence\", observableEvidenceBuckets)\n\nVALIDATION:\n- observable_evidence_bucket_structured == true\n\nFAIL:\n- observable_evidence_bucket_structured == false -> FAIL\n\nIMPACT:\n- the category stays validated but under-evidenced\n- DH exposes judgment without the proof surface that should support it\n- the project inherits a progress-governance contract that cannot show the basis of its own accepted claims"
        },
        {
          "title": "Observable evidence continuity with upstream and downstream stages",
          "content": "WHAT:\nObservable Evidence must connect the judgment made in Validation to the final decision logic of Completion & Promotion so proof remains part of one continuous advancement-recognition chain inside the category\n\nWHY:\nthe role of this bucket is to stop evidence from becoming decorative afterthought; it has to remain structurally connected to both the acceptance decision behind it and the promotion decision ahead of it or else the category loses conclusion integrity\n\nEVIDENCE:\n- file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php\n- stage_context:\n  - Validation\n  - Observable Evidence\n  - Completion & Promotion\n\nVALIDATION:\n- validation_to_observable_evidence_continuity_present == true\n- observable_evidence_to_completion_promotion_continuity_present == true\n- continuous_advancement_recognition_chain_present == true\n\nFAIL:\n- validation_to_observable_evidence_continuity_present == false -> FAIL\n- observable_evidence_to_completion_promotion_continuity_present == false -> FAIL\n- continuous_advancement_recognition_chain_present == false -> FAIL\n\nIMPACT:\n- the category fragments between acceptance, proof and conclusion\n- DH loses the chain that makes recognized progress operationally trustworthy\n- the project becomes exposed to disconnected decisions where evidence no longer carries forward into official completion logic"
        },
        {
          "title": "Observable Evidence authority discipline",
          "content": "WHAT:\nObservable Evidence must expose proof only for advancement legitimacy and completion-readiness inside Project Progress Canonical, without becoming the evidentiary owner of scope perimeter, architecture structure, sandbox trust, server identity, runtime behavior or delivery closure\n\nWHY:\nthis bucket exists to keep the category from overreaching at the proof layer; if evidence authority expands into sibling domains, Devon turns progress proof into a dumping ground for truths that belong to other categories\n\nEVIDENCE:\n- file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php\n- source_scope: Project Progress Canonical overview, prerequisites, installation, configuration, validation and observable evidence definitions\n\nVALIDATION:\n- transitional_validation_only == true\n- observable_evidence_respects_progress_authority == true\n- no_scope_evidence_absorption == true\n- no_architecture_evidence_absorption == true\n- no_sandbox_evidence_absorption == true\n- no_server_registry_evidence_absorption == true\n- no_runtime_evidence_absorption == true\n- no_delivery_evidence_absorption == true\n\nFAIL:\n- observable_evidence_respects_progress_authority == false -> FAIL\n- any sibling evidence absorption == true -> FAIL\n\nIMPACT:\n- the category starts accumulating proof obligations outside its lawful domain\n- DH governance boundaries become unstable at the evidentiary layer\n- the project loses determinism about which category is responsible for proving which kind of truth\n\nTRANSITION_NOTE:\n- this remains transitional because authority discipline is still being validated from rendered contract semantics rather than enforced through structural ownership bindings"
        },
        {
          "title": "Observable Evidence exit condition for progress governance",
          "content": "WHAT:\nObservable Evidence is complete only when Project Progress Canonical can expose observable proof for accepted advancement, show the proof boundary between progress and completion, defend the rejection of fake progress, operate as the proof bridge after validation, materialize Observable Evidence as a structured bucket, maintain continuity with validation and promotion, and respect category authority limits\n\nWHY:\nthis bucket closes the evidence stage by ensuring Devon no longer has only validated progress claims, but visibly supportable claims that can withstand inspection before they are allowed to influence completion truth\n\nEVIDENCE:\n- aggregate result of all previous observable evidence checks\n\nVALIDATION:\n- all_previous_observable_evidence_checks == true\n\nFAIL:\n- any previous observable evidence check false -> NOT COMPLETE\n\nIMPACT:\n- Completion & Promotion cannot begin from a trustworthy proof-backed state\n- Project Progress Canonical remains validated but not evidentially defensible\n- the project continues without a dependable observable basis for recognized advancement"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "bucket": "Failure Modes & Recovery",
      "status": "MISSING",
      "cards": []
    },
    {
      "bucket": "Completion & Promotion",
      "status": "PASS",
      "cards": [
        {
          "title": "Admission into official project advancement state",
          "content": "WHAT:\nThis bucket must define the exact point at which validated and evidenced work is no longer treated as merely acceptable progress signal and is formally admitted into Devon's official advancement state as recognized project gain\n\nWHY:\nthe exclusive role of Completion & Promotion in this category is to convert defensible advancement into canonical status; everything upstream exists to judge and support progress, but this bucket decides when that progress is allowed to become part of the project's official forward state\n\nEVIDENCE:\n- file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_progress_canonical.json\n- promotion_focus:\n  - admission into recognized advancement state\n  - official project gain\n  - canonical forward-state inclusion\n\nVALIDATION:\n- transitional_validation_only == true\n- official_advancement_state_admission_defined == true\n- recognized_project_gain_defined == true\n- canonical_forward_state_inclusion_defined == true\n\nFAIL:\n- official_advancement_state_admission_defined == false -> FAIL\n- recognized_project_gain_defined == false -> FAIL\n- canonical_forward_state_inclusion_defined == false -> FAIL\n\nIMPACT:\n- the category can validate progress but cannot convert it into official project state\n- DH loses the gate that turns accepted advancement into recognized program movement\n- the project keeps producing defensible progress without a lawful way to register it as official advancement\n\nTRANSITION_NOTE:\n- this remains transitional because admission into official advancement state is still being validated from declared canonical semantics rather than formal state-transition enforcement"
        },
        {
          "title": "Promotion threshold between valid progress and recognized completion",
          "content": "WHAT:\nThis bucket must define when lawful progress has advanced far enough to cross from recognized advancement into recognized completion, without allowing intermediate success or partial attainment to steal the meaning of finish\n\nWHY:\nthe role of this bucket inside Project Progress Canonical is to protect the final threshold of the category; promotion is not generic closure, it is the lawful escalation from true advancement into conclusion status that the rest of Devon can trust as finished\n\nEVIDENCE:\n- file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_progress_canonical.json\n- promotion_focus:\n  - promotion threshold\n  - advancement-to-completion escalation\n  - lawful finish recognition\n\nVALIDATION:\n- transitional_validation_only == true\n- promotion_threshold_defined == true\n- advancement_to_completion_escalation_defined == true\n- lawful_finish_recognition_defined == true\n\nFAIL:\n- promotion_threshold_defined == false -> FAIL\n- advancement_to_completion_escalation_defined == false -> FAIL\n- lawful_finish_recognition_defined == false -> FAIL\n\nIMPACT:\n- the category loses the line that separates meaningful progress from actual finish\n- DH can start surfacing completion without a lawful escalation threshold\n- the project becomes exposed to conclusion inflation and false closure signals\n\nTRANSITION_NOTE:\n- this remains transitional because the promotion threshold is still being validated from canonical text rather than enforced through formal completion-state criteria"
        },
        {
          "title": "Promotion only after preserved proof and lawful judgment",
          "content": "WHAT:\nThis bucket must define that no advancement is promoted unless the validation judgment that accepted it remains intact and the observable proof that supports it remains present, traceable and sufficient for canonical recognition\n\nWHY:\nthe exclusive role here is to prevent promotion from acting like a shortcut around the rest of the category; Completion & Promotion must inherit the full burden of lawful judgment and proof, otherwise Devon turns final recognition into discretionary status elevation\n\nEVIDENCE:\n- file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php\n- stage_context:\n  - Validation\n  - Observable Evidence\n  - Completion & Promotion\n\nVALIDATION:\n- validation_dependency_for_promotion_defined == true\n- observable_proof_dependency_for_promotion_defined == true\n- discretionary_status_elevation_block_defined == true\n\nFAIL:\n- validation_dependency_for_promotion_defined == false -> FAIL\n- observable_proof_dependency_for_promotion_defined == false -> FAIL\n- discretionary_status_elevation_block_defined == false -> FAIL\n\nIMPACT:\n- the category can promote advancement without carrying forward the basis that made it legitimate\n- DH loses continuity between accepted progress and official recognition\n- the project becomes exposed to final states that no longer rest on preserved proof and lawful judgment"
        },
        {
          "title": "Exclusion of non-promotable advancement",
          "content": "WHAT:\nThis bucket must define which advancement states are still not promotable even when they appear positive, including partial attainment, unstable movement, unclosed work or any signal that remains below the lawful threshold for official project conclusion\n\nWHY:\nthe role of Completion & Promotion is not only to promote what qualifies but to refuse promotion to what has not yet earned it; this bucket protects Devon from turning encouraging movement into official finish before the category's own law allows it\n\nEVIDENCE:\n- file_path: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/panel/data/project_progress_canonical.json\n- promotion_focus:\n  - exclusion of non-promotable states\n  - partial attainment below completion threshold\n  - unstable or unclosed work blocked from promotion\n\nVALIDATION:\n- transitional_validation_only == true\n- non_promotable_state_exclusion_defined == true\n- partial_attainment_below_threshold_defined == true\n- unstable_or_unclosed_work_block_defined == true\n\nFAIL:\n- non_promotable_state_exclusion_defined == false -> FAIL\n- partial_attainment_below_threshold_defined == false -> FAIL\n- unstable_or_unclosed_work_block_defined == false -> FAIL\n\nIMPACT:\n- the category loses its ability to keep final recognition reserved for truly mature states\n- DH becomes vulnerable to promoting good-looking but incomplete work\n- the project starts converting momentum into closure before the work is actually concluded\n\nTRANSITION_NOTE:\n- this remains transitional because exclusion of non-promotable states is still being validated from declared canonical language rather than executable promotion policy"
        },
        {
          "title": "Promotion continuity with upstream resilience",
          "content": "WHAT:\nThis bucket must define that promotion is downstream of Failure Modes & Recovery, so no damaged, revoked, downgraded or still-contaminated advancement state is allowed to become official conclusion for the project\n\nWHY:\nthe exclusive role here is to ensure the final gate obeys the correction logic of the category; if promotion can bypass failure and recovery, then Devon can detect corrupted progress and still finalize it as trusted completion\n\nEVIDENCE:\n- file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php\n- stage_context:\n  - Failure Modes & Recovery\n  - Completion & Promotion\n\nVALIDATION:\n- failure_recovery_dependency_for_promotion_defined == true\n- revoked_or_downgraded_state_promotion_block_defined == true\n- contaminated_advancement_finalization_block_defined == true\n\nFAIL:\n- failure_recovery_dependency_for_promotion_defined == false -> FAIL\n- revoked_or_downgraded_state_promotion_block_defined == false -> FAIL\n- contaminated_advancement_finalization_block_defined == false -> FAIL\n\nIMPACT:\n- the category can repair corrupted progress upstream while still letting it become official finish downstream\n- DH loses final-gate integrity at the exact point where trust should be strongest\n- the project becomes exposed to canonically completed states built on already-compromised advancement truth"
        },
        {
          "title": "Completion & Promotion bucket materialization",
          "content": "WHAT:\nCompletion & Promotion itself must be materialized as a real structured bucket inside the left-column workflow instead of remaining a placeholder pending card\n\nWHY:\nthis bucket must exist as an explicit stage because Project Progress Canonical is incomplete until it declares how lawful advancement becomes official project recognition; without this stage the category governs evaluation but not conclusion\n\nEVIDENCE:\n- file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php\n- expected_renderer_call: renderStructuredCard(\"Completion & Promotion\", completionPromotionBuckets)\n\nVALIDATION:\n- completion_promotion_bucket_structured == true\n\nFAIL:\n- completion_promotion_bucket_structured == false -> FAIL\n\nIMPACT:\n- the category can judge progress but cannot finish the recognition cycle it was built to govern\n- DH keeps a structural hole exactly where official advancement and completion should be canonized\n- the project inherits a progress-governance contract with no declared final gate"
        },
        {
          "title": "Completion & Promotion authority discipline",
          "content": "WHAT:\nThis bucket must remain limited to promotion of lawful advancement and recognition of lawful completion inside Project Progress Canonical, without absorbing scope closure, architecture closure, sandbox graduation, server registration finalization, runtime readiness or delivery acceptance owned by sibling categories\n\nWHY:\nthe exclusive role of this bucket is to finalize progress truth, not to finalize every kind of truth in Devon; once promotion starts owning sibling completion domains, the category stops representing advancement law and starts corrupting the governance map of the whole project\n\nEVIDENCE:\n- file: /home/yeff/public_html/devon/docs/index.php\n- source_scope: Project Progress Canonical overview, prerequisites, installation, configuration, validation, observable evidence, failure/recovery and completion/promotion definitions\n\nVALIDATION:\n- transitional_validation_only == true\n- completion_promotion_respects_progress_authority == true\n- no_scope_completion_absorption == true\n- no_architecture_completion_absorption == true\n- no_sandbox_completion_absorption == true\n- no_server_registry_completion_absorption == true\n- no_runtime_completion_absorption == true\n- no_delivery_completion_absorption == true\n\nFAIL:\n- completion_promotion_respects_progress_authority == false -> FAIL\n- any sibling completion absorption == true -> FAIL\n\nIMPACT:\n- the category starts finalizing truths it does not own\n- DH governance boundaries collapse at the final recognition layer\n- the project loses determinism about what this category is allowed to officially conclude\n\nTRANSITION_NOTE:\n- this remains transitional because authority discipline is still being validated from rendered contract semantics rather than structural ownership enforcement"
        },
        {
          "title": "Completion & Promotion exit condition for progress governance",
          "content": "WHAT:\nCompletion & Promotion is complete only when Project Progress Canonical defines admission into official advancement state, defines the lawful threshold from progress to completion, requires preserved proof and lawful judgment before promotion, excludes non-promotable advancement, preserves dependency on Failure Modes & Recovery, materializes the bucket as a structured stage and respects category authority boundaries\n\nWHY:\nthis bucket closes the category by ensuring Devon no longer has only a way to interpret advancement, but also a category-specific mechanism for lawfully converting defensible progress into official project recognition and trusted completion truth\n\nEVIDENCE:\n- aggregate result of all previous completion and promotion checks\n\nVALIDATION:\n- all_previous_completion_promotion_checks == true\n\nFAIL:\n- any previous completion promotion check false -> NOT COMPLETE\n\nIMPACT:\n- Project Progress Canonical cannot act as a closed advancement-governance contract\n- DH remains able to analyze progress without being able to canonize its final recognition state\n- the project continues without a dependable final gate for lawful advancement and completion truth"
        }
      ]
    }
  ]
}